On Fri, 25 Nov 2005, Gürkan Sengün wrote:
Package: unzip
Version: 5.52-5
Severity: normal
$ uname -a
GNU/kFreeBSD gnu 5.4-1-686 #0 Sun Nov 20 17:50:29 CET 2005 i686 i386 AMD
Sempron(tm) 3000+ GNU/kFreeBSD
how to reproduce:
$ wget
On Sun, 8 May 2005, Martin Quinson wrote:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Package: shadow
Version: 4.0.3-30.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream
This package used to compile ok under GNU/kFreeBSD, but it does not anymore,
so we have to create a forked
On Mon, 9 May 2005, Christian wrote:
Package: unzip
Version: 5.52-2
Followup-For: Bug #192253
well, i just added #308345 for zip addressing the very same issue:
no Large File Support in zip.
There will be large file support when it is properly implemented by
upstream the right way,
On Sat, 14 May 2005, Guillem Jover wrote:
Hi Santiago,
Can you reproduce #35970 with the latest gnumach packages?
I don't know, and it is going to be quite difficult for me to check, because
the computer is currently running woody as a server for a lot of people...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Please read the archives of debian-policy. This issue has been discussed
several times there.
There will always be people for which your feature request is a good
thing, but IMHO the side effects of it will not compensate the
benefits, so I definitely need something more than it would be useful
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
What Side affects?
The file /etc/profile is similar to .profile, except that it is global.
As a user, I would become very upset if installing a package would
alter my $HOME/.profile. Whatever I do in my startup scripts
is not a business of
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
On Thursday 05 January 2006 11:25, you wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
What Side affects?
As a user, I would become very upset if installing a package would
alter my $HOME/.profile. Whatever I do in my
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
I've reasoned that:
1) policy allows a profile.d
Policy allows a lot of things, but that does not mean that every thing
which policy allows should be implemented. Point 1 invalid.
2) policy prohibits misuse of it
It *will* be abused, and
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Package: gs-gpl
Version: 8.01-5
Severity: normal
According to Policy, section 5.2, a debian package that is
architecture-independent (thus, one that has 'Architecture: all' set
in the debian/control file) should be built as a dependant of the
reopen 220259
thanks
Hi.
Thanks a lot for taking care of this package.
Sorry for the reopening, but I rebuilt this package for hurd-i386
today and binary-arch still creates gnubg-bearoffs. Perhaps you need
to export DH_OPTIONS somewhere in debian/rules for the DH_OPTIONS
trick to work.
Thanks.
severity 213260 important
thanks
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Oliver Bausinger wrote:
Package: pine-tracker
Version: 4.58-1
Severity: wishlist
Having pine-tracker installed breaks non-interactive installations
because of the prompt.
It would be great if the prompt could be a debconf question of
Package: texinfo
Version: 4.8-3
Severity: serious
Package does not install properly:
Unpacking texinfo (from .../texinfo_4.8-3_kfreebsd-i386.deb) ...
Setting up texinfo (4.8-3) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/texinfo.postinst: line 56: update_ls_files: command not
founddpkg: error processing texinfo
Package: sundials
Version: 2.1.1-5
The binary package libsundials-serial-doc contains just documentation,
so it should probably be an Architecture: all package.
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please, people, stop proposing that I enable large file support by
just passing compiler flags. The patch proposed by Paul Slootman
clearly shows that it's NOT enough. There is an unknown number of
typedefs which have to be changed as well. The patch from Paul changes
several of them, but nobody
Package: postgresql-plruby
Version: 0.4.5-1
This package creates postgresql-plruby when built by an autobuilder,
which does dpkg-buildpackage -B. However, architecture independent
packages should be created by the binary-indep target of debian/rules,
and only by such target.
If you are using
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Bastian Blank wrote:
Package: procmail
Version: 3.22-12
Severity: important
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of procmail_3.22-12 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 85
[...]
gcc -c -g -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
I wrote:
Why does it report an undefined reference to __strcspn_c1, which is
not in the test program?
