Package: libocc0-dev
Version: 2.8-7
Severity: serious
Hi,
While doing the second C++ lib transition you forgot to rename the
dependency on libocc0c2 to libocc0c2a in libocc0-dev, making openc++
uninstallable.
thanks,
guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Hi Fabian!
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 11:33:48AM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Marcel Lemke of the unace Team was kind enough to send me the source
code for unace 2.5 along with an improved license.
Nice work, at least the code is there, but it's not free enough for my
taste.
Please have a
Hi Santiago,
Can you reproduce #35970 with the latest gnumach packages?
regards,
guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 04:15:37AM -0400, A Costa wrote:
Package: arj
Version: 3.10.21-3
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Found a typo in '/usr/share/man/man1/arjdisp.1.gz', see attached '.diff'.
You could have filed only one bug report for both minor typo errors.
But anyway thanks for the
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 07:32:36PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 08:19:09PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
I'm packaging a new upstrem release, and was checking if lrmi code is
built on anything != ia32, and it's not, double checked by building it
on pergolesi.
If you
severity 347313 wishlist
thanks
Hi dann,
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 05:58:59PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
Package: inetutils
Version: 2:1.4.3+20051212-2
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Our automated buildd log filter[1] detected a problem that will cause
your package to segfault on
Hi Daniel,
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 05:51:39PM -0800, Daniel Gimpelevich wrote:
Attached is a patch that was tested on an Ubuntu system. It allows the
current sid and dapper (0.7.2-1ubuntu1) sources to build on PowerPC
with binutils 2.16.1-2ubuntu6, but not with binutils
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 07:45:23PM -0800, Daniel Gimpelevich wrote:
The latest binutils in sid is now 2.16.1cvs20051214-1, which should
also work. It's the version currently in etch that won't, even with
this patch. Without this patch, both versions mentioned above error
out. It was
Package: qemu
Version: 0.7.2-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
AngryPorter:
Your package sucks it does not build on PPC anymore!
ShamefulMaintainers:
Sorry about that, we already know about the problem, it's most
probably the PPC linker script patch that Guillem reverted on
last upload. We'll
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 08:40:39PM +0200, Andreas Mohr wrote:
Package: kdelibs-bin
Version: 4:3.4.2-3
I've been having huge trouble doing frame grabbing from my video camera via
firewire recently. Every ~ 20 seconds a frame got dropped.
And this all despite running a -ck kernel with
do not need to manually edit POT or PO files.
#
msgid
msgstr
Project-Id-Version: shadow 1:4.0.13-7\n
Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n
POT-Creation-Date: 2005-10-22 08:58+0200\n
PO-Revision-Date: 2005-12-28 03:01+0200\n
Last-Translator: Guillem Jover [EMAIL PROTECTED]\n
Language-Team: Catalan debian-l10n
license as the debconf package.
# Jordi Mallach [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2001, 2002, 2004, 2005.
# Guillem Jover [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2005.
#
msgid
msgstr
Project-Id-Version: debconf 1.4.66\n
Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n
POT-Creation-Date: 2005-12-25 10:47+\n
PO-Revision-Date: 2005-12-28 03:29+0200\n
Last
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 10:57:31AM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
package: unace
severity: wishlist
Please consider handling the unace binary as 'alternatives',
allowing it to coexist with proprietary versions (=2.20) of unace,
which can be downloaded from unofficial repositories.
Package: libflash-mozplugin
Version: 0.4.13-4
Severity: serious
Hi,
This package is breaking builds with libncurses5-dev, at least.
Those builds are unable to resolve from which packages does
/usr/lib/libncurses.so.5 come from as it is an unowned symlink.
This is due to the
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 01:02:59PM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am Samstag, den 08.10.2005, 16:34 +0300 schrieb Guillem Jover:
With this do you mean coexist with another debian package with the
same name, but greater version?
