Hi,
Same problem, still a problem, anyone have a work around or patch?
--
===Sig===
I can be reached on these IM networks:
AOL Instant Messenger: sidusnare
Yahoo Instant Messenger: sidusnare
MSN Messenger: sidusn...@hotmail.com
Internet relay chat: sidusn...@freenode.net
Gadu-Gadu 2597810
Jabber
On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 20:07:32 -0500 "William L. DeRieux IV" wrote:
> after editing /etc/eclipse.ini
> and adding -debug to it
>
> I get the following output (when running eclipse):
> -
> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM warning: igno
after editing /etc/eclipse.ini
and adding -debug to it
I get the following output (when running eclipse):
-
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM warning: ignoring option MaxPermSize=256m;
support was removed in 8.0
Install location:
file:/usr/lib/eclipse/
Configu
found 891956 3.8.1-10
Using valgrind to execute monodeveop gave me some more information and
it seems to be an issue (free() invalid pointer as well as double free
or corruption) in gtk_file_chooser_get_filenames.
$ valgrind mono-sgen --debug /usr/lib/monodevelop/bin/MonoDevelop.exe
==21563== Conditional jump or m
3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.39-1 (2016-12-30)
x86_64 GNU/Linux
On Mon, 06 Feb 2017 06:12:52 -0500 "William L. DeRieux IV" wrote:
> Package: monodevelop
> Version: 5.10.0.871-2
> Severity: important
>
> When using MonoDevelop 5.10.0.871-2 / mono 4.6.2.7+dfsg-1 and I
Package: monodevelop
Version: 5.10.0.871-2
Severity: important
When using MonoDevelop 5.10.0.871-2 / mono 4.6.2.7+dfsg-1 and I try to open a
file or a project I get the following error.
It does not crash immediately but it does so after a short time (1-5 seconds).
$ apt-cache policy monodevelop
*
tags 851518 = moreinfo unreproducible
--
On Thu, 19 Jan 2017 16:14:08 -0500 "William L. DeRieux IV" wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2017 22:43:42 +0100 Carsten Kosthorstwrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I updated today and cinnamon is working again.
> >
> > Thanks
tags 851518 - moreinfo--
On Tue, 17 Jan 2017 22:43:42 +0100 Carsten Kosthorstwrote:
> Hi,
>
> I updated today and cinnamon is working again.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Carsten
>
>
>
Your version of cinnamon was 3.2.7-1 in the initial report.
The latest version in unstable/sid is 3.2.7-1.
What version wa
--
Gdb backtrace against latest version of scim/1.4.17-1 using Gimp 2.8.18-1
(gimp:16410): Gdk-WARNING **:
/build/gtk+2.0-pW7LUB/gtk+2.0-2.24.31/gdk/x11/gdkdrawable-x11.c:874
drawable is not a pixmap or window
Thread 1 "gimp" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x771fc878 in
On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 11:06:23 +0100 Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> ¡Hola William!
>
> El 2016-11-02 a las 17:32 -0400, William L. DeRieux IV escribió:
> >>> I'm running Cinnamon 3.0.7-2 everything was fine until a recent
update.
> >>> Now clicking on certain items
On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 11:42:54 +0100 Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
>
> ¡Hola William!
>
> El 2016-11-01 a las 12:56 -0400, William L. DeRieux IV escribió:
> > Package: cinnamon
> > Version: 3.0.7-2
> > Severity: important
>
> > I'
Package: cinnamon
Version: 3.0.7-2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I'm running Cinnamon 3.0.7-2 everything was fine until a recent update.
Now clicking on certain items on the cinnamon-panel causes a crash and
when running cinnamon --replace from a tty causes a segmentation fault.
This is t
The thrown exceptions look like these:
ERROR: System.MissingMethodException: Method not found: 'Int32
System.Runtime.InteropServices.Marshal.SizeOf(!!0)'.
ERROR: System.MissingMethodException: Method not found: 'Void
System.Runtime.InteropServices.Marshal.StructureToPtr(!!0, IntPtr,
Bo
Package: monodevelop
Version: 5.10.0.871-2
Severity: important
When building a project and targeting Mono/.NET 4.0 an assemlyinfo file is
automatically generated
in the obj folder: .NETFramework\,Version\=v4.5.AssemblyAttribute.cs
The content of thi
In my example I said samba_util.h from samba-dev was listed for jessie
(even though it was blocked from install) and is no longer available in
testing or later...