Sorry, I meant: Why does it report an undefined reference in __strcspn_c1,
which is not in the test program?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
reopen 345709
thanks
Sorry for the reopening, but this bug is not fixed yet.
I just built this package for hurd-i386 today and I still got
the python-scipy-core_0.3.2-5_all.deb binary package.
This is consistent with the fact that debian/rules has five
different dh_* calls not using -a at the
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Bastian Blank wrote:
No. You build the testcase with -g, which makes the compiler supply some
informations about the source. The linker tries to guess where the
undefined reference is located and is wrong in this case.
So, do you thing that just dropping -g3 from gcc
Hi.
Can you try this patch on a s390 and see whether it works?
diff -ru procmail-3.22.orig/debian/rules procmail-3.22/debian/rules
--- procmail-3.22.orig/debian/rules 2006-01-12 12:46:27.0 +0100
+++ procmail-3.22/debian/rules 2006-01-12 12:44:00.0 +0100
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
Package: lists.debian.org
Severity: normal
murphy keeps sending out bogus error messages for all my mails that I
send to debian-user-german, and I'm not the only person to experience
that. Here's a copy of the bounce I got - but in fact the mail is
reassign 343106 passwd
thanks
Note to the submitter: Please do not use base-files as an all-purpose
package for submitting bugs. As it may be read on bugs.debian.org, if
you can't determine which package contains the problem, please send
e-mail to the Debian user mailing list asking for advice.
Christian Perrier wrote:
All these bugs are very probably away for a long time. We requested
more input from bug submitter but got none. Hence closing them...
Hmm, you are a lazy maintainer. Compare (a) and (b) below:
(a) The user does not give enough information to reproduce the bug,
the bug
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, Christian Perrier wrote:
PS: using rude language does not help, imho. It even more deserves the
content of the ideas you try to support. This is one of the golden
rules of human communication: if your first words are aggressive
towards people you're talking to, your ideas
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, Christian Perrier wrote:
Yep, I understand and your explanations are appreciated.
We use the moreinfo tag at least during this intensive bug triage
period for samba packages, to track down issues where we have
requested bug submitters about old bugs still existing or
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005, Carl W. Hoffman wrote:
Package: unzip
Version: 5.52-1sarge2
Severity: important
Unzipping a zipfile containing links which link to files later in the zipfile
now fails.
It worked before the most recent release of unzip.
If you type unzip with no arguments, the
(Replying 2 years later because you forgot to Cc: me on this :-)
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003, Roberto Lumbreras wrote:
tags 217776 + wontfix
stop
I don't know why a binary included in the upstream .tgz is a bug, the
file is deleted and sources recompiled to generate it...
It is a bug because
severity 292842 important
thanks
Hello.
Fixing Bug#270900 in debmake requires that this bug is fixed first.
In preparation for that, I'm upgrading this one to important.
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
severity 292840 important
thanks
Hello.
Fixing Bug#270900 in debmake requires that this bug is fixed first.
In preparation for that, I'm upgrading this one to important.
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
severity 292854 important
thanks
Hello.
Fixing Bug#270900 in debmake requires that this bug is fixed first.
In preparation for that, I'm upgrading this one to important.
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok, I have a fix for this bug, which I will upload in a few days at most.
If you see a message closing the bug, don't panic. I'll continue
to work on a fix for stable.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, Juhan Kundla wrote:
Package: procmail
Version: 3.22-11
Severity: normal
After upgrade from Woody to Sarge, the mailstat program does not display
the mails delivered into one maildir on one summary line, it instead
displays every message in new line. EG
[EMAIL
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, Juhan Kundla wrote:
Hei!
Santiago Vila wrote:
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, Juhan Kundla wrote:
[...]
The behaviour of the mailstat on Sarge is different than the
behaviour on the Woody and Sid. Not having summary lines per maildir in
the mailstat output is somewhat
reassign 344358 glibc
thanks
I believe the submitter is complaning about libc behaviour here, not about
defaults in base-files. Reassigning accordingly.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ron Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 22:03:11 -0500
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, xavier wrote:
the problem is that i'm trying to set VERBOSE and LOGFILE,
so i can't use -m
You can set VERBOSE and LOGFILE on the command line.
