Michael Tokarev wrote:
switch away from the user-mode networking since it is really
incomplete and not everything works with it. It is good for quick
testing but definitely not for anything serious.
I only use this particular guest to test changes to a program. I always
test first on the
Markus Koschany wrote:
Since I do not have an imminent solution for this issue, I intend to
revert the patch for CVE-2021-3592. I will release a regression
update shortly.
I installed this update ( 1:2.8+dfsg-6+deb9u16 ) on the host, for all
15 of the qemu packages I mentioned in my original
Am Samstag, dem 11.09.2021 um 03:49 -0500 schrieb Matt Roberds:
> Package: qemu-system-x86
> Version: 1:2.8+dfsg-6+deb9u15
> Severity: important
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
>
> Hello all!
>
> Quick version:
> ==
>
> I recently upgraded the qemu packages on my host
btw, email from our mailserver is incorrectly blocked by your provider:
: host al-ip4-mx-vip2.prodigy.net[144.160.235.144] said: 553
5.3.0 alph733 DNSBL:ATTRBL 521< 86.62.121.231 >_is_blocked.For assistance
forward this error to abuse_...@abuse-att.net (in reply to MAIL FROM
command)
[Cc apo@]
Marcus have you seen this bugreport?
11.09.2021 11:49, Matt Roberds wrote:
Package: qemu-system-x86
Version: 1:2.8+dfsg-6+deb9u15
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Hello all!
Quick version:
==
I recently upgraded the qemu packages on my host
Package: qemu-system-x86
Version: 1:2.8+dfsg-6+deb9u15
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Hello all!
Quick version:
==
I recently upgraded the qemu packages on my host from
1:2.8+dfsg-6+deb9u14 to 1:2.8+dfsg-6+deb9u15 , but this breaks user-mode
6 matches
Mail list logo
