"which".
If not then please reword it "so it at least passes a third grader's
grammar test!" Thanks!
Most of this was written by a native US person, so I don't think that
it's that bad.
Adding "which" would make it longer, contradictory with the previous
request.
ices the problem and takes some
action if desired, rather than potentially go unnoticed for a long time.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
2016-01-10 22:54 Miguel Figueiredo:
Package: aptitude
Version: n/a
Tags: l10n, patch
Severity: wishlist
Updated Portuguese translation for aptitude's program messages.
Feel free to use it.
Applied + commited, thanks!
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
2016-01-10 21:36 GMT+00:00 Julian Andres Klode <j...@debian.org>:
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 07:01:45PM +0000, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 - unreproducible
>>
>>
>> @ APT deities: could you please have a look at the bug report and tel
< 1.1 had this behaviour, >= 1.1
should still cry loudly about the one broken repo, but update the
others just fine"
So I guess that this is a satisfactory resolution, closing now.
Please reopen if you still experience a problem related with this.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Mont
, en_GB.UTF-8 and konsole or
xterm, these characters simply show as a question mark '?' (the name of
the developer) and '®' (for "Registered (R)") in my system.
How/when does the errors show, when viewing the package information
screen, or with other operations?
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez
in the options anyway
(aptitude::UI::Package-Header-Format, from the Options menu, command
line or config file), e.g. to remove the program name or version if you
don't want it shown.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
fy the different maintainers so they can take a look to this
report and see if it's a known problem and discuss whether we can try to
fix it.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
Control: tags -1 + pending
Hi,
2012-06-03 16:35 Michael Prokop:
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.6.7-1
Severity: normal
aptitude changelog command returns with exit code 0 when
encountering problems:
Thanks for the report. Fixed now, marking as +pending.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
of reported minor issues permit...
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=764299
Summary: For all of the above, marking as +wontfix and closing.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
formed about all of this and follows upstream development closer. I
just wanted to chime in because he might be busy and not reply for a
few days, and specially to explain that moving to 3.4 might not be
straightforward.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
release, so please disregard this package.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
hours, it seems to stabilise a bit after that.
Version 2.9 was released a few weeks after this last message as
promised, and fixes the problem, so it would be extra nice to have the
new version!
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
Control: tags -1 + fixed-upstream
2016-01-03 13:35 GMT+00:00 Nico Golde <n...@ngolde.de>:
>> On 03 Jan 2016, at 12:30, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
>> <manuel.montez...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> It would be very nice to get this fixed, it's getting up to 800
e, similar to --with-recommends but for already installed packages.
$ aptitude install '!~i~RRecommends:texlive-full'
(Install the packages recommended by texlive-full which are not already
installed -- harmless to omit the '!~i', but generates some errors)
Hope that helps.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez
can do about this... and the operations on aptitude's user config file
was already improved lately.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
d
remove the dash package.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
nge fixed this
problem without this bug being closed.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
nfo.
Looks like a problem with Boost, and I've been checking in its BTS and:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794622
The AMD K6 is an i585, or at least not a fully compatible i686, if I
recall correctly.
I've pinged the maintainers of the x32 port to see if they go ahead with
the NMU (pushing a release with that patch included). I am not sure if
we can do much more about it from aptitude's side.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
it up in a logfile from this morning).
I think the the behaviour of aptitude with candidate releases was
suboptimal compared to a few years ago, but improved since then,
including in the more recent 0.7.* series.
Did you observe this behaviour lately?
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
rt in many other places, not only with the "changelog" operation --
which is a minuscule part of aptitude. But one never knows, so it would
be good to pin-point which library or code-path is causing this.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
Even if the underlying issue wasn't
fixed while this bug report stayed behind not closed (which is what I
think that it happened), I don't think that there's much that we can do
by now to guess what the original maintainer had in mind.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
one that I indicated in every
step, and the candidate version was correctly shown.
Can you still see this happening, and if so please provide a concrete
example?
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
ce this is just days short of 6 years old, and I don't see it being
addressed any time soon even if somebody does think that it would be
positive to implement it, so I am marking as +wontfix and closing for
the reasons stated above.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
principle you can forget about ogre-1.8 for the purpose
of reproducible builds.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
... and thanks to you!
