Hello.
Here is what I got so far with the package.
The reason autoreconf is not working seems to be that the m4 macros are
not being shipped with the package nor they are being included in
Makefile.am or configure.ac
After 'borrowing' the m4macros directory from xfce4-dev-tools and
* Yves-Alexis Perez (cor...@debian.org) [140902 18:40]:
On mar., 2014-07-29 at 18:04 -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
I just tried to find this explaination at [1], but no luck. Do you
mind providing
me the link where you explained why this is low priority?
On all other ppc64el bugs opened
On mar., 2014-09-02 at 20:42 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Yves-Alexis Perez (cor...@debian.org) [140902 18:40]:
On mar., 2014-07-29 at 18:04 -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
I just tried to find this explaination at [1], but no luck. Do you
mind providing
me the link where you explained why
On mar., 2014-09-02 at 21:54 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
So a patch with a normal dh-autoreconf would generally look
acceptable for you? (Just asking to be sure it's worth spending time
on it)
Just calling --with autoreconf doesn't work, but if you manage to fix
that, sure, just add the patch
* Yves-Alexis Perez (cor...@debian.org) [140902 21:39]:
On mar., 2014-09-02 at 20:42 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Yves-Alexis Perez (cor...@debian.org) [140902 18:40]:
On mar., 2014-07-29 at 18:04 -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
I just tried to find this explaination at [1], but no luck. Do
On 09/02/2014 04:55 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On mar., 2014-09-02 at 21:54 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
So a patch with a normal dh-autoreconf would generally look
acceptable for you? (Just asking to be sure it's worth spending time
on it)
Just calling --with autoreconf doesn't work, but
Control: tag -1 wishlist
On mar., 2014-07-29 at 16:12 -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
Currently xfconf doesn't build on ppc64el because the package fail to
identify
ppc64el as a platform that support shared object.
dh_install --fail-missing -X .la
dh_install: libxfconf-0-dev
Hi Yves-Alexis,
On 07/29/2014 04:57 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
So, I am going to ask you to patch the configure and aclocal.m4 files
to add
ppc64el as an architecture that supports shared objects.
I got this patch from Canonical and it works fine on Debian/ppc64el.
Well, we'll just use
On mar., 2014-07-29 at 18:04 -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
I just tried to find this explaination at [1], but no luck. Do you
mind providing
me the link where you explained why this is low priority?
On all other ppc64el bugs opened (usually by various ibm people but not
only). They don't even
9 matches
Mail list logo