$ apt-cache policy samba-dev
samba-dev:
Installed: 2:4.4.5+dfsg-3
Candidate: 2:4.4.5+dfsg-3
Version table:
*** 2:4.4.5+dfsg-3
Package: apt-file
Version: 3.1.1
Severity: important
apt-file does not respect apt pinning priorities and when a file
is found it's hard to determine (from the output) what release it is from.
$ cat /etc/apt/sources.list
deb [arch=amd64,i386] https://mirrors.ludost.net/debian/ jessie
#...quit
Using debian kernel 3.16.0-4-amd64 (3.16.36-1+deb8u1) -- /proc/iomem can
be accessed without root.
Added in linux kernel 4.6: /proc/iomem: only expose physical resource
addresses to privileged users
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370281#c1
This was intent
--
In libsysinfo-0.2.2/Linux/sysinfo_linux.c fucntion get_mem_size(void):
--
long long get_mem_size(void) {
long long mem_size=0;
/* First try any arch-specific memsize functions */
mem_size=get_arch_specific_
I had an older version installed and could confirm the issue existed;
but as of v5.6.30-1 this is no longer an issue.
I just realized that the problem is not necessarily with
get_mem_size_iomem()
-- but the issue still requires root privileges to be able to read the
system ram.
Package: linuxlogo
Version: 5.11-8.1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
when linuxlogo (5.11-8.1) is executed as a normal user it reports that the
system has 128TB of ram; when it is run as root it will show the correct
amount.
The issue resides in file (ibsysinfo-0.2.2/Linux/sysin
These two messages for bug #765069
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=765069
Message 86: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=765069#86
Message 91: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=765069#91
File: PO645788.ace and air way bill.jar may possibly contain
L. DeRieux IV wrote:
The issue is confirmed to be in gtk+3.0-3.14.5 and was fixed in
gtk+3.0-3.16
This issue is in gtk+3.0-3.14.5 and was patched in gtk+3.0-3.16
Related bug: Bug 744991 - Fix loading of GResource SVGs -
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744991
git commit that fixed
The issue is confirmed to be in gtk+3.0-3.14.5 and was fixed in gtk+3.0-3.16
This issue is in gtk+3.0-3.14.5 and was patched in gtk+3.0-3.16
Related bug: Bug 744991 - Fix loading of GResource SVGs -
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744991
git commit that fixed the issue:
https://git
On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:52:57 +0300 Dmitry Ostasevich
wrote:
> Package: openshot
> Version: 1.4.3-1.1
> Severity: normal
> Tags: upstream
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> huge icon is displayed for saved openshot projects in Nautilus.
> That is probably the same problem as in #765069 bug.
>
> -- System I
Package: ifupdown
Version: 0.7
I attempted to add multiple IP addresses via the up command specifying
interface for the ip command argument as $IFACE:
up ip a a 172.32.0.1 dev $IFACE
up ip a a 172.32.0.2 dev $IFACE
and discovered that only one of the two (or more) addresses is added to an
inte
Given the large gap between python 2 and python 3 (and the fact that
python 3 scripts generally don't run on python 2), a lot of script
writers are beginning to use python2 references in their scripts.
aka:
#/usr/bin/env python2
and
#/usr/bin/env python3
I've tested this on every other curren
Package: src:petsc
Severity: wishlist
Hello Christophe,
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 17:07 +0200, trophime wrote:
> Hi,
> I manage to package pastix for debian (see Debian Science repository).
> Moreover I have rebuild petsc to enable pastix support (see the attached
> debian/rules). To perform test jus
On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 21:35 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: illuminator
> Version: 0.11.0-13
> Severity: serious
> Tags: wheezy sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120419 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid,
Hello Christian,
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 06:57 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Adam C Powell IV (hazel...@debian.org):
> > Thank you for your notes of March 29 and April 5. I have been unusually
> > busy for an unusually long period of time, and have not been able to
>
Brief update...
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 09:10 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 21:02 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 15:25 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > > Please remove all of the OCE shared libraries with library version 1,
&g
Please binNMU netgen on armhf to link against new OCE libraries.