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
ess we are in freeze before releases, or the changes upstream are
not relevant for Debian/Linux).
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
debian or ubuntu, so I don't know how to report this
the right way, so I am sending this as an email to libsdl debian
maintainers.
SDL upstream already has fixed the bug, so it would be nice to see it
fixed in the debian/ubuntu/etc realm.
Regards.
--
O.S.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manu
> I've just filed a patch fixing this upstream:
>
> https://bugzilla.libsdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3214
>
> And thought you would want to know.
Thanks, Hans.
I was told that they plan to do a release soon, hopefully this patch
arrives in time for that.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
gest conflict-type
relation first:
Conflicts
Breaks
Replaces
Provides
All the above sound sensible suggestions.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
rming the operation.
There are still other warnings/errors complaining about the lack of home
dir for configuration, but I think that they are present for years.
josch asked me to drop a line about this, closing the bug, but I'd
better leave the latter to you.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
many processes to perform various tasks, and spawning
processes as root is always dangerous (and circumventing that to use
lower priviledges means quite a lot of work).
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
:
This is just a "vote" for this wishlist bug, since it seems to have
been forgotten. I think most users would want this behavior.
This has been implemented now, it will be present in the next release.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
g towards a +wontfix, leaving it open for
further consideration.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
report.
What's your opinion, Marc?
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
2015-12-12 15:42 Götz Hoffart:
On Sat, 12 Dec 2015 15:17:10 + "Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo"
<manuel.montez...@gmail.com> wrote:
Control: tags -1 + unreproducible moreinfo help
Hi Goetz,
2012-01-06 23:02 Goetz Hoffart:
>Package: aptitude
>Version: 0.6.3-3.2+sque
n revision
or as new upstream), so marking as +pending.
@Axel: if you are reading this and it becomes critical in the next few
days, when I might be slow to react, you can release at least a
Debian revision with the patch -- I think that it is safe.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez
OK for me (I suppose that also for Alberto, if he doesn't reply).
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
noticed any similar problem.
Does it still continue to happen in your system?
If yes, can you test if it still happens with apt 1.1 recently uploaded
to unstable?
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
libapt and that now this
problem is not present (there's still the warning reported in #806595).
Can we close this? If OK, please close directly when replying.
(Could be merged, but I don't think that merging them adds any value).
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
many other people also use it and
don't remember having seen other reports like that.
I also tried within tmux (TERM=screen, as in the system/session where
you reported this).
I wonder if it's something specific about that program, or locales.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
ine::Ignore-Trust-Violations set and true
return true
else if ::CmdLine::Ignore-Trust-Violations set and false
return false
else
// ... continue with the prompt
But I don't know if it would have some harmful consequences, like
people/automatic-software already setting it to false, and relying on
current behaviour to continue with the prompt anyway.
Adding yet another option is always an option (pun maybe
intended)... but I am a bit concerned of the proliferation of options
(in fact this option is basically just an alias of
APT::Get::AllowUnauthenticated, so completely unneded in the first place
-- unless it predated apt's).
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
tation, I wonder if it
ever worked.
It is fixed now, will be present in the next release, so marking as
+pending.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
e matching the pattern in question.
from the old:
If one or more s are present, then aptitude will begin its
search at these patterns; that is, the first package in the chain it
prints will be a package matching the pattern in question.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
suggestions of
the resolver, I never use them by default and very rarely played
with them though:
http://aptitude.alioth.debian.org/doc/en/ch02s03s04.html
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
t the
modifications to the resolver should not be guided by facilitating
downgrades, they should first and foremost support well the everyday and
recommended actions -- good support from downgrades is far behind in the
list of priorities.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
close all your bug reports
with this "excuse", but basically the most likely cause is the state of
the system at that point (and the fact that lincity-ng had broken
depends).
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
-gstreamer are not in unstable now), but
if you continue to have a similar set-up it would be quicker / more
reliable to confirm if the behaviour it's still happening as you saw it
in the past.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
Extra
apt-pkg/orderlist.cc: // Important Required Standard Optional Extra
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <m...@debian.org>
again,
deps are enough reason to explain why it's installed or broken, I
guess; and if we don't change that there is less chance of
breakages/complaints because of Con #1.
