08.06.2024 10:25:00 Sanjoy Mahajan :
> Yes, I'll be happy to discuss it with upstream.
> Should I CC you? Or just update the Debian bug as needed?
>
> -Sanjoy
>
> On 2024-06-07 15:48, Preuße, Hilmar wrote:
>
>> On 07.06.2024 13:09, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> The man entry for
09.05.2024 14:12:32 Manny :
> Package: texlive-latex-extra
> Version: 2022.20230122-4
> Severity: normal
> Tags: upstream
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debbug.texlive-latex-ex...@sideload.33mail.com
>
> After an upgrade from Bullseye to Bookworm, the acro package breaks
> compilation even if no acronyms are
Control: tags -1 + fixed-upstream
On 29.02.24 19:33, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote:
Hi,
Dear Maintainer,
here are some notes and editorial fixes for the manual.
Karl Berry told me "I installed the pdftex.man patch, with a few minor
adjustments for the current source." I tag as fixed in
On 27.10.23 22:31, Siep Kroonenberg wrote:
Hello,
The standalone context is mostly free from mkii, but cont-tmf.zip
still has most of the legacy stuff, which will mostly be added back
in, in the form of a context-legacy package for TL. I find sorting
things out and creating / modifying the
On 23.02.24 16:31, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
Hello Moritz,
The following vulnerability was published for texlive-bin.
CVE-2024-25262[0]:
| texlive-bin commit c515e was discovered to contain heap buffer
| overflow via the function ttfLoadHDMX:ttfdump. This vulnerability
| allows attackers to
On 15.01.24 20:32, John Lines wrote:
Hi,
The attached patch allows an argument of
--type=journald:identifier='postfix/smtp'
to be specified.
The patch can't be applied as it is: the check_logfiles file is
generated during build. I moved the code to the appropriate source
files, new
Control: tags -1 + pending
On 04.12.23 14:43, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
Hi,
texworks is the only package that uses poppler's Qt6 in Debian. Please
let me know if it's ok with you if texworks is no longer built for
i386 in Debian.
The debian-devel-announce of today[1] reads:
"Maintainers who wish
On 11/23/23 15:53, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2023-11-23 15:44:17 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
Hi Vincent,
\documentclass{article}
\pagestyle{empty}
\begin{document}
$x'$ ; $\oplus$ ; $\ominus$ ; $\otimes$ ; $\ell$ ; OK.
\end{document}
I get the following:
x0 ; ⊕ ;
On 11/19/23 00:40, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Hi Adrian,
A proper fix would be either to:
1. patch the version check out of texlive-bin (preferred), or
Did so, see [1]. I did not remove the check completely, I just
un-tightened the version. I can confirm that a texlive package linked on
testing
On 11/19/23 00:40, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 11:51:15PM +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
On 11/18/23 20:18, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Hi all,
nmu texlive-bin_2023.20230311.66589-7 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against new
zlib"
Thanks for filing the NMU bug.
S
Control: severity -1 important
Control: block 1056183 by -1
On 11/18/23 20:18, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Hi Samuel,
nmu texlive-bin_2023.20230311.66589-7 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against new
zlib"
Thanks for filing the NMU bug.
So a binnmu of the texlive-bin source package seems
On 11/13/23 23:20, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hilmar Preusse (2023-11-13):
Hi,
the package fails to install on my system. I simply assumes that /boot/firmware
is a
mount point and fails if this is not the case. If /boot/firmware is expected to
be a
mount point the installer should have
Control: severity -1 normal
On 11/12/23 15:55, Vincent-Xavier JUMEL wrote:
Hi,
While I wanted to give spix a try
(https://spix.readthedocs.io/en/latest/install/) I've trusted Debian to
package it in this specific package, which is reported by
`apt show texlive-extra-utils |
On 11/13/23 23:03, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Hi,
Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian.
You can follow progress on this Bug here: 1055901:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1055901.
Here is the error message I get:
hille@rasppi1:~ $ sudo apt -f install
On 9/4/23 22:10, Jeremy Lecour wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
After upgrading to Debian 12, my SFTP client stopped working with
errors when connecting.
