Am Samstag, dem 06.04.2024 um 11:15 +0200 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Is the problem reproducible after a reboot?
> Is the problem reproducible for a freshly created user?
Interestingly, today it worked when I wanted to reproduce the issue.
I'll report back when it occurs again.
Thanks!
- Fabian
Source: 7zip
Version: 23.01+dfsg-7
Severity: normal
Hi again,
currently, the 7zip package has both a versioned Breaks+Replaces as
wellas a versioned Conflicts relationship against the p7zip-full and
p7zip packages. In general, if a package conflict can be resolved by
installing a specific
Source: 7zip
Version: 23.01+dfsg-7
Severity: normal
Hi,
currently, the 7zip-standalone package has a hard dependency on the
full-featured 7zip package, rendering it quite useless as a "light"
standalone package.
Please consider either turning it into an actual standalone package
without any
Package: game-data-packager
Version: 77
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: openj...@packages.debian.org
Hi,
the packaging information for the jazz_jackrabbit_collection package
from GOG.com is outdated. Thre is a new package available for download
called
> If I recall it correctly, the primary suggestion in that bug report
> is to split fonts-noto-core into an LCG and an "other" package.
I have created a MR to implement this:
https://salsa.debian.org/fonts-team/fonts-noto/-/merge_requests/1
- Fabian
signature.asc
Description: This is a
Package: python3-reportlab
Version: 4.0.4-11
Severity: minor
Hi,
according to the comment added in
debian/patches/dejavu-font-default.diff:
# the T1 file was not yet found!
# fall back to Vera TTF font
This reads to me that python-reportlabs tries to find the T1 fonts
*first* and then falls
Package: python3-reportlab
Version: 4.0.4-9
Severity: normal
Hi,
currently python3-reportlab is the only package on my system which
pulls in the deprecated ttf-bitstream-vera font, which has long been
obsoleted by fonts-dejavu. Please change to *any* other font or at
least offer a choice of
Package: installation-reports
Severity: wishlist
Boot method: USB
Image version:
https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso
Date: 20230808
Machine: Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14IAL7
Partitions:
Base System Installation Checklist:
Why the severity? The fonts-liberation2 package is now a transitional package
which pulls in the actual fonts-liberation package. Von meinem/meiner Galaxy
gesendet
Why the severity? The fonts-liberation2 package is now a transitional package
which pulls in the actual fonts-liberation package. Von meinem/meiner Galaxy
gesendet
Do you have the heif-gdk-pixbuf package installed? Von meinem/meiner Galaxy
gesendet
Hi Nilesh,
Am Freitag, dem 30.06.2023 um 08:53 +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
> Could you consider to vendor truetype/liberation2 as a symlink to
> truetype/liberation?
sure, I could do that. But then we'd end up again with two entries in
the file system for the same (in this case even identical)
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
Hi,
as outlined by smcv in #1039564:
zsnes is i386-only due to its use of i386 assembly language, and this
seems unlikely to change any time soon.
Alternatives available for multiple CPUs
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
X-Debbugs-Cc: fonts-liberati...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:fonts-liberation2
Hi,
as announced on debian-devel [1], Liberation fonts v1 have been
abandoned upstream and Liberation
Hi there,
sorry for the late reply!
Am Sonntag, dem 02.01.2022 um 20:44 +0200 schrieb Martin-Éric Racine:
> It would be desirable for fonts-liberation2 to Provides fonts-
> liberation so as to avoid installing two versions of essentially the
> same font.
First, strictly speaking
Hi Reimar,I remember that back then, when powerpc was still a release
architecture in Debian, we built two flavors of the ffmpeg libraries -- one
with altivec and one
without:https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/ffmpeg/-/blob/debian/master/debian/rules#L184That
code is still there, so I
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Boot method: USB
Image version: debian-bookworm-DI-rc2-amd64-netinst.iso (downloaded 2023-05-05)
Machine: Lenovo IdeaPad 5
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Initial boot:
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Boot method: USB
Image version: debian-bookworm-DI-rc2-amd64-netinst.iso from 2023-05-05
Date: 2023-05-05 12:00
Machine: Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14IAL7
Partitions:
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] =
+0100
+++ fluidsynth-2.3.1/debian/changelog 2023-04-18 07:48:30.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+fluidsynth (2.3.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Team upload.
+ * Apply patch from upstream to fix seamless looping between MIDI
+ files.
