On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 12:56:18PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Hello Holger. I'd like to work on this issue.
>
> My plan is to change "exit 1" to "exit 0" (as proposed) in both
> stretch and buster. If that's not enough I will also add a
> Breaks: debian-security-support (<= 2019.02.02~deb9u1)
control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 10:06:50AM +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Am 08.05.2019 um 15:50 schrieb Holger Levsen:
> > control: tags -1 - moreinfo
> Means this I should upload it now to buster/testing?
well, sorry, I have misread your last emails to this bug
On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 02:06:20PM -0400, Gabriel Filion wrote:
> so in order to unblock things one might want to run:
>
> apt purge debian-security-support
> apt update && apt upgrade
> apt install debian-security-support
thanks for sharing this.
I'll find time for the proper fix eventually -
Hi,
On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 12:43:10AM +0200, Lukas Schwaighofer wrote:
> Andreas Steinel wrote:
> > In version 6.04~git20190206.bf6db5b4+dfsg1-1, the bug that was closed
> > in 6.04~git20171011.af7e95c3+dfsg1-6 is back - at least in the 64-bit
> > UEFI part, legacy works fine:
thanks for the
/seen stretch -> buster upgrade by running
pam-auth-update if needed. Workaround for #920760.
* scripts/pre_remove_40_find_unowned_lib_links:
- Handle --merged-usr environments.
* master-bin/reschedule_piuparts_tests: Do not act on 'bugged/*.log' and
'affected/*.log' b
control: tags -1 - moreinfo
thanks
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 10:43:11AM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2019-04-29, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > It seems to be missing the .buildinfo.N, which in some cases are the
> > actual .buildinfo files built by the buildd's and the corresponding .deb
> > files shipped in the archive.
> >
>
Hi,
please note that https://buildinfos.debian.net/buildinfo-pool/ is
currently being recreated and thus not have all data again yet...
(I've added support for 3 (and more) .buildinfo files with the same
name and noticed that the numbered links were created in the wrong
order, thus the
Hi,
attached is the debdiff for this unblock request.
--
tschau,
Holger
---
holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock debian-edu-doc, it's a documentation only change:
debian-edu-doc (2.10.16) unstable; urgency=medium
* Update Debian Edu Buster and Stretch manuals from the wiki.
*
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 08:14:36PM +, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Package: debian-security-support
> Version: 2019.04.25
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to install
sigh & thanks for filing this bug report!
> I'm not sure whether that's related to #928172 but I'm seeing this on a
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 04:53:16PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> - https://buildinfos.debian.net - this service exist since March 2019
to expand on this:
provides two views:
https://buildinfos.debian.net/ftp-master.debian.org/buildinfo/ - this
has the same contents as /srv/ftp-master.debian.
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 01:51:40PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2019-02-15, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > I've just been re-reading this old and joyful thread... :)
> I come back to it now and then myself... :)
and here we go again...
I'll also kind of top-post now, be
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 01:10:39PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 03:08:49PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > We can tell people to upgrade to the latest point release before upgrading.
> > Every software vendor, not just so-called linux distros, recommen
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 03:08:49PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> We can tell people to upgrade to the latest point release before upgrading.
> Every software vendor, not just so-called linux distros, recommend
> such kind of things.
thats not how Debian works since 20 years...
> As I said in
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 02:27:14PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> This is because debian-security-support in testing is still incompatible
> with base-files in sid, as reported here:
yes, sure...
> Paradoxically, the version in unstable is supposed to fix this.
it does, #927450 is fixed (and
Hi Andreas,
thanks for filing this bug report!
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 01:24:26PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
> 'testing'.
> It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails.
[...]
> dpkg: error: error
this is just a test, please ignore.
On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 08:45:11AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > # justification: this indeed breaks download of youtube videos
> Does this affect stretch (2017.05.18.1-1), too?
yes
--
tschau,
Holger
---
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 03:31:42PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Oh and btw: it still does fail on upgrade for systems which have the
> old base-files and the old d-s-s, namely when apt upgrades base-files
> before.