I've opened a GitHub issue and the problem has been solved.
https://github.com/proftpd/proftpd/issues/1694
It will even be backported to the 1.3.8
On 10/30/23 11:52, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
Hi Stuart,
I was told not to use that URL, so here is a new one
https://freeshell.de/~hille42/debian_1054218/
Did you find the time to test the fix?
Hilmar
--
Testmail
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 11/2/23 16:17, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Hello Kumar,
I've inserted a begin-math/end-math symbol since I think you left one out.
Proceed, with fingers crossed.
mtx-context | fatal error: return code: 1
Please let me know what I can do to help. I am downgrading temporarily though.
I
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tags -1 + patch
Control: retitle -1 autopkgtest fails since texinfo 7.1
On 10/30/23 23:53, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi all,
No, I don't have a patch for this yet. I'll try to look into this, but can'
promise anything.
Patch is attached, tagging.
H.
--
On 10/31/23 17:21, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Hi,
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=ffmpeg=7%3A6.0-8
...
makeinfo --html -I doc --no-split -D config-not-all --init-file=/<>/doc/t2h.pm
--output doc/ffmpeg.html /<>/doc/ffmpeg.texi
makeinfo: error parsing /<>/doc/t2h.pm: Undefined
On 10/13/01 23:21, Florian Weimer wrote:
Hi Florian,
texi2dvi includes the source file directory in the TeX search path.
This is quite unusual for programs processing -I options (such as C
compilers), and even makeinfo doesn't do that. Furthermore, it's not
possible to remove that directory
On 10/13/01 23:21, Florian Weimer wrote:
Hi Florian,
texi2dvi includes the source file directory in the TeX search path.
This is quite unusual for programs processing -I options (such as C
compilers), and even makeinfo doesn't do that. Furthermore, it's not
possible to remove that directory
Hi,
I was told not to use that URL, so here is a new one
https://freeshell.de/~hille42/debian_1054218/
Hilmar
29.10.2023 18:12:25 Hilmar Preuße :
> On 10/19/23 14:20, Stuart Prescott wrote:
>
> Hi Stuart,
>
>> The unittests of the 'plastex' package run pdflatex to genera
On 10/19/23 14:20, Stuart Prescott wrote:
Hi Stuart,
The unittests of the 'plastex' package run pdflatex to generate some
figures, and then extract the text from the figures to verify that
various implementation details of the package are working. These tests
pass on all release architectures
On 10/19/23 14:20, Stuart Prescott wrote:
Hi Stuart,
Attached:
test.tex (one of the little .tex files plastex generates in its tests)
amd64.pdf (output of "pdflatex test.tex" on amd64)
s390x.pdf (output of "pdflatex test.tex" on s390x)
I could reduce the input file to the minimal
On 10/21/23 02:12, Al Ma wrote:
Hi Al Ma,
to be honest: I don't really care, which version of a specific (LaTeX)
package I do package. Once a specific package version has made its way
to CTAN, I assume that the TeX Live people will pick it up and I'll
package it later on. Looking at the tar
Control: block 1041668 by -1
On 7/25/23 23:12, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
Add blocking statement.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hintview":
* Package name : hintview
Version : 1.3.1-1
Upstream contact : Martin Ruckert
* URL : https://hint.userweb.mwn.de/hint/hintview.html
*
On 6/28/23 09:01, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
When do you expect the bugs to be closed in unstable?
I've pushed the new texlive-bin and the context package to unstable.
Hilmar
--
Testmail
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Unfortunately I've uploaded pssh, dvisvgm & latexmk to unstable, a while ago,
although the packages were not intended for bookworm. I expected that they will
migrate to testing, once
On 5/11/23 15:11, Oliver Reiche wrote:
Hi,
The source builds the following binary packages:
justbuild - Justbuild generic build system
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/justbuild/
If you look at that
On 4/30/23 20:28, Al Ma wrote:
Hi,
Feed mwe.tex containing
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{pstricks}
\begin{document}
Test
\end{document}
Thanks for the report. The issue seems to have been resolved recently.
