I can no longer reproduce this in the latest version of dcc-client,
please close this bug.
Thanks,
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273 424795
PGP: C0A7 955E EED6 A309 23D7 863B C76A 26A3 F0DC FCA8
never send mail to: [EMAIL PRO
+9,7 @@
DESC="DCC program interface daemon"
test -f $DAEMON || exit 0
+test -f /etc/default/dcc-client && . /etc/default/dcc-client
set -e
Then all that's needed is OPTIONS="" in /etc/default/dcc-client.
Thanks,
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTE
{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ kernel: BIOS EDD facility v[.0-9]+
[0-9]+-\w{3}-[0-9]+, [0-9]+ devices found$
Thanks for your bug report,
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273 424795
PGP: C0A7 955E EED6 A309 23D7 863B C76A 26A3 F0DC FCA8
never send mail
g"?
This file is from spamassassin, not logcheck-database. I've contacted
the maintainer of spamassassin to try and get all the rules for
spamassassin merged into either spamassassin or logcheck-database. In
the meantime I'm reassigning this to spamassassin.
--
-Jamie L. Penman-
On 22 Feb 2006, at 09:50, martin f krafft wrote:
Please move /etc/logcheck/*/courier to the courier packages and out
of logcheck-database.
What's your reasoning?
-j
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi Martin,
On 22 Feb 2006, at 19:21, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[2006.02.22.2010 +0100]:
On 22 Feb 2006, at 09:50, martin f krafft wrote:
Please move /etc/logcheck/*/courier to the courier packages and out
of logcheck-database.
hanks to su(8) or sudo(8), which
change the user ID. The following example checks the logfiles without
updating the offset and outputs everything to STDOUT.
sudo -u logcheck logcheck -o -t
Thanks,
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273
bug (currently enabled by default)
-- Debian DSPAM Maintainers Maintainer: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Thu, 13 Oct 2005 11:53:46 +
README.Debian.patch
Description: Binary data
Thanks,
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273 424795
PGP: C0A7
and chmod 0640.
Thanks,
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273 424795
PGP: C0A7 955E EED6 A309 23D7 863B C76A 26A3 F0DC FCA8
never send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
write right from
/etc/logcheck/logcheck.*
As far as I can see, the group logcheck has no write privileges over
any file or directory under /etc/logcheck:
$ sudo find /etc/logcheck -perm /g+w
$
Reinstalling the logcheck package should restore the permissions to
their default.
--
-Jamie L
[Note] Starting
crash recovery...
Feb 12 00:51:44 lorien mysqld[9896]: 060212 0:51:44 [Note] Crash
recovery finished.
Feb 12 00:51:45 lorien mysqld[9896]: 060212 0:51:45 [Note] /usr/sbin/
mysqld: ready for connections.
Feb 12 00:51:45 lorien mysqld[9896]: Version: '5.0.18-Debian_7-log
./foo
./foobar11
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/test$ mv bar1.1 bar11
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/test$ run-parts --list .
./bar11
./foo
./foobar11
Therefore, I'm going to reassign this to debianutils.
In the meantime I've modified logcheck to use find instead.
Thanks,
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL P
en the subject will
include Security Events, if there are only System Events, the subject
will be System Events. I don't see how making the subject more
complicated will enhance filtering - users can already filter on
Security Events.
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
done
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo chown root:root /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/postfix
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo -u logcheck logcheck -o -t
Error: Couldn't read /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/postfix.
-j
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273 42479
d I'll not be able to fix this bug in a short
time, but please continue helping me in seeking this ugly bug.
This appears to be fixed in the latest version (0.0.97), you can tag
as fixed / close this bug now.
Thanks,
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t: +44 127
ld
be within the next 1-2 weeks.
Thanks,
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273 424795
PGP: C0A7 955E EED6 A309 23D7 863B C76A 26A3 F0DC FCA8
never send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ntries you gave.
Thanks for your bug report,
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273 424795
PGP: C0A7 955E EED6 A309 23D7 863B C76A 26A3 F0DC FCA8
never send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
This'll be included in the next release.
Thanks for your bug report,
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273 424795
PGP: C0A7 955E EED6 A309 23D7 863B C76A 26A3 F0DC FCA8
never send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP.sig
Description: This
alnum:]-]+\) )?via [.[:alnum:]]+
( unknown lease [.0-9]{7,15}\.)?$
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ dhcpd(-2.2.x|): DHCPACK on [.0-9]
{7,15} to [:[:alnum:]]+ (\([\(\)._[:alnum:]-]+\) )?via [.[:alnum:]]+$
The changes will be included in the next release.
