Bug#983088: unblock: nitrokey-app/1.4.2-1

2021-02-19 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: patryk@cisek.email Please unblock package nitrokey-app [ Reason ] nitrokey-app has been removed out of testing since the dependency libnitrokey had a RC bug which was fixed

Bug#982554: dpkg: dpkg-deb fails to extract package contents on FAT32 devices

2021-02-11 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
' => 'System.map-5.10.0-3-amd64': Operation not permitted # mount | grep boot /dev/sda1 on /boot type vfat (rw,noatime,nodiratime,fmask=0077,dmask=0077,codepage=437,iocharset=ascii,shortname=mixed,utf8,errors=remount-ro) On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 20:04:39 +0100 Jan Luca Naumann wrote: > Package: dpkg >

Bug#982554: dpkg: dpkg-deb fails to extract package contents on FAT32 devices

2021-02-11 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Package: dpkg Version: 1.20.7.1 Severity: important On EFI computer it is possible to use the ESP partition directly as /boot. But dpkg has problems to upgrade packages, e.g. the linux-image packages, then since it tries to create hardlinks as backup of existing files. This is not supported for

Bug#979443: chromium: desktop GUI locks up as Xorg process goes to 100%

2021-01-11 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
, upgraded to 87* again, and >> re-launched with the recommended command last night.  The user is back >> on this morning and I'm monitoring from another machine. >> >> Steve >> >> >> Jan Luca Naumann wrote on 1/7/21 2:30 AM: >>> Dear Steve, >

Bug#979135: chromium: GPU hw-accel: ANGLE libs cause a lot of errors and warnings

2021-01-09 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
The reason I prefer at the moment the way to change the order in the code is that there it is checked if the desktop implementation is an allowed choice. I do not know what the behavior would be if this is not a valid choice for some case but we use the command line flag. The patch still allows

Bug#979533: chromium: New 87.0.4280.141 (CVE-2020-15995 CVE-2020-16043 CVE-2021-21106 CVE-2021-21107 CVE-2021-21108 CVE-2021-21109 CVE-2021-21110 CVE-2021-21111 CVE-2021-21112 CVE-2021-21113 CVE-2021-

2021-01-07 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Michel is preparing an new version and I update the buster branch as soon as the unstable version is uploaded. Best, Jan On Thu, 07 Jan 2021 21:01:43 +0100 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Source: chromium > Version: 87.0.4280.88-0.4 > Severity: grave > Tags: security upstream > Justification:

Bug#979443: chromium: desktop GUI locks up as Xorg process goes to 100%

2021-01-07 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Dear Steve, with the upgrade to 87.* we included the ANGLE library which manages the OpenGL access of chromium. Maybe this is the cause of your problem. Could you try to launch "$ chromium --use-gl=desktop"? This should disable the usage of ANGLE. Best, Jan On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 11:00:00 -0800

Bug#973848: security update of chromium in Debian stable?

2020-12-28 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Hey, I have got a successful buster build half an hour ago :) As soon as [1] is fixed or at least worked around (so we do not release a version with a regression), I think we could do the update. I will contact the security team now to discuss the update. Best, Jan [1]

Bug#973848: security update of chromium in Debian stable?

2020-12-23 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Hey, parallel to Michel's very nice work to get chromium into unstable (thanks to him!), I tried to build the current version in a buster chroot. At the moment I struggle that there seems a difference how SFINAE[1] in a special case [2] is handled different between buster's and unstable's clang

Bug#973848: chromium: Unsupported version, many security bugs unfixed

2020-12-15 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Hey, I have uploaded my stuff to https://salsa.debian.org/janluca-guest/chromium We can meet in IRC or Matrix. I am janluca on irc.oftc.net. Best, Jan On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 13:59:53 +0100 Michel Le Bihan wrote: > Hello, > > My work is in this repo: >

Bug#973848: chromium: Unsupported version, many security bugs unfixed

2020-12-14 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Hallo everybody, I have done some of the work as well since I have not seen your message about your efforts. I have uploaded a working build for unstable to mentors including updated version of the patches: https://mentors.debian.net/package/chromium/ This version is using the vendor-shipped

Bug#946231: Versions, Upstream version versus Debian version

2020-09-22 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Dear all, since one concern pronounced in this bug report was that there is no automatic migration. Therefore, I developed a helper script to convert most kinds of pkla files to the JS-based format (see attachment). I created a merge request in the upstream repo as well if they want to include

Bug#966922: libnitrokey: FTBFS: dpkg-gensymbols: error: some symbols or patterns disappeared in the symbols file: see diff output below

2020-09-21 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
f time. > > Scott K > > On Thursday, August 20, 2020 12:28:17 PM EDT Jan Luca Naumann wrote: >> Hey Scott, >> >> could you update the package? Since this is marked as RC bug, >> libnitrokey and all depending packages are kicked out of testing. >> >>