Could you look for the line
\pstVerb{0.8 setlinewidth 0 setgray}%default
Control: tags -1 + pending
On 4/13/23 22:18, Dylan Thurston wrote:
Hi,
The file /usr/share/doc/biber.pdf has evidently not been run through
LaTeX enough times: all cross-references show up as '??'.
For any reason we always ignored the
LaTeX Warning: Label(s) may have changed. Rerun to get
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Many thanks for help.
Hilmar
09.04.2023 10:12:36 Sebastian Ramacher :
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
>
> On 2023-04-09 00:29:55 +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
>> On 4/9/23 00:24, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>
On 4/9/23 00:24, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Hi,
You can follow progress on this Bug here: 1034100:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034100.
Attached is the promised debdiff.
Hilmar
--
Testmail
diff -Nru texlive-base-2022.20230122/debian/changelog
Control: tags -1 + pending
On 5/23/18 23:49, Tobias Gruetzmacher wrote:
Hello,
The latex-beamer style "Aachen" isn't usable, since it does
\RequirePackage{tangocolors}
but tangocolors.sty is nowhere to be found...
I've uploaded the package to CTAN, so it will be in TL soon. Tag as
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On 9/21/22 12:21, Bastien Roucariès wrote:
Hi,
A copy of the MIT License is included in this file."
How did you remove the file?
By patching ? Or by repack ?
For this license you need a repack see man uscan
Question was answered a while ago, remove tag moreinfo.
On 7/12/19 09:57, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
Hi
You might try to ask the author to upload it to CTAN, here is a link
to one of the files with an email of the author. When it is on CTAN, it
will enter into TeX Live, and via that finds it
way into Debian ;-)
https://github.com/dgsiegel/latex
Am 06.03.2023 um 15:19 teilte Bernhard Ehlers mit:
Hi Bernhard,
When starting proftpd with default configuration, it complains about
loading the module mod_rewrite.
Fortunately this issue was already known in upstream and I got a patch.
Does the updated package on [1] solve the issue for
Am 06.03.2023 um 15:19 teilte Bernhard Ehlers mit:
Hi,
When starting proftpd with default configuration, it complains about
loading the module mod_rewrite.
Hmm, weird. I'm able to reproduce the issue, but currently I have no
explanation, as all other modules are loaded fine.
H.
The
Control: severity -1 minor
Control: tags -1 + wontfix
Am 06.03.2023 um 15:28 teilte Bernhard Ehlers mit:
Hi Bernhard,
When module mod_memcache is loaded by "LoadModule mod_memcache.c",
the following warning is shown:
2023-03-06 14:22:42,504 7c6d004cf953 proftpd[255]: mod_memcache/0.1:
Am 26.01.2023 um 17:41 teilte Holger Levsen mit:
Hi,
on a system running bookworm and the latest amd64 kernel
/usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_running_kernel warns me that the running kernel
doesnt
match the on-disk kernel, while it *is* running the latest kernel.
(line breaks added for better
The issue is reported against texlive-binaries:
#922500 .
Hilmar
26.02.2023 10:24:20 Gard Spreemann :
>
> Norbert Preining writes:
>
>>> that my user had set. But it still seems like a bug that postinst fails
>>> if the system doesn't have a certain locale. Or maybe I'm viewing this
>>>
On 2/15/23 18:51, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
Hi Frank,
Of course, chdir into /tmp is a bit risky as any file creation
before the next chdir would be susceptible to the same problem, but
I assume you made sure this won't happen.
BTW, when looked at the changes made, I noticed this:
On 2/23/23 14:28, James Addison wrote:
On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 12:53, James Addison wrote:
Hi,
pass: texlive-base (2022.20220605-1) unstable; urgency=low
fail: texlive-base (2022.20220923-2) unstable; urgency=medium
It should be possible to look at the differences between those (and
On 2/21/23 22:00, James Addison wrote:
Hi all,
I'm adding the 'help' tag to this bug, and am cc'ing the debian-tex-maint list,
because it feels like extra brainpower could aid in figuring this one out more
quickly.
