Bug#347324: marked as done (freeloader: Fails to start on sid)

2006-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Feb 2006 08:47:54 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Closing the bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#351480: exim4-base fails to install with debootstrap

2006-02-05 Thread Marc Haber
tags #351480 confirmed patch moreinfo reassign #351480 adduser thanks On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 03:16:27PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: I guess it's a adduser bug; It is. adduser --system --group --home /var/spool/exim4 --no-create-home \ --disabled-login

Processed: Re: Bug#351480: exim4-base fails to install with debootstrap

2006-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags #351480 confirmed patch moreinfo Bug#351480: exim4-base fails to install with debootstrap There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed, patch, moreinfo reassign #351480 adduser Bug#351480: exim4-base fails to install with debootstrap Bug

Bug#351495: The package is unusable without the patch #335845

2006-02-05 Thread Davide Prina
Package: festlex-ifd Version: 1.0-10 Severity: grave The package is unusable if you do not have added the patch reported in the bug #335845 to the package festival. I think that people who install this package need to know this problem with apt-listbug and know also that there is a solution

Bug#340173: bugs.debian.org: re bug#340713: another one found with #340381

2006-02-05 Thread Loïc Minier
On Sat, Feb 04, 2006, Al Stone wrote: This same problem occurs with #340381 where the bug was fixed two uploads ago but is still being reported as outstanding. #340381 doesn't appear as outstanding right now, so I believe this was fixed yesterday when people addressed the space problem on

Bug#351499: pwc-source still doesn't compile under Linux 2.6.16-rc1

2006-02-05 Thread Stefan Förster
Package: pwc-source Version: 10.0.11-1 Severity: grave The pwc module no longer compiles under the kernel 2.6.16-rc1. It compiles perfectly under 2.6.15. The compiler error I had reported for version 10.0.10-1 is gone, but now I get another one with version 10.0.11-1:

Bug#337351: marked as done (libembperl-perl: FTBFS on arm - fails httpd syntax check 1)

2006-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Feb 2006 10:23:57 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing incorrect FTBFS bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#351499: pwc-source still doesn't compile under Linux 2.6.16-rc1

2006-02-05 Thread Steve Langasek
severity 351499 important thanks On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 11:03:58AM +0100, Stefan Förster wrote: Package: pwc-source Version: 10.0.11-1 Severity: grave The pwc module no longer compiles under the kernel 2.6.16-rc1. It compiles perfectly under 2.6.15. Then this is not a grave bug, since

Processed: Re: Bug#351499: pwc-source still doesn't compile under Linux 2.6.16-rc1

2006-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 351499 important Bug#351499: pwc-source still doesn't compile under Linux 2.6.16-rc1 Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#340150: jwm: *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid next size (normal): 0x0000000000531e50 ***

2006-02-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 09:00:06PM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote: I've been busy but I ahve now prepared new verison of the package. If you find the time to check it, that would be welcomed. Severity: grave, because amd64 is a release architecture. Jari, if you have packages for 1.1

Processed: tagging 351486

2006-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11 tags 351486 pending Bug#351486: udev: 0.084-2 breaks unstable installs with d-i daily builds There were no tags set. Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here.

Processed: reassign 349354 to initramfs-tools,kernel-2.6,udev

2006-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11 reassign 349354 initramfs-tools,kernel-2.6,udev Bug#349354: initramfs-tools - kernel -udev dependency loop Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-2.6' Bug reassigned from package

Bug#343521: marked as done (zaptel-source: zaptel modules cannot be found once installed)

2006-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Feb 2006 03:17:17 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#343521: fixed in zaptel 1:1.2.3-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#350718: marked as done (sylpheed-claws-gtk2: Depends on libetpan3 (=0.40-1) but libetpan3 is no more in the pool)

2006-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 5 Feb 2006 03:39:53 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#350718: sylpheed-claws-gtk2: Depends on libetpan3 (=0.40-1) but libetpan3 is no more in the pool has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#349354: initramfs-tools - kernel -udev dependency loop

2006-02-05 Thread maximilian attems
severity 349354 important stop dude as discussed with vorlon this needs to be resolved soon. but latest klibc in testing needs that i-t release, so let it slip for now, or we'll break to many systems. -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe.

