On 7/16/2017 4:24 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Have you seen multiple crashes with a warning logged referring to the
same file (fs/dcache.c)? Or do you see different filenames or messages
every time?
I honestly don't recall and grepping through my syslogs indicates that I
don't have any
Yes, I can confirm it does work now. I upgraded one of my unstable
systems with a wireless bridge about a week ago, and it is negotiating
with my AP properly.
On 10/15/2016 04:57 PM, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:
Hi!
Reading this bug and the investigation Jesse posted, looks like what
Seven months later
The key issue was the fact that simply using the "pre-up iw dev wlan0
set 4addr on" command wasn't enough because of the race issue. Whatever
you end up doing, make sure to account for that.
Your solution sounds reasonable given the concerns you described with
Package: bridge-utils
Version: 1.5-9
Severity: wishlist
I currently have a successful 802.11 wireless bridge setup, but I have a
problem which I feel is best resolved within the bridge-utils package.
In order to support ethernet bridging over 802.11 wifi networks, the wlan
interface must be
Package: wpasupplicant
Version: 2.3-2.3
Severity: important
Please update wpa_supplicant and tools from upstream. It has some important bug
fixes.
The current version (2.3) won't EAPOL authenticate properly when the interface
is being bridged. The means bridges wifi/802.11 and bridged ethernet
Package: isc-dhcp-server
Version: 4.3.3-8
Severity: important
New/fresh DHCPd installation with a new basic config.
Upon trying to start, this shows up in syslogs:
dhcpd[758]: Can't open lease database /var/lib/dhcp/dhcpd.leases: No such file
or directory
This looks like a duplicate of bug
Ondřej
Lately you have been taking care of the courier packages on Debian, and
I thank you for that.
May I bring your attention to a particular bug which is both causing me
great grief and is trivial to fix?
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=728747
All that needs to
Package: openssh-server
Version: 1:6.7p1-6
Severity: normal
Since yesterday I have been experimenting with strange sshd_config behavior.
After testing extensively, I believe that comment lines are somehow breaking my
configuration.
My sshd_config is below:
--
# Package generated
Just to be clear, user baduser is in group users.
I'm still testing. I'm not sure that this is a comment issue so much as
the interpreter is just breaking due to something else. It seems to die
after the GatewayPorts no line. Any additional configuration lines
seem to cause the client to not
Now this is weird and interesting...
If I change the AllowGroups root users line to AllowGroups root users
baduser, everything works as expected.
Note that user baduser is in both groups baduser and users.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
FYI this bug also affects the ssl variants of courier-mta and
courier-pop as well:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=728747
I had this problem myself.
On 1/2/15 13:32, Robert wrote:
Am 2015-01-02 um 21:20 schrieb Jeremy Stanley:
I encountered the same thing on a
Package: clamav-freshclam
Version: 0.98.5~rc1+dfsg-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Fails on start. I imagine this wasn't tested?
Setting up clamav-freshclam (0.98.5~rc1+dfsg-3) ...
[] Starting ClamAV virus database updater: freshclamERROR: This tool
requires
like a simple oversight.
On 11/13/14 4:25, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 2014-11-13 01:16:25 [-0700], Jesse Molina wrote:
Severity: grave
I would downgrade it to important. Scott?
Fails on start. I imagine this wasn't tested?
You imagine wrong. But this case in particular wasn't
Package: courier-mta
Version: 0.68.2-1
Followup-For: Bug #728747
I believe that I am experiencing this same bug, but am not completely sure.
I just set up an new host on an OpenVZ container, and I don't have access to
the boot console messages, so I don't know if Courier-MTA and my other
Disregard my original comments regarding the dm-raid45 thing. That was
just a wrong hunch, as the same module info is in both initrd images and
so it is unlikely to be the cause.
I am less inclined to think this is a bug in mdadm, though I agree that
this will probably get re-assigned to
Correct, this is mdraid, not dmraid. There is no dmraid on this host.
As for bug 678696, this could be a timeout issue, but I I don't know. I
will keep it in mind.
I will go play with it here for an hour and then let you know what I
think...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
I added rootdelay=5 and the host booted normally. It's just a timing issue.
It looks like 3.10 is just taking too long.