A brief recap of this bug so far, for folks reading the list:
* the feynmf
Am 29.01.2023 um 00:00 teilte Frank Heckenbach mit:
Hello Frank,
Package: texlive-pictures
Version: 2020.20210202-3
Severity: grave
File: /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/scripts/epspdf/epspdf.tlu
Classic /tmp write vulnerability: function dir_writable writes to
"/tmp/1" (and if this fails,
reassign 1023391 texlive-fonts-extra-links
reassign 1020492 texlive-fonts-extra-links
merge 1023391 1020492
retitle 1023391 texlive-fonts-extra-links pulls in old Garamond fonts
stop
Am 15.02.2023 um 10:23 teilte Harald Jele mit:
After doing so, the latex compilation shows the same result as a
Am 04.02.2023 um 16:01 teilte Hilmar Preuße mit:
Hi,
Please remove these files any try again.
Is that issue also solved by the patch for Bug#1023391 ?
Hilmar
--
sigfault
Am 15.02.2023 um 00:22 teilte Hilmar Preuße mit:
Hi Harald,
I'm building new packages, which do not depend on fonts-ebgaramond: the
fonts in there are not part of TL any more, so the dep is obsolete. I'll
hand them over for testing ASAP.
Here is the link: https://freeshell.de/~hille42
Am 14.02.2023 um 13:41 teilte Hilmar Preuße mit:
Am 14.02.2023 um 13:29 teilte Jele, Harald mit:
Hi Harald,
removing the fonts-ebgaramond seems not to be a good idea:
apt remove fonts-ebgaramond
would remove almost the whole texlive installation because of it's
dependencies.
Could you
Am 14.02.2023 um 13:29 teilte Jele, Harald mit:
Hi,
removing the fonts-ebgaramond seems not to be a good idea:
apt remove fonts-ebgaramond
would remove almost the whole texlive installation because of it's dependencies.
Could you nevertheless try that step, just to prove that is is the
Am 14.02.2023 um 10:55 teilte Jele, Harald mit:
Hi Harald,
no local fonts are installed anymore and I reproduced this issue again.
I made a reply via reportbug to the bug report #1023391 with a new
tgz, containing all output files of lualatex. One made with a
portable texlive installation
Am 12.02.2023 um 07:54 teilte min sun mit:
Hi,
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/libcommons-collections4-java/
If you look at that link you'll see a few things, which should the
resolved. At least the
Am 06.02.2023 um 22:45 teilte Richard Frith-Macdonald mit:
Hi,
Thanks.
FYI I implemented the suggested change in gnustep-make trunk in the
git repository, after having tried it out with TeXinfo 5 and 6
I guess you meant TeXinfo 6 & 7; TeXinfo 5 is not even in oldstable.
I can't find your
Control: reassign -1 texlive-latex-base
Control: tags -1 pending
Am 06.02.2023 um 06:20 teilte Stéphane Glondu mit:
Le 05/02/2023 à 20:52, Hilmar Preuße a écrit :
Hi,
Today the new texlive-base & texlive-extra did migrate to testing and
hence were upgraded on your system. The texlive-
Am 05.02.2023 um 19:56 teilte Stéphane Glondu mit:
Package: tex-common
Version: 6.18
Severity: serious
Hello,
I got this when upgrading texlive today in testing:
Paramétrage de tex-common (6.18) ...
Running mktexlsr. This may take some time... done.
Running mtxrun --generate. This may take
Am 03.11.2022 um 11:48 teilte Harald Jele mit:
Hi,
when installing texlive-full into debian testing the EB Garamond fonts seem to
be not installed correctly. Not all ligatures are available, the bold face does
not even have a dash ...
I put a minimal example to
Am 22.09.2022 um 09:50 teilte Harald Jele mit:
Hi,
after installing TeX Live 2022/dev/Debian via the texlive-full pkg I had
to recognize, that the font EB Garamond is not well installed. At least
the Bold Font installation is corrupted.
Could you fix this?
For testing this I made an example
Am 07.11.2022 um 12:38 teilte Olivier Berger mit:
Norbert Preining writes:
Hi Olivier,
This can be addressed by explicitely invoking with:
pythontex --interpreter python:python3
Maybe also installing
python-is-python3
or how the package name was.
That's it.
