Package: revelation
Version: 0.4.5-2
Followup-For: Bug #367578
This is a bit odd. I did an 'apt-get build-dep revelation'. This has resolved
the segfault issue. Revelation starts and seems to function properly, however
the following warning is issued:
tags 365102 + patch upstream fixed-upstream pending
forwarded 365102
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1499921group_id=144022atid=757416
thanks to Sciboy for the debugging help
On Sat, 2006-06-03 at 14:02 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
I'll commit it upstream and in debian svn.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 365102 + patch upstream fixed-upstream pending
Bug#365102: segfault on amd64
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch, upstream, fixed-upstream, pending
forwarded 365102
Your message dated Fri, 02 Jun 2006 23:02:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#364440: fixed in f-spot 0.1.11-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Sat, 2006-06-03 at 13:03 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Another datapoint: Got a similar report upstream, the attached patch
made no difference, apart from a slight one in the backtrace.
Investigating further with the tester.
Thanks a lot for the hint Anthony. The attached patch fixes all the
Your message dated Fri, 02 Jun 2006 23:47:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#369661: fixed in nvidia-settings 1.0+20060516-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Sat, 03 Jun 2006 00:02:51 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#358311: fixed in redhat-cluster 1.02.00-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Hi Toufeeq,
Are you still able to reproduce this problem in xmms? If so, please
send to the bug report:
- the value of the LANG environment setting
- the output of grep -i font ~/.xmms/config
- the xmms-fonts.tar.gz file generated by the following command:
tar zcvf xmms-fonts.tar.gz
Package: angband
Version: 1:3.0.6-2
Severity: serious
The angband package fails to build from source in unstable in the common
case, because of a build-dependency on libxaw8-dev | libxaw7-dev |
libxaw6-dev -- libxaw8-dev is no longer available in unstable, so tools
such as sbuild and apt-get
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 368202 grave
Bug#368202: dia: CVE-2006-2480 and CVE-2006-2453: format string vulnerability
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Package: totem-xine
Version: 1.2.1-4
Severity: grave
The totem-xine and totem-gstreamer packages are both now uninstallable
in unstable, because they have a hard-coded dependency on xlibs which is
a legacy package that has been dropped with x11r7. There's no
explanation in the changelog for this
Hi,
Could this be fixed any time soon? qt4-x11 is currently blocking no
less than 83 packages.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
tags 354571 pending
Bug#354571: RM: gngeo -- RoAM; license problems
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Package: gnome-control-center
Version: 1:2.12.3-2
Severity: grave
The gnome-control-center package is now uninstallable in unstable,
because it has a hard-coded dependency on xlibs which is a legacy
package that has been dropped with x11r7. According to the changelog,
this dependency was
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 361775 + fixed
Bug#361775: [CVE-2006-1772] stores database password in world-readable
config.dat
Tags were: security
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 01:03:54AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
Downgrading to scons in stable seems to fix the problem, so this sounds very
much like a scons bug to me.
Changing Add_define in bysys/libscim.py to append a list rather than a
string appears to resolve the build failure.
Hi Matthias,
works for me.
Have you tried building it with prctl --unaligned=signal? This is not
the default on hppa, but it's used on the autobuilders because it
catches potentially costly programming errors.
It seems the latest version of ecj-bootstrap was hand-built on hppa and
uploaded,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
severity 365977 grave
Bug#365977: gnome-control-center: should not depend on transitional package
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
merge 365977 370090
Bug#365977:
Your message dated Sat, 3 Jun 2006 11:56:30 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#370090: gnome-control-center: uninstallable because of
hard-coded dep on xlibs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 368883 + pending
Bug#368883: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
tags 370089 + pending
Bug#370089: totem: uninstallable because of hard-coded dep on xlibs
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping processing here.
tag 368883 + pending
thanks
Le Sam 3 Juin 2006 10:57, Samuel Thibault a écrit :
Hi,
Could this be fixed any time soon? qt4-x11 is currently blocking no
less than 83 packages.
Samuel
that one is quite annoying.
