Hi,
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 04:07:22PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> xmlsec 1.2.24 was released in April, April 20 to be precise. Please update.
[...]
> LibreOffice finally is able to use system-xmlsec and this should be done. But
> it
> *does* need >= 1.2.24..
Tried it now
Package: src:xmlsec1
Version: 1.2.23-0.1
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
xmlsec 1.2.24 was released in April, April 20 to be precise. Please update.
https://www.aleksey.com/xmlsec/:
April 20 2017
The XML Security Library 1.2.24 release includes the following changes:
Added ECDSA-SHA1, ECDSA
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 12:38:36PM +0200, wunc...@safe-mail.net wrote:
> 1. I have the same bug in a new install of stretch from 20.06.2017.
^^^
> Version: Debian GNU/Linux 8.7.1 "Jessie" - Official Multi-architecture
^^^
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 12:34:28AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > LibreOffice isn't and is also affected (#865303)
>
> Does LibreOffice run Java code in its main thread? I think that might
> be a common factor that makes a difference. It *appears* that the
> 'java' command doesn't run Java
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 02:12:38AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 23:23 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> [...]
> > Indeed, LOs Java stuff crash :(. Checked with "just" creating a database.
> > (which uses hsqldb.)
> >
> > Downgradi
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 09:52:05PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 21:47 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
> > Control: notfound -1 4.9.30-2
> > Control: found -1 4.9.30-2+deb9u1
> > Control: found -1 3.16.43-2+deb8u1
> >
> > Thanks for the extra i
tag 865303 - unreproducible
severity 865303 important
severity 865303 libreoffice: Libreoffice Java features crash with Linux
3.16.43-2+deb8u1
reassign 865303 src:linux
found 865303 3.16.43-2+deb8u1
affects 865303 libreoffice
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 09:55:51PM +0200, Rene Engelhard
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 09:33:22PM +0200, Eduardo Casais wrote:
> >I installed a fresh jessie inside a libvirt VM. The installer alraedy
> >applies the security updates - thus I got the new kernel and libc6 etc.
> >(libffi isn't used by LO)
> >
> >Starts fine for me...
> >
> >-> unreproducible
tag 865303 + unreproducible
retitle 865303 libreoffice: Libreoffice crashes silently upon startup
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 07:21:20PM +0200, Eduardo Casais wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jun 2017 16:12:20 +0200 Rene Engelhard wrote:
> >On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 03:39:03PM +0200, Rene
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 03:39:03PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> There were linux and glibc updates indeed. No idea whether they broke it, can
> you
> try reverting them one-by-one and whether it fixes it?
>
> Guess I need to setup a oldstable VM and try...
Some other reports c
tag 865303 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 02:16:51PM +0200, Eduardo Casais wrote:
> Upon launching LibreOffice, a series of error messages is produced, then the
> program exits:
[...]
> (soffice:510): Gtk-WARNING **: Unable to locate theme engine in module_path:
> "murrine",
>
> (
Hi,
FTR:
>From 2017-05-29:
12:31 < _rene_> pochu: yeah, I know there's no release yet but I already plan
what to do (when) after release and wonder whether I already could get a ACK
for hunspell so the LO 5.3.4 upload (to be released the week after the release)
can directly be built against
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 11:32:52AM +0300, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> I've tried to check a document with both Russian and English words it it
> simultaneously, and failed. Only misspelled English words were detected.
>
> The following command shows the problem:
>
> % hunspell -d en_US,ru_RU
> H
pe wrote:
> On 12-06-2017 17:55, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 01:28:14PM -0300, felipe wrote:
> >> After updating libreoffice to the latest experimental build the program
> >
> > From? 5.2.7 from sid of the 5.3.3 which was in experimental before the
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 10:55:19PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > crashes with the message:
> >
> >"/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice.bin: symbol lookup error:
> >/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/lib
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 01:28:14PM -0300, felipe wrote:
> After updating libreoffice to the latest experimental build the program
From? 5.2.7 from sid of the 5.3.3 which was in experimental before the 5.4 beta2
upload?