+
+ -- Fabian Greffrath Tue, 18 Apr 2023 07:48:
Am Freitag, dem 07.04.2023 um 15:14 +0100 schrieb
nwil...@glyphography.com:
> based on the outline format contained within (quadratic vs cubic
> Beziers), then filename extension alone is not adequate.
>
> Similarly, if the intent is to make some sort of distinction based on
> the contents of
Source: openal-soft
Version: 1:1.19.1-2
Severity: wishlist
Hi there,
please upgrade the openal-soft package to upstream version 1.23!
The 1.19.1 release which is currently in Debian exhibits some serious
clicking when sounds are played repeatedly in Doom source ports and
reportedly these clinks
+1,10 @@
+fonts-dejavu (2.37-6) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Touch all generated TTF files with SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH time,
+Closes: #1032599.
+
+ -- Fabian Greffrath Fri, 10 Mar 2023 09:35:35 +0100
+
fonts-dejavu (2.37-5) unstable; urgency=medium
[ Paul Menzel ]
diff -Nru fonts-dejavu-2.37
Package: gstreamer1.0-plugins-base-apps
Version: 1.22.0-3
Severity: normal
Hi there,
I have a couple of videos here, mostly in MP4 v2 format [1], that
gstreamer-based players have some problems with. In this specific
case, playing a video with gst-play-1.0 and seeking through the video
Hi Daniel,
Am Dienstag, dem 31.01.2023 um 18:23 +0100 schrieb Daniel Baumann:
> patch attached.
sorry, but your patch doesn't apply in debian/control.
Could you probably file a MR in the GIT repo instead?
Thanks!
- Fabian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi Julian,this is highly appreciated, thanks for all the effort you put into
this!I'd recommend to avoid the "awesome" part of the name altogether. Font
Awesome upstream apparently changed his mind and had become rather hostile
towards open development, so we shouldn't give them more reason to
Am Samstag, dem 21.01.2023 um 18:55 +0100 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> This upgrade, which now unfortunately already is in testing makes the
> font NOT metric-compatible with Cambria...
Ouch, that's unfortunate! Do we know which glyphs are affected so that
they can probably get patch back to metric
Hi Roland,
thank you very much for the effort you put into this issue!
Am Freitag, dem 20.01.2023 um 23:03 +0100 schrieb Roland Rosenfeld:
> So we should think about "repairing" these files and make them real
> .pfb files with segment headers. Only problem is, that t1binary
We must not forget
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, dem 19.01.2023 um 13:57 -0500 schrieb Jorge Moraleda:
> Fabian mentioned that "upstream has decided to rename the binary font
> files and in that course change the file extensions from .pfb to
> .t1." but from the above experiment it seems that upstream changed
> the actual
Am Donnerstag, dem 19.01.2023 um 13:12 +0100 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> The very purpose of Noto is to cover many scripts.
> If you need latin-cyrillic-greek coverage, pick another o the many
> fonts covering that smaller scope.
Sure, I was expecting a stubborn reply...
However, you contradict
control: forwarded -1
https://github.com/ArtifexSoftware/urw-base35-fonts/issues/38
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 15:38:56 +0200 Agathe Porte
wrote:
> python-gflanguages has been uploaded to NEW.
>
> Now ITP glyphsets [1] is blocking this upgrade
Now both python-gflanguages and python-glyphsets have fond their way
into Debian.
- Fabian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
Hi Andreas,
thank you for working on this!
I think an upload of your current branch to experimental would be reasonable at
this point.
- Fabian
This e-mail is sent on behalf of Doncasters Group. Its contents are
confidential to the recipient and may be legally privileged, subject to export
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Fabian Greffrath
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org,
pkg-games-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
* Package name: dsda-doom
Version : 0.25
Upstream Contact: Ryan Krafnick <https://github.com/kraflab>
* URL :
> The reason why the Debian/watch file for the Debian package doesn't catch
> this is that it searches for release tarballs with ".bz2" extension, whereas
> upstream has switched to ".xz" compression since the 2.13.91 release.
Control: retitle -1 please update fontconfig to 2.14.1
Indeed, upstream has already released fontconfig 2.14.1 in October 2022.