Brian: will you have time to fix that soon (like in less than a couple
of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
severity 342536 grave
Bug#342536: gnome-control-center: xlibs dependancy is too broad
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
merge 342536 365977
Bug#342536: gnome-control-center:
Your message dated Sat, 3 Jun 2006 11:56:30 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#370090: gnome-control-center: uninstallable because of
hard-coded dep on xlibs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
tags 370090 + pending
Bug#370090: gnome-control-center: uninstallable because of hard-coded dep on
xlibs
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
The totem-xine and totem-gstreamer packages are both now uninstallable
in unstable, because they have a hard-coded dependency on xlibs which is
a legacy package that has been dropped with x11r7. There's no
explanation in the changelog
Le Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 10:30:10PM +0200, Adeodato Simó :
Okay. Let me know what your thoughts about this are: if you just want
quick NMUs from time to time, or co-maintainer uploads, or your lack of
time may be a serious issue for amule maintenance and you think more
people becoming really
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 10:36:50AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
Changing Add_define in bysys/libscim.py to append a list rather than a
string appears to resolve the build failure. Patch below.
Interesting; I'll give it a go.
Cc-ing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have no idea
Your message dated Sat, 3 Jun 2006 11:56:30 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#370090: gnome-control-center: uninstallable because of
hard-coded dep on xlibs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 04:43:01PM +1000, Matthew Chapman wrote:
Package: gzip
Version: 1.3.5-13
Severity: critical
Tags: patch
Justification: causes serious data loss
gzip must check that closing the output file succeeds before removing
the input file, since on an NFS filesystem write
* Julien Delange [Sat, 03 Jun 2006 12:03:01 +0200]:
Hi,
Le Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 10:30:10PM +0200, Adeodato Simó :
Okay. Let me know what your thoughts about this are: if you just want
quick NMUs from time to time, or co-maintainer uploads, or your lack of
time may be a serious issue for
Package: inkscape
Version: 0.43-5
Followup-For: Bug #369828
Hi,
I was experiencing exactly the same behavior as detailed in bug #369828, but
since the very last update of inkscape the
behavior has changed... now I get the following:
$ inkscape
Emergency save activated!
Emergency save
On Jun 03, Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marco, how should init scripts that load modules and use the device
afterwards behave?, is there a common policy? My best guess is the
following, but I'd like confirmation:
The correct solution would be to use RUN rules. Next best, udevsettle
Pierre,
The existing write_error() function prints an error, removes the output
file and exits with an error code. So I believe that my patch is
equivalent to what you are suggesting (except you have some unreachable
code :)).
Matt
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 12:29:37PM +0200, Pierre HABOUZIT
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
tags 324796 + fixed
Bug#324796: gs-gpl: gs segfaults
There were no tags set.
Bug#327288: gs-gpl segfaults on every postscript file
Tags added: fixed
tags 327288 + fixed
Bug#327288:
It might be just better if you ditched the liferea-gtkhtml package.
Why? Only the latest libgtkhtml2 versions are broken.
Er... given that the latest version of libgtkhtml2 has remained
unchanged in Debian for over a year, and AFAIK is superseded upstream by
gtkhtml3.x which is in turn being
Hi yann, any progress on this ? if you can make upstream confirm that
the material is licensed under the GFDL with no invariant sections and
such, this year GR makes it DFSG-free.
though I agree that only the PDF intro document speaks about GFDL,
current licensing state of that package is
Le Sam 3 Juin 2006 12:40, Matthew Chapman a écrit :
Pierre,
The existing write_error() function prints an error, removes the
output file and exits with an error code. So I believe that my patch
is equivalent to what you are suggesting (except you have some
unreachable code :)).
ooh, sorry,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 366748
Bug#366748: depends on unavailable libmysqlclient12
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 02:03:13PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Package: gbib
Version: 0.1.2-7
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on 64 bit arches. During
configure we see:
checking for gettext in libc... no
Which later results in:
c++ -o gbib -g bibentry.o
Package: xterm
Version: 210-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After a recent upgrade, xterm and other X apps (like xmessage) crash on
startup with xterm: symbol lookup error: xterm: undefined symbol:
_XA_UTF8_STRING. I think it's not a bug in xterm, but in some X
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
retitle 271051 Do not include in etch
Bug#271051: please remove xen from sarge
Changed Bug title.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 288925 + fixed
Bug#288925: ltt: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# recreate blocking 'state' for 357326
block 308709 by 357326
Bug#308709: lilypond1.3: Dummy package still needed?
Was blocked by: 319159 324796 326788 327288
Blocking bugs added: 357326
block 314242 by 357326
Bug#314242: Uninstallable: trying to
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Matthias,
works for me.
Have you tried building it with prctl --unaligned=signal? This is not
the default on hppa, but it's used on the autobuilders because it
catches potentially costly programming errors.