Bug#351333: cid-x.map is almost empty

2006-02-05 Thread Ralf Stubner
Hi, I haven't read the full bug report yet. So only a few general comments. On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 12:35 +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: I've checked, tetex-base, and it provides map files in /usr/share/texmf-tetex/fonts/map/ and has files under /etc/texmf/updmap.d/

Processed: reassign 349354 to initramfs-tools,linux-2.6,udev

2006-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 # wrong package name reassign 349354 initramfs-tools,linux-2.6,udev Bug#349354: initramfs-tools - kernel -udev dependency loop Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-2.6' Bug reassigned

Processed: reassign 349354 to initramfs-tools,linux-2.6,udev

2006-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11 reassign 349354 initramfs-tools,linux-2.6,udev Bug#349354: initramfs-tools - kernel -udev dependency loop Bug reassigned from package `initramfs-tools,linux-2.6,udev' to

Processed: Re: initramfs-tools - kernel -udev dependency loop

2006-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 349354 important Bug#349354: initramfs-tools - kernel -udev dependency loop Severity set to `important'. stop dude Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#340395: amule-utils: links to libfreetype6, which is going away

2006-02-05 Thread Steve Langasek
found 340395 2.1.0-1 thanks This bug is apparently back in the latest version of the package. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: severity of 349354 is serious

2006-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 severity 349354 serious Bug#349354: initramfs-tools - kernel -udev dependency loop Severity set to `serious'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Processed: Re: amule-utils: links to libfreetype6, which is going away

2006-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: found 340395 2.1.0-1 Bug#340395: amule-utils: links to libfreetype6, which is going away Bug marked as found in version 2.1.0-1. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#313067: marked as done (kword vs ghostscript fontname confusion)

2006-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Feb 2006 11:58:28 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line KDE's choice of postscript FontNames has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#341398: racoon: Two minor things

2006-02-05 Thread David Serrano
Package: racoon Version: 1:0.6.2-2 Followup-For: Bug #341398 - Of course I have libipsec. It's that I just thought it was a separate package. - My email address as appears on my previous message is incorrect. It ends in es not com. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Bug#344029: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#350954: DSA-960-1 security update breaks libmail-audit-perl when $ENV{HOME} is not set]

2006-02-05 Thread Niko Tyni
On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 02:59:25PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: Comments to the attached patch, which are least intrusive to the update we're already distributing? It's certainly the minimum required change. However, after this patch Mail::Audit is still leaving behind a file in /tmp every

Bug#349354: initramfs-tools - kernel -udev dependency loop

2006-02-05 Thread Bastian Blank
severity 349354 serious thanks On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 01:01:09PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: as discussed with vorlon this needs to be resolved soon. as not discussed with the kernel team, this is a problem and the release team can decide to overwrite this on there own. Bastian -- Ahead

Bug#350458: Xft.h includes freetype headers, .pc file does not reflect this

2006-02-05 Thread Steve Langasek
tags 350458 patch thanks Attached is a patch to add the freetype cflags back into the xft.pc file. The previous patch was also apparently not tested for static linking, since it depended on variables that weren't defined anywhere in the .pc file... :) Let me know if you'd like an NMU for this

Processed: Re: Bug#349354: initramfs-tools - kernel -udev dependency loop

2006-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 349354 serious Bug#349354: initramfs-tools - kernel -udev dependency loop Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Processed: Re: Xft.h includes freetype headers, .pc file does not reflect this

2006-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 350458 patch Bug#350458: Xft.h includes freetype headers, .pc file does not reflect this There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#351516: fvwm95: Depends on unavailable libreadline4

2006-02-05 Thread Sven Joachim
Package: fvwm95 Version: 2.0.43ba-23 Severity: grave From /usr/share/doc/fvwm95/changelog.Debian.gz: fvwm95 (2.0.43ba-23) unstable; urgency=low * [...] * Rebuild against libreadline5 (closes: Bug#326361) It seems that you did not actually do this, since on i386 fvwm95 still depends on

Bug#348999: banshee segfaults for me too...

