Control: tags -1 wontfix
Control: close -1
Den 5.2.2020 kl. 01:29, skrev Alan Modra:
The binutils and gdb projects do not even pretend to a stable ABI or
API for libbfd and libopcodes. Particularly not ABI, that gets broken
on almost every week. perf and other projects that want to use libbfd
or libopcodes are of course welcome to do
On Wed, 2020-02-05 at 09:59 +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> The binutils and gdb projects do not even pretend to a stable ABI or
> API for libbfd and libopcodes. Particularly not ABI, that gets broken
> on almost every week. perf and other projects that want to use libbfd
> or libopcodes are of
The binutils and gdb projects do not even pretend to a stable ABI or
API for libbfd and libopcodes. Particularly not ABI, that gets broken
on almost every week. perf and other projects that want to use libbfd
or libopcodes are of course welcome to do so, but they then need to
deal with the
Hi All,
Le 04/02/2020 à 16:35, Hagen Paul Pfeifer a écrit :
> * Matthias Klose | 2020-02-03 22:29:21 [+0100]:
>
> [CCing Alan Modra, H.J. Lu, Nick Clifton & Arnaldo]
>
> Ok, I tried to check what happens:
>
> - Alan Modra modified the bfd_section_* macros (see commit fd3619828e94a)
>
* Matthias Klose | 2020-02-03 22:29:21 [+0100]:
[CCing Alan Modra, H.J. Lu, Nick Clifton & Arnaldo]
Ok, I tried to check what happens:
- Alan Modra modified the bfd_section_* macros (see commit fd3619828e94a)
upstream (https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=summary)
Or
Hi Hagen,
On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 22:03:10 +0100 Hagen Paul Pfeifer wrote:
>
> It seems other people (kernel folks, Stephen) have the identical error as
> well: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/30/1005
> Stephen: or is the bug fixed somewhere else? Do you have an workaround?
I don't have a workaround, I
[CCing to binutils]
On 2/3/20 10:03 PM, Hagen Paul Pfeifer wrote:
> CCed: Stephen Rothwell
>
> * Matthias Klose | 2020-02-03 21:10:14 [+0100]:
>
> Hey Matthias
>
>> please can you reassign that to the appropriate package? both libopcodes and
>> libbfd have non-public interfaces. If you use
CCed: Stephen Rothwell
* Matthias Klose | 2020-02-03 21:10:14 [+0100]:
Hey Matthias
>please can you reassign that to the appropriate package? both libopcodes and
>libbfd have non-public interfaces. If you use those, please adopt to these.
I don't get it: `apt-file search /usr/include/bfd.h`
On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 21:10 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 2/1/20 10:53 AM, Hagen Paul Pfeifer wrote:
> > Package: binutils-dev
> > Version: 2.33.90.20200122-2
> > Severity: important
> >
> > Dear Maintainer,
> >
> > linux perf build fails with current version of binutils-dev:
>
> please can
On 2/1/20 10:53 AM, Hagen Paul Pfeifer wrote:
> Package: binutils-dev
> Version: 2.33.90.20200122-2
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> linux perf build fails with current version of binutils-dev:
please can you reassign that to the appropriate package? both libopcodes and
libbfd
Package: binutils-dev
Version: 2.33.90.20200122-2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
linux perf build fails with current version of binutils-dev:
Steps to produce:
$ cd /path/to/linux/tools/perf
$ make
Everything worked with the previous(?) version of binutils-dev: 2.33.1-6.
Relevant
12 matches
Mail list logo
