On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 01:49:04AM -0400, Daniel Richard G. wrote: > On Mon, 2017 Mar 27 11:01+0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > > The metapackage is supposed to install (mostly) everything. > > > > This includes the Java stuff. > > > > Think of people wanting to install extensions (which happen to be > > written in Java more often than I'd like it but it's a fact...). > > > > That installation would fail with a non clear message if the Java > > support is not there. -> Bad. > > > > We had that "fun" in the past... > > So, there are Java-based LibreOffice extension packages that do not > properly declare their Java dependencies?
I didn't say "packages"? Extensions from the wild, from upstream, from LOs extension website _in oxt format_. > I checked the upstream RPM packages for LibreOffice 5.2. These library > files from lo-report-builder-bin ... > > /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/librptlo.so > /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/librptuilo.so > /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/librptxmllo.so > > ...are in libobasis5.2-extension-report-builder-5.2.6.2-2.x86_64.rpm, > not in libobasis5.2-core-5.2.6.2-2.x86_64.rpm. The situation is the > same in 5.3. Hmm, then I misremember and need to dig out again why this was in the metapackage... Regards, Rene