office (1:7.0.4-4+deb11u2) stable; urgency=medium
+
+ * debian/patches/fix-e_book_client_connect_direct_sync-sig.diff:
+as name says; from libreoffice-7-2 branch
+ * debian/patches/hrk-euro.diff: add EUR to .hr i18n;
+add HRK<->EUR conversion rate to Calc and the Euro Wizard
+
+ -- Re
tag 1015827 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Am 22.07.22 um 02:12 schrieb Frédéric Mesplède:
I was editing a form and I needed to check which form of sub-form grid I was
editing. I opened the from navigator, maximised it and tries to drag and drop
the grid from the sub-form to the form. I couldn't perfor
Hi,
Am Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 05:00:09PM +0200 schrieb Benoit Vila:
> so apparently i's all related to the apt command, using the -t option
> instead seems to work smoothly:
>
> apt-get install -t bullseye-backports libreoffice
>
> (even without removing/purging libreoffice first)
You should have
Hi,
I just saw in your attachement that you use stable. No big deal per se but:
Versions of packages libreoffice-calc depends on:
pn coinor-libcoinmp1v5
ii libc62.31-13+deb11u3
pn libetonyek-0.1-1
ii libgcc-s110.2.1-6
ii libicu67
Hi,
Am 10.07.22 um 03:39 schrieb Brian Chase:
>
it would be helpful if you didn't send an empty email with an
attachement of the reportbug stuff instead of just sending a proper email..
Anyways, citing from the attachement...
> * What led up to the situation?
>
> tried to launch c
/patches?
I don't mind against this. At least we could license debian/patches
under expat license as most of upstream code is. (I should note, that
many patches were cherry-picked from upstream git.)
But there are some patches Rene Engelhard added
previously, so we need him to approve license c
Hi,
Am 17.04.22 um 18:47 schrieb yg2709:
Package: libreoffice
Followup-For: Bug #1003045
X-Debbugs-Cc: yg2...@hotmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
Probbing at a VM debian testing (12), checking with MATE (1.26.0),
after upgrading all versions (from 1:7.2.4-1 thru 1:7.3.1-1), it opens
sucessfully.
Hi,
Am 15.04.22 um 08:57 schrieb László Böszörményi (GCS):
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 8:48 AM Rene Engelhard wrote:
Am 13.04.22 um 17:52 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 13.04.22 um 17:24 schrieb László Böszörményi (GCS):
LibreOffice self-testing, especially its break iterator test fails for
the Lao
+0200
Von: Rene Engelhard
Organisation: Debian Project
An: László Böszörményi (GCS) , 1007...@bugs.debian.org,
Jeremy Bicha
Kopie (CC): Adrian Bunk , Sebastian Ramacher
, Jérémy Lal ,
debian-gtk-gn...@lists.debian.org, Simon McVittie
Hi,
Am 13.04.22 um 17:24 schrieb László Böszörményi (GCS
Hi again,
Am 13.04.22 um 17:52 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 13.04.22 um 17:24 schrieb László Böszörményi (GCS):
LibreOffice self-testing, especially its break iterator test fails for
the Lao language.
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id
Hi,
Am 13.04.22 um 17:24 schrieb László Böszörményi (GCS):
LibreOffice self-testing, especially its break iterator test fails for
the Lao language.
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=263961306ede0656ebb7904034a2172615ce81d0
We could backport the needed stuff to 7.3.
Ot
Hi,
Am 06.04.22 um 19:55 schrieb Nicolas Patrois:
As far as I know, the "Quartile" quality is not "Quartile", even if it allows
to retrieve up to 25% of the data, but "Quality".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QR_code:
"Level L (Low) 7% of data bytes can be restored.
Level M (Medium) 15%
tag 1006792 + wontfix
thanks
Hi,
Am 05.03.22 um 00:56 schrieb David Calman:
I want to see a build of libreoffice that doesn't pull in dconf.
Why? Tiny library only. You can ignore the feature?
I don't see any reason why it wouldn't
be possible to use, say, gconf instead.
Obviously this
reassign 1006134 ftp.debian.org
retitle 1006134 RM: myspell -- ROM; obsolete
thanks
Hi,
since ifrench-gut as last package was now fixed, let's not wait for
AUTORM to kick in (which would leave it in sid anyway) but explicitely
remove it.