What problem do you have with that?
Sample .procmailrc:
:0:
everything
When I do this:
$ procmail .procmailrc VERBOSE=on
severity 261932 serious
tags 261932 + patch
thanks
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, James Troup wrote:
Package: libcompface
Version: 1989.11.11-24
Severity: wishlist
Tag: patch
We ran into problems compiling libcompface on very fast machines, e.g.
libcompface.so.1.0.0 wouldn't be built because
severity 292840 serious
retitle 292840 obexserver FTBFS because of bad debstd call
thanks
Hi. debmake 3.8.0, now in unstable, does no longer accept calling debstd
with non-existing documentation files.
I'm raising the severity of this bug accordingly.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
severity 292854 serious
retitle 292854 emacspeak FTBFS because of bad debian/info file
thanks
This package now FTBFS using debmake 3.8.0 in unstable.
I'm raising the severity of this bug accordingly.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
severity 292842 serious
retitle 292842 tkusr FTBFS because of bad debstd call
thanks
Hi. debmake 3.8.0, now in unstable, does no longer accept calling debstd
with non-existing documentation files.
I'm raising the severity of this bug accordingly.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Paul Smith wrote:
Package: procmail
Version: 3.22-11
Severity: normal
If I give a specific email message to procmail (using procmail -Y -d psmith)
it fails with:
*** glibc detected *** corrupted double-linked list: 0x08097d20 ***
I have a message that this
forwarded 339021 http://www.info-zip.org/zip-bug.html
thanks
I've forwarded this report to the authors.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
forwarded 340693 http://www.info-zip.org/zip-bug.html
thanks
I've forwarded this report to the authors, including the additional
explanations from Aurelien.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
forwarded 334297 http://www.info-zip.org/zip-bug.html
thanks
I've forwarded this report to the authors.
Specifically, I've asked them what level of support may I expect for
the library, as it does not seem to be documented anywhere.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005, Greg Alexander wrote:
Hello -
I am writing in regards to bug #192253 on bugs.debian.org,
reporting that unzip cannot handle 2GB-4GB zip files.
A patch to fix this problem is provided in 2003 by Paul Slootman.
The upstream version has not been updated to correct this
severity 345524 serious
forwarded 345524 Thomas Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
On Sun, 1 Jan 2006, Daniel Lublin wrote:
Package: dialog
Version: 1.0-20051219-1
Severity: important
(Perhaps it was broken already in 20051207. In 20051107 it works,
though.)
tailboxbg is broken and
Package: gsasl
Version: 0.2.5-1
Tags: patch
There is a typo in debian/control. Patch follows:
diff -ru gsasl-0.2.5.orig/debian/control gsasl-0.2.5/debian/control
--- gsasl-0.2.5.orig/debian/control 2006-01-02 19:30:14.0 +0100
+++ gsasl-0.2.5/debian/control 2006-01-02
Package: python-scipy-core
Version: 0.3.2-4
This package creates python-scipy-core when built by an autobuilder,
which does dpkg-buildpackage -B. However, architecture independent
packages should be created by the binary-indep target of debian/rules,
and only by such target.
If you are using
Package: inadyn
Version: 1.96-1
Unless I'm missing anything, this package should not build-depend on fakeroot.
If you want to use fakeroot to create the .orig.tar.gz, that's fine,
but nobody who wants to create the .debs from the source needs to
create the .orig.tar.gz itself, which is already
Package: simulavr
Version: 0.1.2.2-1
Severity: serious
This package fails to build from source in unstable, because of the
new texi2html behaviour, I think. From the build log:
[...]
Generating example index...
Generating file member index...
Generating namespace member index...
Package: liblocale-ruby
Version: 0.1-1
This package creates liblocale-ruby when built by an autobuilder,
which does dpkg-buildpackage -B. However, architecture independent
packages should be created by the binary-indep target of debian/rules,
and only by such target.