I guess it would be hardly possible for two different
found 339693 1.9.23-1
tags 339693 wontfix
thanks
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 04:34:17PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: svgalib
Severity: wishlist
Please, when reporting bugs, specify the version number so that the
BTS can use the versioning magic to keep track of when the bugs were
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 06:47:38PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: svgalib
Followup-For: Bug #339693
svgalib_helper has the unknown symbol io_remap_page_range which no
longer exists in the linux source. So I'll wait until it gets around to
letting itself get packaged.
Right, I
package openhackware
severity 339870 normal
retitle 339870 openhackware: should not try to build on !powerpc environments
merge 339870 322300
thanks
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 01:55:43PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
Package: openhackware
Version: 0.4.1-1
Severity: serious
building the package
Package: ftp.debian.org
Hi,
The source package gnumach1 was supposed to be what the gnumach one
has now, and gnumach switch to the cvs HEAD, this has never happened
as HEAD is unmaintained and all development goes to a branch.
So please remove this package from the archive. It also has a
build
Package: mc
Version: 1:4.6.1-1
Tags: patch
Hi,
The compatibility package unarj is not in sid anymore, and we have the
full free arj package instead. So when trying to list an .arj archive
mc complains that it cannot find unarj, even if arj is installed. Also
there's no Suggests about that.
severity 339870 normal
thanks
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 06:01:39PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
# The package doesn't build on the Architecture (all) it it declared for
Guillem Jover wrote:
building the package openhackware in a clean sid build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386
found 401153 20060912-2
thanks
On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 19:53:49 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Andreas Henriksson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061204 19:44]:
I can confirm that the patch provided by Guillem Jover seems to fix
the testcase in the original bug-report for me on Debian Testing
PowerPC
tags 402526 pending
thanks
Hi,
On Sun, 2006-12-10 at 23:54:57 +, J S Bygott wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.24
Severity: minor
Actually, this is a bug in all versions since 1.4.0.20
The files 'changelog' and 'changelog.Debian' both contain an insane
timestamp (year 2018 instead
tags 403216 - patch
thanks
On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 13:26:41 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.13.24
Severity: critical
File: /usr/bin/dpkg-shlibdeps
Tags: patch
Er, there's not patch in here... and I think the proposed fix is
wrong.
dpkg-shlibdeps sets
my
On Sun, 2006-09-10 at 16:23:04 +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 07:41:12AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
I'm offline now, in a country where busses on autovias do not have
wireless access (this is really thrid world:-)). So I can't check,
but do you
Package: x11proto-fonts-dev
Version: 2.0.2-4
Severity: important
Hi,
This package contains only headers, and those include some external ones,
which are not represented in the dependencies:
#include X11/Xdefs.h
#include X11/Xfuncproto.h
#include X11/Xmd.h
#include X11/Xproto.h
All those
Package: wengophone
Version: 2.0.0~rc2-svn7135-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I've seen you have packaged latest upstream wengophone-ng, on your home
page, would be nice to have those uploaded to experimental as well, so
people could hammer bugs down and give a wider opportunity for testing
the
package xfstt
tags 387694 - patch
severity 387574 serious
merge 387574 387694
block 387694 by 387597
thanks
On Sat, 2006-09-16 at 08:48:24 +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
Package: xfstt
Version: 1.7-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'xfstt' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 15:34:37 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
The latest addition to the PTS, showing VCS repositories for packages,
is a great addition. However, I'd like it even better if there was also
a link to a web browsable copy of the
On Sat, 2006-10-14 at 16:06:02 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting andi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
As a wishlist item, maybe something could be done about this
trap?
Well, I don't think so. Ctrl-S is handled by the terminal so this
comes before dselect can process it.
No, this is a setting
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 10:55:14 -0700, dann frazier wrote:
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
usertag 395216 + intend-to-nmu
usertag 395218 + intend-to-nmu
As these bugs have been open with a patch for over a week without a
rejection from the maintainer (and etch is quickly approaching), I
intend
Package: parchive
Version: 1.1-4
Severity: minor
Hi,
The package description reads:
[...]
supports the 'Reed-Soloman Code' implementation that allows for recovery of
[...]
It should be 'Reed-Soloman Code' - 'Reed-Solomon Code'.
regards,
guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Hi Tomas,
On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 00:49:33 +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.22
Followup-For: Bug #38334
So is this bug a duplicate of #260696 and could be closed?