FWIW, gij-4.1 also produces unaligned
Package: xfce4-notes-plugin
Version: 0.10.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
This plugin no longer builds against the new 4.4 panel. At some point
we hope upstream will port it to the new panel or an enthusiastic user
might but until then this bug is here to record this and make sure we
don't
Your message dated Sat, 03 Jun 2006 05:02:06 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#357355: fixed in packagesearch 2.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 3 Jun 2006 14:18:42 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Regarding the reference manual for alcovebook
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 3 Jun 2006 14:13:07 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bug does not exist
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
package vim vim-common vim-doc vim-full vim-gnome vim-gtk vim-gui-common
vim-lesstif vim-perl vim-python vim-ruby vim-runtime vim-tcl vim-tiny
Ignoring bugs not assigned to:
Package: lasi
Version: 1.0.5-2
Severity: serious
This package no longer builds in unstable:
Automatic build of lasi_1.0.5-2 on hulk by sbuild/alpha 0.45
...
g++ -DPACKAGE_NAME=\LASi\ -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\lasi\
-DPACKAGE_VERSION=\1.0.5\ -DPACKAGE_STRING=\LASi 1.0.5\
Package: xfce4-cpufreq-plugin
Version: 0.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
This plugin no longer builds against the new 4.4 panel. At some point
we hope upstream will port it to the new panel or an enthusiastic user
might but until then this bug is here to record this and make sure we
don't
Your message dated Sat, 03 Jun 2006 05:17:18 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#357264: fixed in perl 5.8.8-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 08:35:07PM -0700, you wrote:
detail, as of POSIX-1992. I know for a fact that this is the case for
releases of Solaris up to and including (2.)8, and I strongly suspect
That's simply not true. Solaris has obsolete syntax in /usr/bin, and
more modern syntax in
Your message dated Sat, 03 Jun 2006 05:02:06 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#357355: fixed in packagesearch 2.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: xfce4-datetime-plugin
Version: 0.3.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
This plugin no longer builds against the new 4.4 panel. At some point
we hope upstream will port it to the new panel or an enthusiastic user
might but until then this bug is here to record this and make sure we
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 01:02:24PM +0200, Pierre HABOUZIT wrote:
Hi yann, any progress on this ? if you can make upstream confirm that
the material is licensed under the GFDL with no invariant sections and
such, this year GR makes it DFSG-free.
The reference manual itself does not have any
On Fri, 2 Jun 2006, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| gfortran in a single coordinated transition, as with the g++ ABI
| changes, in order to minimize ABI incompatibilities between
| FORTRAN-based libraries. I commented on this at one point,
|
Package: mdadm
Version: 2.4.1-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
I got this upon an dist-upgrade today:
---
Setting up mdadm (2.4.1-3) ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/mdadm-raid ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/mdadm ...
Generating mdadm.conf... E: /proc/mdtest
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 02:07:21PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Automatic build of lasi_1.0.5-2 on hulk by sbuild/alpha 0.45
...
g++ -DPACKAGE_NAME=\LASi\ -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\lasi\
-DPACKAGE_VERSION=\1.0.5\ -DPACKAGE_STRING=\LASi 1.0.5\
-DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Original Message
Subject: Re: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=362897
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 23:01:36 +0200
From: Daniele Venzano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 12:34:41PM +0200, G?rkan Seng?n
hello
please try to start briquolo like this:
export SDL_DEBUG=yes
SDL_AUDIODRIVER=disk briquolo
and tell me if it works, doesn't work and what msgs you get.
yours,
gürkan
Zack Weinberg wrote:
It has also been reported to be the case for various releases of
HP-UX and AIX. On these systems, POSIX-2001 syntax like tail -n 1
simply *does not work*.
Just a detail clarification...
HP-UX 10.20, arguably the oldest HP-UX version still in active use
anywhere, supports
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 366748 depends on unavailable libmysqlclient12 on i386
Bug#366748: depends on unavailable libmysqlclient12
Changed Bug title.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.16
tags 354571 - pending
Bug#354571: RM: gngeo -- RoAM; license problems
Tags were: pending
Tags removed: pending
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Package: manpages-fr
Version: 1.69.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
From my pbuilder build log:
...
cd local-debian make install
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/manpages-fr-1.69.1/local-debian'
make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/manpages-fr-1.69.1/local-debian/at'
po4a
Hi Gauthier!