Thanks,
Adam
--
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6
Engineering consulting with open source tools
http://www.opennovation.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 21:02 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 15:25 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > Please remove all of the OCE shared libraries with library version 1,
> > such as liboce-foundation1 (i.e. upstream version 0.8.0). It seems they
>
Package: ftp.debian.org
X-DebBugs-CC: Anton Gladky ,
debian-science-maintain...@lists.debian.org
Greetings,
Please remove all of the OCE shared libraries with library version 1,
such as liboce-foundation1 (i.e. upstream version 0.8.0). It seems they
are blocking the transition to 0.9.1, which i
Dear Christian,
Thank you for your notes of March 29 and April 5. I have been unusually
busy for an unusually long period of time, and have not been able to
spend the time I otherwise would on my Debian packages.
Let me confirm now that I approve of your NMU for fixing elmerfem
debconf l10n issu
Package: ftp.debian.org
X-DebBugs-CC: debian-science-maintain...@lists.debian.org
Hello,
Apparently petsc, slepc, and their reverse depends will not transition
until binary slepc packages libslepc3.1, libslepc3.1-dev and
libslepc3.1-dbg have been removed for the armel and kfreebsd-*
architectures
Package: ftp.debian.org
X-DebBugs-CC: debian-science-maintain...@lists.debian.org
Hello,
petsc has built on and off (mostly off) on armel, and there's a new
upstream bug which makes it not work on kfreebsd-*. The presence of old
packages is preventing petsc 3.2 and a bunch of rdeps from migratin
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 09:31 -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 05:51:14PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 21:05 +0100, trophime wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > with the following patches the package builds fine.
> >
> >
Hello,
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 15:45 +0100, D. Barbier wrote:
> Le 27 février 2012 15:24, Adam C Powell IV a écrit :
> > On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 08:54 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > [snip]
> > There are a couple of issues in the git repository though. I
> > accidental
tags 660894 pending
thanks
On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 17:54 +, Joe Dalton wrote:
> Package: elmerfem
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: l10n patch
>
> Please include the attached Danish elmerfem translations.
>
> joe@pc:~/over/debian/elmerfem$ msgfmt --statistics -c -v -o /dev/null
> da.poda.po: 3 over
tags 661126 pending
thanks
On Fri, 2012-02-24 at 12:01 +0100, Jeroen Schot wrote:
> Package: elmerfem
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch l10n
>
> Hello,
>
> Attached is the Dutch translation of the elmerfem debconf templates.
> Please include it in your next upload.
Thank you very much, I have
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 21:05 +0100, trophime wrote:
> Hi,
> with the following patches the package builds fine.
Thanks very much Christophe! This is incredibly helpful.
Roberto, can you take care of applying these patches and uploading, or
do you want me to do an NMU? This is holding up a pretty
Hi Denis,
On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 08:54 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 09:29 +0100, D. Barbier wrote:
> > Le 26 février 2012 06:29, Adam C Powell IV a écrit :
> > > Would you like me to upload the new oce with this change, or wait for a
> > > ne
Hello,
On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 09:29 +0100, D. Barbier wrote:
> Le 26 février 2012 06:29, Adam C Powell IV a écrit :
> > Would you like me to upload the new oce with this change, or wait for a
> > new upstream or other changes?
>
> Hello Adam,
>
> You can upload, ye
Powell IV wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There's a better way to do this by just having different shared library
> file names and sonames for each of the shared library packages. Then
> the -dev packages can conflict, while one can install multiple packages
> using the different shared l
Hello Denis,
Would you like me to upload the new oce with this change, or wait for a
new upstream or other changes?
-Adam
On Sat, 2012-02-25 at 00:04 +0100, D. Barbier wrote:
> tags 656838 pending
> thanks
>
> Le 22 janvier 2012 04:37, Michael Cree a écrit :
> > Source: oce
> > Version: 0.8.0-
Package: src:med-fichier
Version: 3.0.3-3
Severity: serious
This requires hdf5-tools and libhdf5-mpi-dev to build, but they conflict
because they depend on conflicting HDF5 shared library packages.
-Adam
--
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6
Engineering consulti
Hi,
There's a better way to do this by just having different shared library
file names and sonames for each of the shared library packages. Then
the -dev packages can conflict, while one can install multiple packages
using the different shared libraries simultaneously, not one-at-a-time
as update
2012/2/21 Adam C Powell IV
> tags 660241 moreinfo
> thanks
>
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 09:37 -0600, Edscott Wilson Garcia
> wrote:
> > Package: libhypre-2.4.0
> > Version
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 15:27 +0100, Johannes Ring wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> Trilinos 10.8.5 has been packaged in svn:
>
> svn://svn.debian.org/svn/debian-science/packages/trilinos/trunk
>
> Please check if this bug is still present there.