Bug#970088: systemd: Add trigger to update systemd-boot installation

2020-09-11 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Package: systemd Version: 246.4-1 Severity: wishlist Dear maintainers, it would be very nice if it would be possible to add a trigger to the postinst of the systemd package which runs "bootctl update" if systemd-boot is installed on the machine. Could you add this feature? Thank you and best

Bug#966922: libnitrokey: FTBFS: dpkg-gensymbols: error: some symbols or patterns disappeared in the symbols file: see diff output below

2020-08-20 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Hey Scott, could you update the package? Since this is marked as RC bug, libnitrokey and all depending packages are kicked out of testing. Best, Jan On Mon, 03 Aug 2020 13:54:57 + Scott Kitterman wrote: > This is probably a result of a new GCC version. C++ symbols can be painful > to

Bug#948087: future of aufs in Debian.

2020-06-20 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
days). >> >> aufs does seem to still be maintained upstream with upstream >> claiming support for Linux 5.6. >> >> According to contributors.debian.net Jan Luca Naumann (the aufs >> maintainer) was last active in September 2019. Jan: are you >> still around? a

Bug#948087: Please report state

2020-06-20 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 I have create a RFH since I have no time due to personal issues: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=963191 I hope somebody can help with the maintaining. Jan On Mon, 1 Jun 2020 16:25:28 +0200 Eduard Bloch wrote: > Hello, > > I was

Bug#963191: RFH: aufs

2020-06-20 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Package: wnpp Severity: normal At the moment aufs is nearly unmaintained since I do not have time due to personal issues. Therefore, I would be happy if there is somebody to co-maintain the package. Open issues are: - Update to current version - Add a version in backports - Support multiple

Bug#948087: future of aufs in Debian.

2020-05-26 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
ce debian-derivatives and debian-live in cc) using aufs in their > live image builds (as far as I can tell debian's own live images seem to > use overlayfs instead nowadays). > > aufs does seem to still be maintained upstream with upstream claiming > support for Linux 5.6. > >

Bug#938961: aufs: needs update for new linux

2019-08-30 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 I will take care of the update next week. This week I'm on holidays without a real computer. Sorry for the delay and best Jan Am 30.08.19 um 17:26 schrieb Ivo De Decker: > package: aufs severity: serious tags: bullseye sid > > Hi, > > The

Bug#923882: [Pkg-sssd-devel] Bug#923882: sssd-tools: sssctl list-domains is broken

2019-03-21 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
directly. Admins of existing installations could be informed about this change via the NEWS file. Would that be a useful solution? Jan Am 21.03.19 um 14:56 schrieb Timo Aaltonen: > On 6.3.2019 19.22, Jan Luca Naumann wrote: >> Package: sssd-tools >> Version: 1.16.3-3 >> Severit

Bug#923882: sssd-tools: sssctl list-domains is broken

2019-03-06 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Package: sssd-tools Version: 1.16.3-3 Severity: normal Since Debian deactivates the installation of the sssd-ifp.service (c.f. changelog for Debian release 1.16.0-4) the subcommands using infopipe (e.g. list-domain and domain-status) of the tool sssctl are broken: $ sssctl domain-list Unable

Bug#920025: python3-lib389: Missing dependency on libnss3-tools

2019-01-21 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Package: python3-lib389 Version: 1.4.0.20-3 Severity: normal The package python3-lib389 is missing a dependency on the package libnss3-tools which provides the tool certutil. Without this package the instance creation via dscreate is broken if using self-signed certificate.

Bug#913820: [Pkg-freeipa-devel] Bug#913820: cockpit-389-ds: Debian-packaged JS libs not sufficient to run cockpit-plugin

2019-01-21 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Hey, the fix of this bug is not complete, the installation of the JS-stuff is still excluded in debian/rules. Could you please take another look into the bug? Best regards, Jan On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 11:20:44 +0200 Timo Aaltonen wrote: > On 15.11.2018 18.22, Jan Luca Naumann wrote: > >

Bug#917857: NMU diff for aufs 4.19+20181217-0.1

2019-01-08 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Hey, thank you for the upload and your work. I am sorry that I did not manage to upload the new version due to too much other workload. I have seen that your delete the dependency on linux-kbuild. I have added it to avoid transition of the aufs-packages to testing before the linux package is

Bug#916911: nitrokey-app: Please announce supported hardware via appstream

2018-12-24 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Dear Szczepan, Dear Jan, in the Debian bug tracker there is a request to include the supported hardware via appstream. Below the initial message is included the complete conversation can be found here: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=916911 This feature should be added

