Bug#819394: RFS: stormlib/9.20-1 [ITP]

ins also static linked .a library. So stormlib build it too... -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com

Bug#819396: RFS: smpq/1.5-1 [ITP]

Hello, I'm still looking for a sponsor for package "smpq" and its dependences. Please look at bug 819396. Thanks! -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com

Bug#810392: 0xffff: please switch to libusb 1.0

On Tuesday 15 March 2016 23:08:26 Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2016-03-15 22:50, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Tuesday 15 March 2016 22:47:23 Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > On 2016-03-15 22:25, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 15 March 2016 22:12:18 Aurelien Jarno wrote:

Bug#711763: igmpproxy: changing from ITP to RFP

to this email, and/or contact the > debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. > > Thank you for your interest in Debian, > -- > Lucas, for the QA team <debian...@lists.debian.org> > > Hi Lucas! If there is no progress on packaging igmpproxy to Debian archive, I can look at it... -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#633931: smpq and stormlib packages are ready

Hi! Packages are now ready at mentors.debian.net: https://mentors.debian.net/package/smpq https://mentors.debian.net/package/stormlib https://mentors.debian.net/package/stormlib-listfiles Can somebody review them? Note that stormlib upstream changed license to MIT. -- Pali Rohár pali.ro

Bug#819396: RFS: smpq/1.5-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "smpq" * Package name: smpq Version : 1.5-1 Upstream Author : Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com> * URL : https://launchpad.net/smpq * License

Bug#819395: RFS: stormlib-listfiles/2015-04-20-1 [ITP]

ttp://zezula.net/en/mpq/namebreak.html. Changes since the last upload: * Initial release (Closes: #819380) Regards, Pali Rohár signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#819394: RFS: stormlib/9.20-1 [ITP]

ezula.net/en/mpq/stormlib.html. Changes since the last upload: * Initial release (Closes: #819380) Regards, Pali Rohár signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#819380: RFP: stormlib -- Library for accessing the MPQ archives

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: stormlib Version : 9.20 Upstream Author : Ladislav Zezula * URL : http://www.zezula.net/en/mpq/stormlib.html * License : MIT Programming Lang: C++ Description : Library for accessing

Bug#810392: 0xffff: please switch to libusb 1.0

On Tuesday 15 March 2016 22:47:23 Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2016-03-15 22:25, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Tuesday 15 March 2016 22:12:18 Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > > Aurelien, I would suggest to have libusb-dev (libusb 0.1) > > > > package in Debian

Bug#810392: 0xffff: please switch to libusb 1.0

here is at least one application which does not work with new libusb 1.0. -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#810392: 0xffff: please switch to libusb 1.0

not removing working libusb 0.1 implementation from Debian until we have other working replacement library. Thanks! -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#791463: Quick review

On Monday 07 March 2016 17:49:00 Pali Rohár wrote: > On Monday 07 March 2016 14:31:44 Andrew Shadura wrote: > > On 6 March 2016 at 21:16, Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > But should not be cleandir part of that --buildsystem=bmake? Or > >

Bug#791463: Quick review

On Monday 07 March 2016 14:31:44 Andrew Shadura wrote: > On 6 March 2016 at 21:16, Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > But should not be cleandir part of that --buildsystem=bmake? Or > >> > why not? > >> > >> You're actually very ri

Bug#791463: Quick review

On Sunday 06 March 2016 10:24:05 Andrew Shadura wrote: > On 6 March 2016 at 09:50, Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > It is because "debian/rules clean" calls only "bmake clean" > >> > which does not delete autogenerated file Make

Bug#791463: Quick review

On Sunday 06 March 2016 10:28:31 Pali Rohár wrote: > On Sunday 06 March 2016 10:24:05 Andrew Shadura wrote: > > On 6 March 2016 at 09:50, Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > It is because "debian/rules clean" calls only "bmake clean"

Bug#791463: Quick review

On Sunday 06 March 2016 10:24:05 Andrew Shadura wrote: > On 6 March 2016 at 09:50, Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > It is because "debian/rules clean" calls only "bmake clean" > >> > which does not delete autogenerated file Make

Bug#791463: Quick review

On Sunday 06 March 2016 08:59:53 Andrew Shadura wrote: > On 6 March 2016 at 01:20, Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com> wrote: > > First dpkg-buildpackage call works, but calling it secondary fails > > with: > > > > dpkg-source: info: local changes detected, the m

