Control: reassign -1 src:grub-installer
Control: found -1 1.83
Control: severity -1 grave
Control: tags -1 + patch
Hi,
This issue relates to GNU/kFreeBSD installs with a ZFS root filesystem,
but with a non-ZFS /boot partition. The previously attempted fix in
partman-zfs would have worked for all
Hi Arno!
Sorry, I somehow didn't have 651...@bugs.debian.org copied on my
previous mail so I'm inlining your mail for the benefit of the BTS:
On 20/11/12 23:19, Arno Töll wrote:
> I am not sure if checking for / being ZFS is good enough then. Wouldn't
> we need to check for any file system being
Hi Steven,
On 11/16/2012 10:42 PM, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> I noticed some relevant code in the grub-installer script that seems to
> do that:
>
>> if [ "$bootfstype" = "zfs" ]; then
>> # Required by update-grub on ZFS
>> mkdir -p $ROOT/boot/zfs
>> cp /boot/zfs/zpool.cache $ROOT
found 651720 src:partman-zfs/23
thanks
[adding debian-bsd@ back into Cc:]
Hi!
> Generating grub.cfg ...
> Found kernel of FreeBSD: /boot/kfreebsd-9.0-2-amd64.gz
> Found kernel module directory: /lib/modules/9.0-2-amd64
> ls: cannot access /boot/zfs/zpool.cache: No such file or directory
Maybe t
Version: 8.3~svn226546-6
In any case, it seems nobody has a strong objection against migrating zfsutils.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian
El 13 de desembre de 2011 19:07, Arno Töll ha escrit:
> Note, I didn't find any /real/ problem when using zfsutils 8.3 with a
> 8.2 kernel. I didn't try it with 8.1 but I don't see why it would be
> different there.
Well, "zfs list" fails with EINVAL on 8.1 kernel, and I recall seeing
"zpool stat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
On 13.12.2011 18:51, Robert Millan wrote:
>> S1. upgrade to kfreebsd-8 8.2, and would need zfsutils 8.2
>
> kfreebsd 8.2 is usable with zfsutils 8.1, they've got a different ZFS
> version but AFAICT they use the same ABI (14 vs 15).
...
>> The
2011/12/13 Steven Chamberlain :
>> But I'm still worried about current Wheezy users being forced to
>> upgrade to 9.0 and hitting problems like #651624.
>
> Haha, I've quite a headache understanding all the combinations.
Relieved to see I'm not alone on that ;-)
> A Squeeze ZFS user would have kf
On 13/12/11 06:59, Robert Millan wrote:
> I guess we should allow it to migrate then?
>
> But I'm still worried about current Wheezy users being forced to
> upgrade to 9.0 and hitting problems like #651624.
Haha, I've quite a headache understanding all the combinations. I'll
list the ones I can
(adding #648744 to CC)
2011/12/13 Steven Chamberlain :
> Now that kfreebsd-9 is in testing, I tried to install it using the
> latest businesscard d-i image. It works fine, except there is no
> installable zfsutils for it in Wheezy yet, so #648744 is a really
> awkward problem.
I guess we should
2011/12/13 Steven Chamberlain :
> Ah, I didn't realise that -- with only one version of the zfsutils
> package in Wheezy, 8.3, the Break for kfreebsd <= 8.2 wouldn't leave an
> installable zfsutils for anyone using those kernels.
Right, it'd be put on hold. I'm unsure if there could be other
prob
Hi again,
On 12/12/11 19:14, Robert Millan wrote:
> This would force all ZFS users of kfreebsd 8.2 in Wheezy to upgrade to
> 9.0. I think we should wait for the release before doing this. OTOH
> if new installs are broken, that's a big problem too.
Now that kfreebsd-9 is in testing, I tried to
On 12/12/11 19:14, Robert Millan wrote:
> This would force all ZFS users of kfreebsd 8.2 in Wheezy to upgrade to
> 9.0.
Ah, I didn't realise that -- with only one version of the zfsutils
package in Wheezy, 8.3, the Break for kfreebsd <= 8.2 wouldn't leave an
installable zfsutils for anyone using t
2011/12/12 Steven Chamberlain :
> Looks like zfsutils 8.3 still has Breaks in place for 8.1/8.2 kernels,
> since 8.3~svn226546-3, so I guess it is safe to migrate to testing, and
> bug #648744 is unnecessary?
This would force all ZFS users of kfreebsd 8.2 in Wheezy to upgrade to
9.0. I think we s
Hello,
On 11/12/11 17:38, Robert Millan wrote:
> 2011/12/11 Arno Töll :
>> Back then I assumed that was quite intentional as upgrading to a 8.3
>> kernel solved the problem. That's why we added breaks conditions to the
>> package back then. Aside of this problem there didn't seem to be a hard
>> (
Hi,
> 2011/12/11 Robert Millan :
>> It seems the default is still zfsutils-udeb 8.2
>> for debian-cd images (netinst, businesscard) but not for netboot.
Did you mean 8.3? That's what I see the latest netinst/businesscard
images try to use, regardless of which kernel is used during install.
Your
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2011 18:43:40 +0100
with message-id
and subject line not a bug
has caused the Debian Bug report #651719,
regarding new ZFS installs completely broken in Wheezy/Sid
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
2011/12/11 Arno Töll :
> Back then I assumed that was quite intentional as upgrading to a 8.3
> kernel solved the problem. That's why we added breaks conditions to the
> package back then. Aside of this problem there didn't seem to be a hard
> (i.e. API or ABI) incompatibility which would have caus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
On 11.12.2011 18:05, Robert Millan wrote:
> For the record, the symptoms of this are that /dev/zvol/* device nodes
> aren't being created, and therefore creating a pool and new file
> systems doesn't make new devices appear in partman GUI.
Tha
2011/12/11 Robert Millan :
> 1- kfreebsd-8 images can't currently be used to install *anything*
> when zfsutils-udeb 8.3 is being used, i.e. when they fetch their
> packages from sid. It seems the default is still zfsutils-udeb 8.2
> for debian-cd images (netinst, businesscard) but not for netboot
Package: partman-zfs
Severity: grave
2011/12/11 Robert Millan :
> 2.3- /boot/zfs/zpool.cache is NOT present!! No idea why this
> happens, but potentially it could also break installed systems (since
> they attempt to boot using outdated /boot/zfs/zpool.cache that was
> generated with older ZFS
Package: zfsutils
Version: 8.3~svn226546-6
2011/12/11 Robert Millan :
> 2.2- zfsutils 8.2 in /target with a kfreebsd-9 runtime breaks
> grub-install (even if zfsutils-udeb is 8.3). Will be fixed when
> zfsutils 8.3 migrates.
Actually, this is much worse. Even 8.3 zfsutils (or zfsutils-udeb)
h
My current summary:
1- kfreebsd-8 images can't currently be used to install *anything*
when zfsutils-udeb 8.3 is being used, i.e. when they fetch their
packages from sid. It seems the default is still zfsutils-udeb 8.2
for debian-cd images (netinst, businesscard) but not for netboot.
2- kfreebsd
23 matches
Mail list logo