Bug#913821: python3-lib389: dscreate searches files in hard-coded paths

2018-11-15 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Package: python3-lib389 Version: 1.4.0.18-1 Severity: important Tags: upstream patch As described in the upstream bug [1] dscreate searches files in hard-coded paths and tries to use /etc/sysconfig instead of /etc/default. A patch to fix this behaviour is attached. [1]

Bug#913820: cockpit-389-ds: Debian-packaged JS libs not sufficient to run cockpit-plugin

2018-11-15 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Package: cockpit-389-ds Version: 1.4.0.18-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable At the momenent the package cockpit-389-ds applies a patch to use the Debian packaged JS libraries. In contrast to the vendored libraries the Debian versions do not work with the current version of

Bug#910796: python3-lib389: Conflicts and Replaces statements are not compatible with backports

2018-10-11 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Package: python3-lib389 Version: 1.4.0.18-1 Severity: normal The Conflicts and Replaces statements are not compatible with backports of the version 1.4.0.18-1. The correct statements should be: Conflicts: python-lib389 (<< 1.3.7.8), 389-ds-base (<< 1.4.0.18-1~), Replaces: python-lib389 (<<

Bug#909329: libnitrokey: Please backport version 3.3 for Stretch

2018-09-21 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Source: libnitrokey Severity: wishlist Please backport libnitrokey version 3.3 for Stretch. This allows to backport nitrokey-app 1.3.1 for Stretch as well. Thank you in advance

Bug#897210: nitrokey-app: Need to coordinate move of udev rule to libnitrokey

2018-05-13 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Control: tags 897210 fixed-in-experimental Dear Scott, I have uploaded nitrokey-app in the current versiont to experimental as well to allow testing the changes. I have removed the udev-releated stuff from the package. I found a small mistake in

Bug#897210: nitrokey-app: Need to coordinate move of udev rule to libnitrokey

2018-05-03 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Hey Scott, I will try to plan in some time on the weekend for this. Best regards, Jan Am 03.05.2018 um 14:03 schrieb Scott Kitterman: > Libnitrokey 3.3 has been accepted into experimental. > > Scott K > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#891022: rustc: Missing Build-Dep on curl and ca-certificates for build profile "pkg.rustc.dlstage0"

2018-02-21 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Source: rustc Version: 1.23.0+dfsg1-1 Severity: normal For the build-profile "pkg.rustc.dlstage0" there are missing build dependencies on curl and ca-certificates. Without them the download of the upstream rustc for the bootstrap process is failing.

Bug#886329: [Filesystems-devel] Bug#886329: Bug#886329: Bug#886329: aufs-dkms: Cannot use aufs union mount with Linux 4.14.7-1: kernel BUG at /var/lib/dkms/aufs/4.14+20171218/build/fs/aufs/finfo.c:113

2018-02-21 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
and best regards, Jan Am 19.02.2018 um 08:49 schrieb intrigeri: > Hi, > > Jan Luca Naumann: >> could you please provide the additional information the upstream >> developer requests for in the README, then I will forward it to upstream: > > Sure! > > To make commun

Bug#886329: [Filesystems-devel] Bug#886329: Bug#886329: aufs-dkms: Cannot use aufs union mount with Linux 4.14.7-1: kernel BUG at /var/lib/dkms/aufs/4.14+20171218/build/fs/aufs/finfo.c:113

2018-01-24 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Hey, could you please provide the additional information the upstream developer requests for in the README, then I will forward it to upstream: 5. Contact When you have any problems or strange behaviour in aufs, please let me know with: - /proc/mounts

Bug#886329: [Filesystems-devel] Bug#886329: aufs-dkms: Cannot use aufs union mount with Linux 4.14.7-1: kernel BUG at /var/lib/dkms/aufs/4.14+20171218/build/fs/aufs/finfo.c:113

2018-01-23 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Hey, the underlying filesystem is a tmpfs for me as well: # uname -a Linux 4.14.0-3-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.14.13-1 (2018-01-14) x86_64 # mount | grep /tmp none on /tmp type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,noatime,nodiratime) # modprobe aufs debug=1 \ && mkdir /tmp/{ro,rw,mount} \ && touch

Bug#886329: [Filesystems-devel] Bug#886329: aufs-dkms: Cannot use aufs union mount with Linux 4.14.7-1: kernel BUG at /var/lib/dkms/aufs/4.14+20171218/build/fs/aufs/finfo.c:113

2018-01-22 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Control: tags -1 unreproducible Hey, sorry for the long delay for my answer. I tested your code sample below and I could not reproduce the bug with a current 4.14.13 kernel on my system. Could you please test it again? Best regards, Jan Am 04.01.2018 um 15:42 schrieb intrigeri: > Hi, > >

Bug#886329: [Filesystems-devel] Bug#886329: aufs-dkms: Cannot use aufs union mount with Linux 4.14.7-1: kernel BUG at /var/lib/dkms/aufs/4.14+20171218/build/fs/aufs/finfo.c:113

