Hi,
this is a good idea, but won't we need multiple version of avr-libc
then aswell, or will a avr-libc compiled with gcc 4.0 work with gcc
3.4?
On 2/17/06, Lars Noschinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: gcc-avr
> Version: 1:4.0.2-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> It would be nice, if you could in
On 2/17/06, Lars Noschinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: gcc-avr
> Version: 1:4.0.2-1
> Severity: minor
>
> gcc-avr suggests the gcc-3.2 package which isn't available in neither
> stable, testing or unstable.
Yes, it should be gcc-4.0 now...
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: t
On 1/16/06, Didier Verna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: compface
> Version: 1:1.5.2-1
> Severity: grave
>
>
> Hi,
>
> since the last upgrade, compface doesn't do its job anymore, but generates
> unjustified warnings instead. Here is a testcase on the xbm file attached
> below (that l
Hi,
thanx for the patch, I can do the upload today.
On 1/18/06, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> package xfaces
> tag 346812 patch
> thanks
>
> I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA
> group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and
>
Hi,
thanx for the fix, but the patch were missing...
On 2/15/06, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Attached the patch for the version I uploaded. Please respond if
> you think that the attached patch won't work.
>
> Cheers
>
> Luk
>
> --
> Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GP
Package: libcompface
Version: 1989.11.11-24
Severity: wishlist
-- Forwarded message --
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Nov 22, 2005 11:37 PM
Subject: possible freetype transition; improved library handling
needed for all C/C++ packages
To: debian-devel-announce@lists
Package: xfaces
Version: 3.3-20
Severity: wishlist
-- Forwarded message --
From: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Nov 30, 2005 4:25 AM
Subject: xlibs-dev Transition
To: debian-devel-announce@lists.debian.org
Hi all,
This mail is being written to let you all know about a
Package: siptoolbox
Version: 0.3.99rc2alpha3-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
it is compiled agains libanimal-0.14.0.so.0, which is no longer availkible
as animal0 is updated. Pleas recompile.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT pol
Hi,
thanx for all the pacthes, I'll make a new release during this weekend...
On 2/3/06, Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> retitle 349015 compface: no longer reads XBM files
> tag 349015 patch
> thanks
>
> The Debian-specific patch that allowed compface(1) to read XBM images
> got lost betwe
lls them
and tries to compile some simple programs.
newlib-support is not as important, but a nice feature once you get
the rest working.
>
> I appreciate your help and understanding in that I might stumble in
> the beginning...
By all means!
>
> Regards
> /Daniel
>
> Ha
Hi,
I've handed over this package into the hands of Daniel Widenfalk. Any
progress Daniel?
On 12/28/05, Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what are your current plans involving this package? At present, the gdb
> packages built from it cannot be compiled on modern gcc at least for
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 06:39:41PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> My system is unstable as of today.
> Is there a missing "build-depends: netpbm" or something?
Probably, I'll look into it...
--
Hakan Ardo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 11:48:10AM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, Hakan Ardo wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 06:39:41PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > >
> > > My system is unstable as of today.
> > > Is there a missi
s
> implemented should probably be tested with a C program with inline
> assembly as well.
>
> I filed this as "minor" because it's easy to work around by undefining
> ADC again after including the header.
>
--
Hakan Ardo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mpiling Debian
> p
> ii m41.4.2-1a macro processing language
> ii wget 1.9.1-8retrieves files from the web
>
> -- no debconf information
>
>
--
Hakan Ardo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from ../../src/gcc/unwind-dw2.c:42:
> ../../src/gcc/gthr-posix.h:43:21: pthread.h: No such file or directory
> ../../src/gcc/gthr-posix.h:44:20: unistd.h: No such file or directory
Seems like you are missing the libc headders. Did you install them? See the
README for mor
ackage.
> It would be desirable to have an updated toolchain-source to match. Thanks!
Will do...