FYI this hardware is a standard PC motherboard and five ST3500630AS
SATA150 disks for the root part. I also have an older PC here with
three disks which I was able to
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.113
Severity: serious
Justification: unbootable
I rebooted a system today on linux-image-3.10-1-amd64 and it was unable to boot.
linux-image-3.2.0-x-amd64 works fine. A initrd.img-3.2.0-4-amd64 file was
generated at the same time the 3.10 one was crated and
it
should be...
Why it is not being loaded, I don't know yet.
Jesse Molina wrote:
The initramfs file /conf/modules says dm-raid45, but I suspect it should say
dm-raid456. I suspect this typo is causing the module to not be loaded, causing boot
to fail, but I have not verified this yet. I
I have reproduced this problem on a second host. I still don't know the
cause yet. I don't have a lot of time to play with this right now.
FYI, this is what is printed on the console during bootup, just before
it drops into the busybox shell:
modprobe: module dm-raid45 not found in
. But I guess this is expected given the above strace :-)
Hope this helps resolving the issue.
Regrds,
Uli
--
# Jesse Molina
# Mail = je...@opendreams.net
# Page = page-je...@opendreams.net
# Cell = 1.602.323.7608
# Web = http://www.opendreams.net/jesse/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
for a process running as your user,
try killing it, and see if things magically start to work again. If so,
that could be your problem.
--
# Jesse Molina
# Mail = je...@opendreams.net
# Page = page-je...@opendreams.net
# Cell = 1.602.323.7608
# Web = http://www.opendreams.net/jesse
with libgamin0 (0.1.10-4).
I'm running wheezy/testing on my machine.
--
# Jesse Molina
# Mail = je...@opendreams.net
# Page = page-je...@opendreams.net
# Cell = 1.602.323.7608
# Web = http://www.opendreams.net/jesse/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
Package: cacti
Version: 0.8.7i-3
Severity: important
Hi
Here is another wonderful Cacti and PHP 5.4 problem: You can't log to syslog
or the php poller breaks with the following:
PHP Fatal error: Call to undefined function define_syslog_variables() in
/usr/share/cacti/site/lib/functions.php
--
# Jesse Molina
# Mail = je...@opendreams.net
# Page = page-je...@opendreams.net
# Cell = 1.602.323.7608
# Web = http://www.opendreams.net/jesse/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Unfortunately, I can not help test. I am relocating my home and have
packed my camera away. I had uninstalled the package completely anyway.
Peter Howard wrote:
On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 19:32 -0700, Jesse Molina wrote:
Package: zoneminder
Version: 1.25.0-1
Severity: normal
Upgrade attempt
or $BINDIR which doesn't begin with / - which is a safe way to
avoid relative paths.
--
# Jesse Molina
# Mail = je...@opendreams.net
# Page = page-je...@opendreams.net
# Cell = 1.602.323.7608
# Web = http://www.opendreams.net/jesse/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ
Just doing a meetoo here and saying that the removal of the suhosin
patch on php5 is not a good thing for me, though I now understand why it
was removed, thanks to this bug filing. I was thrilled when it was
included by default the first time around.
thanks
--
# Jesse Molina
# Mail = je
a problem until something in rkhunter changed fairly
recently.
Thanks. Go ahead and close out.
Julien Valroff wrote:
Le mardi 31 janv. 2012 à 09:02:59 (+0100 CET), Jesse Molina a écrit :
Sorry for slow reply.
--echo $PATH
~/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin
Package: zoneminder
Version: 1.25.0-1
Severity: normal
Upgrade attempt failed badly.
Looks like you are assuming the user has permissions which it does not have.
Very little local modification has occured here.
Setting up zoneminder (1.25.0-1) ...
Installing new version of config file
/games:/home/julien/scripts:/home/julien/bin
rkhunter then complains as it only accepts bin directories beginning with /
to avoid any relative paths being used.
--
# Jesse Molina
# Mail = je...@opendreams.net
# Page = page-je...@opendreams.net
# Cell = 1.602.323.7608
# Web = http
Package: rkhunter
Version: 1.3.8-10
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When doing sudo rkhunter --propupd, error;
Invalid BINDIR configuration option: Invalid directory found: ~/bin
Both the user and root user have ~/bin in their $PATH, which seems to trigger
the issue.
