On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 00:47 +1100, Predatory Kangaroo wrote:
First, Michel, Rémi's statements aren't contradictory, as the second
terminal was the one that was created while Compiz was running. It
doesn't matter that Compiz was started again afterwards.
The point is: The second compiz
Michel Dänzer a écrit :
Did a killall compiz.real, which restarts it. The behaviour is the same
as before : the first terminal is ok, the second one is sluggish.
Note how both windows were created before the second compiz instance
started, which contradicts your theory.
Not really, this
Michel Dänzer a écrit :
I thought of something that might explain the mystery: Do you happen to
have transparent background enabled in gnome-terminal?
Nope, the original configuration, I didn't change anything from the
default config.
How is the resize
performance of the two kinds of
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 11:47 +0100, Rémi Letot wrote:
How is the resize performance of the two kinds of gnome-terminal
windows after you kill and restart compiz?
Did a killall compiz.real, which restarts it. The behaviour is the same
as before : the first terminal is ok, the second one
Michel Dänzer a écrit :
Did a killall compiz.real, which restarts it. The behaviour is the same
as before : the first terminal is ok, the second one is sluggish.
Note how both windows were created before the second compiz instance
started, which contradicts your theory.
Not really,
On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 15:33 +0200, Rémi Letot wrote:
Michel Dänzer a écrit :
All these windows cohexist in a single X session, so I don't think that
it's related to the way the Nvidia driver behaves. Compiz must do
something to the terminal windows it creates that metacity doesn't do,
Rémi Letot wrote:
I use the nvidia driver on a 7600go, so no EXA here. Everything is
uptodate to sid versions.
Of course it could be a driver bug. But before closing the bug, don't
you find the fact that windows started before compiz are unaffected a
bit disturbing ?
Yes, that's strange.
Brice Goglin a écrit :
Yes, that's strange. But the initial reporter did not complain about
this, so it could just be nVidia related problem. We don't know at all
what the nvidia-glx binary driver does for Compiz, so it's impossible to
debug this here.
Yep this could be completely unrelated
On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 13:17 +0200, Rémi Letot wrote:
But IMHO the fact that terminal windows created before compiz is
launched don't suffer from the slowdown proves that compiz *can* handle
terminal windows very well on Nvidia hardware.
All these windows cohexist in a single X session,
Michel Dänzer a écrit :
All these windows cohexist in a single X session, so I don't think that
it's related to the way the Nvidia driver behaves. Compiz must do
something to the terminal windows it creates that metacity doesn't do,
the trick is to find that difference :-)
'Must do'
On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 15:33 +0200, Rémi Letot wrote:
Michel Dänzer a écrit :
All these windows cohexist in a single X session, so I don't think that
it's related to the way the Nvidia driver behaves. Compiz must do
something to the terminal windows it creates that metacity doesn't do,
Package: compiz
Version: 0.5.2-2
Followup-For: Bug #394349
Hello,
I just installed sid on my laptop and was bitten by this bug. But I have
more info.
First of all, gnome-terminal windows are much more affected than other
applications. I do notice some slight slowdown for other apps, but
Rémi Letot wrote:
Package: compiz
Version: 0.5.2-2
Followup-For: Bug #394349
Hello,
I just installed sid on my laptop and was bitten by this bug. But I have
more info.
First of all, gnome-terminal windows are much more affected than other
applications. I do notice some slight slowdown
Hello,
thanks for your answer.
I use the nvidia driver on a 7600go, so no EXA here. Everything is
uptodate to sid versions.
Of course it could be a driver bug. But before closing the bug, don't
you find the fact that windows started before compiz are unaffected a
bit disturbing ?
Thanks,
14 matches
Mail list logo