I think I would prefer a new bug for this. Also suggestions how to fix
package: release-notes
x-debbugs-cc: j...@inutil.org, elb...@debian.org, t...@security.debian.org,
release-no...@packages.debian.org, debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
On Sat, Apr 20, 2019 at 11:07:34PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > Are there other concerns or warnings and
> > should they
control: severity -1 normal
control: retitle -1 debian-security-support needs to be adapted to each new
Debian release
thanks
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 12:34:44AM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> As if I wouldn't have written it before... o.O
talk is cheap, show me the code ;)
> Now all
control: severity -1 serious
# justification: this indeed breaks download of youtube videos
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 12:30:27AM +0530, Joseph Nuthalapati wrote:
> I have to add that not only playlists but playing some individual videos
> also doesn't work.
>
> Maybe this bug should be marked as
Hi Cyril,
On Sat, Apr 20, 2019 at 11:28:23PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > does that also mean that haveged get's installed on the final system if
> > it's deemed to be useful in d-i or is that still missing?
> There's nothing in what I have written (on this bug report or in the
> code I've
On Sat, Apr 20, 2019 at 02:39:49AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> I've tweaked it a little so that we log whether haveged is available,
> and whether it should be started, in case we need to investigate:
>
>
package: voctomix-outcasts
severity: important
x-debbugs-cc: 927...@bugs.debian.org, c...@nextdayvideo.com
Hi Carl,
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 10:45:00AM +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > voctomix-outcasts (0.8.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
> Unblocked.
this is quite yay! (=it will make it into
, which does not exit with error on EOS.
+Closes: #926828.
+ * Recommend gstreamer1.0-alsa for USB microphones. Closes: #926829.
+
+ -- Holger Levsen Thu, 11 Apr 2019 14:18:57 +0200
+
voctomix-outcasts (0.7.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
[ Stefano Rivera ]
diff -Nru voctomix-outcasts
@@
+developers-reference (3.4.24) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * tools.dbk:
+- clarify how to properly choose the debhelper compatibility
+ level. Thanks to Roberto C. Sanchez for the patch. Closes: #466423.
+- also explain to best use a depends like debhelper-compat (=11).
+
+ -- Holger
control: retitle -1 7 DLAs missing from the website (or not)
thanks
Hi Brian,
many thanks for all your fixes on this bug!
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 04:03:25PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> > ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 1130-1
> > ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 719-1
> >
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 09:57:09PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Please go ahead.
thanks, done.
--
tschau,
Holger
---
holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
PGP fingerprint:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 09:14:41PM +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> Unblocked based on #926269, right when you submitted this bug :)
*g* & thank you! :)
--
tschau,
Holger
---
ore robust.
+
+ -- Holger Levsen Tue, 02 Apr 2019 10:54:26 +0200
+
debian-edu-config (2.10.63) unstable; urgency=medium
[ Wolfgang Schweer ]
diff -Nru debian-edu-config-2.10.63/cf3/cf.finalize
debian-edu-config-2.10.64/cf3/cf.finalize
--- debian-edu-config-2.10.63/cf3/cf.finalize 2019-0
On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 01:02:13AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> * definitive reference information. I.e., PROOF.
>("My understanding" is too weak.)
> * Endorsement by DEBCONF active organizer is nice to have as a
>supporting evidence.
I'm "just" a former organizer but I can 100% assure
robocode to security-support-ended.deb8
+
+ [ Salvatore Bonaccorso ]
+ * Mark qtwebengine-opensource-src as limited-support.
+Thanks to Benjamin Barenblat (Closes: #926179)
+
+ -- Holger Levsen Tue, 02 Apr 2019 12:23:47 +0200
+
debian-security-support (2019.02.01) unstable; urgency=medium
(2019.02.02~deb9u1) stretch; urgency=medium
* Team upload.
- * Rebuild for stretch, without d/control changes.
+ * Rebuild for stretch.
