Bug#1054086: lsm: let dh_installsystemd choose the location of units

Em 25/05/2024 17:42, Lucas Castro escreveu: Em 25/05/2024 17:23, Chris Hofstaedtler escreveu: Dear Maintainer, On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 08:11:55PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: Source: lsm Version: 1.0.4-2 I've prepared an NMU and uploaded to DELAYED/7. It is time to get this done. Feel free

Bug#1072167: grub-pc-dbg: newly-added symbol file "..." does not provide any symbols

Package: grub-pc-dbg Version: 2.12-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, I am following the recommended procedure to debug GRUB from the GRUB Developers Manual, ch. 7 Debugging, section i386. [1] gdb refuses to start, because it cannot load the symbols

Bug#1072164: grub-pc-dbg: missing gdb_helper.py script from the upstream source code

Package: grub-pc-dbg Version: 2.12-2 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, I am following the recommended procedure to debug GRUB from the GRUB Developers Manual, ch. 7 Debugging, section i386. [1] When using a pre-built GRUB, the distribution may have a package which installs this GDB

Bug#1049999: vagrant: the future of packaging vagrant in Debian

interesting. Maybe a third party project could create an incus frontend that provides a Vagrantfile-like interface. Given infinite free time, I would likely work on that. :) Lucas

Bug#1054086: lsm: let dh_installsystemd choose the location of units

Em 25/05/2024 17:23, Chris Hofstaedtler escreveu: Dear Maintainer, On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 08:11:55PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: Source: lsm Version: 1.0.4-2 I've prepared an NMU and uploaded to DELAYED/7. It is time to get this done. Feel free to fix this bug yourself before this time.

Bug#1071594: debhelper: fails to start openssh-server after creating host keys due to systemd 255 change

too quickly.' state. I hit this in the context of the Vagrant image, but it could hit users in other contexts as well. Lucas

Bug#1071602: manpage: noauto is supported by systemd

Package: cryptsetup Severity: minor X-Debbugs-Cc: lu...@doolk.com Dear Maintainer, crypttab(5) says for noauto: This option is ignored for initramfs devices and specific to the Debian crypttab format. It's not supported by systemd. It is supported by systemd upstream since version 186:

Bug#1071594: debhelper: fails to start openssh-server after creating host keys due to systemd 255 change

ion A MWE to reproduce is: systemctl stop ssh rm /etc/ssh/ssh_host_* for i in $(seq 1 10); do systemctl start ssh ; done systemctl status ssh dpkg-reconfigure openssh-server systemctl status ssh I tried to identify when and why it was changed in systemd, but failed. It could be argued that this is a regression in systemd. Lucas

Bug#1071528: ITP: hardinfo2 -- Hardinfo2 offers System Information and Benchmark for Linux Systems

version has a new binary package named hardinfo2 is no problem. I had mentioned that with upstream, but no response from Debian actual maintainer. There's some ways to solve that. Regard, atzlinux [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070830 在 2024/5/20 23:01, Lucas Castro

Bug#1071528: ITP: hardinfo2 -- Hardinfo2 offers System Information and Benchmark for Linux Systems

Em 20/05/2024 16:55, Jeremy Bícha escreveu: On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 11:09 AM Lucas Castro wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Lucas Castro X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org * Package name: hardinfo2 Version : 2.1.2 Upstream Contact: Name * URL

Bug#1071489: tracker.debian.org: please upgrade Lintian to the latest

version. So the real problem is that the lintian version in the archive doesn't know about the debian-policy version in the archive... Lucas

Bug#1071528: ITP: hardinfo2 -- Hardinfo2 offers System Information and Benchmark for Linux Systems

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Lucas Castro X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org * Package name: hardinfo2 Version : 2.1.2 Upstream Contact: Name * URL : https://hardinfo2.org/ * License : GPL-2 Programming Lang: C Description

Bug#1071002: ruby-mysql2: FTBFS on ppc64el: test suite hangs

On 14/05/24 at 09:05 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 12/05/24 at 21:23 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Package: ruby-mysql2 > > Version: 0.5.5-2 > > Severity: serious > > Tags: ftbfs > > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the &

Bug#1068063: sssd: FTBFS on armel, armhf (test failures with test_pam_xxx, test_user_xxx... for 2.9.x)