Bug#791463: Quick review

On Friday 04 March 2016 22:59:10 Andrew Shadura wrote: > On 4 March 2016 at 22:57, Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > Well, I did test it and it worked, otherwise I wouldn't have > >> >> > proposed it. > >> > > >>

Bug#791463: Quick review

On Friday 04 March 2016 22:48:59 Andrew Shadura wrote: > On 04/03/16 22:47, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Friday 04 March 2016 22:40:35 Andrew Shadura wrote: > >> > On 4 March 2016 at 22:29, Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com> > >> > wrote: > >>>>

Bug#791463: Quick review

On Friday 04 March 2016 22:40:35 Andrew Shadura wrote: > On 4 March 2016 at 22:29, Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I just wanted to note that with the latest bmake (20150606-1), it > >> is enough to have this in your debian/rules: &g

Bug#791463: closing RFS: udfclient/0.8-1 [ITP] -- userland implementation of the UDF filesystem

On Thursday 17 December 2015 15:51:51 Pali Rohár wrote: > On Monday 14 December 2015 12:37:24 Andrew Shadura wrote: > > On 14/12/15 12:33, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > On Friday 11 December 2015 18:04:06 Andrew Shadura wrote: > > >> > you just dropping the patch into th

Bug#791463: closing RFS: udfclient/0.8-1 [ITP] -- userland implementation of the UDF filesystem

On Thursday 17 December 2015 15:51:51 Pali Rohár wrote: > On Monday 14 December 2015 12:37:24 Andrew Shadura wrote: > > On 14/12/15 12:33, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > On Friday 11 December 2015 18:04:06 Andrew Shadura wrote: > > >> > you just dropping the patch into th

Bug#791463: closing RFS: udfclient/0.8-1 [ITP] -- userland implementation of the UDF filesystem

On Monday 14 December 2015 12:37:24 Andrew Shadura wrote: > On 14/12/15 12:33, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Friday 11 December 2015 18:04:06 Andrew Shadura wrote: > >> > you just dropping the patch into the right place. > > I know where and how. But I do not like idea

Bug#791463: closing RFS: udfclient/0.8-1 [ITP] -- userland implementation of the UDF filesystem

ncy and upgrading if original source code which patch modify changes. And also I see using patches as last option. Are not Debian want to reduce patches if they are not really needed? -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com

Bug#791463: closing RFS: udfclient/0.8-1 [ITP] -- userland implementation of the UDF filesystem

kage? > > cheers, > > G. > Hi Gianfranco, I did not updated package because I did not know that some step is needed to do. My last uploaded version worked and I thought that it was OK. -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com

Bug#791463: closing RFS: udfclient/0.8-1 [ITP] -- userland implementation of the UDF filesystem

not need to patch software just for compilation -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#791463: Quick review

Hello, I added dirhash.h and vfs_dirhash.c files to debian/copyright as those were missing. Other BSD files reported by licensecheck are not correctly detected (they are not BSD licensed). -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#791463: RFS: udfclient/0.8-1 [ITP]

release (Closes: #791421) Regards, Pali Rohár signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#791421: RFP: udfclient -- userland implementation of the UDF filesystem

: cd_disect - Display report of disc cd_sessions - Show sessions on disc mmc_format - Format optical disc newfs_udf - Create UDF filesystem on file or a formatted disc udfclient - FTP-like client for UDF filesystem udfdump - Dump information from UDF filesystem -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com

Bug#786693: RFS: netplug/1.2.9.2-2 [ITA]

* Handle ST_DOWNANDOUT state (Closes: #652418) * Allow to specify custom script file via new param '-s' (Closes: #702495) Regards, Pali Rohár signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#559983: lsusb -t stops in an infinite loop

= '\000' repeats 254 times} As you can see struct usbinterface *i has cyclic reference to itself. Aurelien Jarno, can you look at it? Or do you need some other tests/logs? -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#773212: unblock: 0xffff/0.6.1-1

version 0.6.1. It is really bugfix version and it does not make sense to do any cherry-picking. You should apply all patches from 0.6 to 0.6.1, so if you generate apply cherry- picked patches on top of 0.6 you will have same tarball as 0.6.1. -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com signature.asc

Bug#772727: unblock: netplug/1.2.9.2-2

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Severity: normal Please unblock package netplug New version of netplug package (1.2.9.2-2) which is on http://mentors.debian.org/package/netplug fix more bugs reported to Debian. Ner version is not from