The reason why the Debian/watch file for the Debian package doesn't catch this
is that it searches for release tarballs with ".bz2" extension, whereas
upstream has
Hi Jakub,
Am Donnerstag, dem 01.12.2022 um 19:21 +0100 schrieb Jakub Wilk:
> In the Nimbus Roman font, the character ₤ (U+20A4 LIRA SIGN) looks
> like
> "zł". It should look similar to £ (U+00A3 POUND SIGN) instead.
well, I doubt that we'll be able to fix this in the scope of the Debian
Hi Christoph,
Am Samstag, dem 15.10.2022 um 22:18 +0200 schrieb Christoph Biedl:
> and identified the problem as follows: This file s05l.afm was
> previously provided by gsfonts package, that package is now
> transitional
> and depends on fonts-urw-base35, but the file is not provided there.
Package: fonts-texgyre
Version: 20180621-3.1
Severity: normal
Hi,
while I was glad to see that the math fonts have finally been split
off of the fonts-texgyre package, I was a bit disappointed to realize
that I would have to install them anyway, because fonts-texgyre has a
hard dependency on
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Fabian Greffrath
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, Debian Games Team
* Package name: woof
Version : 10.3.0
Upstream Author : Fabian Greffrath
* URL : Debian Games Team
* License : GPL-2.0+ and others
HI Markus,
Am Freitag, dem 30.09.2022 um 17:08 +0200 schrieb Markus Hitter:
> Would you mind making a packaging patch? This would solve the problem
> at least for Debian (and Ubuntu) users, giving upstream as much time
> as they want or need.
sorry, no chance! This has to be solved upstream,
Am Donnerstag, dem 29.09.2022 um 18:06 +0200 schrieb Markus Hitter:
> Bugfix provided in the upstream bug.
I've seen that, thank you!
> Now comes the hardest part: encouraging upstream maintainers to
> accept the bugfix. They usually feel alienated if some unknown idiot
> (me) comes along and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
unblock 694320 by 694308
The fonts files in fonts-urw-core35 are not built by fontforge anymore.
- Fabian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEIsF2SKlSa4TfGRyWy+qOlwzNWd8FAmMUfacACgkQy+qOlwzN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Am Samstag, dem 27.08.2022 um 19:40 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> Yes, Ghostscript contains a script update-gsfonts which makes use of
> it.
I see, thank you . So, I'll keep the file.
Do you guys think I will have to post a heads-up to
/-/blob/master/debian/10fonts-urw-base35.conf
Am Samstag, dem 27.08.2022 um 14:12 +0200 schrieb Fabian Greffrath:
> Am Freitag, dem 26.08.2022 um 09:52 +0200 schrieb Roland Rosenfeld:
> > Just go for it.
>
> I have just uploaded fonts-urw-base35_20200910-2 to experimental
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Am Freitag, dem 26.08.2022 um 09:52 +0200 schrieb Roland Rosenfeld:
> Just go for it.
I have just uploaded fonts-urw-base35_20200910-2 to experimental which
takes over the gsfonts and gsfonts-x11 packages. So, if you guys could
check if the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 10:21:17 +0200 Fabian Greffrath
wrote:
> > Maybe now is the time?
> Indeed my plan is to tackle this issue in about four weeks.
I currently despair of the format of the fonts.scale and fonts.alias
files that are
> Maybe now is the time?Indeed my plan is to tackle this issue in about four
> weeks. - Fabian Von meinem/meiner Galaxy gesendet
Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Chris Hofstaedtler
Datum: 28.07.22 01:02 (GMT+01:00) An: Fabian Greffrath
, 977...@bugs.debian.org Cc:
Am 26.01.2022 10:51, schrieb Laurent Bigonville:
Could anybody of the multimedia team have a look at this?
What do you expect from "having a look at this"?
I agree that the package should be in main, but in the end it's up to
the ftp-masters to decide.
- Fabian
Hi,
Am 16.12.2021 11:22, schrieb G. Heine:
this version displays only letters a-z correctly thus making the system
hardly
usable, unless you change to a different font. The problem is best
shown with
the attached screen-shot.
this seems to be a duplicate of
PS: Related upstream request here
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/cantarell-fonts/-/issues/55
- Fabian
Gentlemen,
Am 03.12.2021 14:09, schrieb Fabian Greffrath:
That'd be it, then. ;)
I have uploaded a package to experimental [*] in which I applied the two
"tricks" I outlined before. I have not experienced any issues with Gnome
Shell, Gnome Control Center or any other Gnome app, y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sun, 4 Oct 2020 21:32:14 -0400 Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> https://github.com/daltonmaag/statmake
It seems that this is only required to build the variable font [1],
which we do not necessarily want. We have only built and shipped the
static fonts so
Hi corsac,
Am 11.11.2021 15:36, schrieb Yves-Alexis Perez:
So I went ahead and gave it a try. For the sake of interested people,
here's
some details.
could you prepare a patch that makes this available as a package
build-time option, e.g. if DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS contains "headless"?