2018-01-05 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Hey, I am not at home for another two days and do not have a proper computer with me. I will take a look at the problem on the weekend. Jan Am 4. Januar 2018 15:42:56 MEZ schrieb intrigeri : >Hi, > >interestingly, only the first access to the aufs mountpoint triggers >the

Bug#884008: [Filesystems-devel] Bug#884008: aufs-dkms: aufs triggers kernel WARN during boot

2017-12-10 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear aufs-maintainer, the following Debian bug (see also webpage [1]) seems to be a upstream problem of the aufs-kernel-module. Could you take a look into it? Best regards, Jan [1] http://bugs.debian.org/884008 Am 10.12.2017 um 13:28 schrieb

Bug#880387: [Filesystems-devel] Bug#880387: aufs-dkms: the module is not built for Linux 4.14

2017-12-04 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Hey, I have already prepared an upload but there was a seg fault on my test system I want to investigate before uploading. Best regards, Jan Am 04.12.2017 um 10:44 schrieb intrigeri: > Control: severity -1 serious > >> Linux 4.14-rc7 was uploaded to experimental; we're getting close to >> the

Bug#875620: aufs-dkms: Please enable compilation with kernel 4.13

2017-10-06 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
I have uploaded the new version, sorry for the delay. The Git repo is up-to-date as well now, I forgot to push the last changes. Best regards, Jan On Thu, 05 Oct 2017 11:37:02 +0200 intrigeri wrote: > Control: severity -1 serious > > Hi, > > > I tried aufs with kernel

Bug#865614: [Filesystems-devel] Bug#865614: Bug#865614: Bug#865614: aufs-dkms: aufs-dkms does not support Linux 4.11

2017-08-14 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Hey, I have seen that there is the updated kernel today, I will take a look into aufs later this day. Best regards, Jan Am 14.08.2017 um 14:43 schrieb intrigeri: > Jan Luca Naumann: >> I have prepared a version for 4.11 and upload it as soon as I have >> tested it (at the mom

Bug#871935: [Filesystems-devel] Bug#871935: aufs-dkms: wrong symbolic link /usr/share/doc/aufs-dkms/README

2017-08-14 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Control: forcemerge 857783 871935 This bug is a duplicate of bug #857783 which is already closed in a newer version. Best regards, Jan Am 12.08.2017 um 20:16 schrieb marjoram: > Package: aufs-dkms > Version: 4.9+20161219-1 > Severity: minor > > Dear Maintainer, > > the symbolic link

Bug#863166: [Filesystems-devel] Bug#863166: aufs-dkms: Please enable CONFIG_AUFS_XATTR

2017-07-24 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Am 24.07.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Geoffrey Thomas: > > Hi maintainers, > > Now that the freeze is over, can we get this change in buster and > stretch-backports? Let me know if there's something I can do to help, > e.g., test packages with this change in. > > Thanks! > Hey Geoffrey, I will take

Bug#865614: [Filesystems-devel] Bug#865614: Bug#865614: aufs-dkms: aufs-dkms does not support Linux 4.11

2017-07-24 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Control: tag -1 pending Hey, I have prepared a version for 4.11 and upload it as soon as I have tested it (at the moment I'm blocked by https://bugs.debian.org/869511 ) Best regards, Jan Am 18.07.2017 um 18:55 schrieb David R. Hedges: > Hi! > > Jan Luca Naumann: >> I will try t

Bug#865614: [Filesystems-devel] Bug#865614: Bug#865614: aufs-dkms: aufs-dkms does not support Linux 4.11

2017-07-05 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
: > Hi, > > Jan Luca Naumann: >> thank you for the trigger, it seems that I missed the point where 4.11 >> was uploaded to sid. I will update the aufs package over the weekend. > > Do you have an updated timeline for this? > > Cheers, >

Bug#867257: linux: Please update aufs4 patches

2017-07-05 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Source: linux Version: 4.11.6-1 Severity: wishlist Hey, I'm preparing at the moment the upload of a new version of the aufs DKMS package for sid. According to the upstream webpage [1] there was a problem with the patches up to 4.11.7. Could you apply the newest patches for 4.11.7+ in course of

Bug#865614: [Filesystems-devel] Bug#865614: aufs-dkms: aufs-dkms does not support Linux 4.11

2017-06-23 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Hey, thank you for the trigger, it seems that I missed the point where 4.11 was uploaded to sid. I will update the aufs package over the weekend. Best regards, Jan Am 23.06.2017 um 08:58 schrieb intrig...@debian.org: > Package: aufs-dkms > Version: 4.9+20161219-2 > Severity: important > User:

Bug#859497: ITP: libqtaccountsservice -- Qt-style API for AccountsService DBus interface