@ftpmasters: please remove the myspell source package
tag 1005832 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Am 15.02.22 um 19:25 schrieb Lior Kaplan:
package: libreoffice
version: 1:7.3.0-1
Hi Rene,
Long time (:
Indeed.
I've done some package cleaning and libreoffice stopped working.
with this failure:
$ libreoffice
terminate called after throwing an instan
Am 10.02.22 um 07:42 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 09.02.22 um 19:42 schrieb Jeremy Bicha:
Source: libreoffice
Version: 1:7.3.0-1
Severity: important
erm, no. There's no bug at all since it doesn't build.
Fpr avoidance of aoubt: I of course meant something along
"since t
Hi,
Am 10.02.22 um 07:42 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Could you check if libreoffice builds successfully with the new
poppler version? It's available in experimental now.
Strictly speaking that is what _you_ are supposed to do. I can do it
though.
Last I tried with an earlier version i
Am 19.01.22 um 13:13 schrieb Antonio:
I would like to install LibreOffice Help to use it offline but if I do
it then forced me to install Firefox-ESR, which for me would be a
duplicate I don't need.
No, that is wrong as I said. It forces you to use a JS-supporting
browser from the Debian ar
Hi,
so this is even more severe than only "annyoing".
Especially for machines with slow or spinning disks, even on machines
with an ssd where the ssd is slow for whatever reason.
1. i386 autopkgtest of libreoffice does a libreoffice build (because of
#1002477 !) and then times out when copyi
severity 1003864 wishlist
retitle 1003864 please don' t depend on browsers
thanks
Am 17.01.22 um 08:57 schrieb Antonio:
Severity: normal
Why? It's doing that it is intended to do.
If I try to install the LibreOffice help, the Firefox-esr package is
automatically installed.
That is not
Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
libreoffice 7.2.3-1 had a broken changelog accidentially including
7.3.0~alpha1-6 changelogs and making 7.2.3-1 a "successor" of said
7.3.0~alpha1-6.
See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1000605
That was fixed in -2 -
Hi
Am 03.01.22 um 18:46 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> my clean testing VM which I just dist_upgraded. Lo starts fine with the
> default session there which is Xorg.
Nevermind, it was wayland actually but also "GNOME on Xorg" works.
Regards,
Rene
Hi,
Am 03.01.22 um 09:48 schrieb Emmanuel Charpentier:
> similarly, launching an application from a console's command line returns
> after
> a few seconds.
Nothing on the command line?
Can't be a general problem since
https://ci.debian.net/packages/libr/libreoffice/testing/amd64/
passes (and
Package: autopkgtest
Version: 5.16
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
/usr/bin/autopkgtest has
# run create_command
script = [
'builddir=$(mktemp -d %s/build.XXX)' % testbed.scratch,
'cd $builddir',
create_command,
'chmod -R a+rX .',
'cd [a-z0-9]
severity 1000605 normal
reassign 1000730 src:libreoffice
forcemerge 1000605 1000730
thanks
Hi,
Am 28.11.21 um 04:04 schrieb Josh Triplett:
> The Debian changelog for libreoffice contains what looks like a merge
> conflict marker around the entry for 1:7.3.0~alpha1-2:
https://bugs.debian.org
notfound 1000605 1:7.2.2-1
found 1000605 1:7.2.3-1
Hi,
Am 25.11.21 um 20:15 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> Source: libreoffice
> Version: 1:7.2.2-1
Don't believe so. ITYM 1:7.2.3-1
> Severity: minor
>
> changelog contains the following git editing noise:
>
> efaacb77 (actually only set
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hi,
Am 21.11.21 um 00:04 schrieb Debian FTP Masters:
> nspr (2:4.32-2) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
> * debian/libnspr4-dev.links.in, debian/control: Remove
> xulrunner-nspr.pc,
>
Hi,
Am 15.11.21 um 17:40 schrieb Agustin Martin:
> Please enable hunspell-an build from libreoffice-dictionaries sources.
>
> This was originally requested by Dimitrij Mijoski in #991966 hunspell-an bug
> report, I am copying his reasoning,
Cc'ed.
>
> Package: hunspell-an
>
> The current packa
Am 10. November 2021 10:55:31 MEZ schrieb Lucas Nussbaum :
>Hi,
>
>On 10/11/21 at 10:05 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am 9. November 2021 22:28:18 MEZ schrieb Lucas Nussbaum :
>> >Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep
Hi,
Am 9. November 2021 22:28:18 MEZ schrieb Lucas Nussbaum :
>Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in
>debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012.
