Hi!
> > The research done in
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=895570#50 looks good.
> >
> > Do we have now agreement to default to -ast or -astb for packages that have
> > Debhelper 14+?
>
> I don't think making w-a-s defaults depend on the debhelper compat level was
>
On 2024-03-28 01:42, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> The research done in
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=895570#50 looks good.
>
> Do we have now agreement to default to -ast or -astb for packages that have
> Debhelper 14+?
I don't think making w-a-s defaults depend on the
The research done in
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=895570#50 looks good.
Do we have now agreement to default to -ast or -astb for packages that have
Debhelper 14+?
On 2024-03-12 00:33, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 11:04:01 +0100 Paride Legovini wrote:
>> On Sun, 03 Mar 2024 16:26:41 +0100 Benjamin Drung wrote:
>>> Time to join this discussion. The current default was the preference of
>>> the author 14 years ago. My
Hi,
On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 11:04:01 +0100 Paride Legovini wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Mar 2024 16:26:41 +0100 Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > Time to join this discussion. The current default was the preference of
> > the author 14 years ago. My taste has change a bit since then. I am open
> > to change the
Hi Benjamin,
On Sun, 03 Mar 2024 16:26:41 +0100 Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Time to join this discussion. The current default was the preference of
> the author 14 years ago. My taste has change a bit since then. I am open
> to change the default. --trailing-comma for wrapped lines is a good
> idea,
On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 15:23:47 -0400 Daniel Kahn Gillmor
wrote:
> Package: devscripts
> Version: 2.18.1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Thanks for wrap-and-sort! It's great to have nice canonicalized-form
> debian packaging.
>
> Using wrap-and-sort with -ast provides the simplest, cleanest diffs as
>
On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 11:47:12 +, Phil Morrell wrote:
> As a user of -satb, I'd like to point out that the flags are not all
> equal. Two of them support a (more objective?) desire that "addition to
> a list in line-based VCS should have no deletions". That is -at, whereas
> -s is a subjective
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:47:12AM +, Phil Morrell wrote:
> To make that work as a default, there would need to be something like an
> --short-preferred-unless-existing-indent
sorry, going by the current default, that should be
--align-preferred-unless-existing-short
signature.asc
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 08:49:51PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 2/9/21 7:40 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Jonas Smedegaard writes:
> >> Let's see if Debian can agree on a single normalization of 822-ish
> >> files. For starters, I disagree that "wrap-and-sort -a" is a suitable
> >>
On Mon 2018-04-23 14:10:02 +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> I do believe that we should have one so tool writers can have a reference to
> implement and people would not see changes when using different formatting or
> generation tools (e.g dh-make-perl, cme, wrap-and-sort).
makes sense to me.
Hi
Sorry for the late reply
On Thursday, 12 April 2018 21:43:02 CEST Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > Thanks for wrap-and-sort! It's great to have nice canonicalized-form
> > debian packaging.
>
> You should also check out cme :)
I can only agree :-D
> > I think these three options (--wrap-always,
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 03:23:47PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Thanks for wrap-and-sort! It's great to have nice canonicalized-form
> debian packaging.
You should also check out cme :)
> Using wrap-and-sort with -ast provides the simplest, cleanest diffs as
> things change,
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.18.1
Severity: wishlist
Thanks for wrap-and-sort! It's great to have nice canonicalized-form
debian packaging.
Using wrap-and-sort with -ast provides the simplest, cleanest diffs as
things change, while still producing an easy-to-read debian/control.
I think
14 matches
Mail list logo
