Hi Jamil,
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 02:16:13AM +0600, Jamil Ahmed wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Davide Viti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While generating the screenshots [1] showing how new dejavu renders text,
I've noticed there are some missing glyphs, at least for bn [2] and zh_CN
* Aurelien Jarno [Wed, 21 May 2008 15:34:33 +0200]:
Please unblock libusb/2:0.1.12-11 and usbutils/0.73-8, which are both
blocked because of their udeb. They have no known regression.
Unblocked after ack from Otavio. Will syncs udebs when migrated.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó
Hello,
I am somewhat confused about the naming of the ppp provider file. On
debian systems it used to be /etc/ppp/peers/dsl-provider at least since
sarge. On ubuntu, it used to be the same.
But when in the sources (retrieved with apt-get source ppp-udeb) I
find no trace of this file. There,
I am sorry for warming up an old thread. But I got somewhat confused
about one detail of this patch to ppp-udeb:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 11:39:33PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 10 December 2007, Josef Wolf wrote:
IMHO, the setting in /etc/resolv.conf is mostly for convenience. It
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 03:13:23PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Daniel Pocock [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
b) The domU systems should be indistinguishable from normal systems -
using D-I is one way to ensure this. It seems reasonable to expect
that any changes to the install process
On Wednesday 21 May 2008 01:40:18 Joey Hess wrote:
FWIW, this is the only instance of split(' ', ...) in debconf, aside from
one in a rarely used code path. But I don't see anything wrong with
the code in debconf, so I think that rather than change those, this needs
to be reassigned to
On Thursday 22 May 2008 13:32:37 Josef Wolf wrote:
I am somewhat confused about the naming of the ppp provider file. On
debian systems it used to be /etc/ppp/peers/dsl-provider at least since
sarge. On ubuntu, it used to be the same.
But when in the sources (retrieved with apt-get source
On Thursday 22 May 2008 14:04:40 Josef Wolf wrote:
I am curious whether it is really a good idea to point
$HOSTNAME.$DOMAINNAME to 127.0.1.1. While this works fine for services
on the local host, it fails if the address is provided to other hosts.
For example, if one installs dnsmasq, the
Your message dated Thu, 22 May 2008 16:15:31 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#401715: Language selection list display vertically
unaligned translated names
has caused the Debian Bug report #401715,
regarding Language selection list display vertically unaligned
Your message dated Thu, 22 May 2008 16:15:31 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#401715: Language selection list display vertically
unaligned translated names
has caused the Debian Bug report #401715,
regarding localechooser: in the graphical installer, native names of
Hello,
I' after some advice as to how to submit a patch for
wpasuppliant-udeb. Looking at (for example) openssl, it has the udeb
stuff in the main package. With wpasupplicant, we need a separate conf
file so that we don't include unnecessary drivers, clients and EAP
code. I can supply a patch
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 03:05:13PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 22 May 2008 14:04:40 Josef Wolf wrote:
I am curious whether it is really a good idea to point
$HOSTNAME.$DOMAINNAME to 127.0.1.1. While this works fine for services
on the local host, it fails if the address is provided
On Wednesday 21 May 2008 23:47:45 Holger Wansing wrote:
Comments/Problems:
In graphical installer I chose
Keyboard - german
and the logs say, that keymap de_DE was loaded, but umlauts did not work
(äöü) and also the ß. This all works fine in text mode installer.
Additionally Shift + 3
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 03:06:42PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 22 May 2008 13:32:37 Josef Wolf wrote:
I am somewhat confused about the naming of the ppp provider file. On
debian systems it used to be /etc/ppp/peers/dsl-provider at least since
sarge. On ubuntu, it used to be the
On Thursday 22 May 2008 15:25:13 Glenn wrote:
I' after some advice as to how to submit a patch for
wpasuppliant-udeb. Looking at (for example) openssl, it has the udeb
stuff in the main package. With wpasupplicant, we need a separate conf
file so that we don't include unnecessary drivers,
Package: win32-loader
Severity: wishlist
Tags: l10n patch
Turkish translation of win32-loader is attached. I committed it to SVN days ago,
but D-I translation status page shows it untranslated. So please include Turkish
translation. (Of course use SVN version if you can)
Thanks
# Turkish
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: busybox
Version: 1:1.9.2-3
The command 'mount' fails when is trying to mount a squash filesystem
image, in the initramfs, that's a very used case on liveCD's (this bug
affects directly to the debian-live project)
I have verified that the
Op 22-05-2008 om 16:50 schreef Josef Wolf:
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 03:05:13PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
No. You currently use either ppp-udeb or netcfg, never both. If you use
ppp-udeb, the PPPoE interface is expected to be your primary (and in most
cases only) network interface.
