On Sunday, January 15, 2006, Henning Sprang wrote:
> This doesn't get easier when thinking of Ubuntu, or even RedHat support.
Your goals are different then mine. I only need Debian unstable or testing
while you do consider Ubuntu, RH and possibly more.
> The additional fai-distributions
On Sunday, January 15, 2006, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> Yes, I think I read your explanations, but I simply don't think apt and
> debootstrap should be related here - mentioning sid in FAI_DEBOOTSTRAP is for
> debootstrap only - if debootstrap in turn relies on apt, it is up to the
> debootstra
On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 21:11 +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > $ ls /usr/lib/debootstrap/scripts/
> > breezy hoary.buildd sarge.buildd warty woody.buildd
> > etchpotatosarge.fakechroot warty.buildd
> > hoary sarge sid woody
> >
> >
> On Friday, January 13, 2006, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
>
> > What's wrong with using sid instead of unstable??? Judging from the above
> > listing, debootstrap only recongnizes release names (I might be wrong, I'm
> > no
> > export on debootstrap either). In your supplied patch there were
On Friday, January 13, 2006, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> What's wrong with using sid instead of unstable??? Judging from the above
> listing, debootstrap only recongnizes release names (I might be wrong, I'm no
> export on debootstrap either). In your supplied patch there were some notes
> ab
[...]
>
> $ ls /usr/lib/debootstrap/scripts/
> breezy hoary.buildd sarge.buildd warty woody.buildd
> etchpotatosarge.fakechroot warty.buildd
> hoary sarge sid woody
>
> I skimmed quickly at
> fai-server_2.9-multi-distribution:make-fai-nfsroot
I only noticed Henning Sprang message because I browsed the BTS.
Not sure whether I overlooked it in my email or that he should have explicitly
cc 346304-submitter as well.
I will reply briefly because I don't have enough time for a thourough reply.
Hopefully you would be able to extract usef
7 matches
Mail list logo