Thanks for your bug report,
--
-Jamie L. P
On 11 Feb 2006, at 11:29, martin f krafft wrote:
I see no reason why /etc/logcheck should have any more permissions
than 0750. Please consider removing access rights from 'other'.
Conversely, I don't see much point in being this restrictive?
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EM
\) +)?\.\.\.
This is far too broad.
The amavisd-new rules are supplied by the amavisd-new package,
therefore I'm reassigning this bug to amavisd-new.
-j
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273 424795
PGP: C0A7 955E EED6 A309 23D7 863
27;ve added them to CVS under
ignore.d.workstation/cron-apt and they'll be included in the next
release.
Thanks for your bug report,
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273 424795
PGP: C0A7 955E EED6 A309 23D7 863B C76A 26A3 F0DC FCA8
ne
Connection from
UDP: \[[.0-9]{7,15}\]:[0-9]{4,5}$
Thanks,
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273 424795
PGP: C0A7 955E EED6 A309 23D7 863B C76A 26A3 F0DC FCA8
never send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 14 Feb 2006, at 08:58, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[2006.02.13.0042 +0100]:
I see no reason why /etc/logcheck should have any more permissions
than 0750. Please consider removing access rights from 'other'.
Conversely,
The dependencies for logcheck are satisfied in stable, so I don't
really see a need for a backport?
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273 424795
PGP: C0A7 955E EED6 A309 23D7 863B C76A 26A3 F0DC FCA8
never send mail to: [EMAI
included in the next release.
Thanks for your bug report,
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273 424795
PGP: C0A7 955E EED6 A309 23D7 863B C76A 26A3 F0DC FCA8
never send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally
On 16 Feb 2006, at 17:04, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, Jamie L. Penman-Smithson wrote:
The dependencies for logcheck are satisfied in stable, so I don't
really see a need for a backport?
It's just a convenience so people don't have to rebuild the
pac
tags 347227 pending
thanks
On 9 Jan 2006, at 15:15, Adam James wrote:
Current ignore.d.server/postfix rules don't match the following:
Jan 9 11:02:41 evolution postfix/smtpd[18938]: initializing the
server-side TLS engine
The regexp below does:
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postfix/smtp
eport,
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273 424795
PGP: C0A7 955E EED6 A309 23D7 863B C76A 26A3 F0DC FCA8
never send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
es you're
trying to ignore with this rule.
Thanks,
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273 424795
PGP: C0A7 955E EED6 A309 23D7 863B C76A 26A3 F0DC FCA8
never send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi there,
On 10 Nov 2005, at 09:04, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
attached
Please can you provide the log messages which should be ignored.
Thanks,
-j
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
/Linux
Updated the following rules to match the output seen on my system.
Can you provide the log messages that should be ignored?
Thanks,
-j
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273 424795
PGP: C0A7 955E EED6 A309 23D7 863B C76A 26A3 F0DC FCA8
x27;ll be fixed in the next release.
Thanks for your bug report,
-j
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273 424795
PGP: C0A7 955E EED6 A309 23D7 863B C76A 26A3 F0DC FCA8
never send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
03:54:43 Hostname input: USB HID v1.00 Keyboard [Chicony
PFU-65 USB Keyboard] on usb-:00:02.0-1.1
Oct 20 03:54:43 Hostname input: USB HID v1.10 Mouse [B16_b_02 USB-PS/2
Optical Mouse] on usb-:00:02.0-1.3
This will be fixed in the next release.
Thanks for your bug report,
--
-Jamie L
tags 309772 wontfix
thanks
On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 15:41 +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> Hi!
> if autossh debug is enabled it logs to syslog, thus the messages go thru
> logcheck, messages are in this form
>
> May 19 14:02:55 sagara autossh[1909]: port set to 0, monitoring disabled
We're not add
On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 16:55 +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 03:08:49PM +0100, Jamie L. Penman-Smithson wrote:
> > We're not adding rules for debug messages. You can still add regexps to
> > filter out these messages to a ignore.d.$LEVEL/local-foobar f
JavaScript required to sign in
The Microsoft Passport Network requires JavaScript to sign in. This
web browser either does not support JavaScript, or scripts are
being blocked.
