If you are using stable, you should rather use the packages I uploaded
on backports.org than pinning over to unstable.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
On 02/02/06, Hasso Tepper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no way to generate myspell dictionary from ispell one for
Estonian. Ispell just doesn't have support for compound words. Using -C
is ugly workaround, which makes ispell dictionary somewhat usable for
estonians, but it's acceptable
This bug has been open for more than 6 months with no fix. It's caused by
an error in the rules file, causing syslogd to be built with incorrect
large file support. There are two lines that need to be altered. The
patch to fix the problem is inline below. It was also attached to the bug
Le Vendredi 03 Février 2006 07:06, Matt Kraai a écrit :
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 07:01:02AM -0800, Bruce Korb wrote:
Oops. Yes, that's right. Nevertheless, alpha had the same issue, only
more reliably. As soon as I have a round tuit, I'll make a check on an
alpha I was just granted access
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 267040 remote code execution hole due to lack of Java security manager
Bug#267040: gcjwebplugin: Should include UNRESTRICTED access to your computer
warning somewhere
Changed Bug title.
severity 267040 critical
Bug#267040: remote code
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
severity 351023 important
Bug#351023: myspell-et: Myspell dictionary is unusable
Severity set to `important'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Matt: Can you send us the output of
kpsewhich -show-path .tfm
It is strange that this one isn't found.
$ kpsewhich -show-path .tfm
tags 321187 + pending
tags 213282 + pending
tags 328347 + pending
tags 339072 + pending
tags 346944 + pending
tags 321188 + pending
tags 246217 + pending
tags 321190 + pending
tags 193228 + pending
tags 321192 + pending
tags 139980 + pending
tags 221366 + pending
thanks for the fish
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 321187 + pending
Bug#321187: xmovie needs rebuild with gcc 4.0 to undergo C++ transition
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
tags 213282 + pending
Bug#213282: Please migrate to libsndfile1
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
tags
tags 350903 unreproducible
severity 350903 important
thanks
I can build the autogen package on sid without problems.
Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt: Can you send us the output of
kpsewhich -show-path .tfm
It is strange that this one isn't found.
$ kpsewhich -show-path .tfm
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 350903 unreproducible
Bug#350903: cmr10 not loadable
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
severity 350903 important
Bug#350903: cmr10 not loadable
Severity set to `important'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
close 326767 1.10-1
Bug#326767: Failure to use return value from realloc (!)
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ATT.
--- debian/control~ 2006-02-03 22:58:33.872072120 +0800
+++ debian/control 2006-02-03 23:24:27.000960640 +0800
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Matthias Urlichs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Standards-Version: 3.6.1
-Build-Depends:
Package: graphicsmagick
Version: 1.1.7-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Trying to install the package failed:
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/graphicsmagick_1.1.7-2_i386.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite
Hi,
Well, I first received that error as I deinstalled libpam-opensc and
installed libpam-p11 instead. Then I started to get that error. So I
don't think it has to do with wrong PIN input
*IIRC* I also reinstalled pam-opensc and it then worked. but not sure
anymore.
Regards,
Rene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sorry, I've made a mistake, here is the right patch.