Bug#771422: RFS: netplug/1.2.9.2-2 [ITA]

/init.d: - Turn off ethernet interface autoprobing * Handle ST_DOWNANDOUT state (Closes: #652418) * Allow to specify custom script file via new param '-s' (Closes: #702495) Regards, Pali Rohár signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#750789: netplug: FTBFS with clang instead of gcc

Hi Arthur, your patch fix-function-declaration.patch is broken and will not work. That functions must be declarated in functions because they access local function variables. So you cannot move them out. -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally

Bug#661885: network-manager: Should not take IPv6 prefix length from DHCPv6 client

This bug is fixed in upstream version 0.9.6 of network-manager. In Debian Jessie is version 0.9.8, so this bug is already fixed. -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#695246: grub-efi-amd64 has no linux16, fails to boot memtest86+ (multiboot also fails)

is running in bios mode. In uefi mode grub_platform is set to efi. I think that this change should fix this bug. Memtest86+ menu entries will not be visible in uefi mode anymore... -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#656719: Please provide xvmc and vdpau Gallium3D video acceleration drivers (libg3dvl-mesa package)

Right, it does not make sense to have in debian repository free applications with enabled xvmc support and disabled (not included) free xvmc drivers in repository. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#656719: Please provide xvmc and vdpau Gallium3D video acceleration drivers (libg3dvl-mesa package)

2014-03-23 21:19 GMT+01:00 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org: On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 19:03:52 +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: Hello! It looks like nouveau, r600 and radeonsi vdpau drivers are already in debian repository. But not xvmc libraries. See: Correct, we're probably not going

Bug#656719: Please provide xvmc and vdpau Gallium3D video acceleration drivers (libg3dvl-mesa package)

Hello! It looks like nouveau, r600 and radeonsi vdpau drivers are already in debian repository. But not xvmc libraries. See: https://packages.debian.org/sid/mesa-vdpau-drivers https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=705558#24 -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Bug#603719: Please update package aspell-sk

In ubuntu is package updated for 3 years. Can you update this package also in Debian? (e.g forward ubuntu patch?) -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#711763: igmpproxy package

Hi, is there any progress on packaging igmpproxy daemon? When will be package in debian apt repository? -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#726674:

. -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#657191: kopete: multiple crashes in the wlm protocol code

Patches from Debian bug #657191 was commited to Kopete master git repository and they will part of KDE 4.11 release. So this bug can be closed as fixed in upstream. -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#657191: kopete: multiple crashes in the wlm protocol code

On Friday 31 May 2013 16:56:23 Raphael Geissert wrote: Hi, On 31 May 2013 14:58, Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Raphael, are these wlm patches on debian bug #657191 still valid? Btw in future, please send kopete patches to kopete-devel mailinglist or to kde reviewboard

Bug#657191: kopete: multiple crashes in the wlm protocol code

Hello Raphael, are these wlm patches on debian bug #657191 still valid? Btw in future, please send kopete patches to kopete-devel mailinglist or to kde reviewboard. -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#702495: netplug: [PATCH] Allow to specify custom script file via param '-s'

which calling ifup/ifdown). Patch is attached, generated by hg diff against repository on: http://hg.serpentine.com/netplug -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com diff -r aaebd52fac19 lib.c --- a/lib.c Sat Jun 26 09:36:45 2010 -0700 +++ b/lib.c Sat Mar 02 02:38:19 2013 +0100 @@ -29,6 +29,7

Bug#633931: Add new application to Debian

On Št 21. júl 2011, 16:22:48 CEST, Timo Juhani Lindfors timo.lindf...@iki.fi wrote: Hi, I you might want to keep the bug in the Cc list if you talk about it so that others see what has been done.. Ok, I forgot append CC list. Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com writes: I can maintain my

Bug#633931: RFP: smpq -- StormLib MPQ archiving utility

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: smpq Version : 1.3 Upstream Author : Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com * URL : https://launchpad.net/smpq * License : GPL v3 Programming Lang: C, C++ Description : StormLib MPQ archiving utility SMPQ

Bug#603719: Please update package aspell-sk

://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/aspell/dict/sk/aspell6-sk-2.01-2.tar.bz2 ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/aspell/dict/sk/aspell6-sk-2.01-2.tar.bz2It is possible to update this package to current version? -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com

<    1   2   3