2017-04-04 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jan Luca Naumann <j.naum...@fu-berlin.de> * Package name: libqtaccountsservice Version : 0.7.0 Upstream Author : Pier Luigi Fiorini <pierluigi.fior...@gmail.com> * URL : https://github.com/lirios/qtaccountsservi

Bug#856509: unblock: dracut/044+241-2

2017-03-01 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package dracut The version 044+241-2 contains only the patch to fix bug #855370. The bug is about the problem that the dracut-module "aufs" included in the Debian package

Bug#854880: Fwd: firmware-atheros ships binary ath9k_htc firmwares containing GPL code

2017-02-25 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear Linux-Firmware-Maintainers, as reported in the Debian bug report #854880[1] (mail attached below), the firmware files ath9k_htc/htc_7010-1.4.0.fw, ath9k_htc/htc_9271-1.4.0.fw has been created using GPL components and thus the source code has

Bug#856148: unblock: ntfs-3g/1:2016.2.22AR.1+dfsg.1-0.1

2017-02-25 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 17:35:06 +0100 Jan Luca Naumann <j.naum...@fu-berlin.de> wrote: > Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: > release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock > > Please unblo

Bug#856148: unblock: ntfs-3g/1:2016.2.22AR.1+dfsg.1-0.1

2017-02-25 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
ntfsprogs/boot.c file from version 2016.2.22AR.2 (Closes: #808463) + * Update debian/copyright to match boot.c backported to this version. + + -- Jan Luca Naumann <j.naum...@fu-berlin.de> Sat, 25 Feb 2017 16:09:45 +0100 + ntfs-3g (1:2016.2.22AR.1-4) unstable; urgency=high * Fix CVE-201

Bug#808463: ntfs-3g: non-free code in boot.c

2017-02-25 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
: +Backport ntfsprogs/boot.c file from version 2016.2.22AR.2 (Closes: #808463) + * Update debian/copyright to match boot.c backported to this version. + + -- Jan Luca Naumann <j.naum...@fu-berlin.de> Sat, 25 Feb 2017 16:09:45 +0100 + ntfs-3g (1:2016.2.22AR.1-4) unstable; urgency=high * Fix CV

Bug#855370: dracut-core: Check installation path of aufs-dkms in module-setup.sh

2017-02-17 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Hey, I have packaged the module some time ago since overlayfs has still problems with NFS-roots[1] which is as far as I know bad for e.g. FAI. Best regards, Jan [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=832451#15 Am 17.02.2017 um 11:52 schrieb Thomas Lange: > > I forgot to note

Bug#855370: dracut-core: Check installation path of aufs-dkms in module-setup.sh

2017-02-17 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 09:46:26 +0100 Jan Luca Naumann <j.naum...@fu-berlin.de> wrote: > At the moment the module-setup.sh script of the aufs-module included in the > Debian package do not check if there is an aufs module installed in the > DKMS path. > > The attached p

Bug#855371: dracut-core: Check installation path of aufs-dkms in module-setup.sh

2017-02-17 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Package: dracut-core Version: 044+241-1 Severity: important Tags: patch At the moment the module-setup.sh script of the aufs-module included in the Debian package do not check if there is an aufs module installed in the DKMS path. The attached patch adds the feature that the check() function of

Bug#855370: dracut-core: Check installation path of aufs-dkms in module-setup.sh

2017-02-17 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Package: dracut-core Version: 044+241-1 Severity: important Tags: patch At the moment the module-setup.sh script of the aufs-module included in the Debian package do not check if there is an aufs module installed in the DKMS path. The attached patch adds the feature that the check() function of

Bug#854566: fai-server: fai-make-nfsroot have to create $NFSROOT/dev/pts if it not exists

2017-02-08 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Package: fai-server Version: fai/5.3.3~bpo8+2 Severity: important Tags: patch Hey, fai-make-nfsroot mounts $NFSROOT/dev/pts in the upgrade_nfsroot() function. When trying to create a stretch nfsroot, the mountpoint $NFSROOT/dev/pts does not already exists so fai-make-nfsroot should take care of

Bug#854550: fai-server: make-fai-nfsroot tries to remove $MNTPOINT from host and not from $NFSROOT

2017-02-08 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Package: fai-server Version: 5.3.3~bpo8+2 Severity: important Tags: patch Hey, at the moment fai-make-nfsroot tries to remove the mount point set in the variable $MNTPOINT from the host system and not from the NFSROOT. IMHO should the line 501 in the script be fixes as shown in the attached

Bug#841301: ITP: libwlc -- wlc a compositor library for Wayland

2017-01-04 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
aging/developing it? > Or are you just hoping to use it? > > > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Jan Luca Naumann <j.naum...@fu-berlin.de> > wrote: > > Hey, > > nice that someone want to package the library :) > > What is the current status of the ITP? &g

