I'll get an updated build done soon including this patch after I've
investigated further.
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Lars Ellenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> tag 294231 patch
> thanks.
>
> the patch given in
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=294231#5
> is incorrect, imho.
will continue to try and find a fix.
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Jeremy Bouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll have to investigate further to see if upstream has issued any bug fix
> patches for this or determine if there was an incompatible API changes made.
>
>
>
I'll have to investigate further to see if upstream has issued any bug fix
patches for this or determine if there was an incompatible API changes made.
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Simon McVittie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Package: python-
No I do not agree that it should be orphaned. I am currently in the middle
of finishing a basement redesign to build out an office so my computers are
currently offline. Dust and servers don't mix unless you want to make costly
server repairs.
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Thomas Viehmann <[EMA
ad as soon as
I verify it's contents and am satisfied to upload it.
Jeremy
On 1/31/07, Vincent Bernat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OoO Vers la fin de l'après-midi du mardi 19 décembre 2006, vers 16:54,
"Jeremy Bouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> I am working on 2
Time would have been better spent on translations for acidBASE rather than
acidLAB which has a dead upstream and is near removal from the archive.
On 1/21/07, Miroslav Kure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Package: acidlab
Severity: wishlist
Tags: l10n, patch
Hi,
in attachement there is Czech (cs.
Don't waste your time and energy on acidLAB... spend it on acidBASE... the
new package actually being managed upstream.
On 1/20/07, Bjørn Steensrud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Package: acidlab
Severity: wishlist
Tags: l10n patch
Attached is the nb.po file for ACIDlab debconf.
Regards,
Bjørn
+1.
Regards,
Jeremy
On 12/12/06, Jeremy Bouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'll take a look at it... As soon as I have time to get everything on my
network set back up I'll be getting packages current. Unless there's major
bugs in the current version in testing/etch I don&#x
I'll look at it and try to get it done ASAP. I still have not got my full
devel environment back since moving cross-country and starting a new job.
On 12/13/06, Vincent Bernat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi !
Still I needed 1.6.4, I have packaged it. I attached the debian
directory to this mess
I'll take a look at it... As soon as I have time to get everything on my
network set back up I'll be getting packages current. Unless there's major
bugs in the current version in testing/etch I don't expect it until after
it's released.
Jeremy
On 12/12/06, Vincent Bernat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
That's fine if a the one maintaining it has all the time in the world to
maintain a forked branch as each new upstream release would have then be
evaluated against the Debian patched version.
On 12/12/06, Daniel Rodriguez Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
As part of the open/free/peacef
Well known issue for ... oh the past year or two IIRC... It's why I haven't
done anything with any PEAR packages in almost 2 years now... file away the
bug and it will sit until the PHP license changes.
On 12/5/06, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Package: php-image-canvas
Version: 0.2.
It was the PHP License itself that was the problem and unless it's been
revised to deal with the issues that had already been brought up to the PHP
group's attention it will remain one... I'll look but as far as I know it
hadn't been dealt with as it was requiring a license revision and then the
P
I'll have to re-visit Image_Color then from Pear to see if the PHP group has
resolved the licensing issues that was keeping it from being packaged
previously.
On 11/29/06, Igor Tamara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Package: php-image-canvas
Version: 0.2.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders pa
I will look at getting it packaged ASAP. My time is limited at the moment with jobs that pay so I'll get to this when I have time.On 9/18/06, Vincent Bernat
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Hi !Paramiko
1.6.2 is out since one month. Does it solve the problem withbzr.dev ? Can the package be updated ?Th
tags 383885 +wontfixthanksAs I've said in the documentation that mentions this init.d script, and the reason it is not installed in /etc/init.d by default, is that since there is no way to know what each administrator will name their firewall script there is no way to create a one-size-fits-all
in
Go ahead and NMU with my thanks and blessing... I've made my move cross-country but my system at home is still without network connectivity at this time and the telco has been unable to give me anything close to a firm ETA of when they will.
Regards,JeremyOn 7/17/06, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTEC
Very good call then and makes sense... Maybe once I've finished moving and have my computers set back up at my new location cross-country I'll get to dealing with stuff that is currently being neglected. Note I'm sending this from my Gmail account as my systems are offline and unavailable till ever
18 matches
Mail list logo