Thank you, I will do that in the next couple of days.
-Ada
tags 660241 moreinfo
thanks
Hello,
On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 09:37 -0600, Edscott Wilson Garcia wrote:
> Package: libhypre-2.4.0
> Version: 2.4.0b-7
> Severity: important
>
>
> Hypre works fine with mpich2. Instalation via debian package invariably ties
> it up with openmpi. When target user has a
ease make this change. I'll see if I can get some time to help.
-Adam
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 10:05 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Hi Christophe,
>
> Thanks, I understand that the full library list is needed for now, but
> would like it to be otherwise.
>
> Would you acc
Hi Christophe,
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 11:52 +0100, trophime wrote:
> Package: med-fichier
> Version: 3.0.3-3
> Severity: wishlist
>
> It will be great to upgrade med to 3.0.4
> as it is required for Salome and latest Code Aster
I just got med-fichier 3.0.4 and tried to build it.
Unfortunately i
Package: src:coinor-ipopt
Version: 3.10.1-1
Severity: serious
When I try to build this package, it FTBFS in latex while making doxygen
docs:
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.10 (TeX Live 2009/Debian)
entering extended mode
(./_formulas.tex
LaTeX2e <2009/09/24>
Babel and hyphenation pattern
Hi again,
On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 22:30 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2012-02-09 22:25, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > One thing though: do you mind if we downgrade the severity temporarily?
> > There's a big transition about to happen [...]
>
> Adjust as you need i
On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 00:38 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: libelmer-dev
> Version: 6.1.0.svn.5396.dfsg-4
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts
>
> Hi,
>
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
> 'squeeze'.
> It in
Hi Christophe,
On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 16:01 +0100, trophime wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 09:25 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > Package: src:deal.ii
> > Version: 7.0.0-3
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > This needs an upgrade for PETSc/SLEPc 3.2. 7.1.0 is alm
Package: src:deal.ii
Version: 7.0.0-3
Severity: serious
This needs an upgrade for PETSc/SLEPc 3.2. 7.1.0 is almost there, but
the version in alioth doesn't quite work with the new SLEPc interface.
-Adam
--
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6
Engineering consulti
Package: src:freecad
Hello,
Due to the slow (or often nonexistent) responsiveness of OpenCASCADE to
user feedback, patches, etc., users created the OpenCASCADE Community
Edition, or OCE. Debian has adopted OCE as its standard OpenCASCADE
implementation, and there is an OCE package now.
Please c
Package: src:netgen
Hello,
Due to the slow (or often nonexistent) responsiveness of OpenCASCADE to
user feedback, patches, etc., users created the OpenCASCADE Community
Edition, or OCE. Debian has adopted OCE as its standard OpenCASCADE
implementation, and there is an OCE package now.
Please ch
On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 12:30 +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> * Sylvestre Ledru [120126 09:49]:
>
> > Could you remove salome from Debian ?
>
> Sure, as there are no reverse depends.
>
> > It has many RCs (10).
>
> However, due to the multiple versions in the archive, we could
Hello Christophe,
On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 13:26 +0100, Christophe Trophime wrote:
> Source: petsc
> Version: 3.0.0.dfsg-5.1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear Maintainer,
> it will be nice to have shared librairies in the debug package as well (if
> possible)
>
> thanks
At some point I'm considering
reassign 642439 libpetsc3.2
thanks
Sorry, forgot to switch this to 3.2.
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 14:59 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> tags 642439 pending
> thanks
>
> On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 18:23 +0200, Mikael Öhman wrote:
> > Package: libpetsc3.1
> > Version: 3.1.dfsg-1
tags 642439 pending
thanks
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 18:23 +0200, Mikael Öhman wrote:
> Package: libpetsc3.1
> Version: 3.1.dfsg-11
> Severity: wishlist
>
> The CHOLMOD package is supposedly excellent, and is already available
> (libcholmod1.7.1) so I see no reason not to include it, at least for
> t
tags 655940 pending
thanks
Hello,
I'd be glad to re-add alpha, sorry I left it out. I just took the
buildd list and omitted arches with intractable problems. I'm sure
there are a couple of other arches I'll need to add as well.