Well yes and no, it's a duplicate but probably the other one should
not have been closed, just merged
Package: python-tofu
Version: 0.5-2
Hi,
I got python-tofu pulled when installing balazar. But the dependency
seemed excessive. It seems the python-twisted package is now a
metapackage which includes stuff not needed at all by python-tofu.
I looked up which twisted imports are being used in tofu
Hi,
Probably something like DEBBUG would do, even if a bit longer than the
others?
regards,
guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: debsecan
Version: 0.4.3
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I'd like to see the current total advisories per list in the report,
and would be nice as well to see the previous number. Similar to what
the wnpp report does. For example:
,--
*** Fixed vulnerabilities (current: 1,
Package: debsecan
Version: 0.4.3
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I'd like to see the report group the advisories by package instead, so
that I could decide to remove some of them if they seem too buggy.
Something like:
,--
...
libcupsys2, libcupsimage2, libkpathsea4,
Hi,
On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 11:47:35 +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
package: libdirectfb-0.9-25-udeb
severity: normal
Please, include dfbinfo tool (provided currently by libdirectfb-bin
regular deb) into package libdirectfb-0.9-25-udeb.
Denis Oliver Knopp explicitly suggested [1] inclusion
On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 11:42:21 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
reopen 383448
thanks
I can see you applied the dselect/po/ca.po part, but you forgot the po/ca.po
hunks.
Then the dselect patch I commited will have to be reviewed as well,
if jordi has not done so, yet.
I'm attaching the rest of
Hi,
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006 13:44:38 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
I don't feel that this is the right fix. It just moves the dependency
info from the control file to the rules file, which doesn't feel like
any benefit. One of these approaches seems more sound:
* Modify dpkg-deb or something to remove
reassign 390590 cups-pdf
retitle 390590 cups-pdf: /etc/cups/cups-pdf.conf is updated for every new
release
thanks
Please when reassigning, Cc the maintainer address of the package you
are reassingning to.
On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 11:25:02 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
On Mon, October 2, 2006
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 18:01:17 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are noted as the last translator of the debconf Debian package.
Catalan updated.
thanks,
guillem
debconf-ca.po.gz
Description: Binary data
tags 388998 patch
thanks
Hi,
The problem here is that xserver-xorg-video-tdfx is lacking some
included headers, and the getsecs macro does not get expanded, so
module ends up with an unresolvable symbol which makes X crash.
The error can only be seen on the console.
Attached a patch which can
Package: rtorrent
Version: 0.6.2-1
Hi,
This new version got a Build-Dependency on libreadline5. I cannot see
where this library is being linked against in rtorrent, if it's an
indirect dependency that should be reflected in the package directly
needing this library. Second thing is, if that
On Sat, 2006-09-23 at 23:41:18 -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote:
Guillem Jover escribió:
Package: rtorrent
Version: 0.6.2-1
This new version got a Build-Dependency on libreadline5. I cannot see
where this library is being linked against in rtorrent, if it's an
indirect dependency
severity 388810 wishlist
merge 388810 385029
thanks
On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 19:35:23 +0300, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
Package: qemu
Version: 0.8.1-1
Severity: normal
qemu 0.8.2 was released upstream. Please package it.
I'm aware of this, and that has been reported twice already.
thanks,
guillem
On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 13:04:04 -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote:
Guillem Jover escribió:
If bc is missing a dependency on libreadline5, then that's a bug on bc
not your package. If you mean that you just need bc, that's fine, but
that does not imply that you need libreadline5 as well
On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 12:12:43 +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 05:22:07AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
The problem here is that xserver-xorg-video-tdfx is lacking some
included headers, and the getsecs macro does not get expanded, so
module ends up with an unresolvable
On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 14:08:06 -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote:
Ok, I'm sending as attachment my build-log, I use debuild-pbuilder, I
have removed `libreadline5' from Build-Depends.
Please take a look, and tell if I'm doing something wrong.
I cannot see any problem in the build log.