--egrep -v ^# /lib/udev/rules.d/19-ifrename.rules
SUBSYSTEM==net, ACTION==add, IMPORT=/sbin/ifrename -u -i %k,
NAME:=$env{INTERFACE}
--
This appears to be the only IMPORT used in all of /lib/udev/rules.d
which does not specify the type, which I think needs to be program.
IMPORT{program}=
Fixed by downgrading to udev_172-1 and libudev0_172-1 (amd64), which
were the previously installed version here.
--sudo dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/udev_172-1_amd64.deb
/var/cache/apt/archives/libudev0_172-1_amd64.deb
Sample config being used:
--egrep -v ^#
this by yourself.
--
# Jesse Molina
# Mail = je...@opendreams.net
# Page = page-je...@opendreams.net
# Cell = 1.602.323.7608
# Web = http://www.opendreams.net/jesse/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
Package: udev
Version: 175-2
Severity: normal
Upon upgrade and reboot, udev is no longer naming network interfaces correctly.
This resulted in the loss of connectivity to a remote host. No manual
configuration changes to the udev ruled had occured in some time.
Below is output from a second
Package: mt-st
Version: 1.1-4
Severity: normal
Option stshowoptions is in the man page, but not available in the
application.
Usage example:
mt -f /dev/st0 stshowoptions
mt: unknown command stshowoptions
usage: mt [-v] [--version] [-h] [ -f device ] command [ count ]
commands: weof, wset,
Package: zoneminder
Version: 1.24.4-1+b2
Severity: important
Zoneminder upgrade failure;
Setting up zoneminder (1.24.4-1+b2) ...
Configuration file `/etc/zm/zm.conf'
== Modified (by you or by a script) since installation.
== Package distributor has shipped an updated version.
What would
Package: fail2ban
Version: 0.8.4+svn20110323-1
Followup-For: Bug #554162
Meetoo. Same issue. I've been getting hits on my smtp and IMAP ports lately,
so added some couriermta/imap rules. Unfortunately, fail2ban trainwrecks about
half the time when starting.
Hoping this get fixed, or there
Package: courier-ssl
Version: 0.66.1-1+b1
Severity: minor
File: /usr/bin/couriertls
Tags: upstream
TLS_CACHEFILE and TLS_CACHESIZE are not in the courierlts man page. Looks like
upstream bug because I don't see it on the courier website docs either.
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
Package: tmux
Version: 1.4-8
Severity: important
I found that redirecting stdout or stderr in any way can cause tmux to hang.
Per the developer, this is some bug in epoll.
Examples to reproduce;
tmux info /dev/null
tmux has-session -t whatever 2 /dev/null
It's the second example above that
Package: alsa-base
Version: 1.0.23+dfsg-4
Followup-For: Bug #622381
Gigabyte model GA-MA790FXT-UD5P here. Onboard audio is broken now after
update. I get the impression this is the same issue.
user@host--sudo alsactl init
Unknown hardware: HDA-Intel Realtek ALC889A
grub-install
--
# Jesse Molina
# Mail = je...@opendreams.net
# Page = page-je...@opendreams.net
# Cell = 1.602.323.7608
# Web = http://www.opendreams.net/jesse/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
Package: grub
Severity: normal
Hi. This might be a wishlist item since I don't know what the
official status is on raid5 support. At the very least this is
an FYI to other users.
I wanted to test out the worthiness of raid5 support with grub
since I had heard that it had been added awhile
Package: apt-listbugs
Version: 0.1.3
Severity: important
apt-listbug barfs up exit 10 and fails. Here's the tail-end of my apt-get
dist-upgrade attempt;
1729 upgraded, 84 newly installed, 17 to remove and 2 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/2,301MB of archives.
After this operation, 113MB of
Package: screen
Version: 4.0.3-14
Severity: normal
Hi. This is addition is just for documentation reasons.
If you are looking for a good screen alternative to works great with screen,
look into the tmux package. tmux works in a very similar manner to screen,
and it works great with su/sudo.
Package: courier-base
Version: 0.64.2-1
Severity: normal
This is just a MeToo.
See bug # 560238 for additional info on this issue.