>https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-ru
forwarded 998753 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114532
tag 998753 + upstream
thanks
Hi,
Am 07.11.21 um 17:29 schrieb Diederik de Haas:
[...]
> I was/am creating a document and I wanted to add an image I saved from a
> webpage (from 2017( which had the file extension .pn
reopen 998746
found 998746 1:7.3.0~alpha1-1
thanks
Hi,
> When you mix (and not match) different versions, problems can easily
occur.
> After doing "aptitude safe-upgrade ~i~V1:7.2.2-1 -t experimental", I
could
> successfully launch LO Writer, so closing the bug again.
Especially in experimen
Package: libnss3-dev
Version: 2:3.72-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
as said in https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2021/11/msg00018.html
(#998339) nss 2:3.72-1 removes xulrunner-nss.pc which xmlsec1-nss.pc
relied on.
This has now been fixed in xmlsec1 1.2.33-1.
(Which at the time of this writing i
severity 997089 minor
thanks
Am 03.11.21 um 17:27 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> On 03/11/21 at 17:13 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am 03.11.21 um 08:05 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
>>> If it's truly a random failure, it might be better to downgrade it but
Hi,
Am 03.11.21 um 08:05 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> If it's truly a random failure, it might be better to downgrade it but
> keep it open,
I don't really like this. I don't like open bugs which definitely will
never get attention.
> so that another bug does not get opened in future
> rebuilds.
Su
Hi,
Am Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 07:18:19PM +0200 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> And interestingly, (after rm'ing the stale unopkg lockfile..) it passed.
>
> Also after a new attempt with manual
>
> $ make clean && make subsequencheck
>
> in odk worked, too.
>
>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
[ nss maintainer X-Debbugs-Cc'ed ]
Hi,
nss 2:3.72-1 uploaded this morning did:
nss (2:3.72-1) unstable; urgency=medium
[...]
* debian/libnss3-dev.links.in: Remove xulrunner-nss.pc.
[..
Hi again,
Am 28.10.21 um 18:11 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> Am 23.10.21 um 18:41 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
>> [...]
>> "/<>/instdir/program/unopkg" add -f
>> "/<>/workdir/CustomTarget/odk/build-examples_java/out/sdk/LINUXexample.out/bin/Inspector.oxt&q
[ sorry for the late answer, needed to get a new laptop as the battery
broke badly.. ]
Hi,
Am 23.10.21 um 18:41 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> make[5]: Entering directory
> '/<>/instdir/sdk/examples/java/Inspector'
>> mkdir -p
>> /<>/workdir/CustomTarget/odk/build-examples_java/out/sdk/LINUXexample.o
.
Merge them (and provide them) in(to) liblibreoffice-java.
-- Rene Engelhard Tue, 27 Oct 2020 18:04:25 +0100
but not removed by auto-cruft when this was uploaded to sid after the
buster release.
Note that dak rm might complain about r-deps, but those all are having
unversioned dependenc
Hi,
Am 14.10.21 um 10:38 schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen:
> [Rene Engelhard]
>> There is https://salsa.debian.org/rene/muttprint/-/tree/master
> Right. Very good. I notice it is lacking a few of the latest uploads.
For some value of "recent" :)
Since oldoldstable ;-)
>
Hi,
Am 14.10.21 um 09:30 schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen:
> I still remember how, and can do it in the next few days. One key
> question is if you already have a git repository (or some other VCS) for
> the package we should migrate, or if I should rebuild one from scratch
> using git-buildpackage?
ebian/control
> index 0806f4d..81c84d3 100644
> --- a/debian/control
> +++ b/debian/control
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ Priority: optional
> Maintainer: Rene Engelhard
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), imagemagick, ghostscript, docbook-utils,
> sharutils, dh-autoreconf, automake,
[ please always keep the Bug in CC so that discussions about it get
recorded.
Readding. ]
Hi.
Am 10.10.21 um 20:44 schrieb Alex:
> And what is in LO settings?
> LO Settings point to /usr/lib/thunderbird
OK, as I guessed. Then anything can be in KDEs session doesn't matter.