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFCzUuTeXr56x4Muc0RAkiaAJ9rIaxPHUlEslBNZalowO+g6kQ6wwCgpBMF
> 0pRqgQfN0uk9qllbALpIS6o=
> =UmK7
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
--
Hakan Ardo
On 10/20/05, Daniel Widenfalk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I saw at debian.org that you feel you don't have the time needed to
> maintain the toolchain-source binutils and gcc package. I might be
> interested in helping out depending on the amount and resources of
> work needed.
I'm mainta
On 10/20/05, Daniel Widenfalk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ok, that seems managable. I'll do it if you're willing to help me get
Great!
> started and pointed in the right direction. Required tools and so on...
By all means.
> Also, any logs and documentation (or pointers to) of what has been
On 10/29/05, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 10:20:03AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> >Daniel: my experience of GCC development is non-existant but I am
> >rather good at Debian packaging and I happen to need an updated set of
> >cross-compilers. I
Package: wnpp
I've relised that I don't have the time required to maintain this
package. There are currently quite a few bugs and gcc needs to be
upgraded to 4.0.
On 9/22/05, Tom Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any status updates/ETA on this one?
Sorry, no. I've got too little time to handle this, and I've put up
the package for adoption...
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://tevp.net
> Illegitimus non carborundum
>
>
tNyug
> x05BtBxBNK4kRzsFOQDFoRkXyDa9FGhf/9Lcndt5VE0kVn0J9msqCbs41dGE9M87
> MKdY0TMUngnAQ/6jK0qne2dBkjGuM0N+oilEYPfE0aoAXZWYSZwwzYq2ExdJ/K+m
> 5TuCTplmby4=
> =ya1t
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Hakan Ardo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
thanx for the repport. I've forwarded it upstream as bug #19060:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?19060
On 2/13/07, Terran Melconian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Package: avr-libc
Version: 1.4.5-2
Severity: important
In avr/iotnx61.h, the PCMSK registers are defined as follows:
#
-- Forwarded message --
From: Joerg Wunsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jan 8, 2007 2:00 PM
Subject: [bug #3485] Using float arithmetic without linking with -lm
result in incorrect code
To: Joerg Wunsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hakan Ardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
avr-l
Hi,
thanx for the patch. A better solution however would be to
build-depend on gcc-4.1-source in order not to duplicate the gcc
sourcecode.
On 3/13/07, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: gcc-avr
> Version: 1:4.1.0-1
> Severity: serious
>
On 3/13/07, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Hakan Ardo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> thanx for the patch. A better solution however would be to
> build-depend on gcc-4.1-source in order not to duplicate the gcc
> sourcecode.
For sure this would
On 3/13/07, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 06:14:51PM +0100, Hakan Ardo wrote:
> On 3/13/07, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >"Hakan Ardo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> thanx for the
Hi,
I'll have a look at this tonight. If Matthias solution works we'll use
thatone for etch, and the gcc-src solution for unstable. Should I do
anything special to make the release go into etch?
On 3/19/07, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Håkan,
Can you give an ETA for fixing this
Does gcc 4.1.1 support AT90PWMx?
On 4/26/07, Tobias Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Package: avr-libc
Version: 1:1.4.5-3
Severity: minor
With the latest package -- though stating in the changelog that they
have been rebuilt against the newest binutils-avr -- the support for
the AT90PWMx device
Hi,
Daniel Widenfalk has placed a lot of work into getting this pkg into
shape with the intention of adopting it. Please coordinate with him,
I'm more or less out of the loop...
On 10/16/06, Itzhak Ben-Akiva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Hakan and all,
I'm looking for an interesting project to
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 1:1.0.2-7
Severity: minor
The xorg.conf man page referes to a mouse(4) manpage. It is provided by the
manpages but it is not the xorg mouse man page.
-- Systeh Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i
Hi,
thanx for your repport. This is probably an upstream problem. I'll
upgrade the lib to 1.4.5 and if that dosn't help I'll forward the
problem upstream.