Note that to fix, rebooting is necessary.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem (SMP
I was attempting to incentivize the re-allocation of your time, in the
event of any lack of interest.
It was worth a shot anyway.
Mike Hommey wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:20:46PM -0700, Jesse Molina wrote:
Package: iceape
Version: 1.1.17-2
Severity: wishlist
New upstream Seamonkey
Package: iceape
Version: 1.1.17-2
Severity: wishlist
New upstream Seamonkey 2.0 is out as of today. Please see what you can do to
bring to Debian.
I'll bribe anyone $250.00 USD who can upload an Iceape 2.0 before November 6th.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
Package: fetchyahoo
Version: 2.12.4-1
Severity: important
Package fetchyahoo has had critical new upstream versions for months but I
don't think anyone is working on the package. May be orphaned.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux
upgraded since the days of an early 2.0 kernel. I have a lots of
little issues like this.
Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Monday 19 January 2009, Jesse Molina wrote:
The first vhost found in a system is the default vhost that will be
used if nothing else matches. However, given the current
Package: apache2.2-common
Version: 2.2.11-2
Severity: normal
Hi
The first vhost found in a system is the default vhost that will be used if
nothing else matches. However, given the current apache2.conf file, the
default is not the default at all.
u...@host--grep -v ^#.* apache2.conf | grep
in a
similar manner than dhatz has described.
mdadm version is 2.6.7 on Debian unstable -- same segfault behavior, but
with a few additional errors related to a small amount of array
corruption. An older version of mdadm brought it back up so that I
could reconstruct and fsck.
--
# Jesse Molina
Package: cacti
Version: 0.8.7b-2.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello
Upon upgrading Cacti today, I am stuck with a dead Cacti.
Main page simply says;
Parse error: syntax error, unexpected T_STATIC, expecting T_OLD_FUNCTION or
T_FUNCTION or T_VAR or '}' in
Confirmed that downgrading to adodb libphp-adodb_4.93a-1.1_all.deb fixes
the problem.
It would seem to me that this is not the first, second, or even third
time that I have needed to downgrade adodb in relation to Cacti.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
you have anything in /etc/cacti/debian.php besides the database
credentials
- have you made any other change to the cacti source
- do you have any config changes to your php installation
thanks,
sean
On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 00:12 -0700, Jesse Molina wrote:
Package: cacti
Version: 0.8.7b
Package: syslog-ng
Version: 2.0.9-3
Followup-For: Bug #492363
This is just a metoo. There is no way this was tested before it went out.
Stupid mistake, easily fixed. Replace /sbin/syslog-ng with /usr/sbin/syslog-ng
in the init script.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
Package: cacti
Version: 0.8.7b-1
Severity: normal
During an upgrade today, pressing D for diff while inspecting this config file
does nothing;
Configuration file `/etc/cacti/debian.php'
== File on system created by you or by a script.
== File also in package provided by package maintainer.
Package: ntp
Version: 1:4.2.4p4+dfsg-3
Severity: normal
The ntp.conf man file does not explain options iburst and dynamic, in the
following line taken from the defaults;
server 0.debian.pool.ntp.org iburst dynamic
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.91c
Followup-For: Bug #450762
This bug is confirmed. I decided to test out using root=LABEL=foobie and
that fails miserably during boot time.
I am using lilo as the boot loader, and software RAID5 for the root fs.
-- Package-specific info:
--
Package: courier-mta
Version: 0.57.0-1
Severity: important
Upon an upgrade of courier-mta today, it overwrote my esmtp PAM file without
asking!
During installation, the following line was displayed;
Installing new version of config file /etc/pam.d/esmtp ...
Too bad I already had a customized
fairly sure it did happen.
I'll try to reproduce later this week when I can take some downtime.
Thanks for the quick response. Not all maintainers are so mindful of
their packages.
Stefan Hornburg (Racke) wrote:
Jesse Molina wrote:
Package: courier-mta
Version: 0.57.0-1
Severity
Package: fetchyahoo
Version: 2.10.8-1
Followup-For: Bug #440140
Me too.
Maintainer needs to fix this bug or orphan this package. Fetchyahoo is now
totally unusable due to this bug.