2006-02-05 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Hi! I don't know if my problems are the same as the original reporter but banshee is totally unusable for me too. I can start banshee but as soon as I try to play a song banshee dies. I ran gdb as suggested previously in this bugreport, and noticed that there was actually several segfaults

Bug#351331: dvipdfmx NMU broke fontmapsx

2006-02-05 Thread A Lee
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 09:49:48AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: Hi, Why it needs another config file? Is there any reason that ptex-jisfonts package can't use dvipdfmx.cfg file? It's a known interface provided by dvipdfmx Debian package. If you're breaking it, take both

Bug#351331: dvipdfmx NMU broke fontmapsx

2006-02-05 Thread Junichi Uekawa
To properly fix the problem at hand, dvipdfmx should probably have a directory where it reads all configuration sequentially from. I think update-dvipdfmx can do that. Where is it? The Debian maintainer of dvipdfmx decided to patch dvipdfmx to support it. See Bug#271468.

Bug#351331: NMU: 1:20050831-0.2

2006-02-05 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, For the time being, until we get to discuss a framework that makes dvipdfmx functional, I'd like to make dvipdfmx package functional again. Let's make sid usable, kay? diff -ru dvipdfmx-20050831-orig/data/config/cid-x.map dvipdfmx-20050831/data/config/cid-x.map ---

Bug#351333: cid-x.map is almost empty

2006-02-05 Thread A Lee
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 12:35:30PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: After some looking around, probably the map files found in /var/lib/texmf/fonts/map/dvipdfm/updmap/dvipdfm_*.map are the ones that dvipdfmx should be using. Considering that, the next thing to do will be to dump the

Bug#351333: cid-x.map is almost empty

2006-02-05 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, I've checked, tetex-base, and it provides map files in /usr/share/texmf-tetex/fonts/map/ and has files under /etc/texmf/updmap.d/ Probably ptex-base should provide map files somewhere, so that it can be used by dvipdfmx. The way how fonts are to be installed for

Processed: Fixed in NMU of dvipdfmx 1:20050831-0.2

2006-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 351331 + fixed Bug#351331: dvipdfmx NMU broke fontmapsx There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed tag 351333 + fixed Bug#351333: cid-x.map is almost empty There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact

Bug#348390: lirc: Irman driver stopped to work after upgrade

2006-02-05 Thread Florian Kriener
Hello, I just wanted to add that the livedrive_midi driver doesn't work too. btw: what's the sense of shipping lirc without drivers? pgpcW1H5RKQu0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#351331: dvipdfmx NMU broke fontmapsx

2006-02-05 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, It's not a L10n patch. It's a configuration patch for extensible framework. Currently your NMU'd dvipdfmx does not provide a extention framework without touching dvipdfmx conffile. Which means, if I modify its configuration, dpkg will warn you. The old version of dvipdfmx

Bug#351331: dvipdfmx NMU broke fontmapsx

2006-02-05 Thread A Lee
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 10:50:38PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: To properly fix the problem at hand, dvipdfmx should probably have a directory where it reads all configuration sequentially from. I think update-dvipdfmx can do that. Where is it? The Debian maintainer of

Bug#351480: exim4-base fails to install with debootstrap

2006-02-05 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, Looks like adduser 3.81 does falsely assume that uid and gid can be equal. Can you try the following patch? --- adduser (revision 458) +++ adduser (working copy) @@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ printf STDERR gtx(No UID/GID pair is available in the range %d-%d

Bug#351486: marked as done (udev: 0.084-2 breaks unstable installs with d-i daily builds)

2006-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Feb 2006 06:47:15 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#351486: fixed in udev 0.084-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#135136: lose those love handles

2006-02-05 Thread Bob Herrera
Hey 160205, Just wanted to see if you were still looking to get back into sh ape. If so, you'll wanna check out www.bellsouth.www.cnet.u.J.uyew.org/n1/?id=havoc and f ill out their 20 sec short- f orm and they'll help you get back in s hape in no time. I've been with them for months and so has

Bug#318326: /usr/sbin/mkinitrd: Cannot determine SCSI module

2006-02-05 Thread martin f krafft
I see the above error when running mkinitrd, and I think it's related. FYI, the following patch to /usr/sbin/mkinitrd works, tested for 3w-, but it should be the same for 3w-9xxx. Just changed the echo line... However, this is a dirty workaround and should *not* be included with a package (it

Bug#299601: Could you please check whether this bug is fixed in widelands build 9half?