On 10/19/06, Stephan Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Package: avr-libc
Version: 1:1.4.4-2
Compiling the following program with avr-gcc giv
Hi,
I've forwarded this upstream:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?18169
On 10/19/06, Stephan Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Package: avr-libc
Version: 1:1.4.4-2
Compiling the following program with avr-gcc gives an error about
multiple definition of __fixsfsi
// program code sta
-- Forwarded message --
From: Joerg Wunsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Nov 1, 2006 8:54 AM
Subject: [bug #18169] multiple definition of __fixsfsi
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Joerg Wunsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Update of bug #18169 (project avr-libc):
-- Forwarded message --
From: Bob Paddock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Nov 1, 2006 2:46 PM
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #3485] Using float arithmetic without
linking with -lm result in incorrect code
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andrea Baldoni <[EMAIL PROTECT
On 11/1/06, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Added suggest gdb-doc (closes: #392961)
This surely didn't remove the GFDL'ed texi files from the source as
done in the gdb source package.
Nope, I'll rectify that...
--
Håkan Ardö
Hi,
yes, I will release version 1.4.6 any day now. I have to update the
newdevices patch of binutils first though, because currently it has
the wrong architecture for at90usb82, preventing avr-libc from
compiling.
Sorry for the long delay...
On 8/13/07, Lars Noschinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
thanx for the patch, I'll apply it later today.
On 4/29/06, Aaron M. Ucko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Package: xfaces
Version: 3.3-25
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
Greetings.
As you may have heard, Debian is in the midst of a transition to
X11R7. One a
Hi,
I'v forwarded this upstream as bug 2626:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2626
On 4/13/06, Terran Melconian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Package: binutils-avr
Version: 2.15-3
The attiny26 supports some forms of the LPM (load program memory)
instruction, but under certain circu
Package: toolchain-source
Version: 3.2-8
-- Forwarded message --
From: Vasek Stodulka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: May 11, 2006 9:25 AM
Subject: Problem with toolchain-source
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I am using Debian Etch and I tried to run
"TPKG_SERVER=ftp.cz.debian.org tpkg-in
Hi,
thanx for the repport. Would you consider doing a formal upstream bug
repport as desribed here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html
and reply to this mail with the upstream bugreport number.
Thanx!
On 5/11/06, Philipp Marek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.18
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EM
Hi,
thanx for the patch. I'll make sure to included it in the next release
and I have forwarded it upstream as bug 16260:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=16260
On 4/4/06, Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: avr-libc
> Version: 1:1.4.3-1
> Severity: wishli
On 4/14/06, Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: picon-unknown
> Version: 2004.01.02-1
> Severity: normal
>
> It's been a couple of years, so it would be nice to have an update. Have
> you thought about regular updates? Quarterly? Twice a year? Annually?
> Just before a release?
Well
Arrival-Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 11:42:26 +0200
> > Received-From-MTA: dns; barbabok.barbanet.com (213.112.233.145)
> >
> > Final-Recipient: RFC822; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Action: failed
> > Status: 5.2.0
> > Remote-MTA: dns; taket.barbanet.com (81.224.104.166)
> >
Hi,
thanx for the info, I'll upgrade...
On 3/6/06, Carrick Detweiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: avr-libc
> Version: 1.4.3-1
>
> There is a bug in avr/boot.h which causes the wrong macro to be used by
> the preprocessor with some processors. This is fixed in the upstream
> version as pe
Hi,
thanx for all your patches. I'm working on updating the avr packages
and your patches will be usefull. Conserning the FreeBSD patches:
On 4/19/07, Tobias Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I applied also serveral patches from the FreeBSD pages: [1]
binutils-patch-aa.diff
This is irrelevant
Hi,
gcc-4.1-source ver 4.1.2 is still in experimental. Once it is released
to unstable, I'll make this upgrade aswell. I plan to upgrade to 4.1.1
soon...
--
Håkan Ardö
48 matches
Mail list logo
