[removing DSA which does not have interest in this and paulproteus,
whose mx does not work right now]
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 09:53:01PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> On 29/03/15 at 19:43 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>> > On
On 29/03/15 at 22:08 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 9:53 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 29/03/15 at 19:43 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> >> I think DSA position is rasonable, yet UDD data is really valuable not
> >> only for debian-related projects (jenkins in the above q
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 9:53 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 29/03/15 at 19:43 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>> I think DSA position is rasonable, yet UDD data is really valuable not
>> only for debian-related projects (jenkins in the above quote) but for
>> people who want to do random stuff with d
Hi Lucas,
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 09:53:01PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 29/03/15 at 19:43 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 06:42:20PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > Currently three dumps are generated every day:
> > > - usql.sql.gz, with all the data except the l
On 29/03/15 at 19:43 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 06:42:20PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Currently three dumps are generated every day:
> > - usql.sql.gz, with all the data except the ldap, really_active_dds, and
> > pts relations, which are considered "private" dat
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 06:42:20PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Currently three dumps are generated every day:
> - usql.sql.gz, with all the data except the ldap, really_active_dds, and
> pts relations, which are considered "private" data and not suitable for
> wide exposure.
fine. Even if (
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 06:42:20PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >mapreri: yes, but it would also be useful to switch to another
> > dump
> > format
+1
(as abre minimum enhancement xz compression would be sensible)
> - udd-bugs.sql.xz, with only the bugs data (both archived a
[ Maintaining the CC list, although this may be redundant for some. ]
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 18:42:20 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
[...]
> Before changing that, I'd like to understand:
>
> 1) what is the rationale for the public UDD mirror. Is there a way this
>could be provided from Debian
On 29/03/15 at 17:47 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> package: qa.debian.org
> user: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
> usertag: udd
>
> From #debian-qa@OFTC
> lucas: might I ask you to provide udd dumps more often than daily?
> like, every 6 hours? this would greatly help the public udd
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 29/03/15 at 17:47 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>> package: qa.debian.org
>> user: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
>> usertag: udd
>>
>> From #debian-qa@OFTC
>> lucas: might I ask you to provide udd dumps more often than daily?
>>
package: qa.debian.org
user: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag: udd
From #debian-qa@OFTC
lucas: might I ask you to provide udd dumps more often than daily?
like, every 6 hours? this would greatly help the public udd mirror to
stay in sync (and I guess it could also hel
11 matches
Mail list logo