The fix is in alioth. I'll upload when PETSc gets into testing or
tags 656189 pending
thanks
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 14:58 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Le jeudi 19 janvier 2012 à 08:56 -0500, Adam C Powell IV a écrit :
> > On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 10:36 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 12:03 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wro
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 10:36 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 12:03 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> > Source: petsc
> > Severity: important
> > Tags: patch
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > It would be nice if you could apply the attached
Hello Sylvestre,
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 12:03 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Source: petsc
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
>
> Hello,
>
> It would be nice if you could apply the attached patch.
> It disables the search of mpicc as hcp.
> For an unclear reason, it fixes the bug #624671.
> sle
On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 11:15 -0600, Pavan Balaji wrote:
> On 01/12/2012 08:18 PM, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > Just tested a build, it seems to set the link properly, thanks very
> > much. Do you have a timetable for the release of 1.5.x?
>
> 1.5 GA will be released this summ
om/
diff -urN mpich2-1.4.1.orig/debian/changelog mpich2-1.4.1/debian/changelog
--- mpich2-1.4.1.orig/debian/changelog 2011-08-27 03:06:32.0 -0400
+++ mpich2-1.4.1/debian/changelog 2012-01-12 16:56:38.0 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+mpich2 (1.4.1-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+ [ Adam C. Po
Hello Pavan,
On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 12:49 -0600, Pavan Balaji wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> On 01/11/2012 12:26 PM, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > But since we made that switch that switch in early December, MPICH2 has
> > been breaking a number of package builds now which used to w
now. You can always look at "mpicc -show" for any released
> version to figure out what all flags/libs are being set.
>
> -- Pavan
>
> On 01/07/2012 08:19 PM, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > That may be true, but it is a goal of Debian to be able to build the
>
00, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> tags 652061 pending
> thanks
>
> On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 12:11 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > * Christoph Egger , 2011-12-14, 16:01:
> > >Your package failed to build on the buildds:
> > >
> > >checking for dseupd_ in -larpack..
On Sun, 2012-01-08 at 12:05 +0100, Juergen Riegel wrote:
> Hi together,
> I'm, together with Werner, the maintainer of FreeCAD.
> Based on the long history of license struggle with OCTPL I do not think
> they will change the license soon.
> So I decided to go for GPL free for the 0.13 release of F
, this list is libmpich, libmpl and libopa, if you
> are using generic TCP/IP and shared memory support. But if you enable
> other modules, more libraries might be required.
>
> -- Pavan
>
> On 12/29/2011 01:48 PM, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > X-DebBugs-CC: 653...@bugs.deb
tags 652061 pending
thanks
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 12:11 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Christoph Egger , 2011-12-14, 16:01:
> >Your package failed to build on the buildds:
> >
> >checking for dseupd_ in -larpack... yes
> >configure: WARNING: No parallel arpack found.
> >checking for pdneupd_ in -lpar
On Thu, 2011-12-29 at 18:26 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Package: libscotchparmetis-dev
> Severity: wishlist
>
> PETSc cannot use libscotchparmetis-dev for matrix partitioning because
> it is missing the ParMETIS_V3_Mesh2Dual function. Please implement it
> in the inter
Thanks Muammar, it looks like everything worked and it built everywhere,
except s390x which is waiting for a fix to PVM.
I uploaded the new MUMPS, PETSc will go in as soon as MUMPS is ready.
Thanks again!
-Adam
On Thu, 2011-12-29 at 20:39 +0100, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
> Source: scalapack
> Fo
Package: libscotchparmetis-dev
Severity: wishlist
PETSc cannot use libscotchparmetis-dev for matrix partitioning because
it is missing the ParMETIS_V3_Mesh2Dual function. Please implement it
in the interface (assuming its functionality is somewhere in Scotch).
-Adam
--
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AE
Package: src:slepc
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
Upstream is now at version 3.2, which uses PETSc 3.2. My petsc package
is ready and awaiting uploads of scalapack and mumps to fix bugs 653610
and 653032 and you can find it at: http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/petsc/
(it will probably be in the archive by
X-DebBugs-CC: 653...@bugs.debian.org
Package: libmpich2-dev
Version: 1.4.1-1+b1
Greetings,
On mips(el) and s390, the scalapack build fails with:
gfortran -o
/build/buildd-scalapack_1.8.0-8-mipsel-D7TgwK/scalapack-1.8.0/TESTING/xspblas1tst
psblas1tst.o psblastst.o slamch.o pblastst.o PB_Cwarn.