-----------
Thanks,
-
package logcheck-database
tags 310080 moreinfo
thanks
On Sat, 2005-05-21 at 15:22 +0100, Colm G. Connolly wrote:
> It might be useful to include some rules for the logcheck package so
> certain messages from udev can get ignored.
>
> Something like the attached file might do the trick.
Can you
On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 15:41 +0200, Robbert Muller wrote:
> the file /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/dovecot only contains rules for
> dovecot's imap server, but the rule for dovecots pop3 server are
> missing.
Could you provide some messages for the dovecot pop3 server?
Thanks,
-j
signature.asc
package logcheck-database
retitle 310423 logcheck-database: rules for dovecot are incomplete
tags 310423 pending
thanks
On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 23:11 +0200, Robbert Muller wrote:
> Jamie L. Penman-Smithson wrote:
> > Could you provide some messages for the dovecot pop3 server?
>
> t
package logcheck-database
tags 310080 = pending
severity 307588 wishlist
merge 310080 307588
thanks
[Please ensure you Cc bugs.debian.org in any replies. Quoting full
message because it wasn't.]
On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 09:34 +0100, Colm G. Connolly wrote:
> Jamie L. Penman-Smithson wrote:
On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 09:49 +0200, Enrico Tassi wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 11:47:19PM +0100, Jamie L. Penman-Smithson wrote:
> > LUAY: lua error message:
> > LUAY:/usr/share/freepops/lua/browser.lua:460: bad argument #2 to
> > `setopt' (string expected, got nil)
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 19:06 -0400, John A. Martin wrote:
> Mail sent by logcheck
>
> ,
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cron Daemon)
> Subject: Cron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>if [ -x /usr/sbin/logcheck ]; then
> nice -n10 /usr/sbin/logcheck; fi
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 18:02:09
reopen 309845
thanks
On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 23:47 +0100, Jamie L. Penman-Smithson wrote:
> Starting on Wednesday freepops has been unable to collect mail from any
> Hotmail accounts. I've verified that the accounts are still active and
> that the username/passwords are correct,
Hi John,
> Mail sent by logcheck
>
> ,
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cron Daemon)
> Subject: Cron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>if [ -x /usr/sbin/logcheck ]; then
> nice -n10 /usr/sbin/logcheck; fi
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 18:02:09 -0400 (EDT)
>
> egrep: Invalid content of \{\}
tags 300888 pending
thanks
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 17:37 +0100, Sythos wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 04:01:45PM +0000, Jamie L. Penman-Smithson wrote:
> > > logcheck-database contain postgrey ignore file, but postgrey first
> > > attempt is listed in logcheck report
> &
package logcheck-database
tags 303128 moreinfo
thanks
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 18:34 -0400, Douglas F. Calvert wrote:
> Thank you for adding rules for procmail/postfix. I am still seeing a number
> of messages that I do not wish to see and I can not figure out the
> appropriate regexp.
> The relv
package logcheck-database
tags 303176 pending
thanks
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 10:33 +0200, Stephan Niemz wrote:
> When upgrading bind9 from version 1:9.2.5-1 to 1:9.3.1-2, the syslog
> messages of the type
>
> Apr 4 07:49:37 gauss named[2179]: received notify for zone '127.in-addr.arpa'
>
> have c
package logcheck-database
tags 297995 pending
thanks!
On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 21:16 +, Lee Maguire wrote:
> The following supressable messages are reported by logcheck
> (workstation) when an iPod shuffle is inserted (with a udev
> rule to create /dev/ipod ) which is essentially just a USB
> sto
On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 19:12 -0400, Douglas F. Calvert wrote:
> For some reason the files provided by amavis and spamassassin are not in my
> logcheck directory. This is a little off topic but is
> there an easy way to restore these files with some apt/dpkg-foo without
> blowing away my other set
package logcheck-database
tags 295352 pending
thanks
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 15:54 +0900, SATOH Fumiyasu wrote:
> Futhermore, I want to use '.' and '_' for module name in rsyncd.conf.
>
> --- /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/rsync.dist2005-01-24 11:37:31.0
> +0900
> +++ /etc/logcheck/igno
package logcheck-database
tags 302678 pending
thanks
On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 09:40 +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
> The pattern you added in version 1.2.37:
>
> ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ dnsmasq\[[[:digit:]]+\]: reading
> /etc/(run/dnsmasq/)?resolv.conf$
>
> is obviously not equivalent to the
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 15:29 +0100, Sythos wrote:
> logcheck-database contain postgrey ignore file, but postgrey first
> attempt is listed in logcheck report
Can you provide the log messages that are not caught please?