Thanks!
Am 11.11.2021 14:30, schrieb Jonathan Dowland:
You could consider moving to dh. Although it might seem a bit crazy for
a package of literally one file. But if I had done that instead of
golfing the packaging down to the bare minimum, this upload would not
be
necessary (and likely :1.9.fixed-2
Hello Jonathan,
I am going to fix this bug by re-uploading a new package revision.
Should I take the opportunity and remove you from the Uploaders list,
i.e. replace yourself with myself?
Cheers,
Fabian
Am 09.11.2021 22:28, schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
Source: doom-wad-shareware
Version:
Am 08.11.2021 09:59, schrieb Konstantin Khomoutov:
Oh, indeed: I have rebooted the laptop to apply the latest Bullseye
updates,
and the issue has gone away; sorry for the noise.
I'm going to close this bug.
Alright, thank you. Anyway, we should keep in mind to upgrade this game
to use SDL2
Hi Konstantin,
Am 04.11.2021 18:43, schrieb Konstantin Khomoutov:
At startup, rott-commercial fails when performing what looks like a
query
to the X server regarding its capabilities:
I cannot reproduce this issue, so it might have to do with your specfic
video hardware or drivers. I guess
Am 21.10.2021 21:05, schrieb Brian Potkin:
Fortunately, not selecting it isn't of any consequence. A user gets
what else is chosen.
I don't consider it "fortunate", it is inconsistent that having that
choice selected or not does not make a difference as long as any other
choice is selected.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Am Donnerstag, dem 21.10.2021 um 18:33 +0100 schrieb Brian Potkin:
> I think this is exactly the way it was designed. Whether the design
> is the best is what has been brought up in this report.
The results are pretty surprising and unpredictable,
Hi Holger,
thanks for your reply!
Am 21.10.2021 16:31, schrieb Holger Wansing:
Selecting "Desktop Environment", but not choose one of the displayed
possiblities (like "GNOME", "KDE" and so on) is not the way, how this
dialog was designed, I guess.
Yes, apparently. :/
I could imagine a
Package: task-desktop
Version: 3.68
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-b...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I just installed Debian stable in a virtual machine. When I was asked
during the installation process which "meta-packages" to install I
left "Desktop Environment" selected but
HI Markus,
Am 08.09.2021 11:50, schrieb Markus Koschany:
would rather drop freeciv-sound-standard completely
agreed! The sounds and music are an integral part of the game, they add
a mere 2 MB to the installation and are easily missed as they are
currently packaged.
Thanks!
- Fabian
Sorry for my super-clever MUA adding line breaks on its own.
Control: forwarded 990246
https://code.videolan.org/videolan/vlc/-/issues/26035
Am 26.08.2021 04:59, schrieb Vagrant Cascadian:
Control: forwarded 990246
https://savannah.gnu.org/support/index.php?110532
Control: forwarded -1
https://code.videolan.org/videolan/vlc/-/issues/26035
Am 26.08.2021 04:59, schrieb Vagrant Cascadian:
Control: forwarded 990246
https://savannah.gnu.org/support/index.php?110532
control: tags -1 unreproducible
Hi Andrew,
Am Freitag, dem 09.07.2021 um 17:24 +0200 schrieb Andrew via Pkg-games-
devel:
> Secret found! sound only works for non-free Doom data, not Freedoom.
sorry, but I cannot reproduce this.
If prboom-plus cannot find the sfx_secret sound lump - which it
Control: tags -1 confirmed upstream
Control: forwarded -1
https://www.doomworld.com/forum/topic/31039-prboom-plus-ver-2514/?page=123=comments#comment-2301968
Am Montag, dem 03.05.2021 um 20:51 +0200 schrieb Chris via Pkg-games-
devel:
> On sway WM with "xwayland" disabled, prboom-plus seems to
Hi Peter,
Am 22.04.2021 00:52, schrieb peter green:
If I get no response to this bug and I get time to test out the patch
I will likely upload a NMU in a week or so.
the patch looks trivially correct to me. A NMU/Team Upload would be
appreciated.
Thank you!
