On 2/23/20 6:17 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> libseccomp fails to build on riscv64 as the support for this
> architecture is missing. It has just been added upstream:
>
> https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp/commit/5432e15521d5ce5a7d3f26bf78674cbaa9d73d1f
Hmm, I wonder whether I can do this for
Package: src:libseccomp
Version: 2.4.2-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch upstream
User: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: riscv64
Hi,
libseccomp fails to build on riscv64 as the support for this
architecture is missing. It has just been added upstream:
Package: tftpd-hpa
Version: 5.2+20150808-1+b1
Severity: important
Tags: ipv6
Dear Maintainer,
On a normal Debian installation, the following lines can be found in
/etc/hosts:
127.0.0.1 localhost
# The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts
::1
On 2020-02-22 22:31:21 [+], Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
> How does this seem for an SUA snippet?
perfect. Thank you.
> Regards,
>
> Adam
Sebastian
Hi Tony,
On 23/02/2020 17:00, tony mancill wrote:
> Thank you for the bug report. This is easily addressed. Since we are
> building from a snapshot - i.e., a version somewhere between 2.1.4 and
> 2.1.5, is there a preference for which we use for configure?
>
> Given that 2.1.5 isn't released
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : sslscan
Version : 2.0.0-alpha1-4-ge4f0474
Upstream Author : rbsec
* URL : https://github.com/rbsec/sslscan/
* License : GPL-3.0
Programming Lang: C
Description : sslscan tests SSL/TLS enabled services
Thank you for the bug report. This is easily addressed. Since we are
building from a snapshot - i.e., a version somewhere between 2.1.4 and
2.1.5, is there a preference for which we use for configure?
Given that 2.1.5 isn't released yet, my inclination is to use 2.1.4. I
will prepare the
Package: libtext-soundex-perl
Version: 3.4-1+b8
Severity: minor
Description-en: implementation of the soundex algorithm
Text::Soundex implements the original soundex algorithm developed by Robert
Russell and Margaret Odell, patented in 1918 and 1922, as well as a variation
called "American
Dear Bernhard,
thanks for the efforts.
Best regards,
Tjeerd Pinkert
On 1/27/20 15:26, Bernhard Übelacker wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 zynaddsubfx-dssi 3.0.3-1
> Control: affects -1 + audacity
>
>
> Hello Tjeerd,
>
>> Thanks for coming back, I'm not in a hurry...
>>
>> The problem is that
Dear all,
Any update on the soname issue in getting the
libschroedinger-maeparser1 issue resolved, just pinging. It's the only
reason for not installing openbabel.
--
Regards,
Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल
My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
Control: reassign -1 libsigrok-dev
Control: retitle -1 Missing bluetooth + hidapi deps on -dev package cause
FTBFSes
On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 07:53:00AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: sigrok-cli
> Version: 0.7.1-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: buster sid
>
On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 03:51:58PM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > all merged except that one case, fixing the error code.
> Thanks!
thanks for your patches! much appreciated!
> Alternatively, how about deleting the «exit 0» line entirely? That
> would effectively downgrade the error message
On Sun, 23 Feb 2020 at 08:32:42 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
>
> Relevant part (hopefully):
> > input.cpp: In function ‘void input_init()’:
> > input.cpp:94:15: error: ‘SDL_HINT_ANDROID_SEPARATE_MOUSE_AND_TOUCH’
Control: tags 951943 + patch
On Sun, 23 Feb 2020 at 08:31:49 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote (in #951087):
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
...
> > /<>/source/code/sago/SagoDataHolder.hpp:26:10: fatal error:
> > SDL_mixer.h: No such file or
hi,
fixed
On 23/02/20 at 14:53 +0100, William Desportes wrote:
> Hi
>
>
>
> It seems you duplicated
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=952109
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Le dim., 23 févr. 2020 14:30:02 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum
> écrit
>
>
>
> Source:
Package: paraview
Version: 5.7.0-4+b2
Severity: normal
paraview still Recommends: python-paraview.
This should be updated to python3-paraview.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: retitle -2 debian-security-support: Returns EXIT_SUCCESS without doing
any work when the DEBIAN_VERSION check fails (cloned from #951874)
Control: tags -1 +pending
Control: tags -2 -pending
Holger Levsen wrote on Sun, 23 Feb 2020 15:25 +:
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2020
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 01:56:59AM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> It would be good if the example configuration included a way of whitelisting
> mail from known good GPG keys. An example configuration that would be useful
> in real use would be the Debian developer keylist.
I think this is a
Thanks, I’ll have this sorted in about a week, but it’s a bit mayhem right now
:)
Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý
ond...@sury.org
> On 23 Feb 2020, at 16:22, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> Hi Ondřej,
>
> OK, I will try to remember not to file bugs about them.