+ * Re-add debian/compat and depend on debhelper instead of debhelper-compat.
- -- Antoine Beaupré Fri, 01 Feb 2019 13:17:26 -0500
+ -- Holger Levsen Wed
Hi,
kudos for the progress so far!
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 05:50:26AM -0400, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Just throwing out ideas here but perhaps this binary package could
> contain at least the hashes of the generated files you mention?
or we setup debian-cd builds as well..!
--
tschau,
On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 09:10:00PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Unblocked; thanks.
\o/ & thank you too!
--
tschau,
Holger
---
holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
PGP
On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 10:51:52AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> I'll reply to this with the debdiff as its 53kb xz-compressed (and
> thus too big for the list.)
attached now.
--
tschau,
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package diffoscope, it has been in sid for 26 days without
any regressions reported (compared to 112 in buster currently) and
has been used to compare all unreproducible
package: installation-reports
submitter: Joerg Jaspert
x-debbugs-cc: Joerg Jaspert
On Sat, Mar 09, 2019 at 11:52:23PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> with a UHD screen resolution on a thinkpad, using "Debian GNU/Linux
> buster-DI-alpha5 "Buster" - Official Snapshot amd64 DVD Binary-1
>
leanup_multi-distro-upgrade 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ piuparts-0.98/custom-scripts/scripts-multi-distro-upgrade/post_distupgrade_base_cleanup_multi-distro-upgrade 2019-03-01 11:27:47.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+set -e
+
+# Only while creating the reference chroot.
+test
control: block -1 by 894441
thanks
as outlined in
https://lists.debian.org/<2019030510.i3jcqnku6qhd3...@layer-acht.org>
I ran Chris's script again on coccia, with the result that currently
6084 source packages in the archive need a rebuild for reproducible
builds, as they were built with an
0337f0114a361fb2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wolfgang Schweer
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2019 17:42:08 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Also pull in second level recommends
---
tools/sort_deps | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/sort_deps b/tools/sort_deps
index 8582b90..a7c5049 100755
--- a/to
control: found -1 0.13.0.4-2
control: severity -1 serious
thanks
On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 02:44:02PM +0100, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote:
> Monero protocol will be updated on March the 9th [1].
> The version 0.13 in Debian will cease to work then.
raising the severity, as we surely don't want to
Hi Markus!
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 08:27:11PM +0100, Markus Frosch wrote:
> thanks I just did so, and uploaded a new version.
yay, very cool!
> During testing I noticed the "refactoring" patch actually broke logging,
> and therefor reposync working.
ouch, sorry.
> I fixed it with an
On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 05:09:39PM -0600, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> diff --git a/policy/ch-opersys.rst b/policy/ch-opersys.rst
> index 59c92ec..8276bfe 100644
> --- a/policy/ch-opersys.rst
> +++ b/policy/ch-opersys.rst
> @@ -1040,3 +1040,33 @@ Debian, so this section has been removed.
> activate
Hi Guillem,
thanks for this bug report and X-Debbugs-Cc:ing us!
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 10:53:36PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> The reproducible build state is currently only provided for «testing»,
> because «sid» contains additional checks that are deemed would annoy
> maintainers.
the
hi,
from irc:
| sunweaver: but if you have some spare cycles, maybe you could look
into #918578 ;)
- zwiebelbot- | (#debian-release) Debian#918578: gosa: GOsa web interface
missing password field - https://bugs.debian.org/918578
I have the gosa bug on my radar, but no idea, yet.
I have
control: severity -1 minor
# you said it was a typo...
thanks
--
tschau,
Holger
---
holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A
control: tags -1 - patch
control: retitle -1 31 DLAs missing from the website
thanks
Hi,
due to the work of mostly Antoine and Laura, over 1600 DLAs are now
visible on www.debian.org/lts - this is pretty awesome IMO!
A few are still missing however:
~/Projects/debian-www/webwml$
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 07:37:38PM +, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> Regular users do not need to install this package, it is only
> useful to Debian Contributors.
