Package: util-linux
Version: 2.12r-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
$ man getopt | grep -A5 EXAMPLES
Reformatting getopt(1), please wait...
EXAMPLES
Example scripts for (ba)sh and (t)csh are provided with the getopt(1)
distribution, and are optionally installed in
With 0.97-3 and a boot floppy, I get:
Error 15: File not found
or something very similar. This happens with the kernel command.
Thing is that both blocklist and one other command, possibly find, can
see the kernel. The fs is ext2. No splash image. It was working with an
older version of
Package: fai-server
Version: 2.9.1
Severity: normal
File: /usr/sbin/make-fai-nfsroot
Tags: patch
I am not sure that /boot/patches* are intended to be installed into the
nfsroot.
If, however, they should be there in the 1st place then I believe the following
patch
should be applied:
---
On Sunday, January 15, 2006, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
Yes, I think I read your explanations, but I simply don't think apt and
debootstrap should be related here - mentioning sid in FAI_DEBOOTSTRAP is for
debootstrap only - if debootstrap in turn relies on apt, it is up to the
On Sunday, January 15, 2006, Henning Sprang wrote:
This doesn't get easier when thinking of Ubuntu, or even RedHat support.
Your goals are different then mine. I only need Debian unstable or testing
while you do consider Ubuntu, RH and possibly more.
The additional fai-distributions
On Monday, January 16, 2006, Thomas Lange wrote:
Do you know why the subdirectory patches/ is created?
It is a file, not a directory:
$ more nfsroot/boot/patches-2.6.*
::
nfsroot/boot/patches-2.6.14-fai-kernels
::
/usr/src/kernel-patches/all/2.6.14/apply/debian
On Friday, January 13, 2006, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
What's wrong with using sid instead of unstable??? Judging from the above
listing, debootstrap only recongnizes release names (I might be wrong, I'm no
export on debootstrap either). In your supplied patch there were some notes
about
Not related to the lilo issue of the original report, but still another
make-fai-bootfloppy issue:
floppies are prone to errors:
@@ -336,6 +337,7 @@
else
# blank first sector of floopy
dd if=/dev/zero of=$floppydev bs=512 count=1 2/dev/null
+mkfsopt=-cc
fi
# pay attention:
I only noticed Henning Sprang message because I browsed the BTS.
Not sure whether I overlooked it in my email or that he should have explicitly
cc 346304-submitter as well.
I will reply briefly because I don't have enough time for a thourough reply.
Hopefully you would be able to extract
Package: fai-server
Version: 2.9.1
Severity: minor
File: /usr/sbin/make-fai-bootfloppy
Tags: patch
--- make-fai-bootfloppy.orig2006-01-13 20:28:15.0 +0200
+++ make-fai-bootfloppy 2006-01-13 22:49:04.0 +0200
@@ -209,6 +209,7 @@
label=FAI-RARP
EOF
$NFSROOT/sbin/lilo
Package: fai
Version: 2.8.4
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
*** Please type your report below this line ***
--- /tmp/fai/make-fai-bootfloppy.8.orig 2006-01-07 22:32:03.0 +0200
+++ /tmp/fai/make-fai-bootfloppy.8 2006-01-07 22:32:46.0 +0200
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@
.B \-s HOST
Forward message from Narcis Ilisei:
---
Hi,
Happy new year!
Your proposal sounds reasonable.
I was never emotionally attached to any of the archive formats. Zip was
easier because I made both archives
Package: fai
Version: 2.8.4
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
*** Please type your report below this line ***
I was trying to install an nfsroot for sid. Only after applying the following
patch I
succeeded. I do hope that I didn't missed something during my trial and error
process.
I guess that
Obviously, the patch should have been:
--- /usr/sbin/make-fai-nfsroot.orig 2006-01-03 02:18:22.0 +0200
+++ /usr/sbin/make-fai-nfsroot 2006-01-03 00:46:29.0 +0200
@@ -496,7 +496,7 @@
umount $NFSROOT/dev/pts 1/dev/null 21 || true
rm -rf $NFSROOT/.??* $NFSROOT/*
(1) find:
I got the line numbers wrong as well:
@@ -486,7 +486,7 @@
umount $NFSROOT/dev/pts 1/dev/null 21 || true
rm -rf $NFSROOT/.??* $NFSROOT/*
# also remove files $NFSROOT/.? but not . and ..
-find $NFSROOT ! -type d -xdev -maxdepth 1 | xargs -r rm -f
+find
Package: fai
Version: 2.8.4
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
*** Please type your report below this line ***
find emits the following warnings:
find: warning: you have specified the -xdev option after a non-option
argument !, but options are not positional (-xdev affects tests
Package: fai
Version: 2.8.4
Severity: minor
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Quoting the last - 1 paragraph of section 6.1 of fai-guide:
other hostnames
Hosts with other hostname will only use the main class FAIBASE
I believe there is an inconsistency between
Hello,
I believe the 71th line of src/os_unix.c should be removed. This is so
because to the best of my knowledge, there is no signal named SIG_BLOCK. As far
as I can tell, the directive SIG_BLOCK can be used when setting a signal mask,
which is not what that line is dealing with.
From: Narcis Ilisei, who is the upstream author
Date: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 6:40 pm
Subject: Re: inadyn: src/os_unix.c:71 should be removed. SIG_BLOCK is wrong.
Hi,
you're right. It was a copy-paste rush to support all signals.
It was already removed.
see version 1.96
19 matches
Mail list logo