At the moment I think that the main concern is addressed, so marking as
+pending.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
quivalently,
firing up the interactive resolver and asking texlive-fonts-extra to
remain uninstalled).
Maybe it's indeed a bug in the resolver, but it's quite difficult to
test that scenario right now. Have you seen the behaviour lately with
this or other packages?
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
s nobody was
interested in implementing this or even seconding it, it doesn't make
sense to keep it indefinitely gathering dust.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
;, or "U" in curses, it should downgrade
to the version in unstable. (There are some bugs with the "upgrade"
part though, that I am trying to address now, so I ).
Package: *
Pin: release o=Debian,a=unstable
Pin-Priority: 1001
Regarding the warning, it does tell you in the command
.
$
Additionally, "U" in interactive aptitude doesn't do anything as well.
Thanks for the report.
I commited a fix to VCS and all of the modalities of upgrades now work
with this. Will be present in the next release, so marking as +pending.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <
in /etc/apt/preferences -
Package: *
Pin: release a=experimental
Pin-Priority: 100
However downgrading remains impossible
Thanks for this report.
The fix was commited for VCS and will be present in the next release,
marking as +pending.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
ot sure what was going on there.
I made some tests with several other packages, esp. of these cases that
I mentioned (required like gcc-5-base, and virtual) and everything seems
to work fine now.
Maybe the underlying problem was fixed without this bug being closed.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A.
n one place out of two as it seems: only for the command line
interface. And indeed, if I do the same from the command line on Sid,
it works as expected, at least in Sid: "aptitude changelog
redmine=2.5.1-2\~bpo70+2" works fine.
Now merged code and works in both, marking as +pending.
Cheer
, or often, or
only happened once?
Maybe in your case there was something that needed to be written to the
package states on disk, or happened after some files from apt or debtags
had changed on disk and thought that its own states needed some changes,
etc.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez
what you ask with "-o" -- that seems to be the long-standing bug
#587671 and its duplicates, so merging.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
Control: severity -1 minor
2015-12-06 1:04 GMT+00:00 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jida...@jidanni.org>:
>>>>>> "MAFM" == Manuel A Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> writes:
>
> MAFM> dependencies, it decides to
orming an
action like "purge ~c" too often (which suggests that one actually
doesn't care anymore about any cruft left behind), and too often also
wants asks for confirmation to not do anything, it is a possible
alternative.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
like the "purge
~c" -> "aptitude -y purge ~c".
Either that or pressing a single Enter in the relatively rare occasions
when nothing needs to be done, doesn't look terribly inconvenient to me.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
that the output of the versions option is broken and misleading.
Thanks for the report. This is now fixed and will be present in the
next release, marking as +pending.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
ivileges, to avoid failing with the operation.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
ull upgrade" of all packages because of incompatibility of versions in
the different suites that are into the mix.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
2015-12-04 2:24 GMT+00:00 Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org>:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 12:02:39 +0000, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>> Package: dpkg-dev
>> Version: 1.18.3
>> Severity: wishlist
>
>> When I want to generate a dummy
2015-12-03 15:41 GMT+00:00 Badalisc <badali...@thewayofunix.org>:
> On 2015-12-03 02:01, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>>
>> I am fixing this by forbidding to use non-graphic characters (so,
>> excluding control and spaces). I think that it's a reasonab
t a suggestion, of course.
I thought about that, but I think that starting to user usertags would
mean some extra effort, even if not much, and I feel that I spend
already too many hours in the BTS :-/
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
to this in the recent years/versions. Some parts
of the resolver were changed a lot in those years, esp. in the run up to
0.6.
Have you experienced the same behaviour since, or did it only happen
during that time?
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
, and in general I haven't observed this behaviour about wanting
to remove recommended packages of packages on hold in the last few
years.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
ing as +pending.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
am fixing this by forbidding to use non-graphic characters (so,
excluding control and spaces). I think that it's a reasonable
requirement for "tags".
Marking as +pending, will be present in the next release.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
, etc)?
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
years, probably in the run up to aptitude
0.6.