--- debian/control~ 2006-02-03 22:58:33.872072120 +0800
+++ debian/control 2006-02-03 23:24:27.000960640 +0800
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Matthias Urlichs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Fri, 03 Feb 2006 08:47:12 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#336276: fixed in monodoc 1.1.13-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 03 Feb 2006 09:02:09 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#350643: fixed in ekg 1:1.6+20060202-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
severity 351262 wishlist
thanks
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 05:49:06PM +0100, Braun Gabor wrote:
Trying to install the package failed:
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/graphicsmagick_1.1.7-2_i386.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man4/miff.4.gz', which is also
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 351262 wishlist
Bug#351262: graphicsmagick: Fails to install, common file with imagemagick
Severity set to `wishlist'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Fri, 3 Feb 2006 11:23:32 -0600
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
I disagree with the release manager's assessment of the situation,
clearly. And `unless someone proves otherwise' is not a very good way
of deciding. Are things only considered security bugs nowadays if
someone has produced an exploit ? The right approach is to consider
something a security bug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On February 3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Well, I first received that error as I deinstalled libpam-opensc and
installed libpam-p11 instead. Then I started to get that error. So I
don't think it has to do with wrong PIN input
*IIRC* I
Package: fragroute
Version: 1.2-7
Severity: grave
I'm using the default fragroute config file. My local subnet is
172.16.0.0/24. Here is a transcript of a shell session:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]
# uname -a
Linux ghostwheel 2.6.12-1-686 #1 Tue Sep 27 12:52:50 JST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux
[EMAIL
Package: sudo
Version: 1.6.8p7-1.3
Followup-For: Bug #349587
This bug is actually a bit more far sweeping. The patch made in the
security advisory DSA 946-1 was not thought out at all. All of the
mechanisms to provide the workaround functionality put in place were
already in place. env_reset
Thanks for the patch, Steve. I have applied it in my working copy, but
as I don't currently have a working webcam, I can't test the package
properly. I'll be looking for time on the weekend to get the cam
working again so I can test it. Assuming all goes well, I'll upload
before the weekend is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11
tags 350696 + pending
Bug#350696: wxwindows2.4: FTBFS with new make
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11
tags 350695 + pending
Bug#350695: wxwidgets2.6: FTBFS with new make
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 18:54 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
here's the start of a list of documents that have no source in
tetex-base or tetex-src, but whose source is available elsewhere:
And here some documents with (possibly) problematic license:
severity 350905 important
thanks
El mié, 01-02-2006 a las 08:58 -0600, John Goerzen escribió:
Package: asterisk
Version: 1:1.2.1.dfsg-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Since 1.2.1 was released, the Asterisk folks have released new versions
that fix multiple serious
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 08:24:56PM +0100, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
Though I agree that all these bugs have to be fixed, and most when a
new upstream version fixing these is released, none of them renders
package unusable.
I'd say a serious memory leak does more than render the package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 349015 compface: no longer reads XBM files
Bug#349015: compface: wrong encoding (or decoding) of faces
Changed Bug title.
tag 349015 patch
Bug#349015: compface: no longer reads XBM files
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
retitle 349015 compface: no longer reads XBM files
tag 349015 patch
thanks
The Debian-specific patch that allowed compface(1) to read XBM images
got lost between 1989.11.11-24 and 1:1.5.2-1. (Upstream patched the
new version to write XBMs, but not to read them.) The one-line patch
in 1:1.5.2-2
Hi !
I cannot reproduce your bug. With my settings kphonerc is created with 664
rights, since my umask is set to 002.
I think that you have your umask set to 000. Which value returns 'umask ?'
Regards,
--
Ludovic Drolez.
http://www.palmopensource.com - The PalmOS Open Source Portal
libc6 version 2.3.5-12.1 seems to have fixed the problem. Please excuse
me for the noise.
--AvH
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 20:27 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
[GFDL, OpenPub, ...]
I think we should move these to tetex-doc-nonfree, and only try to
contact the maintainers whether they are willing to relicense them once
we know about a DFSG-free documentation license, in other words,
hopefully
Package: syslog-ng
Version: 1.9.8.1+20060128-1
Severity: critical
For the last few weeks I've had a problem with SQLGrey aborting and mail
being rejected. The problem each time was that syslog-ng was no longer
running and SQLgrey wasn't handling the missing syslog daemon more
gracefully.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 351262 serious
Bug#351262: graphicsmagick: Fails to install, common file with imagemagick
Severity set to `serious'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 349988 + pending
Bug#349988: kdbg: [m68k] FTBFS: autoconf: command not found
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thank
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Package: wmsetimon
Version: 0.5-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
wmsetimon can only monitor [EMAIL PROTECTED] Classic processes, and the [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
classic project is now officially dead. So it's unusable.