Debian contributors are regular users too. (And then there are many
contributors who will never use this as they are contributing in
hi Markus,
please adopt yum-utils and get the changes from experiemental into
sid/buster before the freeze is fully in effect. You still have almost a
week to do that! ;)
Also if you do that, please dont forget to include the changes from my
NMU.
If you need any help or advice, please shout!
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 01:51:07PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> > -> this script is incorrect/broken for DLAs it seems, as
> > https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ does list the DLAs 1677-1681,
> > just DLAs 1682-1685 are missing. And they are called DLA-1234 there,
> > not "DLA 1234-1"...
>
Hi Antoine,
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 04:10:47PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> But my little finger tells me there are many DLAs still missing from the
> website. So even if/when the above MR does get merged, more entries will
> be missing. So someone will need to make sure to run the check
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 09:00:52PM +0100, Lars Kruse wrote:
> > I might be naive, but I'm wondering if some debconf dialog to choose at
> > install time might be an option.
> Sounds like a good idea to me.
on irc I commented this:
| sumpfralle: debconf questions are annoying (to get on many
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 03:27:40PM +0100, Michael Prokop wrote:
> Holger, can you still reproduce this with recent versions of
> grml-debootstrap? Otherwise I'd tend to close this bug report. :)
I definitly can reproduce this with the recent stretch version ;)
I cannot speak about newer versions
Hi Jan,
thanks for coming back to this!
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 02:21:10PM +0100, Jan Wagner wrote:
> Am 06.07.13 um 09:23 schrieb David Schmitt:
> > root@testagent:~# /usr/share/munin/plugins/apt_all update 7200 1
> > E: The value 'testing' is invalid for APT::Default-Release as such a
> >
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 04:10:47PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> > can you please put that on wiki.d.o/LTS/Development?!
> This is now done. I added a new section to the wiki
awesome, thank you!
> I've done one more mass import, hopefully the last:
>
Hi Vagrant,
I've just been re-reading this old and joyful thread... :)
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 12:56:20PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> I started the process of uploading all the .buildinfo files available on
> ftp.debian.org to buildinfo.debian.net.
>
> Then I hope to set up a cron job to
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 03:56:41PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> It's true there's a lot of junk in there... I suspect most of the `.pl`
> scripts in there could actually be symlink to the main secteam scripts,
> because they are basically the same.
>
> I also suspect most of the stuff is
Hi Salvatore,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 08:13:18AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> I have the attached patch commited in a local branch, but want first
> to confirm is this the final intended URL to reach the DLAs?
> -return
>
package: security-tracker
x-debbugs-cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
this is a bug to track fixing this small glitch in the new
www.debian.org/lts/security/ area:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 04:26:38PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> >> * Adaptation in the security tracker so the new URL paths
package: www.debian.org
x-debbugs-cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
this is a bug to track fixing this small glitch in the new /lts/security/ area:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 04:26:38PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 03:55:44AM +0100, Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
> >> *
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 04:26:38PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> > I think we want the other DLAs linked from the indexes as well.
> > shall we file a bug to not forget this?
> I looked into this, and couldn't figure it out.
> Please do file a bug for now, I have no idea how to fix this...
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 05:17:27PM +0100, Ansgar wrote:
> More important is the question if the system should /trust/ the keys.
>
> IMHO installing a non-Debian keyring should *not* make the keys trusted
> by APT by default (i.e. with the default answer if debconf is used).
agreed.
>
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 08:06:08AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Is this maybe something which could be reached by funding and
> supporting a paid contributor?
I suppose, so, yes. Of course it depends a bit on the amount of work
needed. And, how feasible is it to develop this without being
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 04:07:10PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> We made the choice to do it like this, because, while disabling PDiffs can
> have some advantages for a small set of users on Packages and Sources files,
> the advantages for Contents files affect an even much smaller set of
Package: apt-file
Version: 3.2.2
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
I don't like (apt's) PDiff feature, so I disable it everywhere. However,
on the few machines/chroots where I like to install apt-file,
/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50apt-file.conf is installed, which set's 'PDiffs
"true";', overwriting
control: severity -1 serious
thanks
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 05:25:50PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> Preparing to unpack .../09-irssi_1.2.0-1_amd64.deb ...
