Quoting Ludovic Drolez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: smbclient
Version: 2.2.3a-14.1
Severity: grave
Oh nice...seems that the release schedule is triggering RC bug
reports.:-(
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Hi !
We use smbclient to backup Windows systems with backuppc.
Hello,
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 07:33:27PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 01:18:59AM +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 10:26:09PM +0200, Remi Vanicat wrote:
Package: libocamlgsl-ocaml-dev
Version: 0.3.5-2
Severity: grave
there seem to be a
Ludovic,
What is the target system ? The bug you report slightly sounds like
#302771, especially if the target is an XP system.
Could you also try to list a directory with less than 32 entries?
If needed please ping either me (bubulle) or Steve (vorlon) on IRC
irc.debian.org.
--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 305216 serious
Bug#305216: util-vserver: Error upgrade
Severity set to `serious'.
tags 305216
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
--
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 08:37:22AM +0200, Markus Hoenicka wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
Uh, linking libdbd-mysql against mysqlclient14 is not an option for sarge,
as this is pretty much a guaranteed segfault in a mod_perl environment.
libdbd-mysql !=
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
And, indeed libdbd-mysql already links against libmysqlclient14 in sarge and
sid. So then, why are you suggesting a rebuild as a solution to this bug?
I may not be sufficiently familiar with Debian packaging and such. When I
checked the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Markus Hoenicka wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
And, indeed libdbd-mysql already links against libmysqlclient14 in sarge and
sid. So then, why are you suggesting a rebuild as a solution to this bug?
But only on i386
Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
libdbd-mysql, and everything works smoothly. I was under the layman's
impression that if you build against libmysqlclient12-dev and run
libmysqlclient14 you may get into trouble, but I may be wrong here.
I don't think that's a problem perse as
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 08:57:03AM +0200, Markus Hoenicka wrote:
And, indeed libdbd-mysql already links against libmysqlclient14 in sarge and
sid. So then, why are you suggesting a rebuild as a solution to this bug?
I may not be sufficiently familiar with Debian packaging and such. When I
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
It's entirely possible that simply doing a proper rebuild of the i386
binaries against libmysqlclient12 will also fix whatever problem you're
experiencing...
Granted.
It would be helpful if you would try to rebuild the current source
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Markus Hoenicka wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
It's entirely possible that simply doing a proper rebuild of the i386
binaries against libmysqlclient12 will also fix whatever problem you're
experiencing...
Hi Ola,
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 11:48:11PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
severity 305216 serious
Bug#305216: util-vserver: Error upgrade
Severity set to `serious'.
Why is this bug serious? It seems that the bug only affects 2.4.29 kernels
-- is that correct?
Thanks,
--
Steve
Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
I'll upload a new version (the only markable difference would be the
dependency on libmysqlclient12) which you can test in the weekend ;-)
Thanks a lot. While you're at it, did you run make check in the libdbi-drivers
directory? This should
Package: desktop-profiles
Version: 1.4.5
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.4
The file /etc/gconf2/path is a conffile owned by the package gconf2.
Postinst of desktop-profiles offers through debconf to mess with that
file. That is a violation of Debian Policy section 10.7.4.
I see no
Debian Bug Tracking System schreef:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#309749: openoffice.org: Heap overflow,
which was filed against the openoffice.org package.
It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Their
I managed to reproduce this bug, unfortunately.
And, even more unfortunately, it seems different from #302771 and it
is NOT fixed by 3.0.14a-2...
Attached is a level 10 debug output from a session with the bug. The
behaviour is what Ludovic described. ls seems to hang and the CPU
and memory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Markus Hoenicka wrote:
Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
I'll upload a new version (the only markable difference would be the
dependency on libmysqlclient12) which you can test in the weekend ;-)
Thanks a lot. While you're at
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 309733 libldap2
Bug#309733: exim: Missing library libsasl.so.7
Bug reassigned from package `exim' to `libldap2'.
severity 309733 important
Bug#309733: exim: Missing library libsasl.so.7
Severity set to `important'.
reopen 309733
Bug#309733:
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 01:24:35PM +0200, Robo Trebula wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 01:00:13PM +0200, Robo Trebula wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
Could you please send us a list of the contents of the /var/cache/cracklib/
directory on your system?
