Bug#377502: diff for 2.10.3 NMU

2006-07-09 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 07:16:00PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > Well, yes; in any case, the current patch is broken, so IMHO this fix should > go in before dinstall even if nobody steps forward. Since dinstall is in about 40 minutes, I'll go ahead and re-NMU. Please let me know if it break

Bug#377502: diff for 2.10.3 NMU

2006-07-09 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 06:56:51PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: >> AFAIK you are right, but at least the posted patch is bogus - is the uploaded >> version of the package fixed correctly? > No, the patch is the same as the one in the package. Should I perhaps upload > a new one with the right

Bug#377502: diff for 2.10.3 NMU

2006-07-09 Thread Michael Tautschnig
> On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 06:56:51PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > >> AFAIK you are right, but at least the posted patch is bogus - is the > >> uploaded > >> version of the package fixed correctly? > > No, the patch is the same as the one in the package. Should I perhaps upload > > a new on

Bug#377502: diff for 2.10.3 NMU

2006-07-09 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 07:06:18PM +0200, Michael Tautschnig wrote: >> Since the previous NMU seems to have gone a bit awry, I'd be glad if any of >> you could verify it this time. :-) > IHMO this one looks a lot better, but a tester would be welcome! Well, yes; in any case, the current patch is

Bug#377502: diff for 2.10.3 NMU

2006-07-09 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 06:55:10PM +0200, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > AFAIK you are right, but at least the posted patch is bogus - is the uploaded > version of the package fixed correctly? No, the patch is the same as the one in the package. Should I perhaps upload a new one with the right variab

Bug#377502: diff for 2.10.3 NMU

2006-07-09 Thread Michael Tautschnig
> On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 06:36:37PM +0200, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > > Has this patch been tested? > > Oops, old code snuck in there; sorry about that. > > > You seem to be removing a file in the NFSROOT, I'd say you need to do rm -f > > $FAI_ROOT/etc/... > > Yes, that sounds correct. > > T

Bug#377502: diff for 2.10.3 NMU

2006-07-09 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Has this patch been tested? [...] > diff -Nru /tmp/qJshluldo9/fai-2.10.2/bin/faireboot > /tmp/taBSyszSiq/fai-2.10.3/bin/faireboot > --- /tmp/qJshluldo9/fai-2.10.2/bin/faireboot 2005-11-23 23:49:56.0 > +0100 > +++ /tmp/taBSyszSiq/fai-2.10.3/bin/faireboot 2006-07-09 15:54:54.0

Bug#377502: diff for 2.10.3 NMU

2006-07-09 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 06:36:37PM +0200, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > Has this patch been tested? Oops, old code snuck in there; sorry about that. > You seem to be removing a file in the NFSROOT, I'd say you need to do rm -f > $FAI_ROOT/etc/... Yes, that sounds correct. The basic idea here is

Bug#377502: diff for 2.10.3 NMU

2006-07-09 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
Package: fai Version: 2.10.2 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi, Attached is the diff for my fai 2.10.3 NMU. diff -Nru /tmp/qJshluldo9/fai-2.10.2/bin/faireboot /tmp/taBSyszSiq/fai-2.10.3/bin/faireboot --- /tmp/qJshluldo9/fai-2.10.2/bin/faireboot2005-11-23 23:49:56.0 +0100 +++ /tmp/taBS