It's been 90+ days now since this has been broken.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Package owner, Chris Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED], appears to have abandoned
package fetchyahoo. It needs a new maintainer.
Fetchyahoo has been unusable for over 90 days and mail is no longer being
picked up for those who use this package. There have been two
Package: mailutils
Version: 1:1.1+dfsg1-3.1
Severity: important
I'm closing bug #430166 from the courier-mta package and opening a bug under
mailutils, since this appears to be a mailutils problem rather than a courier
problem. Courier-mta has a sendmail-like substitute, but it is working
.
--
# Jesse Molina
# Mail = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Page = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Cell = 1.602.323.7608
# Web = http://www.opendreams.net/jesse/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Thanks for following the wild goose chase!
Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Jesse Molina ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
This bug is squirrelly enough that I'm not terribly interested in following
it any longer. Let's just close this and forget it ever happened. There
is a simple workaround anyway
from the server itself
with smbclient: smbclient -U shara //localhost/share ?
There *should* be something in the logs, if something wrong happens
--
# Jesse Molina
# Mail = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Page = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Cell = 1.602.323.7608
# Web = http://www.opendreams.net/jesse
it is executable?
Thanks,
--
# Jesse Molina
# Mail = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Page = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Cell = 1.602.323.7608
# Web = http://www.opendreams.net/jesse/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
via a WinXP system, which failed, and then shortly
thereafter shut samba down.
Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Jesse Molina ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hi Christian
I apologize for not responding sooner. I never got your reply due to
Deb Bug#389475, which caused my mail server to reject messages
no files.
Jesse Molina wrote:
This does not seem to be the case;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]ls /usr/bin/freshclam
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 65K Jun 21 07:07 /usr/bin/freshclam
Double-check;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]test -x /usr/bin/freshclam
[~]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]echo $?
0
I have no idea how I borked this all
system, and a remote SMB mount
from another Linux host fails as soon as I upgrade -- while other shares
continue to work just fine.
Got any other ideas? I'm stumped -- that's why I opened the bug. =)
Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Jesse Molina ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Attached are logs. Please
see how if it is, and
how it goes when it is executable?
Thanks,
--
# Jesse Molina
# Mail = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Page = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Cell = 1.602.323.7608
# Web = http://www.opendreams.net/jesse/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
Password:
+ DAEMON=/usr/bin/freshclam
+ NAME=freshclam
+ DESC='ClamAV virus database updater'
+ '[' -x /usr/bin/freshclam ']'
+ exit 0
--
# Jesse Molina
# Mail = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Page = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Cell = 1.602.323.7608
# Web = http://www.opendreams.net/jesse/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
= no
force group = samba
nt acl support = yes
--
--
# Jesse Molina
# Mail = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Page = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Cell = 1.602.323.7608
# Web = http://www.opendreams.net/jesse/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
/FAQ
/usr/share/doc/clamav-freshclam/BUGS
/usr/share/doc/clamav-freshclam/AUTHORS.gz
[~]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Jesse Molina said:
Hello Stephen
I apologize for not responding sooner. I never got your reply due to
Bug#389475, which caused my mail
Package: courier-mta
Version: 0.53.3-6
Severity: important
/usr/bin/mail, part of the mailutils package, can't send mail when invoked from
the root user if courier-mta is the local MTA. A nearly identical system using
exim has no problem. Sending mail in this was as a non-root user has no
didn't
notice this until someone complained that mail to me was being rejected with a
550 User Unknown error message.
I lost mail because of this. That's bad.
--
# Jesse Molina
# Mail = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Page = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Cell = 1.602.323.7608
# Web = http://www.opendreams.net
Package: clamav-freshclam
Version: 0.90.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When installing new clamav-freshclam, I get the following;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]sudo dpkg --configure -a
Setting up clamav-freshclam (0.90.3-1) ...
Replacing config file /etc/cron.d/clamav-freshclam
Package: samba
Version: 3.0.25a-2
Severity: important
If a share is named share, as given in the example below, it doesn't work!
Debugging isn't helpful and testparm says it's valid.
Simply renaming the share to anything else, such as myshare, ashare, or
arrggg-whered-my-share-go,
_check_stripe parameter is no longer multiplied by number of
stripes.
--
This bug may be closed.