Hnn. the 5.3.0 below suggests that it was from 5.3.0-1... ;)
(And how?)
> cr
:35PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 10:55:19PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > crashes with the message:
> > >
> > >"/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice.bin: symbol lookup error:
> > >/usr/lib/lib
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 11:54:26PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Please go ahead (needs -sa since orig tarball is new)
Ah, right. Almost forgot, thanks.
Done.
Regards,
Rene
On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 11:07:02PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 06:13:05PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Source: libmwaw
> > Severity: grave
> > Tags: security
> >
> > Please see https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvena
0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+libmwaw (0.3.1-2+deb8u1) jessie-security; urgency=medium
+
+ * backport upstream patch to fix CVE-2017-9433 (closes: #864366)
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard Wed, 07 Jun 2017 22:47:10 +0200
+
libmwaw (0.3.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
* upload to unstable
diff -Nru libmwaw-0.3.1/deb
)
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard Wed, 07 Jun 2017 21:47:49 +0200
+
libmwaw (0.3.9-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Imported Upstream version 0.3.9
diff -Nru libmwaw-0.3.9/debian/patches/CVE-2017-9433.diff
libmwaw-0.3.9/debian/patches/CVE-2017-9433.diff
--- libmwaw-0.3.9/debian/patches/CVE-2017-9433.diff 1970
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 12:07:48AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> --- qtwebengine-opensource-src-5.7.1+dfsg/debian/rules2017-01-18
> 20:00:38.0 +0200
> +++ qtwebengine-opensource-src-5.7.1+dfsg/debian/rules2017-06-04
> 22:12:35.0 +0300
> @@ -6,16 +6,22 @@
> expo
tag 863749 + moreinfo
tag 863749 + unreproducible
retitle 863749 libreoffice-calc: desktop freezes when moving multiple cells in
View-> Page Break mode
thanks
Hi,
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 12:38:28AM +0200, Bert Schlumwig wrote:
> When in Calc-> View-> Page Break mode multiple cells are selected
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 08:27:36PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Anyways: There is? The last comment said it's back?
What I forgot to write here:
We don't have 5.3.0 anymore of course but 5.3.3 is in experimental, maybe
it would make sense to check whether it is really fixed th
tag 863146 + upstream
forwarded 863146 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97721
tag 863146 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 08:18:50PM +0200, B.M. wrote:
> There is an upstream bug report related to the same problem containing a fix:
> https://bugs.documentfoundation
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: important
[ I pondered to make it RC, feel free to adjust... ]
Hi,
$ grep buildinfo libreoffice_4.3.3-2+deb8u7_source+amd64+all.changes
bcc561d0ccdcbada26809bae7ee9d8e0d3bb23c8 15696
libreoffice_4.3.3-2+deb8u7_source.buildinfo
0ec1d03f1d6b789c8a1d6d374185892
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 01:02:24AM +0200, Sandro Knauß wrote:
> well why this has changed is that upstream imcluded qtgpgme(pp) into
> gpgmepp,> so a developer can expect to install the gpgmepp-dev package to
> have all
> language bindings to be installed (cpp, qt,...) .
tag 863149 + patch
thanks
Hi,
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 04:45:05PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Mon 2017-05-22 20:32:48 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Can the qgpgme(pp) stuff split out to an own -dev (As was already done
> > with the library itself.) and only that one b
Package: libgpgmepp-dev
Version: 1.8.0-3
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
# apt-cache show libgpgmepp-dev
Package: libgpgmepp-dev
Source: gpgme1.0 (1.8.0-3)
Version: 1.8.0-3+b2
Installed-Size: 3626
Maintainer: Debian GnuPG Maintainers
Architecture: amd64
Replaces: kdepimlibs5-dev
Depends: libgpgmepp6 (= 1
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 11:07:12PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> gnuradio is getting interesting, given it has no c++11 support but
> cppunit now requires it. Either tests will need to get disabled or a
> cppunit1.13
> re-introduced for it..