Cheers,
- Fabian
Hi Thorsten,
Am Sonntag, dem 14.03.2021 um 20:05 + schrieb Thorsten Glaser:
> @Fabian since you were the driving force behind SF3 integration
> into FluidSynth itself, you might wish to have a look at the
> patch as well.
forwarded to Fluidsynth upstream, thanks! (I am not active in this
Hi all,
Am 07.02.2021 22:51, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
Added now explicitly.
well, thanks. I can't wait to participate in this discussion.
My stance on this: In theory it should be technically possible to
replace the gsfonts (and gsfonts-x11) package with fonts-urw-base35 and
I believe
Indeed! Apparently, upstream didn't even have an install rule in their own
Makefile prior to the 2.1.2 release. Thanks for noticing. Cheers, - Fabian Von
meinem/meiner Galaxy gesendet
Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: stephrom
Datum: 17.01.21 12:39 (GMT+01:00) An: Debian Bug
Indeed! Apparently, upstream didn't even have an install rule in their own
Makefile prior to the 2.1.2 release. Thanks for noticing. Cheers, - Fabian Von
meinem/meiner Galaxy gesendet
Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: stephrom
Datum: 17.01.21 12:39 (GMT+01:00) An: Debian Bug
Hi there,> I think this patch is trivial enough that it can be included without
any furthertesting besides the testing on Debian powerpc and ppc64, where I
have verifiedthe patch to fix the problem.it would probably help if you could
become a member if the pkg-multimedia team, applied these
Am Mittwoch, den 30.12.2020, 19:09 +0100 schrieb Gürkan Myczko:
> I wish I could. I'm struggling with that pipeline. Maybe you can hint
> me?
Hm, not sure, quite some usual GIT workflow:
I clone the repository with "git clone ", apply my local changes,
add or remove files with "git add/rm",
Hi Gürkan,
Am Dienstag, den 29.12.2020, 20:37 +0100 schrieb Gürkan Myczko:
> I think that's what you wanted:
could you please push your changes to GIT so I can review them there?
> Happy New Year!
It's not over yet, but I can't wait for it, too. ;)
- Fabian
signature.asc
Description: This
Hi Jonas,
Am Sonntag, den 20.12.2020, 14:10 +0100 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> This package has been superseded by fonts-urw-base35, which contains
> the
> same fonts but a newer release and using policy-compliant package
> name.
indeed, I have prepared fonts-urw-base35 to take over both gsfonts
Package: fonts-agave
Version: 35-2
Severity: normal
Hi Gürkan,
I see that the Agave fonts are build from their SFD sources with a
pretty simple "open and save as OTF" rule. However, upstream provides
some pretty detailed build instructions on the project page.
Especially, the fonts are build in
Package: fonts-recommended
Version: 1
Severity: wishlist
Hi Adam,
please consider applying the proposed changes that I filed as Merge
Requests on Salsa:
move recommended font packages from Depends to Recommends
https://salsa.debian.org/fonts-team/fonts-recommended/-/merge_requests/1
replace
Hi all,this might be the Blender vs. Python3.9 case then.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=976378The dmo packages were a
red herring, sorry. - Fabian Von meinem/meiner Galaxy gesendet
Hi,
Am 2020-12-03 00:47, schrieb will:
ii libavcodec58 10:4.3.1-dmo3
ii libavdevice58 10:4.3.1-dmo3
ii libavformat58 10:4.3.1-dmo3
ii libavutil56 10:4.3.1-dmo3
ii libswscale5
control: reassign -1 task-desktop
Am Montag, den 30.11.2020, 13:51 + schrieb Debian Bug Tracking
System:
> Bug #975712 [unifont] Unifont should be installed by default on
> Bullseye
That would be the task-desktop package, I guess.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
control: tags -1 upstream patch
Am 2020-11-22 11:52, schrieb Adrian Bunk:
Warning: gpac is too old, update to 2007-06-21 UTC or later
This seems to be the fix:
https://code.videolan.org/videolan/x264/-/commit/7c2004b58c26da661618262c9c06b73ad3a9ff6c
- Fabian
Am 2020-11-09 20:58, schrieb Paul Gevers:
# Failed test 'Testing stderr'
# at debian/tests/cfftot1.t line 24.
# got: 'cfftot1:
/usr/share/fonts/truetype/artemisia/GFSArtemisia.otf: No such file or
directory
This is looking for an opentype font in the truetype directory, which is
control: tags -1 +patch
control: forwarded -1
https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/ffmpeg/-/merge_requests/6
Please review my merge request for a patch.