Bug#849568: aufs-dkms: dkms install fails

2016-12-30 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Control: severity -1 serious Control: tags -1 pending Oh, this was a debug line that should not be in the patch. I prepare a upload to fix the bug now. Best regards, Jan On Thu, 29 Dec 2016 09:04:50 +0100 Gabriel Mainberger

Bug#841301: ITP: libwlc -- wlc a compositor library for Wayland

2016-12-27 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hey, nice that someone want to package the library :) What is the current status of the ITP? Best regards, Jan On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:30:32 +0300 Stefanos Boglou wrote: > Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Stefanos

Bug#821397: RFP: sway -- i3-compatible window manager for Wayland

2016-12-27 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Oh sorry, that was my fault: I have read ITP (Intend to package) but this unfortunately only a RFP yet. Sorry for the spam, Jan Am 27.12.2016 um 17:52 schrieb Jan Luca Naumann: > Hey, > > it is very nice that someone want to take car

Bug#821397: RFP: sway -- i3-compatible window manager for Wayland

2016-12-27 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hey, it is very nice that someone want to take care of sway for Debian :) What is the current status of the packaging process? Best regards, Jan On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 15:16:41 +0200 Holger Levsen wrote: > Package: wnpp

Bug#847773: [Filesystems-devel] Bug#847773: aufs-tools: auplink crashes with SIGSEGV in ftw_startup()

2016-12-11 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hey Flos, since I have never used docker and don't have a testing environment thus: Could you try in a test environment if the problem exists with the version 4.1+20161010-1 from testing, too? The aufs-tools should be backward-compatible as far as

Bug#845724: aufs-tools FTCBFS: uses host architecture compiler for build tools

2016-12-11 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Sorry for the long delay, I will take later a look on your patch. Best regards, Jan On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 09:25:06 +0100 Helmut Grohne wrote: > Source: aufs-tools Version: 1:4.1+20161010-1 Tags: patch User: > helm...@debian.org

Bug#847217: RFS: python-django-allauth/0.29.0-1 [ITP]

2016-12-06 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Hey, I forgot to mention that I upload the package to the Git repo of the Python modules team as soon as my request to join the team is accepted. Best regards, Jan On Tue, 06 Dec 2016 16:16:17 +0100 Jan Luca Naumann <j.naum...@fu-berlin.de> wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests

Bug#847217: RFS: python-django-allauth/0.29.0-1 [ITP]

2016-12-06 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-django-allauth" * Package name: python-django-allauth Version : 0.29.0-1 Upstream Author : Raymond Penners and contributors * URL :

Bug#843846: [Filesystems-devel] Bug#843846: aufs for 4.8: "../fs/mount.h not found" when enabling NFS export

2016-11-22 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
; For export.c, it is unnecessary which means a build dependency bug. > The > bug was born back in 2012. > c70a5cf 2012-01-13 aufs: tiny for 3.3, arg for iterate_mounts() > For vfsub.c, it is necessary and it is not a bug. But it is just for > CONFIG_AUFS_BR_

Bug#799281: [Mailman-Developers] Let's try to package mailman3 in Debian!

2016-11-18 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
:18+0100, Jan Luca Naumann a > écrit : >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 >> >> Hey Pierre-Elliott, >> >> my idea is that we package the current development versions and >> upload them to Debian experimental since the development time of

Bug#844743: ITP: python-django-allauth -- Django app that allows both local and social authentication

2016-11-18 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jan Luca Naumann <j.naum...@fu-berlin.de> * Package name: python-django-allauth Version : 0.28.0 Upstream Author : Raymond Penners and contributors * URL : http://www.intenct.nl/projects/django-allauth/ * License

Bug#844205: [Filesystems-devel] Bug#844205: aufs-dkms: I can't load the kernel module after upgrade from Jessie to Stretch.

2016-11-13 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
%2B20160912-2/ Jan Am 13.11.2016 um 14:06 schrieb Leo: > Hi Jan, thanks a lot for your response! :) > > 2016-11-13 13:34 GMT+01:00 Jan Luca Naumann > <j.naum...@fu-berlin.de <mailto:j.naum...@fu-berlin.de>>: > > The current version is packaged for the current

Bug#799281: [Mailman-Developers] Let's try to package mailman3 in Debian!