Oh, and (maybe) ola.
Regards,
Rene
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
"simply" a new upstream release.
The interesting point to note here is that upstream removed "cppunit-config"
and that causes FTBFSes in other packages.
Most are trivial to fix or
+1,9 @@
+libtorrent (0.13.6-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+ * use PKG_CHECK_MODULES instead of AM_PATH_CPPUNIT (closes: #862129)
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard Mon, 15 May 2017 22:56:40 +0200
+
libtorrent (0.13.6-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Non-maintainer upload.
diff --git a/debian/patche
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+rtorrent (0.9.6-3) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+ [ Rene Engelhard ]
+ * use PKG_CHECK_MODULES instead of AM_PATH_CPPUNIT (closes: #862131)
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard Mon, 15 May 2017 22:43:32 +0200
+
rtorrent (0.9.6-2) unstable; urgency=m
instead of AM_PATH_CPPUNIT (closes: #862125)
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard Mon, 15 May 2017 22:03:20 +0200
+
libfilezilla (0.9.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream release
diff -Nru libfilezilla-0.9.0/debian/patches/pkg-config.diff
libfilezilla-0.9.0/debian/patches/pkg-config.diff
-maintainer upload.
+ * use PKG_CHECK_MODULES instead of AM_PATH_CPPUNIT (closes: #862127)
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard Mon, 15 May 2017 20:06:15 +
+
sipxtapi (3.3.0~test17-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium
[ Bernhard Schmidt ]
diff -Nru sipxtapi-3.3.0~test17/debian/patches/pkg-config.diff
sipxtapi
tag 862134 + patch
thanks
Hi,
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 06:45:03PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>
> > # fixed in 0.9.12 upstream, which is already in drumgizmo.git master
> > tags 862134 + pending
> Bug #862134 [src:drumgizmo] src:drum
Hi,
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:25:48AM -0500, Steve Robbins wrote:
>Hi. I think your plan is fine. I no longer use cppunit myself so I'm happy
>to see you take an active role in the maintenance. Please consider
OK.
>yourself the lead maintainer and feel free to go ahead with upload o
Hi,
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 09:19:53AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> I prepared the update, if you want I can commit to collab-maint and/or add
> myself as co-maintainer
> and/or even upload it.
Thought I saw it on collab-maint but I must have dreamed, see none.
So I imported it
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
Please unblock package libreoffice
unblock libreoffice/5.2.7-1
I know it's late but..
This is a new upstream bugfix release.
This actually is the last release at all for the 5.2.x s
found 862394 1:5.2.5-1
forwarded 862394 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106086
thanks
Hi,
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 11:21:00AM +0200, Stéphane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> I open a .docx document and I save it as a different document, same
> format (.docx).
>
> Then LibreOffice cannot o
Hi,
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 05:32:31PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Of the packages using hunspell, only lokalize failed (again, no surprise on
> how they
> do the detection), filed #862163.
... which is now fixed.
Regards,
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
Simply a "new" upstream.
Ben file:
title = "hunspell";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libhunspell-1.4-0" | .depends ~ "libhunspell-1.6-0";
is_good = .depends ~ "libhunspell-1.6-0";
is_b
2.0/debian/changelog jags-4.2.0/debian/changelog
--- jags-4.2.0/debian/changelog
+++ jags-4.2.0/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+jags (4.2.0-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * use PKG_CHECK_MODULES for cppunit instead of AM_PATH_CPPUNIT
+(closes: #862132)
+
+
09:01:52.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+lokalize (4:16.08.3-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * fix build with hunspell 1.6
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard Tue, 09 May 2017 11:01:52 +0200
+
lokalize (4:16.08.3-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Add kinit runtime dependency.
diff
Hi,
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 10:09:46AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 10:26:41PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> [...]