(in curses)
1) removing gawk
2) podget depends on "gawk (>= 4.0.0) | mawk (>= 1.3.0)"
3) installing podget doesn't pull in gawk, it is happy with mawk
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
gt;= 4.0.0) | mawk (>= 1.3.0)"
3) installing podget doesn't pull in gawk, it is happy with mawk
If you can still see this issue, could you please provide a reproducible
case?
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
gs that are currently
under consideration" (so they are easier to find, and if browser
sessions go to waste, as sometimes happened, I still can know in which
ones I was looking at among the several hundreds of other bugs).
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
Hi,
2015-12-01 16:40 Axel Beckert:
Control: block -1 by 32877
Hi,
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>It would be satisfying if that command would have 1 parameter only instead of
>long command not easy to remember:
>sudo apt-get -o Dpkg::Options::="--force-confmiss"
rstandably after a decade) no
reply for 2 months to clarify those questions.
Please reopen if you can provide more information.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
if that command would have 1 parameter only instead of
long command not easy to remember:
sudo apt-get -o Dpkg::Options::="--force-confmiss" install --reinstall
Isn't this more or less the same?
aptitude purge ${pkg}; aptitude install ${pkg}
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <
show the architecture for the "native"/primary one.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
e
Have you seen this problem with the recent updates?
I saw that apt made changes related to this in the last few versions
(1.1~exp* and after moving to unstable).
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
do it for all languages of the guide where this applies,
not only English
* do not forget updates for the "text-mode figures" (alternative text
for the images), not only the changes to the menu keybindings but also
the other text/visuals that change
Then they will be updated.
Cheers.
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.18.3
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
When I want to generate a dummy build-essential package with equivs, I get this:
dpkg-gencontrol: warning: unknown information field 'Build-Essential' in input
data in package's section of control info file
Yet, the official
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.75
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream
Hi,
--help says:
--second-stage-target=DIRRun second stage in a subdirectory instead of
root
(can be used to create a foreign chroot)
(requires
r --second-stage nor --foreign are mentioned.
--
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
se.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
to investigate this bug report by now.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
at which the package is
now, and which options could be taken (some of them will solve this
particular problem, but will break other things).
Same as above, perhaps including the current version (although it's
already printed in the solutions offered) and the current planned action
would h
.
Need to get 66.0 kB of archives. After unpacking 9,216 B will be used.
Note: Using 'Download Only' mode, no other actions will be performed.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?] n
Abort.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
Sorry, I somehow missed this reply...
2015-11-07 23:39 Axel Beckert:
Hi,
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>This has been discussed just recently on the Aptitude mailing list:
>
>http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/aptitude-devel/2012-December/003251.html
>
>It's curre
s is dpkg, debconf or programs
called by them, not aptitude itself. So I am afraid that we cannot do
anything about this.
Also, staring a new shell doesn't work on a remote machine: "No terminal, and
no DISPLAY set, can't fork
shell."
This doesn't come from aptitude either.
for the package display doesn't shwo
anything from packages only available locally. 'now' would be useful and
coherent at this point.
Thanks for the suggestion, this has been implemented and will be present
in the next release, marking as +pending.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
don't have any alternative, like "source" or "origin").
Unless we start to use unusual characters or multiple letters, I am not
sure if this is possible to implement.
It needs more consideration, thus the +moreinfo.
[1] http://aptitude.alioth.debian.org/doc/en/ch02s05s01.ht
[1] http://aptitude.alioth.debian.org/doc/en/ch02s05s01.html
"Placing a question mark (?) between the % and the character
identifying the escape causes the column's “basic” width to vary
depending on its content. Note that the resulting columns might not
line up vertically!"
Cheers.
--
Manuel A.
ut this is probably a candiate for closure as well, because after more
than a decade without "seconds" or attempts to implement it, I simply
don't think that it's very useful to keep around.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
to mess with
this hairy area of column formatting any time soon.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
n unimplemented feature.
So implemented now, and marked as +pending.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
other-tag
This has been requested in:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=498442
... I implemented it in this way now, please see that bug report for
more explanations.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
1001 - 1100 of 2047 matches
Mail list logo