>
> Lucas
>
>
> On 23/02/20 at 14:25
Package: gnome-control-center
Version: 1:3.30.3-2~deb10u1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
After upgrading from stretch to buster, I was checking out the new Gnome
Settings. I noticed that the `gnome-control-center datetime` panel seemed to
indicate that Automatic Date and Time was not on,
Hi Ondřej,
OK, I will try to remember not to file bugs about them.
Lucas
On 23/02/20 at 14:25 +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Lucas,
>
> could you please stop testing PHP extensions for a while? I am in process of
> updating all of them, and the RC bugs are not helpful at this particular
>
Control: tags -1 pending
On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 02:21:31PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: wpebackend-fdo
> Version: 1.4.0-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Known problem, it will be fixed in the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu ros-geometric-shapes_0.6.1-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild against new
liboctomap-dev (Closes: #952277)"
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
APT prefers unstable
Hi Daniel,
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 03:38:15PM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Following up on #951772, here are a few more bugfixes:
> Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Clarify an error message
> Subject: [PATCH 2/4] Fix --version output: used an undefined variable.
> Subject: [PATCH 3/4] Print errors and
Hi
Easy to fix: mocha no more accepts "describe" in a "describe" loop. Just to
replace it by "it"
Regards,
Xavier
Le 23 février 2020 14:49:28 GMT+01:00, Lucas Nussbaum a
écrit :
>Source: node-builtin-modules
>Version: 3.0.0-1
>Severity: serious
>Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>Tags: bullseye
On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 01:56:59 +1100 Russell Coker wrote:
> Package: spamassassin
> Severity: wishlist
>
> It would be good if the example configuration included a way of whitelisting
> mail from known good GPG keys. An example configuration that would be useful
> in real use would be the Debian
Package: spamassassin
Severity: wishlist
It would be good if the example configuration included a way of whitelisting
mail from known good GPG keys. An example configuration that would be useful
in real use would be the Debian developer keylist.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.3
APT
Hello Lucas,
thank you for reporting this problem. I already fixed it in the new package I
am working on since a week. I should upload a fixed version in a few days.
Bye,
Giuseppe
Control: tags -1 + pending
Hi Ian and all,
On Sun, 23 Feb 2020 14:09:20 + Ian Jackson
wrote:
> Apparently pydoctor, which is used to format some API documentation
> for git-buildpackage, wants cachecontrol. Which was removed from the
> archive.
>
> I am getting autoremoval warnings because
Package: lists.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Name: debian-antispam-user
Rationale:
A common use of Debian is for running mail servers. Anti-spam configuration is
a difficult area of MTA configuration that users often need assistance with.
Requests for assistance in configuration can also lead
Package: dput-ng
Version: 1.29
Severity: important
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear maintainers,
Since the latest dput-ng version, dput now ignores default_host_main, attempting
to use FTP for uploads (which fails on the hotel network I'm currently on...) :
> $ head -n13
Hello,
Can this patch be merged? We would like to start building FreedomBox images for
the A64 Olinuxino:
https://salsa.debian.org/freedombox-team/freedom-maker/merge_requests/170
Regards,
James
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 12:11:04AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 03:12:20AM +0100, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> > > I mean, rpm is definitly still useful to have on Debian, but yum and
> > > friends???
> >
control: tags -1 confirmed
control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/astroidmail/astroid/issues/676
Quoting Lucas Nussbaum (2020-02-23 14:04:19)
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
Thanks! Confirmed and passed upstream - let's see what they have to
Package: src:linux
Version: 4.19.98-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
After the update of the linux-kernel from version 4.19.0-6 to 4.19.0-8 the
mouse pointer constantly drifts slowly, when the mouse is controlled by the
TrackPoint of my laptop.
I expect the problem to be caused by the
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=952308
All the warnings are "normal"
but
> 64) PhpMyAdmin\Tests\TwoFactorTest::testApplication
> google2fa not available
>
> /<>/test/classes/TwoFactorTest.php:118
>
> 65) PhpMyAdmin\Tests\TwoFactorTest::testKey
> u2f-php-server not
Source: tunnelx
Version: 20170928-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
Source: octave-arduino
Version: 0.4.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory
Source: opam
Version: 2.0.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering directory '/<>'
>
Source: uglifyjs
Version: 2.8.29-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
Source: terraintool
Version: 1.13-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
Source: node-jschardet
Version: 1.6.0+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: node-jsonld
Version: 1.6.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory
Source: zeroinstall-injector
Version: 2.15-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: xemacs21
Version: 21.4.24-8
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering directory
Source: onionbalance
Version: 0.1.8-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debian/rules clean
>
Source: yaws
Version: 2.0.6+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering directory
Source: node-jsonminify
Version: 0.4.1+dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: node-rdf-canonize
Version: 1.0.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Hi
It seems you duplicated https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=952109
Le dim., 23 févr. 2020 14:30:02 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum
écrit
Source: phpmyadmin-motranslator
Version: 4.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Hi Adrian,
thank you!