Sure, here you
reassign 309733 libldap2
severity 309733 important
reopen 309733
thanks
Ladislav,
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 10:18:58AM +0200, Ladislav Dobias wrote:
On Wed, 18 May 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 08:12:28AM +0200, Ladislav Dobias wrote:
Exit cannot be started, it says:
On Friday 20 May 2005 09:42, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Package: desktop-profiles
Version: 1.4.5
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.4
The file /etc/gconf2/path is a conffile owned by the package gconf2.
That file is left alone by default on installation of desktop-profiles.
The
Let your child grow with the best software...
http://mvjqw.5crkqmngkxnck6n.quotajquot9.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I wrote:
1. I have not seen a security announcement about this bug, and there
is securtity support in Sarge now. Or do I miss something?
2. I have not seen this bug in the bug-tracking system.
I am sorry.
The bug was fixed before there was security support for Sarge...
With regards,
Paul
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 305216 - wontfix
Bug#305216: util-vserver: Error upgrade
Tags were: wontfix
Tags removed: wontfix
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Unpacking this tarball to my system does not let me reproduce the bug.
Can you try to get a backtrace of this bug by running 'gdb passwd' as root,
typing 'run test' to change the password of user 'test', and then sending
the output of 'bt' when it crashes?
New interesting observations - the
Robo Trebula wrote:
Unpacking this tarball to my system does not let me reproduce the bug.
Can you try to get a backtrace of this bug by running 'gdb passwd' as root,
typing 'run test' to change the password of user 'test', and then sending
the output of 'bt' when it crashes?
New interesting
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 07:16:11AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
bug 292337 is fixed, and there is no RC bug pending for doc++.
Is there any reason you want to remove doc++ now?
I don't think it's reasonable to try to remove doc++ from sarge now,
especially when the current bugs have been fixed.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20-05-2005 10:46, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
On Friday 20 May 2005 09:42, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Package: desktop-profiles
Version: 1.4.5
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.4
The file /etc/gconf2/path is a conffile owned by
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 309883 normal
Bug#309883: mozilla-firefox: Moziall-firefox fails to print via cups, possible
due to incorrect PostScript
Severity set to `normal'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 294413 serious
Bug#294413: useless package
Severity set to `serious'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
To
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 298054 + fixed
Bug#298054: ssmtp mangles messages in transit
Tags were: fixed woody security
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
severity 309883 normal
thanks
AFAIK the main subject of mozilla-firefox is to browse Web, isn't
print-out.
Of course problem should be fixed in the future, but I don't think it is
release critical.
To fix a problem, you need to provide more detail information, such as
where problematic web site
What is the justification for assigning this bug report a severity level
of grave? Clearly the program isn't unusable.
--
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I confirmed this bug, and ldconfig doesn't solve for me.
Whenever I enter password in dictionary, for example dictionary,
segmentation fault happens soon after (index fread failed): Success.
# passwd kmuto
New UNIX password: dictionary
(index fread failed): Success
Segmentation fault
I
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
tags 309534 + help experimental
Bug#309534: libdebtags1: FTBFS: Missing build depedency.
Tags were: experimental
Tags added: help, experimental
End of message, stopping processing
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 09:48:43PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
You did not declare and build dependency on python at all.
I suggest you read the python policy in
/usr/share/doc/python/python-policy.txt.gz
Thanks for reporting this!
I'm adding a build-dependency on python-dev, however I prefer
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 12:43:16PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
severity 294413 serious
thanks
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 05:57:45PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
this package should really be removed from debian.
- It is in italian, so it is absolutely useless
severity 309798 important
merge 309689 309798
thanks
Quoting Ludovic Drolez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hi !
Here is the l10 dump.
I think that the bug is triggered by a directory. I'm trying to find which
one.
One with more than XX entries, very probably.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1
Severity: serious
Justification: Breaks functionality on upgrade
Following upgrade from Woody, 'dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86'
silently becomes a no-op because no /var/lib/xfree86/XF86Config-4.md5sum
file exists. This causes an unexpected
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 02:18:32PM +0200, Massimo Dal Zotto wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 12:43:16PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
severity 294413 serious
thanks
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 05:57:45PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
this package should really be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Langasek wrote:
| On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 08:31:51AM -0500, Jay Kline wrote:
|
|Steve Langasek wrote:
|| On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 07:51:05AM -0500, Jay Kline wrote:
||
||| Jay, taking care to run rm -f /usr/lib/libldap.so.2.0.15 before
|doing so,
Your message dated Fri, 20 May 2005 14:34:41 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line libsdl-erlang has been removed from sarge
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
severity 309914 normal
Bug#309914: 'dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86' become no-op on upgrade from
Woody
Severity set to `normal'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 04:13:55AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Here's the (not so useful) backtrace:
[...]