However, the
Am 03.02.2023 um 12:17 teilte Hilmar Preusse mit:
Hi,
The easiest solution is probably to collect the docs from the new
location, specified in d/elpa-transient-doc.docs, but that needs to be
verified.
Probably not the best idea; this way the package becomes incompatible to
TeXinfo 6.8.
Am 03.02.2023 um 14:23 teilte Santiago Vila mit:
Hi Santiago,
The easiest solution is probably to add option "--output=$(package)" to
the makeinfo --html in d/rules, but this needs to be verified.
I confirm that adding --output=$(package) works (and also produces
identical results in
Control: reassign -1 texlive-latex-base
Control: forcemerge -1 1029438
Am 31.01.2023 um 23:50 teilte Santiago Vila mit:
Well, I feared the merge could fail, and yes, it did.
I have not gotten the hang of it.
If you could merge them properly, that would be great.
Thanks a lot.
--
sigfault
Am 30.01.2023 um 21:11 teilte Hilmar Preusse mit:
Hi,
A few days ago I uploaded a new TeX Live snapshot. Since
then the test suite of your package fails to run, see [1].
Interestingly I can run the line from the test script without
any issue:
/usr/bin/pycirkuit -t -p -f
Am 30.01.2023 um 13:57 teilte Hilmar Preuße mit:
Am 30.01.2023 um 13:10 teilte Jan Wagner mit:
Hi,
thanks for confirming.
As I don't have a bookworm system (with running kernel) at hand, I can't
go deeper into debugging this issue until I get hands on it.
I'm able to reproduce
Control: tags -1 + help
Am 29.01.2023 um 00:00 teilte Frank Heckenbach mit:
Hi,
Classic /tmp write vulnerability: function dir_writable writes to
"/tmp/1" (and if this fails, "/tmp/2" etc.) without sufficient
checks.
Harmless demonstration:
% mkfifo /tmp/1
% epspdf /etc/hostname /dev/null
Am 30.01.2023 um 13:10 teilte Jan Wagner mit:
Hi,
thanks for confirming.
As I don't have a bookworm system (with running kernel) at hand, I can't
go deeper into debugging this issue until I get hands on it.
I'm able to reproduce, if that helps.
hille@sid-amd64:~$
Am 30.01.2023 um 06:51 teilte Brendan O'Dea mit:
Hi Brendan,
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 11:46:49PM +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
Version: 7.0-1
Am 28.11.2022 um 23:28 teilte Barak A. Pearlmutter mit:
Yes! That fixes it.
Closing then.
This is still present in the unstable version
Control: affects -1 src:glosstex
Am 21.01.2023 um 16:05 teilte Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) mit:
Hi Danai,
Indeed, I have tested it yesterday too and the scripts now breeze through
without bailing out.
I would like to keep the bug, and will solve it by adding a versioned
build-dependency on Fontforge to ensure it will always build
Am 21.01.2023 um 12:24 teilte Vincent Smeets mit:
Hi,
The command "adequate texlive-latex-extra" reports a broken link.
$ adequate texlive-latex-extra
texlive-latex-extra: broken-symlink
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/pdfx/sRGB_IEC61966-2-1_black_scaled.icc
->
Am 20.01.2023 um 13:06 teilte Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel mit:
Dear Frédéric,
as I'm not able to reproduce the issue (due to different software
constellation on the Desktop): would you be so kind to forward that
issue to upstream by your own? The upstream tracker is on
Am 13.01.2023 um 22:54 teilte Paweł Tomulik mit:
Hi Paweł,
ProFTPD mod_sftp_ldap may be very useful for ProFTPD installations with
virtual users stored in LDAP database together with SSH keys. It enables
the authentication based on these keys stored in LDAP.
The package has been uploaded to
Am 20.12.2022 um 04:08 teilte Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) mit:
Hi,
Sorry, I forgot all about this!
I figured out it was a regression so in Unstable you need to go two
versions back for Fontforge, which will ignore the warnings instead of
halting the process.
I'll be back home on 30 December.