2 results returned while expected just one. > > This is because of time_t now being 64bits and a "%lu" format string > is being used to construct an ldap filter. See > https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/issues/7276 Hi, This one was fixed upstream. Lucas

Bug#1071002: ruby-mysql2: FTBFS on ppc64el: test suite hangs

On 12/05/24 at 21:23 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Package: ruby-mysql2 > Version: 0.5.5-2 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org > > Hi, >

Bug#1071002: ruby-mysql2: FTBFS on ppc64el: test suite hangs

rather recently (2024-03-17) but that was a different upstream version. Lucas

Bug#1071001: how-can-i-help: really needs a test suite

Package: how-can-i-help Version: 18 Severity: normal As shown by #1070713 -- System Information: Debian Release: 12.5 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (100, 'bookworm-fasttrack') Architecture:

Bug#1064297: RFS: foolsm/1.0.21-1 -- Link connectivity monitor tool

thinking about to delete the unstable. I'll maintain just the debian/latest for development, debian/ for backports, security and propose-update and mentioned on DEP-14. Thanks, Lucas Castro Em 11/05/2024 03:44, Tobias Frost escreveu: On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 08:02:17PM +0200, Daniel Gröber wrote

Bug#1070978: firefox: Spanish keyboard layout not working properly

Package: firefox Version: 125.0.3-1+b1 Severity: minor Tags: l10n X-Debbugs-Cc: josel.seg...@gmx.es Dear Maintainer, In a Gnome environment, when using the Spanish layout, the "ñ" letter and some of the accents that usually works as dead-keys are not working, just being ignored. I tried with

Bug#1069258: ruby-curb: test regression with curl 8.7.1: client read function EOF fail, only only 4/5 of needed bytes read

Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/taf2/curb/issues/451 Hi, I forwarded this upstream. Lucas

Bug#1020217: S3-backed snapshot implementation

On 06/05/24 at 14:40 +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: > Lucas Nussbaum writes: > > > - I got the OK to host a S3-backed snapshot mirror using the Debian AWS > > account (see thread in #1020217) > > Is this s3 bucket public, or will it be? It's my plan to make it pu

Bug#1020217: S3-backed snapshot implementation

that an import into S3 is doable in a couple of weeks in the worst case. In any case, that's a question to keep in mind, but that does not need to be resolved now. Lucas

Bug#1069549: racket: FTBFS on armel: dh_install: error: missing files, aborting

rmel (and armhf), depending on > your goals of course. Yeah, rebuilding arch:all in addition to arch:any was a mistake. I only filed bugs for packages that also have arch:any on armel, but obviously this wasn't enough to avoid all non-RC issues. Downgrading is of course fine. Lucas

Bug#1069783: packeth: Man page refers to an non existing file

Package: packeth Version: 2.1-0.2 Severity: minor X-Debbugs-Cc: josel.seg...@gmx.es Dear Maintainer, When reading the man page for current packeth, it refers to file /usr/share/doc/packeth/README. The file doesn't exist in current package version. -- System Information: Debian Release:

Bug#1069480: bochs: FTBFS on armhf: build-dependency not installable: gcc-i686-linux-gnu

. (I'd prefer a downgrade, because if that bug had existed, I would have seen it and would not have filed the bug) Lucas

Bug#1069367: qemu: FTBFS on arm64: build-dependency not installable: gcc-powerpc64-linux-gnu

On 20/04/24 at 15:39 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: > 20.04.2024 15:33, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > [..] > > This is part of a mass rebuild, first building on arm64 and then on > > armhf and armel. So I'm not suggesting anything. :-) > > Aha. > > > Is this failing bec

Bug#1069557: libkdumpfile: FTBFS on armel: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 check "TESTSUITEFLAGS=-j4 --verbose" VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

Source: libkdumpfile Version: 0.5.4-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069553: xsd: FTBFS on armel: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 test returned exit code 2

Source: xsd Version: 4.0.0-9 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]:

Bug#1069556: rovclock: FTBFS on armel: rovclock.c:27:10: fatal error: sys/io.h: No such file or directory

Source: rovclock Version: 0.6e-7 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part (hopefully): > gcc -g