--
-jamie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | spamtrap: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w: http://www.sil
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 14:57 -0400, Marc Sherman wrote:
> Jamie L. Penman-Smithson wrote:
> > Since there is an open bug about this filed against spamassassin, I'm
> > not sure this should be included with logcheck. This is a temporary
> > issue which will [hopefully] be
tags 307588 pending
thanks
On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 13:59 +1000, Martin Schwenke wrote:
> The patterns for udev are a bit too strict. In particular, they don't
> match this sort of thing:
>
> May 4 12:10:34 localhost udev[5851]: configured rule in
> '/etc/udev/rules.d/udev.rules[59]' applied, '
On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 00:12 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > Now logcheck doesn't usually allo for the @ in logs which results in
> > bascially no ignore line matching. Please add @ to the regexes, thanks.
>
> ~/src/logcheck/rulefiles/linux$ egrep
package logcheck-database
tags 307675 pending
thanks
> Logcheck reports statistical bind information:
> May 4 18:07:16 blacksheep named[474]: NSTATS 1115222836 1115061480 A=4881
> NS=1 PTR=144 =3499 AXFR=4
>
> Please add this to ignore.d.server/bind:
> ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ nam
On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 19:44 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Wed, 04 May 2005, Jamie L. Penman-Smithson wrote:
> > > > Now logcheck doesn't usually allo for the @ in logs which results in
> > > > bascially no ignore line matching. Please add @ to the regexes,
package logcheck
tags 308249 pending
thanks
On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 17:07 -0700, Rob Leslie wrote:
> logcheck uses the value of $FQDN before it has been read from the config
> file, and thus any setting there is ignored.
I've fixed this in CVS. Thanks for your bug report.
--
-Jami
x27;, 'foo', 'bar',
'HASH(0x814cc20)') called at ./test line 22
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273 424795
PGP: C0A7 955E EED6 A309 23D7 863B C76A 26A3 F0DC FCA8
never send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
otate
/etc/init.d/inn2 reload > /dev/null
endscript
}
[..] (etc. etc.)
..would be good. At least then the log files wouldn't grow to
astronomical size.
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273 424795
PGP: C0A7 955E EED6
d log
messages for the latest version?
Thanks,
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273 424795
PGP: C0A7 955E EED6 A309 23D7 863B C76A 26A3 F0DC FCA8
never send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ached.
Thanks,
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273 424795
PGP: C0A7 955E EED6 A309 23D7 863B C76A 26A3 F0DC FCA8
never send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
execve("./check_smtp", ["./check_smtp", "-H", "smtp.pinklemon.
not known \(-2\) \[pop_init.c:1196\]$
If there are any further messages that should be ignored, let us know.
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273 424795
PGP: C0A7 955E EED6 A309 23D7 863B C76A 26A3 F0DC FCA8
never send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTE
package logcheck-database
tags 305350 pending
thanks
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 10:54 -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Consider:
> ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postfix/smtpd\[[0-9]+\]: TLS connection
> established (to|from) [^[:space:]]+: (TLSv1|SSLv[23]) with cipher
> [^[:space:]]+ \([/0-9]+ bits\
reassign 305707 courier-imap-ssl
thanks
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 17:33 +0200, kiu wrote:
> Since a few days (courier update?) i get logchecks warnings:
> 2005-04-21 17:02 System Events
> Apr 21 16:03:18 blacksheep imapd-ssl: 1 active connections.
>
> Please ignore these messages...
Rules for couri
package: amule
version: 1.2.6+rc8-3
severity: grave
justification: renders package unusable
aMule crashes upon startup:
Initialising aMule
Userhash loaded: EDE156D7A00E803562DBB3BFD5CD6F79
*** UDP socket at 4665
*** reading servers
Loading temp files from /home/jps/.aMule/Temp.
Loading 001.part.m
package: xmms-xmmplayer
version: 0.3.3-1
severity: wishlist
It would be nice if xmmplayer had an option to keep the mplayer window
'on top'. Since mplayer already has the -ontop command line option, this
is probably pretty simple to implement:
-ontop Makes the player window stay on top o
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 22:10 -0400, Steve Gran wrote:
> ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ nagios: EXTERNAL COMMAND:
> PROCESS_SERVICE_CHECK_RESULT
>
> (although that may be too broad)
Can you provide the log messages that this matches?
