Hello Release Team,
We have 3 bugs for iscsitarget, which if permitted, would be good to see
go in for Wheezy.
These are:
687925 - This one. Fixes a session lock problem. Checked upstream and
shouldn't create regressions.
687619 - This one has a 1 liner change, bumping the max_connections to 256.
2012/9/17 Ritesh Raj Sarraf :
> Hello Arne / Ross,
>
> This debian bug, 687925, is release critical for the OpenStack suite.
> OpenStack uses iscsitarget as its storage sub-module.
>
> As is explained in this bug report, the ietd daemon does not seem to be
> releasing the sparse files that it expos
l bug release.
-Ross
> -Original Message-
> From: Ritesh Raj Sarraf [mailto:r...@researchut.com] On Behalf Of Ritesh
> Raj Sarraf
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 4:49 PM
> To: Arne Redlich; Ross S. W. Walker
> Cc: Loic Dachary; 687...@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: Re
Hello Arne / Ross,
This debian bug, 687925, is release critical for the OpenStack suite.
OpenStack uses iscsitarget as its storage sub-module.
As is explained in this bug report, the ietd daemon does not seem to be
releasing the sparse files that it exposes to the initiator, even after
the initia
On 09/17/2012 07:41 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Monday 17 September 2012 10:28 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
>> On Monday 17 September 2012 08:41 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
The proposed NMU was based on the assumption that it would be easier to
fix the release critical bug first and
>
On Monday 17 September 2012 10:28 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Monday 17 September 2012 08:41 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
>> > The proposed NMU was based on the assumption that it would be easier to
>> > fix the release critical bug first and
>> > then advocate for other changes:
>> >
> Agreed.
On Monday 17 September 2012 08:41 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
> The proposed NMU was based on the assumption that it would be easier to fix
> the release critical bug first and
> then advocate for other changes:
>
Agreed. Just that the other bug, that the one in experimental fixes, is
related to a k
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Here is the patch, rebased against 1.4.20.2-11
Cheers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAlBXRdEACgkQ8dLMyEl6F20q4wCgll9G1Vcrgc8254LumI2gk
On 09/17/2012 03:49 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Monday 17 September 2012 03:09 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
>> Dear maintainer,
>>
>> I've prepared an NMU for iscsitarget (versioned as 1.4.20.2-10.1) and
>> uploaded it to DELAYED/3. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it
>> longer.
>>
>
On 17/09/2012 15:49, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Given the freeze, I am not hopeful of it getting in for Wheezy.
Doesn't look so awful to not be unblocked. Why do you think the
contrary? (It still needs to be acked by -boot folks though)
--
Mehdi Dogguy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-d
On Monday 17 September 2012 03:09 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for iscsitarget (versioned as 1.4.20.2-10.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/3. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it
> longer.
>
> I'll take care of the unblock request.
Can you rebase i
tags 687925 + patch
tags 687925 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for iscsitarget (versioned as 1.4.20.2-10.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/3. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it
longer.
I'll take care of the unblock request.
Regards.
diff -Nru iscsitarget-1.4.20.2/
12 matches
Mail list logo