> > According to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id11694 it
FTR: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311694.
Something app
igure so built still fails
Works for me. I fixed zipios++ in exactly that way:
$ cat debian/patches/pkg-config.diff
Description: use pkg-config instead of cppunit-config
cppunit-config (and AM_PATH_CPPUNIT) was removed in cppunit 1.14
Author: Rene Engelhard
Origin: vendor
Forwarded: no
Bug-Debia
Hi,
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 09:59:09PM +, Martyn Plummer wrote:
> This was fixed long ago in the sourceforge repository, but the relaxed
> release schedule of JAGS means that bugs like this one persist in the release
> tarball.
>
> I have reached my feature target for release 4.3.0. With a
Hi,
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 04:51:52PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On 8 May 2017 at 23:41, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> | Hi,
> |
> | On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 04:34:27PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | > Not when you talk to upstream, as I do as maintainer. Upstream's
Hi,
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 04:34:27PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Not when you talk to upstream, as I do as maintainer. Upstream's code may
> well be built against cppunit-config for years to come.
Why?
The point is: you (= upstream) already checks for >= 1.12.1.
So you already have pkg-
retitle 862135 src:zookeeper: FTBFS with cppunit 1.14
AM_PATH_CPPUNIT/cppunit-config removed)
retitle 862134 src:drumgizmo: FTBFS with cppunit 1.14
(AM_PATH_CPPUNIT/cppunit-config removed)
retitle 862133 src:gnuradio: FTBFS with cppunit 1.14 (no C++11 support,
required by cppunit)
retitle 862132
Hi,
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 04:12:19PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Ans when you say "you" I presume you are talking to upstream (who happens to
> be a friend of mine, and CC'ed) ?
>
> Are you suggesting that "someone" (ie upstream) modifies configure.ac ?
Yes. And use pkg-config.
(If upst
Hi,
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 07:56:05AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Will file bugs for all these...
1 + May 08 Debian Bug Trac ( 0) Bug#862135: Acknowledgement
(src:zookeeper: FTBFS with cppunit 0.14 (AM_PA
2 + May 08 Debian Bug Trac ( 0) Bug#862134: Acknowledgem
Package: src:rtorrent
Version: 0.9.6-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
[ cppunit 0.14 is not in Debian yet, see #861718. Thus normal for now ]
On a rebuild test using ratt I noticed your package doesn't build with
cppunit 0.14:
[...]
dh build --with autoreconf --parallel
dh_testdir -O--par
Package: src:gnuradio
Version: 3.7.10.1-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
[ cppunit 0.14 is not in Debian yet, see #861718. Thus normal for now ]
On a rebuild test using ratt I noticed your package doesn't build with
cppunit 0.14:
[...]
[ 21%] Building CXX object
gnuradio-runtime/apps/CMakeF
Package: src:jags
Version: 4.2.0-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
[ cppunit 0.14 is not in Debian yet, see #861718. Thus normal for now ]
On a rebuild test using ratt I noticed your package doesn't build with
cppunit 0.14:
[...]
dh_auto_configure -- --without-included-ltdl
dh_auto_configure:
Package: src:libtorrent
Version: 0.13.6-1.1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
[ cppunit 0.14 is not in Debian yet, see #861718. Thus normal for now ]
On a rebuild test using ratt I noticed your package doesn't build with
cppunit 0.14:
[...]
dh build --with autoreconf --parallel
dh_testdir -O
Package: src:zookeeper
Version: 3.4.9-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
[ cppunit 0.14 is not in Debian yet, see #861718. Thus normal for now ]
On a rebuild test using ratt I noticed your package doesn't build with
cppunit 0.14:
[...]
# Compile C library
cd src/c && autoreconf -i
configure.ac
Package: src:mpd
Version: 0.19.21-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
[ cppunit 0.14 is not in Debian yet, see #861718. Thus normal for now ]
On a rebuild test using ratt I noticed your package doesn't build with
cppunit 0.14:
[...]