Thanks,
--
-jamie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | spamtrap: [EMAIL
package logcheck-database
tags 306695 pending
thanks!
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 10:25 -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Jamie L. Penman-Smithson said:
> > On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 22:10 -0400, Steve Gran wrote:
> > > ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ nagios
package logcheck
tags 306815 wontfix
thanks
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 13:21 -0400, Marc Sherman wrote:
> Please add this rule to /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/spamd:
>
> ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ spamd\[[0-9]+\]: Parsing of undecoded
> UTF-8 will give garbage when decoding entities at
> /usr
On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 08:34 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> Attached is another entry that suppresses the adjustment messages
> ntpd\[[0-9]+\]: peer .* now (in)?valid
Already fixed in CVS.
> ntpd\[[0-9]+\]: adjust time server .* offset
> ntpd\[[0-9]+\]: adjusting local clock by [0-9.]+s$
Please
package logcheck-database
tags 303661 pending
thanks
On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 21:07 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > > ntpd\[[0-9]+\]: adjust time server .* offset
> > > ntpd\[[0-9]+\]: adjusting local clock by [0-
package: dcc-client
version: 1.2.74-2
severity: normal
The dangers of running daemons as root are well known, so I won't repeat
them here.
It'd be good if dccifd ran as another user (dcc perhaps?) instead of
root, by default.
-j
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message pa
On Sun, 2005-05-01 at 14:29 +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> Can you be more specific about what you mean? Here, /etc/init.d/dcc-client
> contains the option --chuid dcc:dcc, so I'm not sure why you're running
> it as root.
Yes, it contains the option --chuid dcc:dcc:
start-stop-daemon --start --qu
On Sun, 2005-05-01 at 20:58 +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> j wrote:
> > However, it doesn't actually work for some reason:
>
> That's very strange. It works fine here, even through sudo.
> Three questions:
> 1. Do you have a dcc user and a dcc group, shown by "id dcc"?
uid=119(dcc) gid=111(dcc) groups=11
package logcheck
severity 311216 important
tags 311216 = pending
thanks
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 14:28 -0400, John A. Martin wrote:
> >>>>> "Jamie" == Jamie L Penman-Smithson
> >>>>> "Re: Bug#311216: logcheck: mails "egrep: Invalid co
uot;Starting Postfix Mail Statistics: $NAME"
-start-stop-daemon -S -q -b -p $PID_FILE -x $DAEMON -- -l $MAIL_LOG
-d --daemon_rrd=$RRD_DIR $IGNORE_OPTION
+start-stop-daemon -S -q -b -p $PID_FILE -x $DAEMON -- -l $MAIL_LOG
-d --daemon_rrd=$RRD_DIR $OPTIONS $IGNORE_OPTION
echo "."
tags 312597 pending
thanks
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 14:34 +0930, Clytie Siddall wrote:
> The Vietnamese translation for debconf: logcheck
> translated and submitted by: Clytie Siddall,
Thanks, I've added this to CVS.
-j
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
tags 312598 pending
thanks
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 14:35 +0930, Clytie Siddall wrote:
> While translating the file logcheck, I encountered the following
> typo, which I thought you might like to eliminate in a future release.
> From version 1.1.1-8, logcheck supports run-parts controled rule
>
package logcheck-database
tags 312729 pending
thanks
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 22:30 +0100, Lee Maguire wrote:
> Everytime a sucessful ssh login occurs a line such as the following is
> sent:
I've modified the rule in CVS, it now matches the messages you supplied:
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+
package logcheck-database
tags 313601 pending
thanks
On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 15:20 +0100, Dave Love wrote:
> These are the subject of an am-utils FAQ
> http://www.am-utils.org/docs/am-utils/FAQ.txt> and would be
> useful in the ignored list. Note that it's either `newer' or `older'.
>
> Jun 14 14:
package logcheck
tags 314951 wontfix
thanks
On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 17:44 +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:# su -s /bin/bash -c "/usr/sbin/logcheck" logcheck
> >/dev/null
> hostname: Unknown host
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:# echo $?