- Fabian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Am 2020-10-26 11:01, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
Your signalling that you think I am an idiot does not help here.
I absolutely do not think you are an idiot! Quite the contrary, I assume
you to be a very intelligent person, thus I wonder why you ask me to
repeat my arguments over and over
Am 2020-10-26 09:56, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
You cannot mean to sugges that ghostscript should violate Debian Policy
by ignoring the integrity of symlinks, so it must be something else.
Please elaborate what you have in mind.
*Sigh!*
Please reconsider letting unrelated packages migrate to
Am 2020-10-25 22:48, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
It seems to me that the concrete delay is caused by ghostscript in
_testing_ having tight dependency on the font, and that it therefore
cannot be solved by an upload to unstable - only by ghostscript
migrating to testing (or ghostscript getting
Package: libavformat58
Version: 7:4.3.1-4
Severity: wishlist
Hi there,
is there any reason why we don't yet provide an additional
libavformat-extra package which could contain support for the SMB
protocol? We already do so for libavcodec-extra and libavfilter-extra,
so I don't see any reason why
Package: libgs9-common
Version: 9.52.1~dfsg-1
Severity: important
Hi there,
the fonts-urw-base35 is currently stuck in unstable and not allowed to
migrate to testing because the ghostscript package currently suffers
from a completely unrelated RC bug. This is because the libgs9-common
package
What happens if you simply run prboom-plus in a terminal, without any
parameters? Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet.
Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Nicolas Patrois
Datum: 23.10.20 14:54 (GMT+01:00) An: Debian Bug
Tracking System Betreff: Bug#972783: prboom-plus:
What happens if you simply run prboom-plus in a terminal, without any
parameters? Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet.
Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Nicolas Patrois
Datum: 23.10.20 14:54 (GMT+01:00) An: Debian Bug
Tracking System Betreff: Bug#972783: prboom-plus:
Hi Gürkan,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "comic-neue":
I have just found this by pure coincidence.
* Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/fonts-team/fonts-comic-neue
Could you please push your working branch to the GIT repo and file a
merge request there? There are other changes
Am 2020-08-17 11:30, schrieb Michael Cree:
Ffmpeg does not build on alpha as it currently depends on
libpocketsphinx-dev but pocketsphinx does not build on alpha
due to long standing test suite failures. I see the build
dependency has been removed on many other arches including
some release
Hi there,
Am 2020-06-30 13:49, schrieb Matteo F. Vescovi:
I'm spending few days of [VAC] so I'm afk.
Feel free to provide me a patch to fix the issue and I'll more than
happy to apply it to the package once I'm back, as already done in the
past. ;-)
will adding the line
export
Am 2020-06-09 14:42, schrieb Fabian Greffrath:
Looks like we don't have gftools in Debian, sigh...
Apparently this boils down to a single python script importing fonttools
which I could just integrate into the Debian package, so chances are
good I'll switch to upstream's own TTF build chain
Am 2020-06-08 22:08, schrieb Fabian Greffrath:
sounds reasonable, I'll consider it for the next revision. I hope we
have all the pre-requisites for building the TTF variants in Debian,
their build chain contains some more steps than the one for the OTF
variants.
Looks like we don't have
Am 2020-06-09 04:20, schrieb Paul Wise:
Pango/HarfBuzz is dropping support for low-res displays and hinting so
I'm not sure how useful this is.
fonts-firacode upstream has already dropped the build scripts for the
OTF variant (not that we have used them, but whatever), so we should
probably
Hi Salim,
Am Montag, den 08.06.2020, 17:01 +0200 schrieb Salim B:
> Therefore I think it would *really* make sense to switch to the TTF
> variant of the font since it's mainly intended for "on-screen" usage
> anyway (in contrast to print) and thus sharp rendering is very
> important.
sounds
Hi,FiraCode v4 has a major regression, thus I'd rather wait for the next
release:
https://github.com/tonsky/FiraCode/issues/1049https://github.com/tonsky/FiraCode/issues/1059
- FabianVon meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet.
Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Nicholas D Steeves
However, the game won't boot anyway. Just the clean GRUB background is
displayed and nothing else happens. Any idea why?
Actually, this may be part of the problem! The game is supposed to run
in plain text mode (80x25) which is apparently not active as long as the
GRUB background is still
1 - 100 of 2796 matches
Mail list logo