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -DNDEBUG -I./src -pthread -I/usr/incl
Package: src:drumgizmo
Version: 0.9.11-3
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
[ cppunit 0.14 is not in Debian yet, see #861718. Thus normal for now ]
On a rebuild test using ratt I noticed your package doesn't build with
cppunit 0.14:
[...]
dh build
dh_testdir
dh_update_autotools_config
d
Package: src:zipios++
Version: 0.1.5.9+cvs.2007.04.28-6
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
[ cppunit 0.14 is not in Debian yet, see #861718. Thus normal for now ]
On a rebuild test using ratt I noticed your package doesn't build with
cppunit 0.14:
[...]
dh build --with autotools-dev
dh_testd
Package: src:sipxtapi
Version: 3.3.0~test17-2.1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
[ cppunit 0.14 is not in Debian yet, see #861718. Thus normal for now ]
On a rebuild test using ratt I noticed your package doesn't build with
cppunit 0.14:
[...]
dh build --with autoreconf --builddirectory=.
d
Package: src:libfilezilla
Version: 0.9.0-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
[ cppunit 0.14 is not in Debian yet, see #861718. Thus normal for now ]
On a rebuild test using ratt I noticed your package doesn't build with
cppunit 0.14:
[...]
dh_auto_configure
./configure --build=x86_64
Package: src:ola
Version: 0.10.3.nojsmin-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
[ cppunit 0.14 is not in Debian yet, see #861718. Thus normal for now ]
On a rebuild test using ratt I noticed your package doesn't build with
cppunit 0.14:
[...]
libtool: compile: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Wdate-time
tream version 1.3.10
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard Sat, 06 May 2017 13:20:52 +0200
+
graphite2 (1.3.9-4) unstable; urgency=medium
* add -ffloat-store to COMPILE_FLAGS; enable awami tests again
diff -Nru graphite2-1.3.9/debian/patches/do-not-require-ss2.diff
graphite2-1.3.10/debian/patches/do-
Hi,
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 09:19:53AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> This release might be "fun" to transition to, they removed cppunit-config
> completely, which might
> or might not (I honestly would place a bet on the former) a "interesting"
> impact of build
tag 861718 + patch
thanks
Hi,
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 09:19:53AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> I prepared the update, if you want I can commit to collab-maint and/or add
> myself as co-maintainer
> and/or even upload it.
The trivial diff of this is attached. Package also availabl
retitle src:cppunit: please update cppunit to 1.14.0
thanks
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 09:19:53AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> cppunit 0.14.0 was released mid-April.
Obviously s/0.14.0/1.14.0/ :)
Regards,
Rene
Package: src:cppunit
Version: 1.13.2-2.1
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
cppunit 0.14.0 was released mid-April.
See https://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/cppunit/.
(yes, initially it was not there for a few days even when it was available on
http://dev-www.libreoffice.org/src/ where LO mirro
Package: libpoco-dev
Version: 1.7.6+dfsg1-4
Severity: serious
Dear Maintainer,
In file included from /usr/include/Poco/Crypto/X509Certificate.h:24:0,
from /usr/include/Poco/Net/Context.h:25,
from /usr/include/Poco/Net/SecureServerSocket.h:25,
fro
found 859882 1:5.0.0~alpha1-1
tag 859882 + upstream
forwarded 859882 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92237
thanks
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 08, 2017 at 09:06:17AM -0500, Sebastian Silva wrote:
> This has been reported upstream but because of the visibility of this bug I
> felt it was re
On Sun, Apr 02, 2017 at 03:58:58PM +0300, Alex Dănilă wrote:
> Sorry for offending you, I assumed that adding an attachment was the easiest
> way to send a small screenshot.