2006-02-05 Thread Marcin Krawczyk
I think that now is ok. The problem is with my computer my procesor is overheated. Great clone of setlers II I hope that version 1.0 will be ready in couple months? Best regards Marcin Martin Quinson napisał(a): Hello, a while ago, you reported that widelands sometimes hang and grab

Bug#351532: freeloader fails to fire up from terminal

2006-02-05 Thread Shaun Lee
Package: freeloader Version: 0.3-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable freeloader fails to start from gnome-terminal with the following error output: $ freeloader Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/freeloader, line 78, in ? import btdl File

Bug#351384: dovecot cannot be stopped, consumes 90% CPU

2006-02-05 Thread Fabio Tranchitella
Il giorno sab, 04/02/2006 alle 16.12 +0100, Lukas Ruf ha scritto: Package: dovecot Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable after upgrading dovecot today, the /usr/sbin/dovecot cannot be stopped by KILL -HUP, and /etc/init.d/dovecot stop respectively. Moreover, the

Bug#349209: [pkg-boost-devel] Bug#349209: boost: Boost Graph Library is non-free and undistributable in compiled form

2006-02-05 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Dear Boost Graph Library Developers, The following is a reply to a bug report from a Debian user [http://bugs.debian.org/349209] pointing out deficiencies in the library licensing, from Debian's point of view. We'd like to know whether the few remaining files NOT available under the Boost

Bug#351384: Acknowledgement (dovecot cannot be stopped, consumes 90% CPU)

2006-02-05 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006, Lukas Ruf wrote: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-02-04 16:48]: today, dovecot calmed down. Now, everything seems to work as expected. Sorry for my impatience. Does this mean the bug can be closed now? Btw, was NFS involved at all? Stale NFS

Bug#351384: Acknowledgement (dovecot cannot be stopped, consumes 90% CPU)

2006-02-05 Thread Lukas Ruf
Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-02-04 16:48]: today, dovecot calmed down. Now, everything seems to work as expected. Sorry for my impatience. wbr, Lukas -- Lukas Ruf http://www.lpr.ch | Ad Personam rbacs http://wiki.lpr.ch | Restaurants, Bars and Clubs Raw IP

Bug#351534: yahoo2mbox: Fails to fetch messages for new group

2006-02-05 Thread Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan
Package: yahoo2mbox Version: 0.17-1 Severity: grave yahoo2mbox was working properly for me, and works for a group which I have already downloaded and updates new messages, but if I try fetching for a new group, it fails. See the log below. radio:~/mailing-list-archives$ yahoo2mbox --user=foo

Bug#351384: Acknowledgement (dovecot cannot be stopped, consumes 90% CPU)

2006-02-05 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Sun, 2006-02-05 at 16:56 +0100, Lukas Ruf wrote: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-02-04 16:48]: today, dovecot calmed down. Now, everything seems to work as expected. Sorry for my impatience. It was probably building ssl-parameters.dat file. signature.asc

Bug#351384: Acknowledgement (dovecot cannot be stopped, consumes 90% CPU)

2006-02-05 Thread Fabio Tranchitella
Il giorno dom, 05/02/2006 alle 16.56 +0100, Lukas Ruf ha scritto: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-02-04 16:48]: today, dovecot calmed down. Now, everything seems to work as expected. Sorry for my impatience. Uh? I don't understand.. is this a real bug or something

Bug#342593: marked as done (beagle: couldn't find msvcrt)

2006-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Feb 2006 17:25:59 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Beagle crash has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#344157: marked as done (beagle 0.1.3-1 crashes on startup)

2006-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Feb 2006 17:25:59 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Beagle crash has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#351384: dovecot cannot be stopped, consumes 90% CPU

2006-02-05 Thread Lukas Ruf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Fabio, Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-02-05 17:31]: grazie! Il giorno sab, 04/02/2006 alle 16.12 +0100, Lukas Ruf ha scritto: Package: dovecot Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable after upgrading

Bug#351384: Acknowledgement (dovecot cannot be stopped, consumes 90% CPU)

2006-02-05 Thread Lukas Ruf
Jaldhar, Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-02-05 17:39]: On Sun, 5 Feb 2006, Lukas Ruf wrote: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-02-04 16:48]: today, dovecot calmed down. Now, everything seems to work as expected. Sorry for my impatience. Does this mean

