Hi,
Is it still possible to include a systemd unit for ZNC before Debian
Buster is released? In case more examples are appreciated, this is how
Fedora does it:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/znc/blob/master/f/znc.service
--
Met vriendelijke groet,
Kees de Jong
De informatie opgenomen
Am 01.01.2016 um 04:09 schrieb Eric Dorland:
To repeat myself: If you guys (packagers) all agree on how this file
should look like, I'm fine with it too.
If you want to maintain a separate unit file for Debian which is
different from other distros, I'm not in a position to stop you from
doing
* Patrick Matthäi (pmatth...@debian.org) wrote:
>
>
> Am 01.01.2016 um 04:09 schrieb Eric Dorland:
> >>To repeat myself: If you guys (packagers) all agree on how this file
> >>should look like, I'm fine with it too.
> >>
> >>If you want to maintain a separate unit file for Debian which is
>
> Cool. Outside of packaging, there are probably some hardening options
> that would be useful to add. Have you considered adding socket
> activation support, sd_notify and syslogging support to make this work
> a little better with systemd? I'd be happy to contribute some
> patches.
Unless there
No, the reason I reverted it is
https://github.com/znc/znc/issues/1165#issuecomment-156880251 (point 2.)
To repeat myself: If you guys (packagers) all agree on how this file
should look like, I'm fine with it too.
If you want to maintain a separate unit file for Debian which is
different from
* Alexey Sokolov (ale...@asokolov.org) wrote:
> No, the reason I reverted it is
> https://github.com/znc/znc/issues/1165#issuecomment-156880251 (point 2.)
I don't really understand this argument. Using datadir (or pkgdatadir)
allows the builder to set it to whatever value they wish at build
time,
* Alexey Sokolov (ale...@asokolov.org) wrote:
> Hi Eric,
> Does the service file need to be different from the included one?
> (https://github.com/znc/znc/blob/master/znc.service.in)
Currently it does, because the patch as is creates a _znc user rather
than znc to avoid namespace collision. It
Package: znc
Version: 1.6.2-2+b1
Followup-For: Bug #734442
Here is a patch that tries to add this functionality. It adds a package,
znc-daemon that creates a system user and runs znc under systemd. Let me know
if you don't like this approach and how I should approach this.
-- System
Hi Eric,
Does the service file need to be different from the included one?
(https://github.com/znc/znc/blob/master/znc.service.in)
Also please check the recent discussion about it at
https://github.com/znc/znc/issues/1165
9 matches
Mail list logo