No problem, I was just wondering. :) It's just more work to look at the
attachement as it involves opening the webmail where
On Sun, Apr 02, 2017 at 10:50:05AM +0300, Alex Dănilă wrote:
> C.UTF-8 in the second screen (Default locale for the system environment)
> log-out+log-in
>
> Currently locale returns:
> locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory
^^
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:09:39PM -0400, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
> On Tue, 2017 Mar 28 09:35+0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > >
> > > If LibreOffice is installed without Java runtime support, then how
> > > is the failed installation of Java-based third-party ex
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 03:28:31AM -0400, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
> On Tue, 2017 Mar 28 08:36+0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > >
> > > > That installation would fail with a non clear message if the Java
> > > > support is not there. -> Bad.
> &
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 01:49:04AM -0400, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
> On Mon, 2017 Mar 27 11:01+0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> >
> > The metapackage is supposed to install (mostly) everything.
> >
> > This includes the Java stuff.
> >
> > Think of people want
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 02:57:58AM -0400, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
> What about the hard dependency of "libreoffice" on lo-java-common? This
> package is just a dependency of components that need Java, so it is not
> appropriate for the metapackage.
The metapackage is supposed to install (mos
Hi,
oops.
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 10:12:01AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> They are not. If you used one of them (which you probably won't run into
> given even the wizards are Java) you get told you want Java. Basically it's
[...] are NOT java anymore but python [...]
Regards,
Rene
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 01:18:00AM -0400, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
> Of course. I don't care too much which specific components need Java
> (unless e.g. Writer one day starts requiring it); I just want to tell
> apt-get "no Java!" and let it do its thing.
Then install the various modules manu
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 12:10:35AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> [...] *And* it will also tell people to install libreoffice-java-common [...]
Actually that's untrue - the patch is disabled, probably because it didn't apply
anymore and it was forgotten to update.. ;/
Regards,
Rene
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 12:01:53AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 07:00:22PM -0400, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
> > # apt-get -s install libreoffice default-jre- | grep '^Inst' | egrep
> > 'jre|jdk|java'
> > Inst libreoff
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 07:00:22PM -0400, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
> # apt-get -s install libreoffice default-jre- | grep '^Inst' | egrep
> 'jre|jdk|java'
> Inst libreoffice-java-common (1:5.2.5-2 Debian:testing [all])
>
> Hunh, that worked. The lo-java-common package went in, even t
severity 858655 wishlist
tag 858655 + wontfix
thanks
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 07:00:22PM -0400, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
> A regular LibreOffice install has many Java dependencies:
>
> # apt-get -s install libreoffice | grep '^Inst' | egrep 'jre|jdk|java'
Description-en: office productiv
[ I am NOT the plasma-discover maintainer ]
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 12:53:20PM -0400, Leand wrote:
>There are basic functions that are bugged. For example, the search
>function returns wrong and unrelated results too many times. If I
>search for "office" or "writer" it doesn't show Lib
s:
+- move /usr/include/libreoffice/sal/typesizes.h symlink to -dev
+ instead of -dev-common (closes: #858199)
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard Mon, 20 Mar 2017 11:46:38 +0100
+
libreoffice (1:5.2.6-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream release
diff -Nru libreoffice-5.2.6/debian/control lib
Package: libreoffice-dev,libreoffice-dev-common
Version: 1:5.2.3~rc1-1
Severity: grave
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 03:00:21PM +0100, bjoern wrote:
> 1/ libreoffice-dev/amd64 has a
> /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/libreoffice/sal/typesizes.h
>while the example is set up to find the header in
severity 857467 normal
reassign 857467 libreoffice-base,libreoffice-sdbc-postgresql
retitle 857467 libreoffice-base: Postgresql — Cannot enter or edit data or edit
table columns without primary key
thanks
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 11:35:36AM +0100, Dr. Axel Stammler wrote:
> I actually believe
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 06:05:07PM -0400, Neal Murphy wrote:
> Version: 5.2.5.1
I still try to understand why people insist on inventing a version here.
Obviously this is the Debian BTS, so obviously what counts is the
_Debian package version_ - not some (internal!) upstream version...
