Bug#812108: [PATCH] problem upgrading from offlineimap 6.3.4 to 6.6.1

2016-03-09 Thread Nicolas Sebrecht
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 10:11:54PM +0100, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: > Comments follow. I think the current logic is uselessly complex > > -- %< -- > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Sebrecht <nicolas.s-...@laposte.net> > --- > offlineimap/folder/Maildir.py | 7 +++ &

Bug#812108: [PATCH] problem upgrading from offlineimap 6.3.4 to 6.6.1

2016-03-06 Thread Nicolas Sebrecht
o my mind > is to accept both FMD5 values as valid. > > If anyone has any better idea, I would be happy to try and implement it. Comments follow. I think the current logic is uselessly complex -- %< -- Signed-off-by: Nicolas Sebrecht <nicolas.s-...@laposte.net> --- offlin

Bug#812108: problem upgrading from offlineimap 6.3.4 to 6.6.1

2016-03-06 Thread Nicolas Sebrecht
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 09:32:47PM +0200, Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote: > I sent the pull request[1]. > I successfully did a migration from version 6.3.4 to 6.6.1. > Please review and/or test. Reviewed and applied. Thank you. -- Nicolas Sebrecht

Bug#812108: problem upgrading from offlineimap 6.3.4 to 6.6.1

2016-03-04 Thread Nicolas Sebrecht
> hence, we will make sure that they have read the blog-post and made a > backup. Good! > I will update the patch and send a pull request (hopefully by the weekend). Thank you for working on this Ilias! -- Nicolas Sebrecht

Bug#812108: problem upgrading from offlineimap 6.3.4 to 6.6.1

2016-03-04 Thread Nicolas Sebrecht
On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 09:50:16AM +0100, franc...@avalenn.eu wrote: > On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 07:29:02PM +0100, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: > > I guess this might be confusing or make bad things (including data loss) > > if applied on mails that has moved from a folder to anot

Bug#812108: problem upgrading from offlineimap 6.3.4 to 6.6.1

2016-02-28 Thread Nicolas Sebrecht
plied on mails that has moved from a folder to another one without a full filename change because this might lead to UID conflicts. -- Nicolas Sebrecht

Bug#670120: [PATCH] Re: Make SIGHUP singal handler equivalent to SIGTERM and SIGINT.

2012-07-30 Thread Nicolas Sebrecht
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 01:10:32PM +0200, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 04:04:10AM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: offlineimap has several frontends that encourage running it from a terminal under an X session. When X session closes for a system shutdown, the terminals

Bug#670120: [PATCH] Re: Make SIGHUP singal handler equivalent to SIGTERM and SIGINT.

2012-06-09 Thread Nicolas Sebrecht
. [0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SIGHUP Looks ok to me except that users might rely on this signal from script. I think it's worth to warn about this change in the changelog. Thanks for contribution! ,-) -- Nicolas Sebrecht -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org

Bug#610685: [PATCH] Re: Limit msg body length in debug output

2011-05-08 Thread Nicolas Sebrecht
On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 06:34:31PM +0200, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: On Sat, 7 May 2011 13:56:29 +0200, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: I inclined to merge this patch if it's still needed (thinking about the very last imaplib2 improvements around log). Should I? Difficult call :-). If we turn off

Bug#610685: [PATCH] Re: Limit msg body length in debug output

2011-05-07 Thread Nicolas Sebrecht
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 11:56:28PM +0200, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: On Thu, 5 May 2011 20:18:24 +0200, Nicolas Sebrecht nicolas.s-...@laposte.net wrote: I agree that it would be nicer. But that would entail some content analysis of each and every email that we handle. I don't want to think

Bug#610685: [PATCH] Re: Limit msg body length in debug output

2011-05-05 Thread Nicolas Sebrecht
? -- Nicolas Sebrecht -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org