Bug#351384: Acknowledgement (dovecot cannot be stopped, consumes 90% CPU)

2006-02-05 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006, Fabio Tranchitella wrote: Uh? I don't understand.. is this a real bug or something else happend? Could you please help me in digging into to problem? Fabio, See [EMAIL PROTECTED] on the dovecot list. Quote: DH parameters are now set for SSL to get forward secrecy, and

Bug#351532: freeloader fails to fire up from terminal

2006-02-05 Thread Julien Valroff
Hi, File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/BitTorrent/download.py, line 56, in ? from khashmir.utkhashmir import UTKhashmir File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/khashmir/utkhashmir.py, line 11, in ? import khashmir, knode File

Processed: Removing kimberlite

2006-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 348195 ftp.debian.org Bug#348195: kimberlite: neglected and unused package, should this be removed? Bug reassigned from package `kimberlite' to `ftp.debian.org'. severity 348195 normal Bug#348195: kimberlite: neglected and unused package,

Bug#351540: zeroconf if-up.d script trashes existing network settings.

2006-02-05 Thread Daniel Burrows
Package: zeroconf Version: 0.6.1-1 Severity: serious I just discovered that I have zeroconf on my system. I didn't ask for it; it came in at the bottom of a dependency chain starting with rhythmbox. The way I discoverd it was this: when I booted up my computer, I had no network connectivity.

Bug#321644: Please apply the patch! anyone has time to NMU?

2006-02-05 Thread Loïc Minier
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: Ubuntu compiles with -fno-strict-aliasing. On all platforms, I presume. And my amd64-using neighbour is not having particular problems. This actually makes a lot of sense since the bug in Mozilla that triggers all this is an aliasing violation...

Bug#351384: Acknowledgement (dovecot cannot be stopped, consumes 90% CPU)

2006-02-05 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Sun, 2006-02-05 at 11:54 -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: DH parameters are now set for SSL to get forward secrecy, and Dovecot doesn't really start until it sees them for the first time. The first generation may take minutes, or even longer if you have an old computer. Timo, Do you

Bug#351542: Kernel upgrade process holds

2006-02-05 Thread Artur R. Czechowski
Package: lilo Version: 1:22.6.1-7+b1 Severity: serious File: /usr/sbin/update-lilo Hello, Due to changes in kernel-package 10.025 (details follows) update-lilo causes hang up during installation of latest kernel-image packages. From changelog of kernel-package: * Bug fix: [powerpc] k-p 10.00x

Bug#351544: Doesn't properly create its system group; fails to install.

2006-02-05 Thread Daniel Burrows
Package: avahi-daemon Version: 0.6.6-1 Severity: serious Configuring the avahi-daemon package fails as follows: Setting up avahi-daemon (0.6.6-1) ... groupadd: GID 105 is not unique adduser: `/usr/sbin/groupadd -g 105 avahi' returned error code 4. Aborting. dpkg: error processing avahi-daemon

Bug#351549: nvidia-kernel-source: the infamous NVRM: Xid: pick a number bugs

2006-02-05 Thread Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
Package: nvidia-kernel-source Version: 1.0.8178-1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software A lot of patches, no usable solution yet :( These links: http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=62021

Bug#350458: Xft.h includes freetype headers, .pc file does not reflect this

2006-02-05 Thread David Nusinow
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 04:59:25AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: tags 350458 patch thanks Attached is a patch to add the freetype cflags back into the xft.pc file. The previous patch was also apparently not tested for static linking, since it depended on variables that weren't defined

Bug#350458: Xft.h includes freetype headers, .pc file does not reflect this

2006-02-05 Thread David Nusinow
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 12:42:25PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote: On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 04:59:25AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: tags 350458 patch thanks Attached is a patch to add the freetype cflags back into the xft.pc file. The previous patch was also apparently not tested for static

Bug#351262: graphicsmagick: Fails to install, common file with imagemagick

2006-02-05 Thread Daniel Kobras
On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 04:56:08PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 02:39:57PM +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote: To clarify: You want us to support having imagemagick from sarge installed + pulling in graphicsmagick from etch, but pulling graphicsmagick from etch + later

Bug#351384: marked as done (dovecot cannot be stopped, consumes 90% CPU)

2006-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Feb 2006 19:10:46 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#351384: Acknowledgement (dovecot cannot be stopped, consumes 90% CPU) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#335403: libgmp3-doc: [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL] includes non-free documentation

2006-02-05 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Hello, Would like to note that I have just sent off a query to the GMP developers as to whether they could re-license the docs. See: http://swox.com/list-archives/gmp-devel/2006-February/000608.html Thanks, -Steve -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe.