Package: src:scalapack
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi Muammar,
I'm afraid scalapack FTBFS again on three platforms. On all three the
failure mechanism is the same: libmpich2.so is not linked to libmpl.so .
The workaround is in the attached patch: if you explicitly link -lmpich
-lmpl it should
Hi Muammar,
Reducing the recipients list as this concerns technical details.
On Sun, 2011-12-25 at 20:31 +0100, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
> Source: scalapack
> Followup-For: Bug #652313
>
> Hi,
>
> I have prepared a new revision of scalapack, but I have a doubt which is: do
> I have to provide a
On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 20:50 +0100, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 14:41, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > Hi Muammar,
> >
> > On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 11:59 +0100, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
> >> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 23:28, Adam C
tags 653032 patch
tags 653032 pending
block 653032 by 652312
block 653032 by 652313
thanks
This is fixed in alioth and I'll upload it when 652312 and 652313 are
fixed.
-Adam
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 18:00 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Package: src:mumps
> Version: 4.10.0-1
> Sev
tags 652313 patch
thanks
On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 13:23 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> retitle 652313 Needs mpich2 targets in debian/rules
> block 652313 by 652312
> thanks
>
> Hi Julien,
>
> On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 21:03 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec
retitle 652313 Needs mpich2 targets in debian/rules
block 652313 by 652312
thanks
Hi Julien,
On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 21:03 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 08:43:12 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 17:32 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
Package: src:scotch
Severity: wishlist
Bug title says it all.
-Adam
--
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6
Engineering consulting with open source tools
http://www.opennovation.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 17:32 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 08:00:15 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>
> > I think blacs-mpi, scalapack and suitesparse make sense for no-change
> > rebuilds. But I've been procrastinating maintenance on the rest
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 09:57 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 19:45:47 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>
> > Found the problem. PETSc built on November 16 with mpi-defaults 0.6
> > which depended on LAM on non-openmpi arches. Now mpi-defaults
Hi Francesco,
On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 19:30 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 11:49:10 -0500 Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 15:20 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> [...]
> > > Yes, but I think freecad should not be released in a stable ve
On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 18:15 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Hi
>
> as we have been asked about this license problem and not yet provided an
> answer:
>
> Either the licensing is changed so that the incompatibility no longer
> is there (by either getting the license changed, or exceptions in the
>
ock -9 by -6
block -9 by -7
block -9 by -8
thanks
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 14:36 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 09:55 +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> > reopen 651452
> > found 651452 0.11.0-12
> > thanks
> >
> >
> > Hi!
> &
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 09:55 +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> reopen 651452
> found 651452 0.11.0-12
> thanks
>
>
> Hi!
>
> * Adam C Powell IV [111214 15:33]:
>
> > Better to rip out the -llam and replace LLAM in the patch with -lmpi.
> > I'
clone 652061 -1
reassign -1 libarpack2-dev
retitle -1 Removed symbols needed by other packages
found -1 3.0.1-1
block 652061 by -1
thanks
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 14:31 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Hi Sylvestre,
>
> On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 18:50 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> >
Hi Sylvestre,
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 18:50 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Le mercredi 14 décembre 2011 à 11:58 -0500, Adam C Powell IV a écrit :
> > Hi Christoph,
> >
> > On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 16:01 +0100, Christoph Egger wrote:
> > > Package: src:elmerfem
> &
Package: src:petsc
Severity: wishlist
Subject says it all.
--
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6
Engineering consulting with open source tools
http://www.opennovation.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi Christoph,
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 16:01 +0100, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Package: src:elmerfem
> Version: 6.1.0.svn.5396.dfsg-3
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid wheezy
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
>
> Hi!
>
> Your package failed to build on the
Package: src:deal.ii
Version: 7.0.0-3
Severity: wishlist
The upstream debug method takes twice as long to build and uses a lot
more disk space than the Debian method of stripping debug symbols into a
separate file.
Please change it to the Debian way.
--
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B
1 - 100 of 989 matches
Mail list logo