On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 20:13:22 -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote:
Guillem Jover escribió:
I cannot see any problem in the build log. What was the build failure
that were you experiencing?
debuild: fatal error at line 1151:
The only error I can see is related to debsign, which
On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 14:28:47 -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote:
Sorry, the one before is the good one, here's the fails build-log.
[...]
- Considering bc
- Trying bc
- Installing debhelper libtorrent9-dev libsigc++-2.0-dev
libcurl3-openssl-dev libncurses5-dev bc
[...]
bc ya
tags 388740 wontfix
thanks
On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 13:55:58 +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
# Hello,
# The request was to fix the version number of the orig tarball in order to
# make it *obvious* for everybody that the orig tarball used by Debian
# is not the upstream tarball
reopen 388740
Well
Package: iasl
Version: 20060707-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I've started Build-Depending on iasl in qemu to build some ASL files
present in latest release, but didn't realize until after the upload
and with the build failure in powerpc that iasl is only present for
i386 and amd64 variants (linux
Hi Alexander,
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 15:54:20 +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
* Guillem Jover [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060812 02:03]:
Thanks for the report, and sorry for the delay. I've been out of town
and don't have access right now to any 3dfx graphics board. I've a
new upstream release
Package: angrydd
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: important
Hi,
The package is missing a dependency on python-numeric, which is being
using through the surfarray stuff from python-pygame.
regards,
guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Package: dissy
Version: 3-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
This package is a frontend for objdump, readelf and nm, but it does
not depend on binutils. It's lacking dependencies at least also on
python-gtk2. Please check if anything else is missing before
uploading.
thanks,
guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Package: varnish
Version: 1.0.2-2
Hi,
On purge the package leaves /var/lib/varnish/varnish_storage.bin.
Also the package does not cleanup the temporary files /tmp while using
gcc at runtime.
regards,
guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Package: apf
Version: 0.8.2-1
Severity: minor
Hi,
The long package descriptions contain a misplaced dot just before the
Homepage pseudo-field. The dot should be placed in the second column,
not the third.
regards,
guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Hi,
On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 19:19:58 +0100, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.24
Architecture: sparc
Severity: grave
I have some SparcSTATION 20 with one or two SuperSPARC-II and 448 MB
of memory (thus, HIGHMEM is used). On these workstations, dpkg works fine.
If I replace
On Fri, 2006-11-24 at 10:20:05 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 05:34:56AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 11:39:43 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.22
Severity: wishlist
There should be a possibility to get ahold of the exit
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 12:18:36 +0100, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
package: directfb
severity: normal
Please, apply the attached patch to directfb 0.9.25 sources: this
patch allows DirectFB to handle devices which produce absolute x,y
coordinates events (touchpads).
This patch proved to
Hey,
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 10:23:17 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
I have such a card, but it's sitting in a machine that runs Sarge (and
I'm not going to update it to etch before that's released).
If it would help, I'd be willing to run some tests on that box. Just
tell me what you want me
Hi,
Mattia I'm sorry you got this, after I asked to enable iasl on all
arches to be able to use it in qemu. I started investigating this
last week or so, but didn't file a bug report because I've not come
yet with a complete solution. Below my current analysis anyway, if
I've time I'll try to
reassign 400372 linux-image-2.6.18-3-sparc32
thanks
Included most of the relevant discussion for the kernel team's benefit.
On Sun, 2006-11-26 at 10:19:39 +0100, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
Guillem Jover a écrit :
On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 19:19:58 +0100, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 04:28:08 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Package: svgalib
Version: 1:1.4.3-23
Severity: wishlist
This patch adds support for an lrmi compatibility layer built on top of
the x86emu CPU emulator. With it, I'm able to use the vesa driver on my
amd64 system.
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 18:00:09 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.3.22
Seen in src/archives.c:
narglist[i++]= strdup(f);
narglist[i++]= strdup(-print0);
narglist[i++]= 0;
execvp(FIND, narglist);
ohshite(_(failed to exec find for
Hi,
On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 18:32:08 +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
I came across
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/08/msg5.html
and if I understood it correctly, dpkg is now frozen. Do you think the
localization updates (as well as the improvements for the orignals,
e.g.