Bug#349123: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.15-1-powerpc: no working ramdisk creator depended on)

2006-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 5 Feb 2006 13:24:39 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Bug#351564: mesa: FTBFS: No makedepend

2006-02-05 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Package: mesa Version: 6.4.1-0.2 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build on the auto builders with the following error: E: Couldn't find package makedepend The problem is the order of the build dependencies. It has: makedepend | xutils sbuild will always pick the first one, and

Bug#349528: Security bugs in elog

2006-02-05 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Recai Okta? wrote: Let me know whether it is fine and I'll make the upload to stable-security (right?). Did you upload? I don't see any builds trickling in. If not, I'll do it. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Bug#340791: python2.3 - FTBFS: build-depends against removed package: tix8.1-dev

2006-02-05 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Hi, Has there been any progress on fixing this? Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: setting package to libnspr4 libnspr-dev libnss3 libnss-dev mozilla mozilla-browser mozilla-calendar mozilla-chatzilla mozilla-dev mozilla-dom-inspector mozilla-js-debugger mozilla-mailnews

2006-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11 package libnspr4 libnspr-dev libnss3 libnss-dev mozilla mozilla-browser mozilla-calendar mozilla-chatzilla mozilla-dev mozilla-dom-inspector mozilla-js-debugger mozilla-mailnews

Processed: Re: reassign to adduser

2006-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity #351552 serious Bug#351552: install failed to add group Debian-ippl Severity set to `serious'. merge #351552 #351480 Bug#351480: exim4-base fails to install with debootstrap Bug#351552: install failed to add group Debian-ippl Merged 351480

Bug#351566: warped: FTBFS: configure: error: Could not find PCCTS headers.

2006-02-05 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Package: warped Version: 20051029-2 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: checking for PCCTS includes... /usr/include/pccts checking AParser.h usability... no checking AParser.h presence... no checking for AParser.h... no configure: error: Could not

Bug#351567: librmagick-ruby: FTBFS: debian/rules:11: *** target file `unpatch' has both : and :: entries. Stop.

2006-02-05 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Package: librmagick-ruby Version: 1.10.0-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: fakeroot debian/rules clean debian/rules:11: *** target file `unpatch' has both : and :: entries. Stop. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Bug#351568: prelude-manager: FTBFS: checking for libprelude - version = 0.9.4... no

2006-02-05 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Package: prelude-manager Version: 0.9.2-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: checking for libprelude-config... /usr/bin/libprelude-config checking for libprelude - version = 0.9.4... no *** An old version of LIBPRELUDE (0.9.0) was found. *** You need

Bug#351552: reassign to adduser

2006-02-05 Thread Paul Slootman
On Sun 05 Feb 2006, Marc Haber wrote: We are still trying to reproduce the bug, as the patch listed in #351480 doesn't seem to help :-( One thing that I noticed: after gid 101, I have 1000 in my /etc/group. 102 comes later. And group id 102 isn't used in /etc/passwd. Paul Slootman -- To

Bug#323731: marked as done (FTBFS: Conflicting prototypes)

2006-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Feb 2006 14:10:23 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line FTBFS: Conflicting prototypes has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#350697: marked as done (libsigc++-1.2: FTBFS with new make)

2006-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Feb 2006 11:02:21 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#350697: fixed in libsigc++-2.0 2.0.16-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#351552: reassign to adduser

2006-02-05 Thread Marc Haber
severity #351552 serious merge #351552 #351480 thanks On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 07:37:51PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote: This seems to be a problem with adduser, as it also happened with oidentd and telnetd-ssl: And with exim, see #351480. We are still trying to reproduce the bug, as the patch

Bug#351570: libyaml-perl: wrong dependencies?

