Bug#1030657: libbpfcc-dev: Why is the list of build architectures limited?

2024-07-15 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Source: bpfcc Version: 0.26.0+ds-1 Followup-For: Bug #1030657 Hi, looking at [1], the list of architectures is still very limited. Can we at least enable bpfcc on all architectures in Debian Ports? Since Debian Ports is not an officially supported distribution, there shouldn't be any concerns

Bug#1030657: libbpfcc-dev: Why is the list of build architectures limited?

2023-02-14 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Tue, 2023-02-14 at 14:35 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > Will it be hard to test if the result work during build and reject > the > architecure based on build failure instead of a fixed list of > architectures. Getting it to build is one part, making it behave reliably is comes immediate

Bug#1030657: libbpfcc-dev: Why is the list of build architectures limited?

2023-02-14 Thread Gustavo Iñiguez Goya
Hello! The list of supported architectures is here: https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/blob/master/src/bpf_tracing.h Per my experience building opensnitch packages for i386, amd64, armhf and arm64, gobpf (which uses libpfcc-dev) works fine on those platforms. eBPF modules loads and works fine. On

Bug#1030657: libbpfcc-dev: Why is the list of build architectures limited?

2023-02-14 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Ritesh Raj Sarraf] > By 'upstream support', I meant based on random conversations I had with > them years ago. Aha. I guess it is limited to the set of architectures the developers have access to and are interested in. > So, for curiosity, I did a quick check on where packaging in general >

Bug#1030657: libbpfcc-dev: Why is the list of build architectures limited?

2023-02-14 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Tue, 2023-02-14 at 13:22 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > I don't recollect if the list of supported architecture is > > mentioned > > somewhere, but I restricted the build to some of the 64 Bit > > architectures only, because of the lack of upstream support. > > OK.  What do 'upstream

Bug#1030657: libbpfcc-dev: Why is the list of build architectures limited?

2023-02-14 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Ritesh Raj Sarraf] > I don't recollect if the list of supported architecture is mentioned > somewhere, but I restricted the build to some of the 64 Bit > architectures only, because of the lack of upstream support. OK. What do 'upstream support' mean here, and did they list supported platforms

Bug#1030657: libbpfcc-dev: Why is the list of build architectures limited?

2023-02-14 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Hello Petter On Mon, 2023-02-06 at 08:20 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > Because of issues with the opensnitch build and test, I noticed the > Debian buildds only build bpfcc on a limited set of architectures.  > Is > it written down somewhere why so few of the Debian architectures are >

Bug#1030657: libbpfcc-dev: Why is the list of build architectures limited?

2023-02-05 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Package: libbpfcc-dev Version: 0.25.0+ds-2 Severity: wishlist Dear maintainer of libbpfcc-dev, Because of issues with the opensnitch build and test, I noticed the Debian buildds only build bpfcc on a limited set of architectures. Is it written down somewhere why so few of the Debian