Hi Roberto,
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 19:11:56 +0200, Roberto Gordo Saez wrote:
severity 376812 grave
thanks
Upgraded severity to grave because I think it the package should be
not be released with this bug. It is ususable and crashes the display
when triyng to use it.
Thanks for the report,
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 11:59:28PM +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
I've added -lsepol in configure and I've added a build-depends
libsepol1-dev, and now it seems to work fine. Patch attached.
Thanks for the patch, but it's not completely correct. The file to patch
is m4/libs.m4 (in any case
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 09:41:58AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 12:51:54AM +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote:
What I want to avoid is that this becomes a de-facto Catalan keyboard.
I'm happy with providing the support, but calling it the Catalan
keyboard makes me feel
Package: libsepol
Version: 1.10-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
As you can see from bugs #348659 and #347744 dpkg is now FTBFS, that's
due to libselinux having gained the libsepol dependency, and there not
being a way for packages to know automatically the transitive dependencies
when
Package: libselinux
Version: 1.28-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
Following the patch on libsepol, I'm filing this one, similar in
request (please read #348947 for more details).
Patch attached. In this case I added a Depends to libsepol1-dev in
libselinux1-dev, so that packages that want
Hi,
I'm planning to apply the latest two patches on this bug report before
the mini-freeze starts if nobody opposes. You can check the whole
discussion (it's long though), or skip it and just go to the explanation
at the end. There's the patches and a small test suite. =)
Package: ftp.debian.org
Hi,
Initially I packaged pistachio because it was supposed to be the next
microkernel to be used by the Hurd. That's questionable now. Also the
package suffers some problems that I don't want to spend time fixing,
like it not building on all supposedly supported arches,
tags 329833 patch
thanks
Hi,
Attached is a patch that makes dak use the versioned closes instead of
the obsolete fixed tag. This is the relevant ChangeLog entry:
2006-01-22 Guillem Jover [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* katie.py (nmu_p): Remove unused class.
(Katie.__init__): Do
retitle 182887 Please have NMU-provoked bugmessage tag -pending in addition to
+fixed
block 182887 by 329833
block 347433 by 329833
thanks
Hi,
These two bugs will go away once the one fixing the use close instead
of fixed tag is closed. I'm retitiling as Jeroen didn't send a mail
to control.
Hi,
This bug seems to be fixed in dak, so could be closed. At least in
jennifer (check_deb_ar) the checks are done, and the package rejected
if appropriate.
regards,
guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 09:22:49 +0100, Shish wrote:
I've had the same annoyance; and it struck me as silly that the
override file be a mandatory argument in the first place, if there are
legitimate situations where it isn't needed (the tutorial I was
following used /dev/null as a
Hi,
Hmm all this time passed already...
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 17:47:52 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008, Guillem Jover wrote:
Yeah got the code the day after that mail, but I've not found the time
to test it. I guess the easiest is to change one of the function
return
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 23:18:33 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.14.22
Severity: minor
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertag: package-creation
Git-buildpackage can be configured in a per-repository .gbp.conf, which
must not be included in the package sources.
Can
Hey!
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 09:02:54 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Guillem Jover wrote:
The other is that when onerr_abort is signaled dpkg should not
continue processing anything anymore, it should just do whatever cleanup
is required and exit. But that can wait
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 17:39:17 +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 21:55:38 +0300 Guillem Jover wrote:
We still can do this on our own though :)
Good. :)
Did you test your patch on amd64? v86_lrmi.c seems to be not 64bit
safe. When I compile it on my amd64 with your
Source: grub2
Version: 1.96+20080724-2
Severity: important
Several of the grub2 binary packages have a dependency on debconf w/o
the alternative debconf-2.0 which will make a future transition to
cdebconf really hard. Some of those already have an additional
dependency on the the correct debconf
reassign 492432 aptitude
thanks
Hi,
On Sat, 2008-07-26 at 07:38:31 +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Package: dpkg
Severity: wishlist
Please consider allowing a display of the copyright file of a package
via dpkg. While I am sure you will ask me why this is any different
from doing zcat
Hi,
On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 13:50:29 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Here's a proposed clarification of the current Policy language around
Essential. Comments, feedback, seconds?
diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml
index c9bd84f..d0dc2dc 100644
--- a/policy.sgml
+++ b/policy.sgml
@@ -985,29
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 21:38:41 +0200, Javier Serrano Polo wrote:
reopen 453790
thanks
Please CC the bug report when needed to justify actions, as otherwise
it's easy to miss messages to the control address or just tedious to
have to fish the message from the BTS.
libglide.so.2 is still
Hi!
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 16:23:50 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
The glide Debian package, which you are the maintainer of, has
pending bug report(s) which include translation updates or fixes
for po-debconf, namely bug number 484006 (and maybe other similar bugs).
Right, and a new one just
summary 143307 0
tag 143307 - pending patch
severity 143307 normal
retitle 143307 dpkg: assertion when removing a lot of already removed packages
clone 143307 -1
severity -1 important
retitle -1 dpkg: --no-act not working in triggers code (regression)
thanks
The original bug report goes up to msg
a patch fixing this, you might need to run “autoreconf -f -i”,
after applying it.
regards,
guillem
From c47f361e3aeb816c68dfa2e22a8a24a509a7bbb3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Guillem Jover [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:22:10 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] Use external libx86 instead of embedded
merge 489068 486843
thanks
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-08-14 at 13:46:11 +0100, Nick Leverton wrote:
My thanks to all those who suggested resolutions. dpkg --configuring
the packages one by one didn't work, and it was necessary to uninstall
and then reinstall all 38 packages which were still in state
tags 492052 - patch
tags 492052 pending
thanks
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 16:33:39 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.14.20
Severity: minor
man 1 dpkg-deb mentions the following under BUGS:
| There is no authentication on .deb files; in fact, there isnt
| even a
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
# via tagpending
#
# dpkg (1.14.21) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * When loading the status file fix up any inconsistent package in state
#triggers-awaited w/o the corresponding package with pending triggers.
#Closes:
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-08-14 at 13:17:53 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.14.20
Severity: important
Between 1.14.16 and 1.14.17, dpkg-source appears to have started omitting .a
files from native V1.0 format packages even outside of the debian/ directory.
I didn't see
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 19:38:02 +0100, Zoe Parsons wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.14.20
Followup-For: Bug #76687
Just ran into 2 different assertion errors myself with current version
in testing:
[...]
dpkg: ../../src/packages.c:221: process_queue: Assertion `dependtry = 4'
failed.
tag 401402 moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 23:45:54 -0800, Kingsley G. Morse Jr. wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.24
Severity: wishlist
I still find dpkg useful and would like to humbly
suggest adding an option like --listfiles, but
which also lists files in
reassign 417953 ftp.debian.org
thanks
Hi
On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 23:01:36 +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.46.4
Severity: wishlist
Why go through all the effort to make a Packages.diff directory, and
then only keep one week of diffs in it?
Doesn't the song go on the
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
# via tagpending
#
# dpkg (1.14.21) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Match description of -si option in dpkg-buildpackage to the one in
#dpkg-genchanges. Closes: #493743
# * State that the preferred front-end is aptitude and
Source: hwinfo
Source-Version: 15.3-1
Severity: important
Hi,
The shared libraries contained in this package are not co-installable
for no good reason. For example from libhd14 and libhd15 I see no file
overlap:
$ dpkg -L libhd14
/.
/usr
/usr/lib
/usr/lib/libhd.so.14.19
/usr/share
Hi again,
On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 02:47:50 +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
For the -doc package, please rename the doc-base file (matching the
library name be good) so that they can be co-installed. And for the
-dev packages the best option would be to rename the package to
libhd-dev.
Actually, I
Package: debbugs
Severity: minor
Hi,
On the web interface, when there's been a clone on a bug, the control
message shown is missing the bug number target of that clone.
As an example, near this message:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=143307#143
regards,
guillem
--
To
1 - 100 of 4830 matches
Mail list logo