> 0
This is a problem with your system, not logcheck. You n
package logcheck
severity 315250 normal
merge 315071 315250
thanks
On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 15:56 +0300, Noam Rathaus wrote:
> During installation the following is returned:
> Setting up logcheck (1.2.39) ...
> gpasswd: unknown user adm
> adduser: `/usr/bin/gpasswd -M root,adm,daemon,logcheck adm' re
PGDATA
/etc/postgresql/postmaster.conf no longer exists. Thus attempting to run
anything under the postgres user results in:
/home/postgres/.bash_profile: line 1: /etc/postgresql/postmaster.conf:
No such file or directory
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t: +44 1273 424795;
package logcheck
reassign 316618 hddtemp
retitle 316618 hddtemp: logcheck rules do not ignore drive sleeping messages
thanks
On Sat, 2005-07-02 at 15:22 +0200, Rainer Zocholl wrote:
> >Jul 2 09:25:51 data hddtemp[15424]: /dev/hda: IBM-DJNA-351520: 43 C
> >Jul 2 09:25:51 data hddtemp[15424]: /de
00:24:04 lorien freepopsd: DBG(popserver.c, 172):
Jul 4 00:24:04 lorien freepopsd: [6861] -> +OK ANSWER FOLLOW
Jul 4 00:24:04 lorien freepopsd: DBG(popserver.c, 172):
Immediately after this freepops crashes. The output of strace is
attached.
If there is any further information that would b
package logcheck
tags 334415 pending
thanks
Thanks, your translation will be included in the next release.
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273 424795
PGP: C0A7 955E EED6 A309 23D7 863B C76A 26A3 F0DC FCA8
never send mail to: [EMAIL PRO
eport, this will be fixed in the next release.
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273 424795
PGP: C0A7 955E EED6 A309 23D7 863B C76A 26A3 F0DC FCA8
never send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
> Oct 21 13:02:07 localhost spamd[5468]: spamd: connection from localhost
> [127.0.0.1] at port 56544
Thanks for your bug report, this will be fixed in the next release.
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273 424795
PGP: C0A7 955E EED6 A309
tags 334042 moreinfo
thanks
[Quoted from private reply, submitter requested that log messages were
kept private.]
On Sat, 2005-10-15 at 09:31 +0200, Paul van der Holst wrote:
> My server runs all stuff, also a mailserver (qmail + vpopmail etc). When I
> receive the update thru mail, it is full wi
[0-9]+ bytes.$
Thanks for your bug report. The rules you suggested will be included in
the next release.
Thanks,
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273 424795
PGP: C0A7 955E EED6 A309 23D7 863B C76A 26A3 F0DC FCA8
never send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTE
the log messages from mon which are being included in
logcheck reports?
Thanks,
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273 424795
PGP: C0A7 955E EED6 A309 23D7 863B C76A 26A3 F0DC FCA8
never send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Thi
mon:
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ mon\[[0-9]+\]: client command "list
failures"$
I didn't include the messages given on reload, since logcheck doesn't
suppress startup/shutdown messages.
Thanks for your bug report,
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
written when upgrading.
Thanks for your bug report,
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273 424795
PGP: C0A7 955E EED6 A309 23D7 863B C76A 26A3 F0DC FCA8
never send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ethod=(PLAIN|LOGIN|(CRAM|DIGEST)-MD5),
rip=(:::)?[.[:digit:]]+, lip=(:::)?[.[:digit:]]+(, TLS)?$
It'll be included in the next release.
Thanks,
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273 424795
PGP: C0A7 955E EED6 A309 23D7 863B C76A 26A3
digit:]]+(, TLS)?$
Thanks,
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273 424795
PGP: C0A7 955E EED6 A309 23D7 863B C76A 26A3 F0DC FCA8
never send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
the next release.
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273 424795
PGP: C0A7 955E EED6 A309 23D7 863B C76A 26A3 F0DC FCA8
never send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
be:
> [0-9a-f.:]+
Thanks for catching that, my only excuse is that I was falling asleep at
the keyboard at the time..
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273 424795
PGP: C0A7 955E EED6 A309 23D7 863B C76A 26A3 F0DC FCA8
never send mail to: [EMA
hosts
> without working reverse DNS.
Thanks for the patch, it'll be included in the next release.
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273 424795
PGP: C0A7 955E EED6 A309 23D7 863B C76A 26A3 F0DC FCA8
never send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 171 matches
Mail list logo
