Bug#598845: closed by wer...@aloah-from-hell.de (technically a sender restriction)

2012-01-11 Thread werner
Hi Martin, documentation.txt:smtpd_recipient_restrictions = documentation.txt:smtpd_recipient_restrictions = I think this is what I was talking about, as well as man/man8/policyd-weight.8:smtpd_recipient_restrictions = man/man8/policyd-weight.8:smtpd_recipient_restrictions =

Bug#598845: closed by wer...@aloah-from-hell.de (technically a sender restriction)

2012-01-11 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wer...@aloah-from-hell.de [2012.01.11.0955 +0100]: The documentation is coming from the upstream author - I suggest to report this issue directly to the upstream author? As soon as there is an updated documentation from the upstream - we can follow :)

Bug#598845: closed by wer...@aloah-from-hell.de (technically a sender restriction)

2012-01-11 Thread werner
Hi, Couldn't you just forward a reference to this bug report upstream? This is how I imagine things done usually in Debian. Sure. I will inform the upstream author about this documentation bug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Bug#598845: closed by wer...@aloah-from-hell.de (technically a sender restriction)

2012-01-11 Thread werner
Sure. I will inform the upstream author about this documentation bug. done. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#598845: closed by wer...@aloah-from-hell.de (technically a sender restriction)

2012-01-11 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wer...@aloah-from-hell.de [2012.01.11.1005 +0100]: Sure. I will inform the upstream author about this documentation bug. Thank you!!! -- .''`. martin f. krafft madduck@d.o Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer

Bug#598845: closed by wer...@aloah-from-hell.de (technically a sender restriction)

2012-01-11 Thread werner
Hi, Thank you!!! I've got a response from the upstream author. He says that it's best practice to define restrictions in smtpd_recipient_restrictions (which I also think). It would be a bad idea to change that, policyd-weight furthermore also checks for recipients (e.g. postmaster handline,

Bug#598845: closed by wer...@aloah-from-hell.de (technically a sender restriction)

2012-01-11 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wer...@aloah-from-hell.de [2012.01.11.1123 +0100]: He says that it's best practice to define restrictions in smtpd_recipient_restrictions (which I also think). It would be a bad idea to change that, policyd-weight furthermore also checks for recipients

Bug#598845: closed by wer...@aloah-from-hell.de (technically a sender restriction)

2012-01-10 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Debian Bug Tracking System ow...@bugs.debian.org [2012.01.10.1754 +0100]: this bugreport is open for more than two years, I've just taken over maintenance of the package. I'm not sure which part of policyd-weight your bugreport is up to (documentation, setup-instructions, etc.)?

Bug#598845: closed by wer...@aloah-from-hell.de (technically a sender restriction)

2012-01-10 Thread werner
Hi Martin, this bugreport is open for more than two years, I've just taken over maintenance of the package. I'm not sure which part of policyd-weight your bugreport is up to (documentation, setup-instructions, etc.)? Probably documentation. It would be helpful if you could tell me what

Bug#598845: closed by wer...@aloah-from-hell.de (technically a sender restriction)

2012-01-10 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wer...@aloah-from-hell.de [2012.01.10.2015 +0100]: documentation.txt:smtpd_recipient_restrictions = documentation.txt:smtpd_recipient_restrictions = I think this is what I was talking about, as well as