2016-11-11 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hey Pierre-Elliott, my idea is that we package the current development versions and upload them to Debian experimental since the development time of 3.1 will last some more time according to the Mailman developers... If you have no problem I could

Bug#843846: [Filesystems-devel] Bug#843846: aufs for 4.8: "../fs/mount.h not found" when enabling NFS export

2016-11-10 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Caution: linux/mount.h is not the same as fs/mount.h, see https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/fs/mount.h vs. https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/include/linux/mount.h Jan Am 10. November 2016 09:56:49 MEZ, schrieb Philipp Marek : >Hi Jan, > > >>

Bug#843846: [Filesystems-devel] Bug#843846: aufs for 4.8: "../fs/mount.h not found" when enabling NFS export

2016-11-10 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Hey Phil, the file fs/mount.h belongs to the normal kernel source. Upstream suggest to build the aufs-module inside the kernel source tree. Since this is not simply possible for the automatic Debian package builds, I have to think about a good solution for thr Debian package. If I find a good

Bug#843846: [Filesystems-devel] Bug#843846: aufs-dkms: enabling NFS export gives "export.c: fatal error: ../fs/mount.h not found"

2016-11-10 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Hey, I will take a look on the problem but I will have less time the next days so there could be some delay. Best regards, jan Am 10. November 2016 09:17:24 MEZ, schrieb Philipp Marek : >Package: aufs-dkms >Version: 4.8+20161010-1 >Severity: normal > >I tried to

Bug#799281: [Mailman-Developers] Let's try to package mailman3 in Debian!

2016-11-07 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear Pierre-Elliott Bécue, what is the current status of your packaging intend. Since I did not the WNPP-list very well I started another ITP (that I closed of course now) and maybe we can work together and/or I can take over some of the work.

Bug#843546: ITP: python-mailman -- Core module for Mailman3

2016-11-07 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jan Luca Naumann <j.naum...@fu-berlin.de> * Package name: python-mailman Version : 3.1.0 Upstream Author : the Free Software Foundation, Inc. * URL : https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman * License : GPL-3+ Progr

Bug#842682: mp3splt: depending libmp3splt version not available yet (0.7.3 vs 0.9.2)

2016-11-03 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Sorry, forgot to add a description in the message before: The bug should be closed in version 2.6.2-0.1 Best regards, Jan On Mon, 31 Oct 2016 11:39:10 +0100 der_...@opentrash.com wrote: > Package: mp3spltVersion: 2.4.2-2mp3splt in sid depends on

Bug#741164: fixed in mp3splt 2.6.2-0.1

2016-11-02 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hey, I can take a look on it and try to get it back to the archive again. Best regards, Jan Am 02.11.2016 um 08:07 schrieb Amr Ibrahim: > Thanks Jan for the update. Are you planning to update mp3splt-gtk > also?

Bug#842162: ITP: anything-sync-daemon -- Anything-sync-daemon (asd) is a tiny pseudo-daemon designed to manage user specified directories referred to as sync targets from here on out, in tmpfs and to

2016-10-26 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jan Luca Naumann <j.naum...@fu-berlin.de> * Package name: anything-sync-daemon Version : 5.83 Upstream Author : graysky <gray...@archlinux.us> * URL : https://github.com/graysky2/anything-sync-daemon * License

Bug#741164: mp3splt: Please update to current version 2.6

2016-10-09 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Hey, I would like to help with the package and want to upload a NMU with a new version to mentors.debian.net. Best regards, Jan signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#754159: New upstream release available: 0.9.1

2016-10-09 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Hey, I would like to help with the package and want to upload a NMU with a new version to mentors.debian.net. Best regards, Jan signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#835521: RFP: nitrokey-app -- Application to manage the nitrokey

2016-10-03 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Hey Guido, the tool looks interesting, I will package it for Debian :-) Best regards, Jan On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:27:01 +0200 Guido =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FCnther?= wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > > * Package name: nitrokey-app > Version : 0.4.26 >

Bug#839049: /usr/bin/profile-sync-daemon: line 359: ${#DIRArr @ ##*/}: bad substitution

2016-09-29 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Control: tags -1 = upstream pending Thank you for forwarding the upstream bug report. I will upload a Debian version with the patch applied soon. Jan Am 28.09.2016 um 21:27 schrieb Ian Kelling: > I hit this bug, and submitted a fix upstream: >

Bug#839049: /usr/bin/profile-sync-daemon: line 359: ${#DIRArr[@]##*/}: bad substitution

2016-09-28 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Tags: unreproducible Hey Brent, I tried to reproduce your problem but at my test system I do not get this error message. The steps I tried to reproduce the problem are: 1) Install "profile-sync-daemon" on Debian unstable 2) Run "profile-sync-daemon parse" with the resulting message "First time

Bug#788513: aufs-tools: FTBFS: linux/aufs_type.h: No such file or directory

2016-09-26 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Hey. there is already another bug about this topic: https://bugs.debian.org/838632 I already started to prepare a upload to fix this issue. Best regards, Jan > Hey. > > Is it really necessary that the userland tools binary package depends > on the kernel driver package? > > That seems to be