> What if you set y
found 996016 1:7.0.4-4
retitlle 996016 ibreoffice: fails to send email with Thunderbird set as
mailer in KDE
tag 996016 + moreinfo
tag 996016 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
Am 10.10.21 um 11:30 schrieb Alex:
> Package: libreoffice
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> When I created a do
tag 994757 + wontfix
thanks
Hi,
Am 22.09.21 um 17:56 schrieb Alfonso Sanchez-Beato:
> and that in general having the option to compile statically cannot be
harmful.
I disagree. It's probably usedul for essential stuff but not for GUI
stuff. (and graphite is about fonts, so GUI).
There actual
Hi again,
Am 22.09.21 um 18:08 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> Hi,
>> Do you want me to create a new bug? I was about to do it, but thought
>> that would create more noise by now.
>
> obviously not. if you read the bug you'd have seen that I fixed the
> metadata.
I am so
Hi,
> Do you want me to create a new bug? I was about to do it, but thought
> that would create more noise by now.
obviously not. if you read the bug you'd have seen that I fixed the
metadata. Yes,a new bug would be useless noise.
Regards,
Rene
notfound 994757 1.3.13-11
severity 994757 wishlist
thanks
Hi,
Am 20.09.21 um 16:43 schrieb Alfonso Sanchez-Beato:
> Package: libgraphite2-dev
> Version: 1.3.13-11build1
There is no such version. You are reporting against Debian, please use
proper versions existing there.
Also you are reporti
reopen 994698
thanks
Hi,
Am 20.09.21 um 00:00 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> Am 19.09.21 um 17:28 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
>> Whereas LO builds with g++ 11 since 1:7.1.0~rc1-1 in general Rico pointed me
>> to
>> https://git.launchpad.net/~libreoffice/ubuntu/+source/libreof
Hi,
only appeared in the original bug, fwd...
Regards,
Rene
- Weitergeleitete Nachricht von Rene Engelhard -
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 17:28:52 +0200
From: Rene Engelhard
To: 984...@bugs.debian.org, 984204-submit...@bugs.debian.org
Cc: cont...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: one more fix for
severity 984204 important
clone 984204 -1
block 984204 by -1
retile -1 FTBFS with g++ 11 on armhf: Error: selected processor does not
support `vpush {d0-d7}' in ARM mode
tag -1 + pending
thanks
Hi,
Whereas LO builds with g++ 11 since 1:7.1.0~rc1-1 in general Rico pointed me to
https://git.launc
unarchive 985867
tag 985867 - patch
found 985867 1:7.2.1-1
thanks
Hi,
this was reverted. (There was no actual LTO usage anywyay ttbomk).
- It missed a chmod 755 so that clang_wrapper was executable
This was fixed in 1:7.2.0-3
- configure doesn't detect any clang and uses g++
(cf.
https
tag 994624 - moreinfo
retitle 994624 libreoffice fail to start with error undefined symbol:
_ZNK11LanguageTag20getGlibcLocaleStringESt17basic_string_viewIDsSt11char_traitsIDsEE
after installing 7.2.1-1 on testing
severity 994624 serious
thanks
Hi,
Am 19.09.21 um 11:11 schrieb Rene Engelhard
reopen 994624
thanks
Hi,
Am 19.09.21 um 12:25 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> OK, looking at a diff between 7.1.5 and 7.2.1 suggests that the UNO
> runtime got new LanguageTag-using functions so I did:
> - install testing
> - install libreoffice from sid
> -> run in to the err
retitle 994624 libreoffice fail to start with error undefined symbol:
_ZNK11LanguageTag20getGlibcLocaleStringESt17basic_string_viewIDsSt11char_traitsIDsEE
with pre-7.2.0 ure
tag 994624 + confirmed
thanks
Hi,
Am 19.09.21 um 11:43 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> - add unstable to sources.list and
tag 994624 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Am 18.09.21 um 22:40 schrieb Pirate Praveen:
> $ libreoffice
> /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice.bin: symbol lookup error:
> /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libmergedlo.so: undefined symbol:
> _ZNK11LanguageTag20getGlibcLocaleStringESt17basic_string_viewIDsSt11c
Hi,
Am 16.09.21 um 11:03 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> Though admittedly -plasma misses a Recommends: on libreoffice-kde5:
> rene@frodo:~$ apt-cache show libreoffice-plasma | grep Recomm
> rene@frodo:~$ apt-cache show libreoffice-gnome | grep Recomm
> Recommends: libreoffice-styl
retitle 994445 missing Recommends on libreoffice-kf5
reassign 994445 libreoffice-plasma
severity 994445 minor
thanks
Hi,
Am 16.09.21 um 09:16 schrieb karl...@abwesend.de:
> Package: libreoffice
> Version: 1:7.0.4-4
(no Severity)
Sorry, no, IMHO this is a minor bug, not a normal one, but it
Hi,
Am 14.09.21 um 15:59 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> b) removed the unreproducible tag already.