Am 18.01.2023 um 20:29 teilte Bastian Germann mit:
Am 18.01.23 um 20:20 schrieb Hilmar Preuße:
Am 18.01.2023 um 11:52 teilte Bastian Germann mit:
Am 18.01.23 um 11:21 schrieb Hilmar Preuße:
Hi,
Do you have a list of these files or do you know how to generate one?
grep -r licence=cc-by-nc
Am 18.01.2023 um 11:52 teilte Bastian Germann mit:
Am 18.01.23 um 11:21 schrieb Hilmar Preuße:
Hi,
Do you have a list of these files or do you know how to generate one?
grep -r licence=cc-by-nc-sa
This gives a lot of TeX input files should I remove them?
Hilmar
--
sigfault
Am 18.01.2023 um 10:49 teilte Bastian Germann mit:
Hi Bastian,
Many of context's manual files contain licence=cc-by-nc-sa which is a
non-free license (non-commercial).
Please repack to get rid of them.
Do you have a list of these files or do you know how to generate one?
Thanks,
Hilmar
--
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "proftpd-mod-sftp-ldap":
* Package name : proftpd-mod-sftp-ldap
Version : 0.2-1
Upstream contact : TJ Saunders
* URL :
Control: retitle -1 ITP: proftpd-mod-sftp-ldap
Control: reassign -1 wnpp
Am 13.01.2023 um 22:54 teilte Paweł Tomulik mit:
Hi,
ProFTPD mod_sftp_ldap may be very useful for ProFTPD installations with
virtual users stored in LDAP database together with SSH keys. It enables
the authentication
Am 13.01.2023 um 22:54 teilte Paweł Tomulik mit:
Hi Paweł,
ProFTPD mod_sftp_ldap may be very useful for ProFTPD installations with
virtual users stored in LDAP database together with SSH keys. It enables
the authentication based on these keys stored in LDAP.
The upstream project is here:
Control: tags -1 + pending
Am 11.01.2023 um 02:48 teilte Adrian Bunk mit:
Hi,
Your package fails to build with:
|Writing index file glosstex.idx
|(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/hypdoc/hypdoc.sty
|(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/atveryend-ltx.sty)
Am 10.06.2022 um 11:29 teilte Timothy Allen mit:
Dear Timothy,
As I'm sure you know, when the "texinfo" package is installed, it creates
`/usr/share/info/texinfo.info.gz`, and a metadata chunk from the preamble of
that file is merged into `/usr/share/info/dir`.
I've uploaded texinfo 7.0.1-3
Am 06.01.2023 um 12:46 teilte Bastian Germann mit:
Hi,
The non-free Lenna image is stripped from the xtuthesis package via
debian/tpm2deb.cfg.
However, xtuthesis.pdf still contains the image and is actually a
non-source file.
So please exclude it as well.
I've excluded the file (no "git
Am 07.01.2023 um 16:16 teilte Bastian Germann mit:
Hi Bastian,
The NIV has to be represented in d/copyright regardless of having the
"right" wording or not.
You currently do not mention it at all. GFDL-1.3+ (no NIV) is considered
non-free, so please fix this.
I do not mind the lintian override
Am 07.01.2023 um 02:30 teilte Bastian Germann mit:
Am 07.01.23 um 02:27 schrieb Bastian Germann:
Hi,
boilerplate code
boilerplate license text (in @quotation):
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
Am 07.01.2023 um 02:27 teilte Bastian Germann mit:
Hi Bastian,
On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 23:49:43 +0100 Hilmar Preusse wrote:
- "license-problem-gfdl-non-official-text": override and fix.
The GFDL variant has to be GFDL-NIV-1.3+ and the short license text that
you have in d/copyright has to
Control: tags -1 + wontfix
Am 24.12.2022 um 10:27 teilte Joey Schulze mit:
Hi,
I have found an incompatibility between the package colortbl and the
dinbrief documentclass.
The problem sneaked into bullseye and did not exist in buster. It
seems to be still present in bookwork unfortunately
Package: texlive-fonts-extra
Version: 2022.20221123-2
Severity: normal
This is a question, which came up, when working on #1026460.
Things are worse: file(1) /does/ have magic for "TeX virtual font data"
but is *that* weak (only 16 bit, 0xf7 0xca at the start of file) it gets
beaten by the
Am 27.07.2022 um 12:10 teilte Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) mit:
Hi Danai,
is there progress? Did you get response from upstream?