--
# Jesse Molina
# Mail = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Page = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Cell = 1.602.323.7608
# Web = http://www.opendreams.net/jesse/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Package: lvm2
Version: 2.02.06-3
Severity: important
I'm having a problem getting a Debian system from Linux kernel 2.4 to 2.6 due
to LVM. On the 2.4 kernel/LVM1, the VGs and LVs work fine, mount up, and show
absolutely no sign of any problem. However, I can't get the 2.6 kernel/LVM2 to
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-3-686
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Due to initrd-tools being removed from unstable, this kernel line is no longer
installable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500,
This problem is at my end. For a reason that I've not yet determined, I
have some old stale manfiles hanging around from the previously purged
lvm10 package.
This bug may be closed.
Patrick Caulfield wrote:
Jesse Molina wrote:
Package: lvm10
Version: 1:1.0.8-12
Severity: normal
Hi
Package: initrd-tools
Version: 0.1.84.1
Followup-For: Bug #272079
Here I am, six months later, having the same bug when a fix is clearly
available but the maintainers don't want to implement it.
My situation is completely legit. I have LVM compiled in but need an initrd
for a SATA card, and
Package: lvm10
Version: 1:1.0.8-12
Severity: normal
Hi
When passing options -f or --file to vgcfgbackup, I get an error;
vgcfgbackup: invalid option -- f
The man page says that this is a valid option. Not sure if the man page is out
of date, or there is something wrong with this tool.
--
/broken-cacti.png (This
is a png-image. Use firefox in order to view it, IE doesn't open it
properly).
Any idea what's wrong here?
Regards,
Gunther
--
# Jesse Molina
# Mail = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Page = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Cell = 1.602.323.7608
# Web = http://www.opendreams.net/jesse
I attempted to reproduce this problem on another Cacti system of the
same version level, but on a Red Hat system which used the FC3 rpm from
the Cacti website for installation.
I was not able to reproduce the problem that I am having with my Debian
Cacti implementation.
--
# Jesse
Package: cacti
Version: 0.8.6h-2
Severity: normal
Hi
I have a Linksys managed switch (SRW2016) being polled by Cacti. The
switch provides port descriptions under IF-MIB::ifAlias, and I wanted to
change my graph titles to display the new descriptions that I had added
to the switch.
I am using
on this bug.
however, please continue to cc this bug address with any
pertininent info, as others will likely come across it if
they have the same problem. when the issue is opened
with upstream i can tag it upstream as well.
sean
--
# Jesse Molina
# Mail = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Page
Package: cacti
Version: 0.8.6g-3
Severity: grave
Justification: n
After the last upgrade of Cacti, the /etc/cacti/debian.php was replaced
with default/null values. This caused polling to stop and data for five
days was lost for my install.
During the upgrade, I recall being prompted about the
Package: initrd-tools
Version: 0.1.84
Followup-For: Bug #272079
Hi
This bug is bugging me too. I fixed similar to what Eto Yasuo did.
I've got LVM1 compiled into the kernel. The only reason that I need an
initrd is because of a lame Promise SATA controler that I need to boot
off of. My root
Package: spamassassin
Version: 3.1.0a-1
Followup-For: Bug #333134
Hi!
I'm doing a me-too. Same problem. I've got syslog messages complaining
about this perlmod being missing.
Output is below;
Oct 13 12:28:30 shoebox spamd[20076]: Can't locate Sys/Hostname/Long.pm
in @INC (@INC contains: lib
, but I wanted to be sure to bug
under my distro first. Should you or I pursue the issue
with the maintainers?
Thanks for your attention
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 01:36:28PM -0500, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Jesse Molina ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: samba
Version: 3.0.14a-3
Severity
Package: samba
Version: 3.0.14a-3
Severity: normal
Hi
A host which I administrate over is writing to log files
/var/log/samba/log.smdb and /var/log/samba/log.nmdb, despite the
following configuration parameters being set;
syslog only = yes
syslog = 1
The expected behavior is
, Jesse Molina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am interested in taking over the Debian Cacti package from it's
current maintainer and may peruse that here in the next week (after this
Holiday stuff). It seems as though he doesn't have time any
longer for this package. It's been awhile since it's been
96 matches
Mail list logo