I updated the package.
Am 22.02.20 um 19:10 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
> Source: open-ath9k-htc-firmware
> Version: 1.4.0-97-g75b3e59+dfsg-3
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs bullseye sid
>
>
Apparently pydoctor, which is used to format some API documentation
for git-buildpackage, wants cachecontrol. Which was removed from the
archive.
I am getting autoremoval warnings because my package depends on
git-buildpackage (which it runs, as a command line program). I don't
really know
Source: minlog
Version: 4.0.99.20100221-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering directory
Source: linuxdoc-tools
Version: 0.9.73-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering directory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sun, 2020-02-23 at 14:49 +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> Severity grave to make sure it doesn't enter testing.
Wouldn't that be better applied to proftpd-basic - since it was the update
there that broke this? I posted a bug against mod-vroot
Source: strophejs
Version: 1.2.14+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
> dh
Source: node-builtin-modules
Version: 3.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: deepdiff
Version: 3.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debian/rules clean
> dh
Source: php-sabredav
Version: 1.8.12-8
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory
On Thu, 31 Oct 2019 18:39:16 +0100 Paolo Greppi wrote:
> Hi Dmitry, I have fixed the dangling symlink in libjs-vue-route.
>
> It now builds locally and on Salsa CI
Hi Paolo,
Is it ready for upload?
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Source: plexus-build-api
Version: 0.0.7-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
> dh
Source: elkcode
Version: 6.2.8-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering directory
Package: debdelta
Version: 0.65
Severity: normal
Hi!
It seems that somewhere in the code debdelta-upgrade is trying to
compare a 'str' object with 'bytes':
*** Error while applying delta for cups-common: : None
'>=' not supported between instances of 'str' and 'bytes'
Thank you!
Best
Source: swiftsc
Version: 0.5-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debian/rules clean
> dh
Source: golang-github-rsc-letsencrypt
Version: 0.0~git20160929.0.76104d2-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: gcl
Version: 2.6.12-93
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering directory
Source: backupchecker
Version: 1.7-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debian/rules clean
>
Source: php-codecoverage
Version: 7.0.10+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: phpunit
Version: 8.5.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
>
Source: prometheus-mailexporter
Version: 1.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
>
Source: golang-1.11
Version: 1.11.12-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
> dh build
Control: reassign -1 libprocps-dev
Control: forcemerge 951494 -1
On 2020-02-23 14:27 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: apitrace
> Version: 9.0+repack-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
>
> Hi,
>
> During
ibsim moved to Github. The specific error seems to have been fixed by
https://github.com/linux-rdma/ibsim/commit/7bf171bab9c8bf3cc6c8f822bfcbd85570ca9abc
The warning: likely fixed by
https://github.com/linux-rdma/ibsim/commit/8625a69de7a319a0a1f3e4c86a0f14eda7e1612c
Latest version there is 0.9 .
Source: libjs-webrtc-adapter
Version: 7.3.0~ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: brebis
Version: 0.10-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debian/rules clean
> dh
Source: proxy-suite
Version: 1.9.2.4-10
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering directory
Source: geronimo-commonj-spec
Version: 1.1.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: photocollage
Version: 1.4.3-2.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debian/rules clean
Source: uglify-js
Version: 3.6.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
Source: composer
Version: 1.9.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
>
Source: kxd
Version: 0.14-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
> dh build
>
Source: php-mockery
Version: 1.3.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering directory
Source: jss
Version: 4.6.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
> cd
Source: ghdl
Version: 0.35+git20181129+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering
Source: node-depd
Version: 1.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
Source: node-crc
Version: 3.0.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
>
Source: libcrcutil
Version: 1.0-5.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering directory '/<>'
Source: php-mikey179-vfsstream
Version: 1.6.8-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: openclipart
Version: 1:0.18+dfsg-15
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Processing filelist
Source: php-tijsverkoyen-css-to-inline-styles
Version: 2.2.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: iso-flags-svg
Version: 1.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering directory
Source: sndobj
Version: 2.6.7+ds1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
Source: arduino-builder
Version: 1.3.25-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory
Source: shatag
Version: 0.5.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debian/rules clean
> dh
Source: hylafax
Version: 3:6.0.6-8.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory
Source: docker.io
Version: 19.03.6+dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: marionnet
Version: 0.90.6+bzr508-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering
Source: pt-websocket
Version: 0.2-8
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
> dh build
Source: f2fs-tools
Version: 1.11.0-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory
Source: golang-github-akrennmair-gopcap
Version: 0.0~git20150728.0.00e1103-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
101 - 200 of 494 matches
Mail list logo