Hilmar
Some observations:
Going back to fontforge version 20201107~dfsg-4 and its dependencies, I
notice the following warning message:
21900/1114292:
Add extrema...
Control: reassign -1 latexml
Am 12.12.2022 um 21:56 teilte Paul Gevers mit:
Hi Paul,
With a recent upload of texlive-extra the autopkgtest of latexml fails
in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of
texlive-extra from unstable. It passes when run with only packages
Control: reasssign -1 latexml
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/brucemiller/LaTeXML/issues/1985
Control: tags -1 + fixed-upstream pending
Am 12.12.2022 um 21:56 teilte Paul Gevers mit:
Hi Paul,
With a recent upload of texlive-extra the autopkgtest of latexml fails
in testing when that
Control: tags -1 + patch pending
Am 12.12.2022 um 10:48 teilte Jakub Wilk mit:
Hi,
Some parts of groff.info make info(1) crash:
$ info groff > /dev/null
corrupted size vs. prev_size
Aborted
Got a prompt patch from upstream, solved in git.
Hilmar
--
sigfault
Am 10.12.2022 um 18:16 teilte Bernhard Übelacker mit:
Hi,
I have seen other packages that added a dependency
to package sse2-support in such cases.
That would not solve the issue, but would make it
visible at installation time for the user,
if I understand it right.
Thanks for the hint. My
Am 30.11.2022 um 07:48 teilte picca mit:
Hello,
I imagine that the zzz1.asy file is my B_b3_y.asy, right ?
Yes, correct.
if so, something must be different between your environment and mine.
I use the latest unstable with ghostscript 10
and you ?
Some here. Pure Debian unstable, w/ gs
Am 29.11.2022 um 10:02 teilte Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel mit:
Hi,
sorry I'm failing to reproduce the issue. For me that command line works:
hille@sid-amd64:~/devel/TeXLive$ asy -config "" -d -render=4 -f png -o
zzz1.png zzz1.asy
hille@sid-amd64:~/devel/TeXLive$ ls -l zzz1.*
-rw-r--r-- 1 hille
Am 28.11.2022 um 15:41 teilte Barak A. Pearlmutter mit:
Hi Barak,
Note the strange characters here that mess up the entry:
$ cat -v /usr/share/info/dir | egrep -2 '[(]emacs[)]'
* Magit: (magit). Using Git from Emacs with Magit.
* With-Editor: (with-editor). Using the
Am 11.07.2022 um 16:16 teilte Petr Nivnický mit:
Hello Petr,
All flags with emblems (with worldflags package https://ctan.org/pkg/
worldflags) are not generated when Czech or Slovak babel are used. Other
languages work. All flags without emblems work even with Czech or Slovak
babel. So, I
Control: reassign -1 gnuplot-doc
Am 24.05.2021 um 01:36 teilte Vincent Lefevre mit:
Hello,
as discussed in that bug the issue seems only to occur w/ gnuplot-doc so
the issue is specific to the gnuplot documentation. Please be so kind to
have a look at the issue.
Hilmar
The info manual says:
Control: tags -1 + wontfix
Am 24.05.2021 um 01:36 teilte Vincent Lefevre mit:
Hi,
As found out the issue is limited to this specific info page and
probably not a bug in info, but in the info page. I tag the bug as
wontfix for now.
Hilmar
The info manual says:
('scroll-backward')
Control: tags -1 + pending patch
Am 14.11.2022 um 11:44 teilte Jakub Wilk mit:
Hi,
This seems to hang forever:
$ LC_ALL=C info python3.10 -n 'Other Language Changes<3>'
Upstream has provided a patch (which solved the issue for me), new
packages for amd64 are here [1]. If you need build
Am 16.11.2022 um 20:16 teilte Alexander Reichle-Schmehl mit:
Hi,
Thanks for the upload!
Just two small remarks:
* I think it would be relatively easy to add autopkgtest to the
package, allowing automatic verification of the functionality.
* Feel free to ping me for additinal
1 - 100 of 1193 matches
Mail list logo