If you are using debhelper
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
On Wednesday 04 January 2006 13:09, you wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
Package: base-files
Version: 3.1.9
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Adding the snippet below to /etc/profile modularizes
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Matej Vela wrote:
Package: base-files
Version: 3.1.9
Severity: minor
LGPL-2 should also be updated with the new FSF address.
I can't do that if the official version isn't updated first, as the
license itself does not allow modifications, and this has not happened.
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Akim Demaille wrote:
Package: m4
Version: 1.4.3-2
Severity: normal
The changeword feature is not compiled in m4. It is useful,
and harmless.
Hmm. What about You should note that using `changeword' will slow `m4'
down by a factor of about seven. as noted in the manual?
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, Dan Jacobson wrote:
Package: procmail
Version: 3.22-11
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/share/doc/procmail/QuickStart
Line 54, PATH=$HOME/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin already is the default.
So what? The line is not an example that the PATH may be changed, it's
an
severity 339021 normal
thanks
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, jetxee wrote:
Package: unzip
Version: 5.52-3
Severity: important
Tags: patch l10n
Problem: ZIP-files created on Windows have cyrillic file names encoded
in CP866 codepage. unzip incorrectly converts them as being CP850 to
CP1252 and
Package: fetchmail
Version: 6.3.6~rc3-1
$ ldd /usr/bin/fetchmail
libcrypt.so.1 = /lib/tls/libcrypt.so.1 (0x0ffb2000)
libresolv.so.2 = /lib/tls/libresolv.so.2 (0x0ff7d000)
libssl.so.0.9.8 = /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8 (0x0ff29000)
libcrypto.so.0.9.8 =
Package: dmapi
Version: 2.2.4-1
The source for this package contains a debian/tmp directory that should
probably not be there.
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BTW: I'll apply this patch to the Debian recode package:
diff -ru recode-3.6.orig/src/Makefile.in recode-3.6/src/Makefile.in
--- recode-3.6.orig/src/Makefile.in 2001-01-22 19:14:16.0 +0100
+++ recode-3.6/src/Makefile.in 2006-12-08 13:19:24.303610833 +0100
@@ -819,7 +819,7 @@
severity 375988 serious
clone 375988 -1
tags 375988 help
reassign -1 spamassassin
retitle -1 spamassassin needs more than 512MB to process innocent 2.5MB email
found -1 3.1.7-1
thanks
In this report, the submitter says that some messages make procmail to crash.
He also says to be using
For the record: A very similar problem is reported in the spamassassin
bug tracking system:
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=3296
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Duncan Findlay wrote:
It's generally a bad idea (i.e. not supported) to stick messages
larger than 250k through spamassassin. The spamc client refuses to
check messages larger than this size, and the example procmailrc in
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006, Robert Edmonds wrote:
I have prepared a Debian package of clamassassin using Santiago's sed
script. If there's no activity in a few weeks, I'll upload my package.
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Anders Jackson wrote:
It has gone a couple of weeks now. So how about hijack this ITP,
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
But in the general case it would be nice if apt-get would get the
file/size/md5sum from a trusted Packages file and then fetch the deb
from an untrusted source if it matches.
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Andras Korn wrote:
[...] if two packages have
On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Alejandro Forero Cuervo wrote:
Package: procmail
Version: 3.22-11
Severity: wishlist
procmailrc(5) states:
These regular expressions are completely compatible to the normal
egrep(1) extended regular expressions. See also Extended regular
expressions.
However,
FYI: As promised, m4-1.4.6 is now available in unstable.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 11:33:17AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
# Rebootstrap the package
aclocal -I macros
aclocal: macro `AM_PROG_MKDIR_P' required but not defined
aclocal: macro `AM_PROG_MKDIR_P' required but not defined
So in addition to
Oops. It's 386263 not 306263. Sorry.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 11:33:17AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
# Rebootstrap the package
aclocal -I macros
aclocal: macro `AM_PROG_MKDIR_P' required but not defined
aclocal: macro `AM_PROG_MKDIR_P' required but not defined
So in addition to
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Peter Niss wrote:
Package: procmail
Version: 3.22-11
Severity: important
After editing my .procmailrc with wordpad.exe on Windows the line endings
were silently changed to DOS style. After that procmail deleted ALL received
emails without any message in log file.