Bug#772190: Debian bug reports for aufs-utils

2016-09-12 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Hey, in Debian there are two open bugs for aufs-utils that belongs to the upstream code: 1. https://bugs.debian.org/772190 2. https://bugs.debian.org/777559 (contains patch) Both reported problems seem not to be fixed in the current version yet so you want to fix them maybe :-) Best regards,

Bug#834764: linux: Please update aufs4-patches to latest version

2016-08-18 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Source: linux Version: 4.7_rc7-1_exp1 Severity: wishlist Hey, I'm packaging aufs4 for Debian at the moment. It would be very nice if you could update the aufs4 kernel-patches applied by Debian to the latest version (seems to be "4.6-20160815" and "4.7-20160815" at the moment). Thank you, Jan

Bug#833135: profile-sync-daemon fails to work properly after system crash

2016-08-06 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Dear Michael, I have forwarded your bug to upstream: https://github.com/graysky2/profile-sync-daemon/issues/178 It would be nice if you can provide some more informations in the upstream bug report, for more informations see responses of upstream author graysky). Thank you and best regards, Jan

Bug#832451: ITP: aufs4 -- advanced multi layered unification filesystem version 4.x

2016-07-26 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Am 26.07.2016 um 02:07 schrieb Ben Hutchings: > On Mon, 2016-07-25 at 21:05 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> We have already overlayfs in modern kernels. Could you explain why we >> need aufs4 as well? > > I believe aufs stil has these advantages over overlayfs: > > - Can be exported via NFS > -

Bug#832359: linux-kbuild-4.6: Please include "scripts/headers_install.sh" and "scripts/unifdef", needed by "scripts/Makefile.headersinst"

2016-07-26 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Am 26.07.2016 um 02:10 schrieb Ben Hutchings: > On Sun, 2016-07-24 at 17:10 +0200, Jan Luca Naumann wrote: >> Package: linux-kbuild-4.6 >> Version: 4.6.4-1 >> Severity: normal >> >> In linux-kbuild-* the Makefile "scripts/Makefile.headersinst" is inclu

Bug#723594: ITA: aufs-tools -- Tools to manage aufs filesystems

2016-07-25 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 21:25:38 +0200 Luk Claes wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: normal > > Hi > > As I've lost interest in the package, I'm looking for a new maintainer for > aufs-tools and some other filesystem related packages. > > Cheers > > Luk > > Hey, in course of

Bug#832451: ITP: aufs4 -- advanced multi layered unification filesystem version 4.x

2016-07-25 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jan Luca Naumann <j.naum...@fu-berlin.de> * Package name: aufs4 Version : 4.6+20160523 Upstream Author : Junjiro R. Okajima <hooanon...@gmail.com> * URL : http://aufs.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL2+ Prog

Bug#832359: linux-kbuild-4.6: Please include "scripts/headers_install.sh" and "scripts/unifdef", needed by "scripts/Makefile.headersinst"

2016-07-24 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Package: linux-kbuild-4.6 Version: 4.6.4-1 Severity: normal In linux-kbuild-* the Makefile "scripts/Makefile.headersinst" is included. The Makefile needs the shell script "scripts/headers_install.sh" which is not included in the current version of linux-kbuild-4.6. Can you please include this

Bug#827127: ITP: profile-sync-daemon -- Symlinks and syncs browser profile dirs to RAM thus reducing HDD/SDD calls and speeding-up browsers.

2016-06-12 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jan Luca Naumann <j.naum...@fu-berlin.de> * Package name: profile-sync-daemon Version : 6.22 Upstream Author : graysky <gray...@archlinux.us> * URL : https://github.com/graysky2/profile-sync-daemon * License

Bug#825864: ITP: sedutil -- Tool to use functionality of Self Encrypting Drives (SED) that comply with the TCG OPAL 2.00 standard

2016-05-30 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jan Luca Naumann <j.naum...@fu-berlin.de> * Package name: sedutil Version : 1.12 Upstream Author : Bright Plaza Inc. <drivetr...@drivetrust.com>, r0m30 <r0...@r0m30.com> * URL : https://github.com/Drive-Trus

Bug#796163: dracut: Moving aufs module from dracut-network to dracut causes Trying to overwrite ... error

2015-08-19 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Package: dracut Version: 043-1+zedv1 Severity: normal Using the current version 043-1 from unstable causes error trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/dracut/modules.d/90aufs/aufs-mount.sh', which is also in package dracut-network 040+1-1 when upgrading the package from version 040+1-1. -- System

Bug#778615: installation-reports: Lenovo T61 8889-B35 NVIDIA G86M Quadro NVS 140M

2015-02-17 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Package: installation-reports Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, installation, wethernet, wireless and brightness controll works without any problems. There is a problem with graphics when waking up from suspend, I will fill in a seperate bug report upstream. -- Package-specific info: Boot

  1   2   >