Thanks Steve.
Since I don't have access to alpha desktop it would be quite hard to debug
the problem.
One more question. Does it segfault with `asc -q` switch?
regards
fEnIo
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Baker wrote:
Luk Claes wrote:
Relevant snippet of the build log [1]:
./RunTest: line 111: 25459 Bus error
./pcretest -i $testdata/testinput2 testtry
make[1]: *** [runtest] Error 1
I can't reproduce this. I've logged in to
reassign 309746 cracklib-runtime
tags 309746 + patch
thanks
I found this problem is because word database is corrupted when
it was built with LANG=sk_SK.
I suspect other latin languages are affected by this bug.
Solution is to run each commands with LC_ALL=C in
/usr/sbin/crack_mkdict.
Your message dated Fri, 20 May 2005 10:47:13 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#307497: fixed in lme4 0.95.8-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
tags 309746 - security
Bug#309746: libpam-cracklib: passwd program segfaults when pam_cracklib.so used
Tags were: patch security
Tags removed: security
End of message, stopping
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 02:44:40PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
If you're positive, officially you're requested to file a bug on
ftp.debian.org pseudopackage asking for its removal, but I can take it
on from you if you explicitely say you've decided you want it to be
removed. For
Actually:
if [ -e /dev/.udevdb/ ]; then
if [ ! -e /dev/md/0 -a ! -e /dev/md0 ]; then
cd /dev WRITE_ON_UDEV=1 ./MAKEDEV md
fi
fi
Md vorlon: I have been pointed at #294404: testing for presence of
/dev/.static/dev is broken, and there are probably good reasons to not
move the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 301459 serious
Bug#301459: gnome-menus: conflict with kdelibs-data
Severity set to `serious'.
tag 301459 expermental
Unknown tag/s: expermental.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 04:05:53PM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
Since I don't have access to alpha desktop it would be quite hard to debug
the problem.
I doubt this is relevant for the bug, but Valgrind shows several errors in
the memory handling. For instance, asc allocates memory
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 303300
Bug#303300: file permissions modification race (CAN-2005-0953)
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
tags = security, woody
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
reopen 303300
tags = security, woody
thanks
I find no traces on http://www.nl.debian.org/security/nonvulns-woody.
Btw. http://lwn.net/Articles/136284/ also talks about CAN-2005-1260,
but there is no info yet. Please check how they relate.
Greetings
Helge
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
# 6.5.3 is not scheduled to enter sarge
reopen 309838
Bug#309838: gcompris: missing dependency on python2.3-gnome2
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
tags 309838 + sarge
Package: kdebindings
Severity: serious
Version: 3.3.2-1
From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot:
...
/bin/sh ../../libtool --silent --tag=CXX --mode=link i386-linux-g++
-Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -Wundef -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500
-D_BSD_SOURCE -Wcast-align -Wconversion
Package: osgcal
Followup-For: Bug #309201
I've added a clean command on clean target, also added the proper entry on
changelog. I'm not sure if this is the right-thing since I'm not that familiar
with the library, but it seems to work/build both on my sid system and
pbuilder' sarge chroot. Hope
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 268924 grave
Bug#268924: lxdoom-x11: won't start, complains of being 'Unable to find
supported visual settings'
Severity set to `grave'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Package: fluxbox
Severity: serious
blackbox and fluxbox both contain /usr/share/man/man1/bsetroot.1.gz, but
the packages do not conflict:
Unpacking fluxbox (from .../fluxbox_0.9.12-1_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/fluxbox_0.9.12-1_i386.deb
(--unpack):
trying to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: kernel-image-2.6.11-9-em64t-p4-smp
Version: 2.6.11-2
Severity: grave
while booting the message hdb: cdrom_pc_intr: The drive appears
confused (ireason = 0x01) repeats several times and the system hangs
for some seconds. After booting and
severity 308052 serious
merge 308052 309958
thanks
blackbox and fluxbox both contain /usr/share/man/man1/bsetroot.1.gz, but
the packages do not conflict:
Please do not file multiple bugs.
We are investigating this.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :' :proud Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
tags 308052 + fixed confirmed sarge
Bug#308052: Both blackbox and fluxbox seem to provide bsetroot
There were no tags set.