OK, actually I forgot the CC. (This happens if you do it when you
actually have more imprtant university stuff to do...)
Done manually now.
Regards,
Rene
Hi,
Am 14.09.21 um 15:54 schrieb paul deg:
> Saying it's "not reproducible" is refusing to accept reality.
If you actually have read my mails you would have seen that I
a) acknowledged the problem (there's a easy workaround, though)
b) removed the unreproducible tag already.
Regards,
Rene
Am 14.09.21 um 15:20 schrieb paul_deg:
> What you say makes 0 sense.
Helpful. Not.
I could have said that for you too, (besides that your "top menu" also
didn't make any sense at all given you mean "tool bar".)
I didn't, I tried to argue with examples. Like writing black on black.
(here it i
tag 993449 - unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
Am 14.09.21 um 02:29 schrieb paul deg:
> Still reproducible on my end. Make sure "icon style" in LibreOffice
> options/view is set to� "automatic", which is default.
Or default in gnome tweaks.
> Then in Gnome tweaks select icon set as "breeze-dark".
Am Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 11:27:07AM +0200 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> See screenshots. Looks OK.
And yes, even with Adwaita there is no icons in any menu.
The (needed) checkboxes as (as you see in my menu.png) also there.
So it's still unreproducible.
Regards,
Rene
retitle 993449 libreoffice-calc: Top level tool menu is missing text
labels and icons for most buttons with breeze-dark theme
found 993449 1:7.1.5-2
thanks
[ sorry for the late answer, never appeared in my mbox, just saew it by
chance in the BTS logs ]
Hi,
Am Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 11:58:54AM -050
Source: caveexpress
Version: 2.5.1-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
as I said in my post to -release caveexpress doesn't build anymore with the
newly
unoddinated(!) upload of box2d 2.4:
[...]
[20%] Building CXX object
src/modules/physics/CMakeFiles/physics.dir/DebugRenderer.cpp.o
cd
/home/rene/LibreOff
severity 993449 important
tag 993449 + moreinfo
tag 993449 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
Am Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 09:56:22AM -0500 schrieb pavel:
> Package: libreoffice-calc
> Version: 1:7.0.4-4
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
Bulls*.
How does it break booting? How do
severity 992779 serious
found 992779 1:7.2.0-2
notfound 992779 1:7.1.5-2
tag 992779 + confirmed
thanks
Hi,
Am 23.08.21 um 12:31 schrieb Nicolas Patrois:
> Package: libreoffice-gnome
> Version: 1:7.1.5-2
Oh, my. obviously not. If at all the bug is in the new package not
declaring the correct
Hi,
last note.
Am 18.08.21 um 07:56 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
>> "/usr/local/bin/libreoffice: 52: cd: can't cd to ../lib/libreoffice/program"
> And obviously nothing in this package contains any
>
> /usr/local/bin/libreoffice
In fact, anything in /usr/local is a p
Hi,
Am 18.08.21 um 07:56 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> Did you put one there yourself once? You are are not supposed to copy
> stuff around...
And this fails because it expects to be in /usr (where it's supposed to
be) and then does that cd which works becazse LO is in
/usr/lib/libreoff
:7.1.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian LibreOffice Maintainers
Changed-By: Rene Engelhard
Changes:
libreoffice (1:7.1.5-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* "New" upstream release
.
* upload to unstable
Checksums-Sha1:
a3d30e3388fae6cc641715276abcd8efb26f
notfound 934678 7.0.4.2
thanks
Am 17.06.21 um 16:21 schrieb Debian Bug Tracking System:
>> found #934678 7.0.4.2
And this is smply wrong, there is no 7.0.4.2 in Debian context.
Version: is the *package* version here.
(and it's not needed since the version tracking clearly knows 1:7.0.4-4
is
nfigured. Fix up
+ the symlink in postinst instead. (Closes: #985297)
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard Sat, 01 May 2021 13:50:48 +0200
+
libreoffice (1:7.0.4-3) unstable; urgency=medium
* debian/tests/control.in: *really* add libreoffice-writer dependency
diff -Nru libreoffice-7.0.4/debian/control l
Hi,
Am 30.04.21 um 16:23 schrieb Andreas Beckmann:
> I've been experimenting a lot to fix this bug.