Bug#1069555: gtk-d: FTBFS on armel: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: dh-dlang (>= 0.6.6), gir-to-d

Source: gtk-d Version: 3.10.0-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069554: winff: FTBFS on armel: build-dependency not installable: libreoffice-draw-nogui

Source: winff Version: 1.6.3+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069552: freecontact: FTBFS on armel: make[1]: *** [Makefile:469: all-recursive] Error 1

Source: freecontact Version: 1.0.21-13.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069549: racket: FTBFS on armel: dh_install: error: missing files, aborting

Source: racket Version: 8.12+dfsg1-7 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069550: kvirc: FTBFS on armel: build-dependency not installable: qtwebengine5-dev

Source: kvirc Version: 4:5.2.2+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069548: haskell-yesod-auth-hashdb: FTBFS on armel: unsatisfiable build-dependencies

Source: haskell-yesod-auth-hashdb Version: 1.7.1.7-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part

Bug#1069546: ktorrent: FTBFS on armel: dh_install: error: missing files, aborting

Source: ktorrent Version: 22.12.3-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069547: libkolabxml: FTBFS on armel: make[3]: *** [CMakeFiles/generate_bindings.dir/build.make:89: bindings/kolabformat.cxx] Error 132

Source: libkolabxml Version: 1.2.1-5 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069542: octave: FTBFS on armel: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:59: override_dh_auto_build-indep] Error 1

Source: octave Version: 8.4.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]:

Bug#1069544: mame: FTBFS on armel: collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

Source: mame Version: 0.264+dfsg.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part (hopefully): > g++

Bug#1069543: haskell-gi-vte: FTBFS on armel: unsatisfiable build-dependencies

Source: haskell-gi-vte Version: 2.91.31-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069538: zeroc-ice: FTBFS on armel: make[3]: *** [Makefile:29: tests] Error 1

Source: zeroc-ice Version: 3.7.10-2.2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069541: haskell-gi-dbusmenugtk3: FTBFS on armel: unsatisfiable build-dependencies

Source: haskell-gi-dbusmenugtk3 Version: 0.4.14-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part

Bug#1069539: softhsm2: FTBFS on armel: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 check "TESTSUITEFLAGS=-j4 --verbose" VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

Source: softhsm2 Version: 2.6.1-2.2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069537: haskell-crypton-x509-store: FTBFS on armel: unsatisfiable build-dependencies

Source: haskell-crypton-x509-store Version: 1.6.9-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part

Bug#1069536: glib-d: FTBFS on armel: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: dh-dlang (>= 0.6.2), gir-to-d (>= 0.23.2)

Source: glib-d Version: 2.4.3-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069535: galera-3: FTBFS on armel: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-arm-linux-gnueabi && make -j1 test ARGS\+=--verbose ARGS\+=-j1 ARGS=--output-on-failure returned exit code 2

Source: galera-3 Version: 25.3.37-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069534: pycryptodome: FTBFS on armel: ld: /usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/13/libasan.so: undefined reference to `__atomic_compare_exchange_8'

Source: pycryptodome Version: 3.20.0+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part (hopefully):

Bug#1069532: dune-istl: FTBFS on armhf: umfpack.hh:106:27: error: cannot convert ‘long int*’ to ‘const int64_t*’ {aka ‘const long long int*’}

Source: dune-istl Version: 2.9.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): > cd

Bug#1069531: rcs-blame: FTBFS on armhf: mktime.c:106:52: error: size of array ‘a’ is negative

Source: rcs-blame Version: 1.3.1-4.2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): > gcc

Bug#1069530: mumudvb: FTBFS on armhf: unsatisfiable build-dependency: libzvbi-common (= 0.2.42-1.1) but 0.2.42-2 is to be installed

Source: mumudvb Version: 1.7.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069529: tua: FTBFS on armhf: tua.c:614:24: error: conflicting types for ‘time’; have ‘time_t(long int *)’ {aka ‘long long int(long int *)’}

Source: tua Version: 4.3-14 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): > gcc -c

Bug#1069527: libchdr: FTBFS on armhf: libchdr_chd.c:3001:39: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ftello64’; did you mean ‘ftello’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: libchdr Version: 0.0~git20230918.9108f34+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part