Wmsetimon should probably be removed from Debian.
Package: wmufo
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This is to keep the package out of testing until the ftpmasters process
the removal bug (reassigned from the WNPP bug).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 08:02:51PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
wmsetimon can only monitor [EMAIL PROTECTED] Classic processes, and the
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
classic project is now officially dead. So it's unusable.
Wmsetimon should probably be removed from Debian. Alternatively, it could
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11
severity 351312 grave
Bug#351312: syslog-ng: Segmentation fault during logrotation
Severity set to `grave'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11
tags 351312 sid
Bug#351312: syslog-ng: Segmentation fault during logrotation
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11
retitle 351312 Segmentation fault when sent the HUP signal
Bug#351312: syslog-ng: Segmentation fault during logrotation
Changed Bug title.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 348106 + patch
Bug#348106: FTBFS: build depends on non-existent libopensc1-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Running ltrace on the syslog-ng process at the time of the segfault
showed:
free(0x80b2cd8) = void
free(0x80eb798) = void
free(0x815e358) = void
free(0x80d40f8) =
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11
severity 351312 grave
Bug#351312: Segmentation fault when sent the HUP signal
Severity set to `grave'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11
tags 351312 security
Bug#351312: Segmentation fault when sent the HUP signal
Tags were: sid
Tags added: security
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
reassign 351078 libgpepimc0-dev
thanks
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 07:27:33AM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
libcontactsdb failed to build on all buildds, duplicated on my sparc
pbuilder.
checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
checking for CONTACTSDB... configure: error: Package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 285347 + fixed
Bug#285347: gs-afpl: new upstream version available
Tags were: pending
Tags added: fixed
tag 289501 + fixed
Bug#289501: gs-aladdin: New upstream - 8.50 (11-Dec-2004)
Tags were: pending
Tags added: fixed
tag 346993 + fixed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 351078 libgpepimc0-dev
Bug#351078: libcontactsdb: ftbfs [sparc] Package requirements (sqlite
libgpepimc) were not met
Bug reassigned from package `libcontactsdb' to `libgpepimc0-dev'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Your message dated Fri, 03 Feb 2006 20:03:13 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#348106: fixed in gnupg2 1.9.20-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: dvipdfmx
Version: 1:20050831-0.1
Severity: grave
Justification, breaks other packages
/etc/texmf/dvipdfm/fontmapsx
isn't being read by dvipdfmx anymore, which breaks Japanese fonts,
ptex-jisfonts package
This is a regression of 271468 which is probably:
Package: dvipdfmx
Version: 1:20050831-0.1
Severity: grave
justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
what's happened to cid-x map contents?
Compared to the version in sarge, it's mostly too empty to find any font.
Is there a new mechanism to find the fonts?
I noticed while debugging a problem
Nick Phillips dijo [Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 07:51:44AM +1300]:
That'll be because they shouldn't exist. I'm not sure offhand whether
it's ever made it as far as policy, but it's been discussed several
times (sometimes in the context of trying to update sources from
upstream revision control
Package: clisp
Version: 1:2.36-4
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 7.2
libreadline4 (and indeed, the whole source package readline4) have been
removed from unstable. Currently, clisp contains a dep on libreadline4,
apparently due to the build-dep alternative libreadline5-dev |
Hello,
I'm doing an NMU of audiooss to fix #346676 and #349381; diff
attached.
Thanks,
Matej
diff -u audiooss-1.0.0/debian/changelog audiooss-1.0.0/debian/changelog
--- audiooss-1.0.0/debian/changelog
+++ audiooss-1.0.0/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+audiooss (1.0.0-2.1) unstable;
Your message dated Sat, 04 Feb 2006 08:44:18 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
59 matches
Mail list logo