This
Package: readline-common
Version: 5.2-1
Severity: minor
The default /etc/inputrc as provided in /usr/share/readline/inputrc
breaks the usual spanish keyboard mapping, as the Insert key
is supposed to output the ~ sign.
Way to reproduce it:
a)
Reconfigure console-tools to use the es keyboard
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: readline-common
Version: 5.1-5
setting
set bell-style none
in /etc/inputrc has no effect
Do you have a space just after the none word?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Peter Niss wrote:
Santiago Vila schrieb:
Please provide a minimal .procmailrc file which makes procmail to delete
email.
A broken procmailrc is attached.
In fact, the mails were not deleted. [...]
Ah, but then you have not provided what I asked!
Why do you think
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Roger Leigh wrote:
Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 5 Nov 2006, Roger Leigh wrote:
That's a good idea. Does something like the following (untested)
patch work for you?
Yes, I've just tested it, and it works. Thanks!
Just another thought. Do you
Hi.
This is some kind of me too. I really miss the following shortcuts:
PrevWorkspaceKey = Mod1+Control+Left;
NextWorkspaceKey = Mod1+Control+Right;
AutoFocus = YES;
It would be nice to have them in etch before the freeze.
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Package: mpg123
Version: 0.61-3
Severity: important
On a powerpc with Linux 2.6 and oss-compat installed, mpg123 (i.e. mpg123-oss)
outputs just noise. Seems like a bytesex problem.
mpg123-alsa works correctly.
While we are at it, since OSS is deprecated and we will not ship Linux 2.4
in etch,
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Package: rbldnsd
Version: 0.996
Severity: serious
Usertags: grid5000
Hi,
During a piuparts run over all the packages in etch, I ran into a
problem with your package:
Setting up rbldnsd (0.996) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/rbldnsd.postinst:
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Santiago Vila wrote:
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
[]
Michael, this is just a missing dependency on adduser, which is needed
because adduser is not Essential: yes. Here is a patch:
Yup. I already replied to the original report
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, saf wrote:
Package: procmail
Version: 3.22-11
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When I check my kernel messages with the dmesg command I see this
errors some times:
procmail[6099]: segfault at rip 2adc5570
rsp
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Jiri Palecek wrote:
Package: diff
Version: 2.8.1-11
Severity: normal
Hello,
the diff program gives bogus results when comparing directories
and locale is set to my usual locale (cs_CZ.iso8859-2). Particularly,
it treats every file containing a period (.) and dash
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Package: base-files
Version: 3.1.16
Severity: important
base-files needs an update for etch to update the version in
/etc/debian_version. I suggest you upload directly to
testing-proposed-updates.
Last time I did that, we had the version
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006, Don Armstrong wrote:
tag 278538 moreinfo
thanks
Before another pseudopackage is added to the BTS for stuff like this,
there should be a list of bugs in general for which the pseudopackage
is appropriate using usertags, and a set of circumstances where the
pseudopackage
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006, Santiago Vila wrote:
You are assuming that there are already bugs in general regarding
this which should be usertagged.
If they're aren't bugs existing to which you would reassign to a
packages.debian.org virtual package
severity 368306 normal
thanks
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
I was hit by the same issue and it was because of /boot/grub/menu.lst
containing ``--read-only'' on ext2fs.static's line. This had probably
been added when auto-detecting an existing Debian GNU/Hurd installation
by
Package: ucf
Version: 2.0016
When ucf is purged, I usually see the following lines, this is from a
build log:
[...]
Removing ucf ...
Purging configuration files for ucf ...
find: /var/lib/ucf/cache: No such file or directory
rmdir: /var/lib/ucf/cache: No such file or directory
I think this is
Package: sbuild
Version: 0.52
Severity: wishlist
The check_watches() function is disk-intensive on flaky systems like
the Hurd, but even on robust machines, sbuild could go even faster if
there was a way to disable it (sometimes, some people want to build as
many packages as possible in as little
On Sun, 5 Nov 2006, Roger Leigh wrote:
tags 397123 + patch
thanks
Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The check_watches() function is disk-intensive on flaky systems like
the Hurd, but even on robust machines, sbuild could go even faster if
there was a way to disable
perfectly.
This issue was fixed in February this year:
base-files (3.1.10) unstable; urgency=medium
* Removed mdns item from hosts line in default /etc/nsswitch.conf, since
it does not make everybody happy (Bugs #348578, #348580 and #351990).
-- Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 9 Feb 2006
Hi.
Thanks for the report.
Before I forward it upstram. Could you please tell me if you can still
reproduce using version 0.16 in experimental?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BTW: I have just uploaded the i386 version of gettext 0.16-0 for
experimental (my usual architecture is powerpc), so it will be in
incoming.debian.org in a few minutes, and it will be in experimental
in a few hours.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Fri, 24 Nov 2006, Martin Pitt wrote:
Hi Santiago,
Santiago Vila [2006-11-24 12:53 +0100]:
Does it crash with gettext 0.16 in experimental too?
Took me a while to build everything... 0.16 seems to work fine, it
did not crash on the lisp file and produced a seemingly good PO
template
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
Who, me? :) Not at all. gettext is currently frozen.
http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gettext.html
Perhaps gettext maintainer can say more (CC-ed).
Yes, gettext is frozen, but I hope the release managers let it
propagate to etch in the near future,
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-3-k7
Version: 2.6.18-6
I have a system here which shows this message when booting:
kobject_add failed for audio with -EEXIST, don't try to register things with
the same name in the same directory.
[c01b8d8a] kobject_add+0x146/0x16c
[c0213a6e]
reassign 401173 debian-policy
thanks
Note to the submitter: This bug does not belong to base-files.
Please read base-files FAQ!
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Jari Aalto wrote:
Package: base-files
Version: 4
Severity: normal
The list of licenses is limited in:
$ ls -1
Package: bogofilter
Version: 1.1.1-5
In the clean target, debian/rules does not remove bogofilter-bdb.substvars,
bogofilter-qdbm.substvars or bogofilter-sqlite.substvars.
[ Moreover, tail is still using the old deprecated syntax. This has been
reported before as Bug#369218, now closed, but the
Package: partconf
Version: 1.19
Severity: wishlist
The defaults word in /etc/fstab exist so that one has something to write
as a 4th field, but it's really useless if there are more options. In such
cases it may be removed safely.
In most cases, removing this extra word makes fstab more
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20061102
Severity: minor
Tested debian-testing-powerpc-netinst.iso today.
When a menu asks the user to choose among available kernels, the
following package was one of them:
kernel-image-2.6-powerpc
but this package, while it would work, is obsolete in etch,
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20061102
[ I'm not sure this is the right package, please reassign as appropriate ].
In sarge, the user had the choice of adding a security.debian.org line
to /etc/apt/sources.list or not.
This seems to be no longer the case in etch, not even in expert mode.
I
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20061102
Severity: important
This is really a feature more than a bug, but the adverse effects are
so devastating that it would be nice to have a workaround in
debian-installer, or have it properly documented in the install manual.
It seems there is a buggy
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Florian Ernst wrote:
Package: gettext
Version: 0.14.6-1
Severity: important
Hello Santiago,
more stuff from the blender folks. :)
gettext ships several shared libraries in /usr/lib, but only for one
of them there exists an entry in debian/shlibs.
This is because
reassign 382246 blender
retitle 382246 blender should link against libgettextpo, not libgettextlib
thanks
In fact, gettext does not provide any header file which allows other packages
to depend on libgettextlib properly:
# dpkg -L gettext | grep usr/include
/usr/include
1 - 100 of 5795 matches
Mail list logo
