Bug#491834: wyrd: 80/23 seems to be an artificial limitation?

Hi! * Ico Doornekamp [2009-01-12 17:54:08 CET]: > According to the previous reply, the reported assertion is due to wyrd > requiring a terminal of at least 80x23 chars. I don't happen to speak > fluent caml, but after browsing through the source and changing the > required

Bug#491834: wyrd: 80/23 seems to be an artificial limitation?

* On 2015-11-26 10:44:28 +0100, Rhonda D'Vine wrote: > * Ico Doornekamp [2009-01-12 17:54:08 CET]: > > According to the previous reply, the reported assertion is due to wyrd > > requiring a terminal of at least 80x23 chars. I don't happen to speak > > fluent caml, but after

Bug#491834: wyrd: 80/23 seems to be an artificial limitation?

* Ico Doornekamp [2015-11-26 10:49:04 CET]: > * On 2015-11-26 10:44:28 +0100, Rhonda D'Vine wrote: > > * Ico Doornekamp [2009-01-12 17:54:08 CET]: > > [...] > > > > When resizing horizontal to less than 80 characters wide it crashes > > with the assertion. > >

Bug#491834: wyrd: 80/23 seems to be an artificial limitation?

Package: wyrd Version: 1.4.4-1 Followup-For: Bug #491834 Personally, I'm bitten by this assertion quite often (few times a day), which I can partly attribute to running a tiled window manager: tiling window managers tend to resize windows much more often and more aggresivethen 'traditional'