"Pawel Wiecek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ personal attacks removed...]
> > You are wrong: *you* did create a patch that is repsonsible for the fact
> > that
> > your build environment for star uses a broken star_fat.c
>
> Stop talking about packaging if you do not understand related procedures.
On Apr 17, 12:26pm, Joerg Schilling wrote:
[... snip ... 81 lines of rant removed ]
No wonder we no longer ship smake and cdrecord.
> You are wrong: *you* did create a patch that is repsonsible for the fact
> that
> your build environment for star uses a broken star_fat.c
Stop talking about pack
PLEASE FINALLY FIX YOUR MAILER
This is the third time you destroyed the mail address for Mika (Michael Prokop)
and this is the third time I had to manually insert the correct address for
Mika.
"Pawel Wiecek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 16, 1:19pm, Joerg Schilling wrote
On Apr 16, 1:19pm, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > You seem to forget that the binaries names are changed so they do not clash
> > with other packages.
> I see no name clashesplease explain!
Various versions mt and rmt are provided in tar, star and mt-st. None of them
can claim the names mt or rmt
"Pawel Wiecek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
PLEASE FIX YOUR MAILER!
Your mailer repeatedly bastardizes the mail address for Mika
> On Apr 15, 11:18pm, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > > Ehm, no, manpage naming binaries differently than they are named in
> > > filesystem
> >
Hi,
On Apr 15, 11:18pm, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > Ehm, no, manpage naming binaries differently than they are named in
> > filesystem
> > is not actually correct.
> The star man page names the binaries the same way they are in the filesystem.
> Where do you see problems?
You seem to forget that
"Pawel Wiecek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 15, 11:03am, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > Why do you expect to get bugreports for a correct man page?
>
> Ehm, no, manpage naming binaries differently than they are named in filesystem
> is not actually correct.
The star man page names the binaries
Hi,
On Apr 15, 11:03am, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Why do you expect to get bugreports for a correct man page?
Ehm, no, manpage naming binaries differently than they are named in filesystem
is not actually correct.
> My suggestions are always correct. The problem is that you did missunderstand
Ye
"Pawel Wiecek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let me see...
>
> > star/star.1
>
> Obviously using Joerg's version would very quickly get me a lot of bug
> reports.
Why do you expect to get bugreports for a correct man page?
Looking at the current Debian Bug list shows that all bug reports that are
* Pawel Wiecek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20080415 01:09]:
> On Apr 15, 12:05am, Michael Prokop wrote:
> > Well, I personally don't _love_ dpatch but I strongly prefer to have
> > patches against *upstream* sources seperated from original upstream
> > sources.
> That's what dpkg-source does.
Yes, but n
Hi,
On Apr 15, 12:05am, Michael Prokop wrote:
> Well, I personally don't _love_ dpatch but I strongly prefer to have
> patches against *upstream* sources seperated from original upstream
> sources.
That's what dpkg-source does.
> But I think we should cleanup debian/rules and check out the
> mod
* Pawel Wiecek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20080414 23:45]:
> On Apr 14, 11:24pm, Michael Prokop wrote:
> > IMHO we should use debian/patches/ (dpatch, quilt,... - whatever you
> > prefer) instead of directly patching upstream sources as well.
> My general opinion about dpatch (or alike) is that it make
Hi,
On Apr 14, 11:24pm, Michael Prokop wrote:
> IMHO we should use debian/patches/ (dpatch, quilt,... - whatever you
> prefer) instead of directly patching upstream sources as well.
My general opinion about dpatch (or alike) is that it makes maintenance harder
:^)
Pawel
--
(___) |
* Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20080414 23:11]:
> I recommend to through away the sources at http://hg.svartech.com/debian/star/
> and cleanly start with the official source.
> The reason for a clean start is:
> 1)your source includes a broken star_fat.c, but it sould not
> con
Hi,
On Apr 14, 11:15pm, Michael Prokop wrote:
> See attached patch.
Thx.
> Ok, are you checking those? I'm quite busy in the next few days but
Yes, I'll take care of this.
> Great. The attached patch applies fine on current hg head
> (ab0604ab763f).
Thanks again :^)
Pawel
--
(___)
* Pawel Wiecek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20080414 20:36]:
> On Apr 14, 2:52pm, Michael Prokop wrote:
> > > Yes, it's in the work. It will not be released until I manage to work
> > > around
> > > #465511.
> > Ok, I *might* have a fix for this issue - I'll test it and report to
> > you.
> It'd be ni
Hi,
I recommend to through away the sources at http://hg.svartech.com/debian/star/
and cleanly start with the official source.
The reason for a clean start is:
1) your source includes a broken star_fat.c, but it sould not
contain this file at all. Seeing star_fat.c makes me asume th
Oops...
On Apr 14, 8:36pm, Pawel Wiecek wrote:
> There's a preliminary version of 1.5a88 (which I'll probably update to
> 1.5final today) at http://hg.svartech.com/star/.
It should be http://hg.svartech.com/debian/star/.
Pawel
--
(___) | Pawel Wiecek -- Coven / Svart -- htt
Hi,
On Apr 14, 2:52pm, Michael Prokop wrote:
> > Yes, it's in the work. It will not be released until I manage to work around
> > #465511.
> Ok, I *might* have a fix for this issue - I'll test it and report to
> you.
It'd be nice. Apparently the problem is that distclean works weirdly,
configure
* Pawel Wiecek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20080414 07:29]:
> On Apr 13, 11:06pm, Michael Prokop wrote:
> > build dependency on non-existing smake). Do you plan to provide this
> > new upstream release in the near future? (If you need any help or
> Yes, it's in the work. It will not be released until I
Hi,
On Apr 13, 11:06pm, Michael Prokop wrote:
> build dependency on non-existing smake). Do you plan to provide this
> new upstream release in the near future? (If you need any help or
Yes, it's in the work. It will not be released until I manage to work around
#465511.
> welcome co-maintaining
Package: star
Version: 1.5a67-1.2
Severity: wishlist
star 1.5 (Stable) was released on Sunday, 13. April 2008, 22:32:14 CEST
http://sourcewell.berlios.de/appbyid.php?id=838
The last upload (non-NMU) of the star package took place more than 2
years ago (22 Sep 2005) and currently there are severa
22 matches
Mail list logo