But
On Thursday 22 May 2008 16:50:59 Josef Wolf wrote:
But wasn't ppp originally intended to connect multiple networks? In
this (IMHO _very_ common) scenario you would always have at least two
interfaces: ppp to the provider and a statically configured interface
to the local network. Further,
On Thursday 22 May 2008 16:31:55 Josef Wolf wrote:
I've done some more investigations, and it looks like this is not a
new inconsistency. It seems to already exist for quite a while. I
have multiple etch boxes here, some with provider and some with
dsl-provider. AFAICS, it boils down to how
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
tags 482411 pending
Bug#482411: [win32-loader] [INTL:tr] Turkish translation
Tags were: l10n patch
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 06:52:04PM +0300, Mert Dirik wrote:
Package: win32-loader
Severity: wishlist
Tags: l10n patch
Turkish translation of win32-loader is attached. I committed it to SVN days
ago,
Thanks!
but D-I translation status page shows it untranslated. So please include
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
debian-installer_20080522.dsc
debian-installer_20080522.tar.gz
debian-installer_20080522_amd64.deb
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no
debian-installer_20080522_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer_20080522.dsc
debian-installer_20080522.tar.gz
debian-installer_20080522_amd64.deb
debian-installer-images_20080522_amd64.tar.gz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
partconf | 1.22 | arm
Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be
to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer_20080522_amd64.deb
Changes: debian-installer (20080522) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Stephen R. Marenka ]
* Add atari keymaps to pkg-lists for m68k.
.
[ Frans Pop ]
* Lenny will be version 5.0.
* Improve consistency between x86 syslinux
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 07:12:22PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 22 May 2008 16:50:59 Josef Wolf wrote:
But wasn't ppp originally intended to connect multiple networks? In
this (IMHO _very_ common) scenario you would always have at least two
interfaces: ppp to the provider and a
Your message dated Thu, 22 May 2008 19:32:13 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#477988: fixed in debian-installer 20080522
has caused the Debian Bug report #477988,
regarding Document irqpoll in the special boot parameters help screen
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Thu, 22 May 2008 19:32:13 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#475774: fixed in debian-installer 20080522
has caused the Debian Bug report #475774,
regarding Please include a version.txt in the boot.img.gz image
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 482417 moreinfo
Bug#482417: mount fails with squash filesystems on initramfs, message: 'block
device required'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
tags 482417 moreinfo
thanks
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 06:14:49PM +0200, Thanatermesis wrote:
The command 'mount' fails when is trying to mount a squash filesystem
image, in the initramfs, that's a very used case on liveCD's (this bug
affects directly to the debian-live project)
Used parameters?
I can not duplicate this on any of my Power Mac machines.
It sounds like a hardware problem... Have you checked that all your
RAMs are firmly seated in their sockets?
Rick
On May 20, 2008, at 3:00 PM, Chao Cao wrote:
Package: installation-reports
Problem:
The installation CD will not
Hello,
On Thu, 22 May 2008 16:21:19 +0200 Frans Pop wrote:
and the logs say, that keymap de_DE was loaded, but umlauts did not work
(äöü) and also the ß. This all works fine in text mode installer.
Additionally Shift + 3 didn't worked correctly: in graphical installer
output was 3, in
Si ce message ne s'affiche pas correctement, cliquez ici
En exclusivité sur le Web !
Enregistrez votre recherche et attendez d'être contacté par le vendeur
www.annonces-automobile.com
En partenariat avec
A bientôt sur ANNONCES Automobile. Pour vous désinscrire, cliquez ici.
34 matches
Mail list logo