Bug#309958: fluxbox and blackbox contain same file
Tags
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
tags 309958 - fixed
Bug#309958: fluxbox and blackbox contain same file
Tags were: sarge confirmed fixed
Bug#308052: Both blackbox and fluxbox seem to provide bsetroot
Tags removed:
Hi martin!
You wrote:
This has been fixed in 0.9.12-1. We are trying to decide whether
a backport to 0.9.11 is necessary for sarge, or whether we can
release 0.9.12.
I'm sorry, but it's not fixed in 0.9.12-1. blackbox 0.70.0-4 and
fluxbox 0.9.12-1 still both contain bsetroot binary and man
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 309495 patch
Bug#309495: anon-proxy: fails to clean /etc/environment on uninstall, debconf
change
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 11:40:47PM +0200, dwitch wrote:
As I mentionned yesterday on IRC, that patch seems ro refer to a
pre-6.5.2 change, and only applies when reversed. Looking at cvsweb,
it really looks like that change was applied before the 6.5.2
release. Furthermore, once applied, it
Your message dated Fri, 20 May 2005 17:47:08 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#309519: fixed in murasaki 0.8.11-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 308624 + patch
Bug#308624: gdb: Integer overflow in ELF segment parsing
Tags were: security
Tags added: patch
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Package: picasm
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Multiple buffer overflows in picasm's code for generating error messages
have been found that can be exploited through crafted source code with
overly long preprocessor directives. For full details please see this
Le vendredi 20 mai 2005 à 23:40 +0200, Yann Dirson a écrit :
Hi Bruno,
As I mentionned yesterday on IRC, that patch seems ro refer to a
pre-6.5.2 change, and only applies when reversed. Looking at cvsweb,
it really looks like that change was applied before the 6.5.2
release. Furthermore,
On Friday 20 May 2005 12:28, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 20-05-2005 10:46, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
On Friday 20 May 2005 09:42, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
c) Provide your hack only as a tweak
that's the current situation I think, no?
No. Your hack replaces the file, ignoring any and
also sprach Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.05.21. +0200]:
Right, so, please upload a fixed version of 0.9.11 to
testing-proposed-updates.
0.9.12-1 really *is* fixed. It uses diversions:
cirrus:..fluxbox-0.9.12/debian apt-get install fluxbox blackbox -t unstable
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'s
[ported to -devel from -release, -release on Bcc]
In the 0.9.11-1 changelog:
- Removed diverts (Closes: Bug#263512)
So the diversion here are leftovers which weren't deleted. Oh oh,
fluxbox, things are looking bad.
Thanks Steve for keeping a clear head when mine was in the clouds.
So
also sprach martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.05.21.0149 +0200]:
So the diversion here are leftovers which weren't deleted. Oh oh,
fluxbox, things are looking bad.
So apart from
test -d /etc/X11/fluxbox rm -rf /etc/X11/fluxbox
in postrm, which could potentially delete data installed
The only reason I suggested an epoch is that there is supposed to be a
freeze on, and this is a fairly destabilizing API change at a
relatively late date. But if that isn't a problem, then I'll update
libhtml-mason to work correctly with the new mp2 and NMU it.
-=Eric
Package: upgrade-reports
Severity: serious
Archive date: Thu May 19 19:00:01 UTC 2005
Upgrade date: Sat May 21 04:17:36 CEST 2005
uname -a: Linux signy 2.4.16 #1 Sun Dec 16 16:38:44 CET 2001 mips unknown
Method: online ftp, using apt-get
Contents of /etc/apt/sources.list:
deb
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 12:48:12AM +0200, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote:
Hi,
Attached to this mail a patch which fixes a security problem in gdb.
I tested the patch and it works. Patch comes from the current snapshot
of gdb, I backported it.
Bug #308624
There are at least two other patches
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 309798 important
Bug#309798: smbclient eats all memory and cpu with a simple ls
Severity set to `important'.
merge 309689 309798
Bug#309689: Infite loop while reading directory listings.
Bug#309798: smbclient eats all memory and cpu with a
As recently as November 2004, I was seeing serious lockups and dataloss
with BDB backends, due to upstream bugs in the BDB integration, and all
our LDAP setups ended up using LDBM due to reliability concerns.
These BDB reliability concerns are tracked in Bug #190165
79 matches
Mail list logo