> Unpacking irssi (1.2.0-1) over (1.1.2-1) ...
> dpkg: error processing archive
> /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-9iSR4c/09-irssi_1.2.0-1_amd64.deb
control: severity -1 wishlist
thanks
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 01:14:00PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.19.2
> Severity: important
>
> The above error message is useless. It doesn't tell what needs to be fixed or
> where.
while I agree that the location should
Hi Marc,
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 01:09:37AM +0100, Lars Kruse wrote:
> > # Plugins like "df" require access to /home if that is a separate filesystem
> > ProtectHome=false
> See the other bug report for this issue:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=918851
> We are discussing
package: munin-node
version: 2.0.45-1~bpo9+1
x-debbugs-cc: mat...@debian.org
hi,
(we discussed this problem on irc previously.)
Just got another email:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 05:52:45PM +, mu...@jenkins.debian.net wrote:
> debian.net :: osuosl-build169-amd64.debian.net :: Filesystem
F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C
From 69421aaa3286682fe75bcfea5f7a5388ff058899 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Holger Levsen
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2019 18:10:59 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] add a parapraph linking to
https://jenkins.debian.net/userContent/debian-policy/
Signed-off-by: Holger Levsen
Hi Ola & Brad,
thank you for your quick feedback!
On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 09:27:53PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Here is a little more extensive list of dependencies:
>
> python-certbot (of course as it is the one providing certbot)
> python3-acme (>= 0.26.0~) - not in jessie, available in
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 02:51:45PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> emacs has had a bad history (from piuparts point of view) of providing
> clean upgrade paths to newer versions. All versioned emacs packages were
> co-installable and there were no transitional packages provided ever to
> ensure
Hi Laura,
many many thanks for your work on this, including and especially this
writeup!
some comments below, where I dont say anything I mean 'yay"! :)
On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 03:55:44AM +0100, Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
> * The /lts/security//index.*.html files show the last advisory for
>
On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 02:54:43PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> I can also add that I have looked into this for myself and the number of
> needed dependencies is rather large. So it is not just certbot that need an
> update, we also need to include quite a few other packages too.
how large
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.118
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
gosa-plugin-pwreset (0.99.5-2) has "W: file-without-copyright-information"
for the files COPYING and COPYING.CC-BY-SA-3.0.
impressive-display (0.3.3-1) has "W: file-without-copyright-information"
for the file LICENSE.
Hi Antoine,
On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 02:08:06PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Thanks for working on this.
indeed!
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 01:44:10PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> > On 2018-12-19 18:05:36, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> > > The DLAs are visible here:
> > >
On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 12:44:51PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > we would like to update debian-edu-config in stretch with the following
> Please go ahead, bearing in mind that the window for 9.8 closes this
> weekend.
thanks, uploaded.
--
tschau,
Holger
reassign 919982 debian-cd
thanks
Hi,
AFAICS #919982 was introduced when trying to fix #769589, and then
#919982 has effectivly been closed by
https://salsa.debian.org/images-team/debian-cd/commit/dc48123273092fa011b09a5d1204b055ce40d2a4
though it's not been closed in the BTS yet. (Maybe it
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
we would like to update debian-edu-config in stretch with the following
changes (with the distribution set to stretch obviously), which are all
available in buster since
control: severity -1 important
# this bug doesnt break debian-cd for everyone...
thanks
Hi,
can someone please confirm whether this bug has (not) been fixed in
the d-i alpha5 buster release?!
--
tschüß,
Holger
control: reassign -1 x2goserver
thanks
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 04:22:06PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> control: severity -1 serious
> # x2go-server is now in buster
right, thanks for raising the severity.
> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 10:30:57AM +0100, Wolfgang Schweer wrote:
> > > > If NX do not
Hi Andreas,
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 01:00:13AM +, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Source: emacs
> Version: 1:26.1+1-3.2
> Closes: 916758
> Changes:
> emacs (1:26.1+1-3.2) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
>* Non-maintainer upload.
> .
>* Add more transitional packages for ancient versioned
On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 01:58:04PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> I'm looking at the update process for DLAs on the main website again.
\o/
> In
> #859122, I've mentioned that I have, again, updated the MR to include
> all DLAs up to DLA-1657-1. The www team folks tell me they will review
>
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.124
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
so I uploaded
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1025869/accepted-anarchism-151-8-source-into-unstable/
and had this line in debian/control:
Vcs-Git: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/anarchism.git.git
It would be nice if
Hi intri,
a patch for this for developers reference would be very welcome indeed.
--
tschüß,
Holger
---
holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09
control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
control: retitle -1 "RM: pxz -- ROM ; obsolete"
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 09:52:07PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Package: pxz
>
> Since version 5.2.0 released in 2014 (and shipped in stretch)
> xz also supports -T, which makes me wonder whether there is
> any
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 02:09:19AM +0100, Josh Triplett wrote:
> It's worth documenting things that some packages have gotten wrong
> when the reason why they're wrong isn't obvious and isn't currently
> documented anywhere.
this in mind...
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 12:06:31PM +0100, Josh Triplett
package: piuparts.debian.org
severity: wishlist
x-debbugs-cc: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org,
piuparts-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi Ivo & Niels,
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 06:34:19PM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> > > > currently britney uses piuparts regressions comparing testing vs. sid to
>
Package: strip-nondeterminism
Version: 1.1.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
debian-edu-doc 2.10.11 when tested on tests.r-b.o shows this:
│ │ │ ├── ./usr/share/doc/debian-edu-doc-da/debian-edu-buster-manual.epub
│ │ │ │ ├── bsdtar -tvf {}
│ │ │ │ │ @@ -1,54 +1,54 @@
│ │ │ │ │ drwxr-xr-x 0 0 0
Hi Holger,
On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 01:49:09AM +0100, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > > -Given how easy it is to become a Debian Maintainer, you might want
> > > +Given how easy it is to become a Debian Member, you might want
> > > to only sponsor people who plan to join.
> > to become a Maintainer?
>
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 12:36:31PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 06:28:04PM +, Sean Whitton wrote:
> > Could you provide an actual diff to be applied to policy.git, please?
>
> Sure, what about:?
>
> diff --git a/policy/upgrading-checklist.rst
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 05:05:07PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Policy §5.6.26 permits "-b" only in the case of Vcs-Git:
[...]
> However, Mercurial (ie. "Vcs-Hg") supports this too in its
> equivalent "hg clone" command. This change was triggered via
> #920314 in Lintian.
>
> A simple patch (also
control: reopen -1
control: retitle -1 dev-ref: tech-ctte prefers fresh bug reports with a summary
thanks
On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 12:34:46PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> ISTM that it would be useful to have this in dev-ref, yes. I'm not sure
> whether it should be a reopening or a new bug though
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 04:56:09PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> > which IMO is as good as it is. It also explicitly points to
> > http://www.debian.org/devel/tech-ctte for detailed information.
> At least for Policy bugs referred to the TC, they prefer a fresh bug
> where the first message is a
Moin Holger :)
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 11:59:53PM +0100, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > yes, a patch to fix this would be awesome! Many thanks in advance! :)
> Patch is attached!
wow, that was quick! Many thanks for that!
> In fact, this member/maintainer/developer naming thing is somewhat tricky,
On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 06:17:48AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> I will upload new packages that include the fontspec fixes, as well as
> tighter package coupling. This will fix 2- and most probably also 1-,
thank you for your quick feedback and fixing this!
--
tschüß,
Holger
Hi Holger,
yes, a patch to fix this would be awesome! Many thanks in advance! :)
--
tschüß,
Holger
---
holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09
1101 - 1200 of 6841 matches
Mail list logo