Bug#1069526: libevdevplus: FTBFS on armhf: InputEvent.hpp:23:39: error: ‘struct input_event’ has no member named ‘time’

Source: libevdevplus Version: 0.1.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069525: libnginx-mod-http-srcache-filter: FTBFS on armhf: make: *** [debian/rules:6: binary] Error 25

Source: libnginx-mod-http-srcache-filter Version: 0.33-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part

Bug#1069524: rl-renderpm: FTBFS on armhf: dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b . subprocess returned exit status 2

Source: rl-renderpm Version: 4.0.3-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069520: sbcl: FTBFS on armhf: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:53: override_dh_auto_build] Error 1

Source: sbcl Version: 2:2.3.7-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[2]:

Bug#1069523: libss7: FTBFS on armhf: ss7.c:654:56: error: format ‘%li’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 3 has type ‘long long int’ [-Werror=format=]

Source: libss7 Version: 2.0.0-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): > gcc -g -O2

Bug#1069522: haskell-yesod-bin: FTBFS on armhf: unsatisfiable build-dependencies

Source: haskell-yesod-bin Version: 1.6.2.2-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully):

Bug#1069521: patat: FTBFS on armhf: unsatisfiable build-dependencies

Source: patat Version: 0.11.0.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069518: projecteur: FTBFS on armhf: deviceinput.cc:697:64: error: narrowing conversion of ‘(int32_t)ie.DeviceInputEvent::value’ from ‘int32_t’ {aka ‘int’} to ‘__u16’ {aka ‘short unsigned int’} [-

Source: projecteur Version: 0.10-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069519: python-udatetime: FTBFS on armhf: ValueError: year 104781 is out of range

Source: python-udatetime Version: 0.0.17-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069516: abinit: FTBFS on armhf: tests fail

Source: abinit Version: 9.10.4-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]:

Bug#1069517: drogon: FTBFS on armhf: build-dependency not installable: libssl3

Source: drogon Version: 1.8.7+ds-1.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069515: eclib: FTBFS on armhf: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 check "TESTSUITEFLAGS=-j4 --verbose" VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

Source: eclib Version: 20240408-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[3]:

Bug#1069514: trophy: FTBFS on armhf: unsatisfiable dependencies

Source: trophy Version: 2.0.4-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069513: isochron: FTBFS on armhf: src/common.c:91:43: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘__time64_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=]

Source: isochron Version: 0.9~rc4-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): > cc

Bug#1069509: r-cran-metamix: FTBFS on armhf: tests fail

Source: r-cran-metamix Version: 0.3-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069511: mpgrafic: FTBFS on armhf: tests fail

Source: mpgrafic Version: 0.3.19-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069510: elpa: FTBFS on armhf: make[5]: *** [Makefile:84371: test-suite.log] Error 1

Source: elpa Version: 2022.11.001-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069507: dc3dd: FTBFS on armhf: verify.h:132:30: error: negative width in bit-field 'verify_error_if_negative_size__'

Source: dc3dd Version: 7.3.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): > gcc -I.

Bug#1069506: prelude-lml: FTBFS on armhf: unsatisfiable build-dependencies

Source: prelude-lml Version: 5.2.0-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069505: tmperamental: FTBFS on armhf: features-time64.h:26:5: error: #error "_TIME_BITS=64 is allowed only with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64"

Source: tmperamental Version: 1.4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): > cc -g

Bug#1069504: libosmo-sccp: FTBFS on armhf: build-dependency not installable: libosmo-netif-dev (>= 1.2.0)

Source: libosmo-sccp Version: 1.6.0+dfsg1-3.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part

Bug#1069503: haskell-gtk-strut: FTBFS on armhf: make: *** [/usr/share/cdbs/1/class/hlibrary.mk:170: build-haddock-stamp] Error 1

Source: haskell-gtk-strut Version: 0.1.3.2-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully):

Bug#1069501: haskell-pandoc-server: FTBFS on armhf: unsatisfiable build-dependencies

Source: haskell-pandoc-server Version: 0.1.0.2-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part

Bug#1069502: input-utils: FTBFS on armhf: input.c:146:18: error: ‘struct input_event’ has no member named ‘time’