2006-02-05 Thread Edward J. Shornock
Package: libyaml-perl Version: 0.57-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 3.5 # apt-cache depends libyaml-perl libyaml-perl Depends: perl Depends: libclass-spiffy-perl Depends: libtest-base-perl According to the upstream author, Test::Base is only needed to build the module. The upstream

Bug#351572: libgpevtype0-dev: Missing dependencies.

2006-02-05 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Package: libgpevtype0-dev Version: 0.11-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your libgpevtype.pc file states: Requires: glib-2.0, mimedir-1.0 You should be adding dependencies for those packages to your -dev package in case they really are required. This seems to mean you need to add a depends on

Bug#351568: marked as done (prelude-manager: FTBFS: checking for libprelude - version = 0.9.4... no)

2006-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Feb 2006 11:47:43 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#351568: fixed in prelude-manager 0.9.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#349528: Security bugs in elog

2006-02-05 Thread Recai Oktaş
* Moritz Muehlenhoff [2006-02-05 19:47:45+0100] Recai Oktaş wrote: Let me know whether it is fine and I'll make the upload to stable-security (right?). Did you upload? I don't see any builds trickling in. If not, I'll do it. Yes, uploaded on 28 January:

Processed: Re: Bug#351563: skribe: undefined symbol: bgl_dynamic_env

2006-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 351563 serious Bug#351563: skribe: undefined symbol: bgl_dynamic_env Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#340150: jwm: *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid next size (normal): 0x0000000000531e50 ***

2006-02-05 Thread Jari Aalto
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 09:00:06PM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote: http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp/debian/jwm svn-buildpackage -uc -us -rfakeroot Yes, that appears to have done the correct thing for the most part; the package is correctly non-native,

Bug#339845: bug is reprodiuceable

2006-02-05 Thread Sigmund Scheinbar
Hello There! I just came over this bug report as I did a search for the error message i got from rsnapthost. The box here is running Sid and is up to date (the last apt-get update apt-get dist-upgrade -f is about 2h ago). So here is some some debug info: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ mkdir test

Bug#350458: Xft.h includes freetype headers, .pc file does not reflect this

2006-02-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 12:42:25PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote: On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 04:59:25AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: tags 350458 patch thanks Attached is a patch to add the freetype cflags back into the xft.pc file. The previous patch was also apparently not tested for static

Bug#318326: /usr/sbin/mkinitrd: Cannot determine SCSI module

2006-02-05 Thread Sven Luther
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 04:05:04PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: I see the above error when running mkinitrd, and I think it's related. FYI, the following patch to /usr/sbin/mkinitrd works, tested for 3w-, but it should be the same for 3w-9xxx. Just changed the echo line... initrd-tools

Bug#351570: libyaml-perl: wrong dependencies?

2006-02-05 Thread Florian Ragwitz
tag 351570 + pending On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 02:26:02PM -0500, Edward J. Shornock wrote: Package: libyaml-perl Version: 0.57-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 3.5 # apt-cache depends libyaml-perl libyaml-perl Depends: perl Depends: libclass-spiffy-perl Depends:

Processed: Re: Bug#351570: libyaml-perl: wrong dependencies?

2006-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 351570 + pending Bug#351570: libyaml-perl: wrong dependencies? There were no tags set. Tags added: pending On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 02:26:02PM -0500, Edward J. Shornock wrote: Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. Package:

Processed: Fixed in NMU of mozilla 2:1.7.12-1.1

2006-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 154862 + fixed Bug#154862: mozilla-browser: debconf template translation to brazilian portuguese (pt_BR) for mozilla-browser Tags were: pending l10n patch Tags added: fixed tag 186827 + fixed Bug#186827: mozilla-chatzilla: Gnome menu entry

Bug#351480: marked as done (exim4-base fails to install with debootstrap)

2006-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Feb 2006 13:32:23 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#351480: fixed in adduser 3.82 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#351552: marked as done (install failed to add group Debian-ippl)

2006-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Feb 2006 13:32:23 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#351552: fixed in adduser 3.82 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#351480: marked as done (exim4-base fails to install with debootstrap)

2006-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Feb 2006 13:32:23 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#351552: fixed in adduser 3.82 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#351552: marked as done (install failed to add group Debian-ippl)

2006-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Feb 2006 13:32:23 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#351480: fixed in adduser 3.82 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

  1   2   >