Thanks very much.
> I've running various buster->bullseye upgrade scenarios (with and
> without recommends, direct distupgrade vs upgrade && dist-upgrade)
> with the patched packages as upgrade targ
block 987552 by 987504
thanks
Hi,
Am 25.04.21 um 15:05 schrieb Chris Hofstaedtler:
> Caused by #987504, see that bug for further details.
Then imagemagick should be fixed. I mean, come on, it's simple image
convert...
Regards,
Rene
severity 986876 minor
retitle 986876 libreoffice can't open filenames containing spaces if not
properly quoted if started from terminal
thanks
Hi,
Am 13.04.21 um 12:11 schrieb Sander van Grieken:
> Package: libreoffice
> Version: 1:7.0.4-3
> Severity: important
No, see below. I am not even s
close 986418 1:7.1.1~rc2-1
thanks
Hi,
Am 06.04.21 um 22:55 schrieb Drew Parsons:
> Anyhow, I converted the "close" tag to "fixed" in 1:7.1.1~rc2-1. If
> you think this bug really does need to be closed and dropped, then I
> won't reopen it again.
>
"closed" is correct. The same would have happe
tag 986418 + fixed-upstream
tag 986418 + upstream
forwarded 986418
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139511
close 986418 1:7.1.1~rc2-1
thanks
Hi,
Am 05.04.21 um 16:45 schrieb Drew Parsons:
> Package: libreoffice-impress
> Version: 1:7.0.4-3
> Severity: important
> Control:
severity 985867 wishlist
thanks
Hi,
Am 25.03.21 um 08:59 schrieb Matthias Klose:
> When building LO with lto turned on (https://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/LTO),
> the build fails, because one module (skia) is still built with clang,
> apparently
> for performance reasons. I didn't check if tha
Hi again,
Am 18.03.21 um 06:53 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> It would be helpful if you actually did your homework. There already was
> 985297 so you now caused a bogus addditional RC bug.
>
> That bug even was marked as blocked by the dpkg bug so being careful
> when reassignin
Am 18.03.21 um 08:32 schrieb Andreas Beckmann:
> a clean minimal buster
>
> apt-get install libreoffice-writer # without --install-recommends enabled
>
> or
>
> apt-get install libreoffice-calc # happens both with and without
> --install-recommends enabled
>
Hrm. Indeed.
Regards,
Rene
reassign 985401 dpkg
thanks
Hi Guillem,
Am 18.03.21 um 00:02 schrieb Guillem Jover:
> Control: reassign -1 libreoffice-common 1:7.0.4-3
It would be helpful if you actually did your homework. There already was
985297 so you now caused a bogus addditional RC bug.
That bug even was marked as blo
Hi,
Am 16.03.21 um 22:02 schrieb Adi Kriegisch:
> thank you very much for the hard work you've put in packaging libreoffice
> online. Starting from your salsa repo[1] I was able to successfully build
> loolwsd and loleaflet packages with the libreoffice packages from
> buster-backports. There were
tag 985297 + moreinfo
tag 985297 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
Am 15.03.21 um 15:11 schrieb Andreas Beckmann:
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
> 'buster'.
In what scenario?
- a clean buster debootstrap + apt install libreoffice
- a clean buster deboo
Hi,
Am 13.03.21 um 19:57 schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Mon, 2021-03-08 at 13:26 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>> +libreoffice (1:6.1.5-3+deb10u7) buster; urgency=medium
>> +
>> + * debian/patches/fix-PYTHONPATH.diff: backport upstream
Hi,
Am 09.03.21 um 19:27 schrieb Vincas Dargis:
> Changing rule into this:
>>>
>>> owner @{libo_user_dirs}/{,**/}lu?{,?,??}.tmp rwk, #Temporary
>>> file used when saving
>>>
>>> Did the trick (needed 9 symbol variant).
>>
>> As was done.
>>
>>
>> If you would actually have read the bug you
Hi,
for avoidance of doubt...
Am 08.03.21 um 20:51 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
>> type=AVC msg=audit(1615225628.771:1363): apparmor="DENIED"
>> operation="mknod" profile="libreoffice-soffice"
>> name="/home/vincas/Dokumentai/lu4638vdjw1.
=medium
+
+ * debian/patches/fix-PYTHONPATH.diff: backport upstream fix to
+not leave a bare trailing : in PYTHONPATH as it causes unconditional
+loading of encodings.py from . (closes: #984703)
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard Mon, 08 Mar 2021 13:13:24 +0100
+
libreoffice (1:6.1.5-3+deb10u6) buster
Hi again,
Am 07.03.21 um 23:08 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> Am 07.03.21 um 22:45 schrieb Milko Krachounov:
>> After some additional testing, checking my environment and inspecting pyuno/
>> source/loader/pyuno_loader.cxx, I want to amend the report, particularly
>> about
forwarded 984703 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121384
thanks
Hi,
Am 07.03.21 um 22:45 schrieb Milko Krachounov:
> After some additional testing, checking my environment and inspecting pyuno/
> source/loader/pyuno_loader.cxx, I want to amend the report, particularly
> abou
tag 984703 + moreinfo
tag 984703 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
Am 07.03.21 um 13:34 schrieb Milko Krachounov:
> When opening any CSV file with LibreOffice Calc, Calc opens and executes
> encodings.py from the current working directory.
Demonstrably wrong, see below.
> That presumably happens
Hi again,
Am 07.03.21 um 13:34 schrieb Milko Krachounov:
> When opening any CSV file with LibreOffice Calc, Calc opens and executes
> encodings.py from the current working directory. That presumably happens
> because
There also is no mention of any "encodings.py" in anything in
LibreOffice itsel
Hi,
Am 15.02.21 um 15:56 schrieb Vincent Lefevre:
> Now, I don't know whether this file is really needed, in which case
> I suppose that there is a missing dependency on libboost1.74-dev
> (currently).
Hmm, yes.
Looks like libcmis-dev needs a Depends: libboost-dev...
Regards,
Rene
Hi,
Am 11.02.21 um 21:59 schrieb Raphaël Hertzog:
> [1] For details it happened in dbus-glib:
> https://snapshot.debian.org/package/dbus-glib/0.110-2/ -> it has .asc file
> https://snapshot.debian.org/package/dbus-glib/0.110-3/ -> no .asc
> https://snapshot.debian.org/package/dbus-glib/0.110-4/ -
Hi,
Am 08.02.21 um 03:15 schrieb Paul Wise:
> Tags: patch
No, No patch.
patch does not mean "add a ?" but if at all someting like this
$ git diff sysui/desktop/apparmor/program.soffice.bin
diff --git a/sysui/desktop/apparmor/program.soffice.bin
b/sysui/desktop/apparmor/program.soffice.bin
ind
Hi again,
Am 13.01.21 um 20:59 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> Am 13.01.21 um 19:43 schrieb Antonio:
>> I solved it by changing this line of the file
>> "/usr/share/hunspell/it_IT.aff":
>>
>> --- it_IT.aff.orig.bad 2021-01-13 19:28:38.184457124 +0100
>&
Hi Antonio,
Am 13.01.21 um 19:43 schrieb Antonio:
> I solved it by changing this line of the file
> "/usr/share/hunspell/it_IT.aff":
>
> --- it_IT.aff.orig.bad 2021-01-13 19:28:38.184457124 +0100
> +++ it_IT.aff.new.ok 2021-01-13 19:38:06.141194317 +0100
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
> LANG it_IT
> HOM
Hi,
Am 13.01.21 um 10:36 schrieb g.l. gragnani:
> Package: hunspell-it
> Version: 1:7.1.0~rc1-1
> Followup-For: Bug #979439
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I can confirm this bug for both LibreOffice and Thunderbird (1:78.6.0-1)
> According to the program isutf8 (package moreutils)
> the file /usr/share
tag 980013 + moreinfo
tag 980013 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
Am 12.01.21 um 22:54 schrieb Nick Bailey:
> access("/tmp", W_OK)= 0
> getuid()= 1000
> socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0) = 3
> fcntl(3, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0
> co
Package: texlive-base
Version: 2020.20201203-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
dist-upgrade buster->bullseye which just caused my system to not get out of apt
-f install anymore:
Entpacken von texlive-base (2020.20201203-2) über (2018.20190227-2) ...
dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten des Archivs
/tmp/apt-dpk
301 - 400 of 5621 matches
Mail list logo