Source: input-utils Version: 1.0-1.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069500: haskell-cryptostore: FTBFS on armhf: unsatisfiable build-dependencies

Source: haskell-cryptostore Version: 0.3.0.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part

Bug#1069499: mtbl: FTBFS on armhf: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 check "TESTSUITEFLAGS=-j4 --verbose" VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

Source: mtbl Version: 1.3.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[3]:

Bug#1069498: libx86emu: FTBFS on armhf: mem.c:581:12: error: implicit declaration of function ‘inb’; did you mean ‘ins’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: libx86emu Version: 3.5-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): > cc -g -O2

Bug#1069495: wacomtablet: FTBFS on armhf: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-arm-linux-gnueabihf && make -j4 test ARGS\+=--verbose ARGS\+=-j4 returned exit code 2

Source: wacomtablet Version: 3.2.0-5 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069497: osmo-hlr: FTBFS on armhf: build-dependency not installable: libosmo-netif-dev (>= 1.2.0)

Source: osmo-hlr Version: 1.5.0+dfsg1-3.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069492: dune-common: FTBFS on armhf: tests fail

Source: dune-common Version: 2.9.0-6 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069496: libmatthew-java: FTBFS on armhf: make[3]: *** [Makefile:104: .enabledebug] Error 2

Source: libmatthew-java Version: 0.8.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069494: haskell-pandoc: FTBFS on armhf: unsatisfiable build-dependencies

Source: haskell-pandoc Version: 3.1.3-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069493: haskell-pandoc-lua-engine: FTBFS on armhf: unsatisfiable build-dependencies

Source: haskell-pandoc-lua-engine Version: 0.2.0.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part

Bug#1069491: haskell-stack: FTBFS on armhf: unsatisfiable build-dependencies

Source: haskell-stack Version: 2.9.3.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069490: superlu-dist: FTBFS on armhf: tests fail

Source: superlu-dist Version: 8.2.1+dfsg1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully):

Bug#1069489: haskell-tldr: FTBFS on armhf: unsatisfiable build-dependencies

Source: haskell-tldr Version: 0.9.2-5 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069487: pseudo: FTBFS on armhf: {standard input}:26700: Error: symbol `open64' is already defined

Source: pseudo Version: 1.9.0+git20230301+ec6151a2b057-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part

Bug#1069482: libnginx-mod-http-lua: FTBFS on armhf: make: *** [debian/rules:12: binary] Error 25

Source: libnginx-mod-http-lua Version: 1:0.10.26-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part

Bug#1069486: priv-wrapper: FTBFS on armhf: 1: [ LINE ] --- ./tests/test_setrlimit.c:63: error: Failure!

Source: priv-wrapper Version: 1.0.1-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069485: ydotool: FTBFS on armhf: InputEvent.hpp:23:39: error: ‘struct input_event’ has no member named ‘time’

Source: ydotool Version: 0.1.8-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069484: cowdancer: FTBFS on armhf: ccjNp8Id.s:2361: Error: symbol `open64' is already defined

Source: cowdancer Version: 0.89 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): > /bin/bash

Bug#1069483: genwqe-user: FTBFS on armhf: wrapper.h:143:23: error: duplicate member ‘gzopen64’

Source: genwqe-user Version: 4.0.18-3.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069481: freecdb: FTBFS on armhf: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 check returned exit code 2

Source: freecdb Version: 0.76 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]:

Bug#1069477: octave-stk: FTBFS on armhf: make: *** [debian/rules:5: binary] Error 134

Source: octave-stk Version: 2.8.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069480: bochs: FTBFS on armhf: build-dependency not installable: gcc-i686-linux-gnu

Source: bochs Version: 2.8+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069479: libpreludedb: FTBFS on armhf: unsatisfiable build-dependencies

Source: libpreludedb Version: 5.2.0-2.2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069478: datefudge: FTBFS on armhf: ./datefudge.c:91: multiple definition of `__clock_gettime64'; datefudge.o:./datefudge.c:91: first defined here

Source: datefudge Version: 1.26 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069476: libtexttools: FTBFS on armhf: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:57: override_dh_auto_build-arch] Error 7

Source: libtexttools Version: 2.1.0-28 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): >

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >