Package: php4-auth-pam
Version: 0.4-6
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and
various bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the
PHP team has made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in
the Debian packages. P
Package: php4-dbtcp
Version: 0.1.17-4.1
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and
various bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the
PHP team has made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in
the Debian packages.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 05:19:37PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 11:53:52AM +0100, Helmut Toplitzer wrote:
> >
> > Do the dietlibc-people know about the problem.
> > Could not find any bugreport about that.
>
> I do not know. I have not checked yet. I'll file a bugreport
>
Package: turck-mmcache
Version: 2.4.6-10
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various
bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has
made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in the the Debian
packa
Package: php4-tclink
Version: 3.4.0-3.2
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various
bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has
made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in the the Debian
packag
Package: php4-sqlrelay
Version: 1:0.35-6.1
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various
bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has
made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in the the Debian
pac
Package: php4-rrdtool
Version: 1.04-10
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various
bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has
made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in the the Debian
package
Package: php4-ps
Version: 1.3.1-5
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various
bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has
made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in the the Debian
packages. P
Package: php4-mcrypt
Version: 3:4.3.10-0.1
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various
bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has
made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in the the Debian
pac
Package: php4-lasso
Version: 0.6.1-1
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various
bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has
made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in the the Debian
packages.
Package: php4-gpib
Version: 3.2.03-1
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and
various bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the
PHP team has made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in
the Debian packages. Pl
Package: php4-idn
Version: 1.1-1.1
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and
various bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the
PHP team has made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in
the Debian packages. Plea
Package: php4-imagick
Version: 0.9.11-0.1
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and
various bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the
PHP team has made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in
the Debian packages
Package: php4-interbase
Version: 4.3.8-3.1
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and
various bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the
PHP team has made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in
the Debian package
Package: php4-sqlite
Version: 1.0.2-6
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various
bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has
made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in the the Debian
packages
Package: php4-spplus
Version: 1.0-4
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various
bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has
made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in the the Debian
packages.
Package: php4-syck
Version: 0.42-7
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various
bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has
made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in the the Debian
packages.
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 09:46:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Binary rebuild for mipsel
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 286636 libimlib2-dev,illuminator
Bug#286636: illuminator: ftbfs [sparc] /bin/sed: can't read
/usr/lib/libltdl.la: No such file or directory
Bug reassigned from package `illuminator' to `libimlib2-dev,illuminator'.
> retitle 286636 Package '@r
Steve Langasek wrote:
> Package: php4-lasso
> Version: 0.6.1-1
> Severity: grave
> Tags: sid
>
> After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various
> bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has
> made the hard decision to revert support for t
reassign 286636 libimlib2-dev,illuminator
retitle 286636 Package '@requirements@', required by 'imlib2', not found
tags 286636 -sid
thanks
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 03:56:06PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
> Now the error is:
> checking LIBXML2_LIBS... -lxml2 -lpthread -lz -lm
> checking for imlib2
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 23:43:04 -0300
Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> tags 300440 +patch
> thanks
>
> Hi Stefan,
>
> I've tracked this bug and with the vorlon and fatalerror help
> i reproduced it this way:
>
> - Install dhelp package;
> - Install doc-linux-it package;
> - Remove or mo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 286636 patch
Bug#286636: Package '@requirements@', required by 'imlib2', not found
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11
> severity 296518 grave
Bug#296518: libimlib2-dev: pkg-config description with wrong Requires field
Severity set to `grave'.
> severity 286636 grave
Bug#286636: Package '@requirements@
tags 286636 patch
thanks
Ok, well, that was easy enough; there are simply no references anywhere in
the current imlib2 code that would replace '@requirements@' with a proper
value. So the best solution here, AFAICT, is to simply remove that line
from imlib2.pc.in. Patch attached.
Cheers,
--
St
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11
> reassign 286636 libimlib2-dev
Bug#286636: Package '@requirements@', required by 'imlib2', not found
Bug reassigned from package `libimlib2-dev,illuminator' to `libimlib2-dev'.
> merg
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 02:08:29 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gstreamer0.8: FTBFS in sarge: failed to make documentation?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Hi,
Relatedly: when /etc/network/run exists as a symlink to
/dev/shm/network, but /dev/shm/network doesn't exist (which for some
reason was the case here), the script fails with `The canonical path of
/etc/network/run could not be determined. Aborting'.
Removing the symlink seems to have solved i
Package: xmpi
Version: 2.2.3b8-6
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source
xmpi failed to build from source on a sparc buildd. This problem was
NOT duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. There may be insufficiently
strict build dependancies.
Making install in src
make[2]:
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 05:47:17 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300534: fixed in libgnumail-java 1.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Attached is a patch to fix most of the compilation problems for
util-vserver. Steve Langasek tested this on sparc and it worked. Builds
still fail on at least hppa, powerpc, and mipsel, since the dietlibc
linking fails. See #300926 for some discussion about this.
I didn't try giving the -Os option
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 06:18:10 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301326: fixed in gpib 3.2.03-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 15:27:17 +0100
Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: sylpheed-claws-vcalendar-plugin
> Version: 0.9-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid
>
> Hi,
Hello Kurt,
> Your package is failing to build on various arches because the
> libical directory is using a very old ve
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 06:20:05 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301337: fixed in syck 0.42-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Hi Steve,
> Please rebuild turck-mmcache to match with a build-dependency on
> php4-dev (>= 4:4.3.10-10) and a dependency on phpapi-20020918, and please
> accept our apologies for the inconvenience.
Hehe, yep, so it obviously caused you guys as much stress as it did me
then ;-)
No problem, I'll
Package: rxtx
Severity: serious
When building 'rxtx' in a clean chroot, I get the following error:
344. throw new gnu.io.PortInUseException(
^^
*** Semantic Error: You need to modify your classpath, sourcepath,
bootclasspat
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 01:08:30PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> Attached is a patch to fix most of the compilation problems for
> util-vserver. Steve Langasek tested this on sparc and it worked. Builds
> still fail on at least hppa, powerpc, and mipsel, since the dietlibc
> linking fails. See #30
As a user who used x3270 I am very displeased about the disappearance of x3270
from Debian. I read here about the events that caused this and I'm amazed. It
seem to me the the situation can be cleared by sending few emails and instead
the pacage was removed. If the package maintainer did not se
Package: icecast2
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Several security issues have been reported for Icecast2. Please refer to
the CAN Ids in the changelog when fixing them:
CAN-2005-0838:
Multiple buffer overflows in the XSL parser may cause DoS and possibly
remote c
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
Version: 2.6.8-15
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Kernels before 2.6.11 do not properly restrict access to the N_MOUSE line
disciple for TTYs, which allows local users to inject mouse or keyboard
events into other's users sessions and possibly gain extended privileges.
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 07:32:06 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301330: fixed in lasso 0.6.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 12:55:59PM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 03:45:58AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 01:08:30PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > > Attached is a patch to fix most of the compilation problems for
> > > util-vserver. Steve Langasek
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 03:45:58AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 01:08:30PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > Attached is a patch to fix most of the compilation problems for
> > util-vserver. Steve Langasek tested this on sparc and it worked. Builds
> > still fail on at leas
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 300168 + pending
Bug#300168: arpack++: fails to comple simple.cc example given in "nonsym"
examples directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracki
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 04:59:04AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 12:55:59PM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> > The workaround for sparc wouldn't be necessary if the diet wrapper is
> > called with the -Os option (this adds -mcpu=supersparc), a good idea
> > anyway for all archit
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 300117 important
Bug#300117: revelation: Don't start
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
-
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 01:23:01PM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 04:59:04AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 12:55:59PM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> > > The workaround for sparc wouldn't be necessary if the diet wrapper is
> > > called with the -Os optio
severity 300117 important
thanks
This bug only affects compatibility with old versions of packages from
testing, and therefore is not release-critical.
Stefan, the problem here is that you depend on a series of
python2.3-specific packages (python (>= 2.3), python2.3-crypto,
libxml2-python2.3), bu
The new craze is finnally here - one of the bast
sites that can give you the things you've allways
wanted to get - watchees, repliccas to be correct,
of the bast brand s in the world! Impress you're lady
with tag heur, roleex, and more. You naame it - We
got it for you!
m show me more
http://a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 301378 serious
Bug#301378: geneweb: near 100% memory utilisation and slow system
Severity set to `serious'.
> tags 301378 sid -experimental
Unknown tag/s: -experimental.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 301267 patch
Bug#301267: libant1.6-java: FTBFS: Jikes could not find package "java.lang"
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
tags 301267 patch
thanks
Since a few months SableVM's class library is compressed, so the
/usr/share/sablevm/sablevm-classpath does not contain it. The
preferred interface for finding the boot class path has always
been `cat /usr/share/sablevm/classlib.pth`, while the rules
had the path hardcode
Package: libjavascript-perl
Version: 0.52-4
Severity: grave
Tags: experimental
Justification: renders package unusable
I tried to simulate 'document.write()', so I wrote a simple package Document.pm:
-- cut --
package Document;
sub new {
my $self = {};
bless $self;
return $self;
}
sub writ
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 05:44:40AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 01:23:01PM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 04:59:04AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > It most certainly is *not* a good idea; it's contraindicated by policy to
> > > build binaries wit
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 02:26:41AM +, Paul Brossier wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 01:38:27AM +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> it works perfectly on powerpc, a much nicer solution indeed. and
> the first patch was wrong, the image was slightly more redish.
>
> > Great. We're getting closer, it
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:03:24 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#289182: fixed in kino 0.75-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 12:31:00PM +0100, Ricardo Mones wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 15:27:17 +0100
> Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It's also trying to make a shared library without using -fPIC.
> > This also causes build failures on other arches and is probably
> > the result of no
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:47:30 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301193: fixed in sylpheed 1.0.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:47:57 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301352: fixed in xmpi 2.2.3b8-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:03:24 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301243: fixed in mozilla-firefox 1.0.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Package: libant1.6-java
Version: 1.6.2-2
Followup-For: Bug #301267
Here is a full patch to solve the problem.
Have fun!
Etienne
--
Etienne M. Gagnon, Ph.D. http://www.info.uqam.ca/~egagnon/
SableVM: http://www.sablevm.org/
SableCC:
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:47:38 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301200: fixed in sylpheed-claws 1.0.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 301267 patch
Bug#301267: libant1.6-java: FTBFS: Jikes could not find package "java.lang"
Tags were: patch
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please c
#299939 and #218014 likely have the same cause. Someone might
consider downgrading #299939 and/or merging them.
It seems that both are caused by a user-trigged disconnect event while
in a state when disconnect should be disallowed. A proper solution
probably requires glib synchronization, but I'
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 301038 confirmed
Bug#301038: imagefs: segfaults on startup
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you ne
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 301038 patch
Bug#301038: imagefs: segfaults on startup
Tags were: confirmed
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs databa
tag 301038 patch
thanks
It appears that the imagefs crash can be avoided by pre-creating the
file. It will crash if the file doesn't exist, but seems to succeed
if you /usr/bin/touch the file beforehand.
There's something wrong with the constructor CImage::CImage. When you
try to create a file,
Package: libgtkmm-2.4-1
Version: 2.4.10-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libgtkmm-2.4-1: Depends: libatk1.0-0 (>= 1.9.0) but 1.8.0-4 is to be
installed
E: Broken packages
I've tried 2 italian mirror, but situation is th
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 14:47:58 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300662: fixed in qalculate 0.7.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 285257 ext2resize - invalid superblock on BE machines
Bug#285257: ext2resize: invalid superblock on mips
Changed Bug title.
> severity 285257 grave
Bug#285257: ext2resize - invalid superblock on BE machines
Severity set to `grave'.
> thanks
St
Le 24/03/05 à 16:31 Achim Bohnet ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) écrivait :
Sorry for the delay to answer.
I have hundred mails to read. Could you please tell me what I've to do
for showimg ?
Thanks.
> On Thursday 24 March 2005 15:41, Mark Purcell wrote:
> [...]
> > I intend to upload libkexif1 and rebuilt k
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 300306 + fixed
Bug#300306: wine: Insecure world readable storage of Wine registry
Tags were: patch security
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
Package: smail
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
Justification: user security hole
[Dear security-team, this should affect Woody as well]
Sean <[EMAIL PROTECTED] has discovered two vulnerabilities in smail,
that can be exploited to obtain root privileges:
1. A heap overflow in RFC 821 header
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 15:51:17 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301336: fixed in sqlrelay 1:0.35-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 15:51:17 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#294015: fixed in sqlrelay 1:0.35-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
I just installed 1.36.2-1 and everything appears to have worked. Of
course, I haven't done a backup yet... I had done an abortive
earlier install, and then purged it. There remained a bacula user on
the system, but not in postgres.
However, there were a number of questions in the setup that we
I was able to get the openswan-modules to compile into a deb with the follwing
steps and the patch shown below. However I could not establish a tunnel, but
that's not related to this bug as far as I know (unless there is a compile time
option I'm missing). Info included on this anyway.
Linux mah
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 16:47:14 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301331: fixed in php4-mcrypt 3:4.3.10-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: comerr-dev
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Trying to apt-get install the comerr-dev package, the following error
is returned:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
comerr-dev: Depends: libcomerr2 (= 1.35-6) but 1.35-8 is to be installed
E: Broken packa
On Friday 25 March 2005 21:46, Jean-Michel Kelbert wrote:
> Le 24/03/05 Ã 16:31 Achim Bohnet ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Ãcrivait :
>
> Sorry for the delay to answer.
> I have hundred mails to read. Could you please tell me what I've to do
> for showimg ?
Hi Jean-Michel,
short story: upload a showimg ve
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 17:02:24 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301378: fixed in geneweb 4.10-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 301038 - patch
Bug#301038: imagefs: segfaults on startup
Tags were: patch confirmed
Tags removed: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you nee
Hi,
> transponderdefinitionwidget.cpp:44: error: `spacer1' undeclared (first use
> this function)
> transponderdefinitionwidget.cpp:44: error: (Each undeclared identifier is
>reported only once for each function it appears in.)
If the environment variables QT_COMPAT and KDE_COMPAT are set, KT
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 18:17:12 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#285431: fixed in libnss-pgsql 1.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 18:17:11 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#299952: fixed in fai 2.7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11
> tags 301416 sid
Bug#301416: libgtkmm-2.4-1: Broken dependencies
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need ass
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 15:52:58 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301436: comerr-dev: cannot install while libcomerr2 1.35-8
is installed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line opie removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line opie removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line opie removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line opie removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line opie removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line opie removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line opie removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line opie removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line opie removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line opie removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line opie removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line opie removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Severity 301416 grave
Bug#301416: libgtkmm-2.4-1: Broken dependencies
Severity set to `grave'.
> Merge 301416 298517
Bug#298517: new version depends on experimental versions of libraries
Bug#301416: libgtkmm-2.4-1: Broken dependencies
Mismatch - only B
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