> Ins
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 06:28:44PM +0100, Axel wrote:
> opening a table for data editing (by pressing Enter or double-clicking &c.)
> only shows the
> column names in the header, otherwise the window is completely empty and all
> controls
> greyed out. If data are inserted using the commandl
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 10:26:42AM +0100, Volker Diels-Grabsch wrote:
> When both libreoffice-writer and okular are installed, Okular takes
> precendence over LibreOffice for ODT files.
Interesting.
> Reproduction of this bug:
>
> apt-get install okular libreoffice-writer
> xdg-mime
reassign 857441 libreoffice-writer,okular
reassign 857443 libreoffice-writer,okular
forcemerge 857441 857443
thanks
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 10:26:42AM +0100, Volker Diels-Grabsch wrote:
> When both libreoffice-writer and okular are installed, Okular takes
> precendence over LibreOffice for OD
tag 857311 + unreproducible
tag 857311 + moreinfo
found 857311 1:5.2.5-2
thanks
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 05:23:48PM -0400, Carl Nikolov wrote:
> Package: libreoffice-calc
> Version: 5.2.5.1
I always wonder why people think they need to invent this. reportbug
does it correct already.
This Version:
olete libreoffice-gtk conflicts which makes -core Break: it
with bin-NMUs; add (intended) -gtk2/-gtk3 ones...
* merge from Ubuntu:
- uno-libs: Create the libuno_* symlinks in the multiarch libdir
-- Rene Engelhard Tue, 13 Sep 2016 04:28:17 +0200
so that libreoffice now pulls this in via
On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 11:33:15AM +0900, Hughe wrote:
> Package: libreoffice-writer
> Version: 1:4.3.3-2+deb8u5
> Severity: important
>
> Hi,
>
> Version: 4.3.3.2
> Build ID: 430m0(Build:2)
[...]
> I partly understand why Korean version of LibreOffice-writer in such sorry
> state. Firefox, Chro
On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 07:11:23PM -0700, Tony Sultana wrote:
>When I installed the libreoffice metapackage the JRE error disappeared but
There is no JRE error. There is a JRE *warning*. As said, LO *does* start
without
a JRE.
>the LLVM remained. I am troubleshooting the LLVM but I too
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 11:40:53AM -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> were causing a serious issue, we could discuss splitting ant into
> something like "ant-bin" (maybe there's a better name) and libant-java,
> so only the latter library package is a dependency of
> libapache-poi-java.
>
> In tha
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 08:22:41AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > This is the same behavior when running localc, loimpress, lodraw and
> > lomath. If you install the libreoffice metapackage then it will install
> > JRE.
>
> This is intended. Only stuff re
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 06:11:18PM +0100, Peter Nowee wrote:
> Removing libreoffice-gtk2, as suggested by Chris, does prevent the
> issue.
>
> Seen on both:
> - Debian 8.7 Jessie stable with backports libreoffice 1:5.2.5-1~bpo8+1
> - Debian sid/unstable with libreoffice 1:5.2.5-2
> Both amd64 with
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 02:17:58PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 01:50:39PM +0100, Stefan Weil wrote:
> > Indeed it would be nice to have a Debian package for LibreOffice Online.
> > I finished installing it manually on Debian Stretch, and it works
block 787080 by 856192
thanks
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 01:50:39PM +0100, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Indeed it would be nice to have a Debian package for LibreOffice Online.
> I finished installing it manually on Debian Stretch, and it works pretty
> good.
>
> When building I noticed that missing JS
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.30+deb8u4
Severity: minor
Hi,
[...]
Now running lintian...
W: boxer-data: extra-license-file
usr/share/boxer/wheezy/classes/Service/print/cups/bsd.yml
N: 2 tags overridden (2 warnings)
Finished running lintian.
Now signing changes and any dsc files...
[...]
% cat
1101 - 1200 of 5621 matches
Mail list logo