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 05:09:06PM +0200, Gauthier Quesnel wrote:
Package: inkscape
Version: 0.43-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
thanks for your report. Only problem is, that it seems this is not
inkscape's fault. In similar cases
retitle 366748 depends on unavailable libmysqlclient12 on i386
thanks
It seems it's just the binary upload from the maintainer which is
broken, and that a binNMU on i386 would solve this.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
tag 368883 + pending
thanks
Le Sam 3 Juin 2006 10:57, Samuel Thibault a écrit :
Hi,
Could this be fixed any time soon? qt4-x11 is currently blocking no
less than 83 packages.
Samuel
that one is quite annoying.
Brian: will you have time to
Your message dated Sat, 03 Jun 2006 07:02:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#370112: fixed in lasi 1.0.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: autoconf
Version: 2.59.cvs.2006.06.02-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
From my pbuilder build log:
...
echo Updating man page autom4te.1
Updating man page autom4te.1
PATH=../tests:../config:$PATH; \
export PATH; \
/bin/sh
I demand that Reinhard Tartler may or may not have written...
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 10:10:01PM +0100, Darren Salt wrote:
The .diff.gz, .dsc etc. for 1.1.1-1.2 are at
URL:http://zap.tartarus.org/~ds/debian/
Btw, why aren't you in Uploaders: and prepare a new maintainer upload?
Siggi -
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package lasi
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lasi
tags 370112 + patch
Bug#370112: FTBFS: invalid conversion from 'int (*)(FT_Vector...
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Hi, Flavio.
I have prepared packages including a fix for the problem with colors in krita
in powerpc. Can you try them and report? :)
They are available at:
http://155.210.13.238/~isaac/koffice/
Best regards
--
Isaac Clerencia at Warp Networks, http://www.warp.es
Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
On 6/4/06, Gürkan Sengün [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello
please try to start briquolo like this:
export SDL_DEBUG=yes
SDL_AUDIODRIVER=disk briquolo
and tell me if it works, doesn't work and what msgs you get.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ export SDL_DEBUG=yes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ SDL_AUDIODRIVER=disk
On 6/3/06, Eddy Petrişor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/4/06, Gürkan Sengün [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello
please try to start briquolo like this:
export SDL_DEBUG=yes
SDL_AUDIODRIVER=disk briquolo
and tell me if it works, doesn't work and what msgs you get.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ export
Your message dated Sat, 03 Jun 2006 08:17:06 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#370127: fixed in autoconf 2.59.cvs.2006.06.02-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Package: epylog
Version: 1.0.3-2
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/epylog-1.0.3/modules'
../compiledir .
Listing . ...
Compiling ./logins_mod.py ...
Compiling ./mail_mod.py ...
Compiling
package lasi
tags 370112 + patch
thanks
Hi,
It seems that this bug comes from a change in libfreetype6-dev.
Here is a patch to fix this bug.
--
Florent
--- lasi-1.0.5/src/drawGlyph.cpp.old 2006-06-03 16:50:43.0 +0200
+++ lasi-1.0.5/src/drawGlyph.cpp 2006-06-03 16:41:19.0 +0200
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
unblock 346347 by 248931
Bug#346347: gpsim: FTBFS: build-depends on xlibs-dev
Was blocked by: 248931
Blocking bugs removed: 248931
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Sat, 03 Jun 2006 08:40:23 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#365977: fixed in control-center 1:2.14.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sat, 03 Jun 2006 08:40:23 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#347796: fixed in control-center 1:2.14.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
* Florent Bayle [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-06-03 17:07]:
package lasi
tags 370112 + patch
thanks
Hi,
It seems that this bug comes from a change in libfreetype6-dev.
Here is a patch to fix this bug.
Thanks, I already uploaded the package some hours ago with a patch
identical to yours.
--
Package: libprinterconf
Version: 0.5-8
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
/bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link g++-4.0 -g -O2 -L/usr/lib -lglib -o
libprinterconf.la -rpath /usr/lib -version-info 2:0:0 printerconf.lo
snmpinter.lo parport.lo -lprintsys -lpthread -ltdb
Hello guys, I am not sure if someone found the solution to this problem.
But it works for me, I am using Debian unstable, and I had the same problem,
I tried to reinstall xfig, fonts etc..., but didn't work, so after
searching seems that we need to do a reset of the font path that is
installed in
Your message dated Sat, 03 Jun 2006 08:40:23 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#365977: fixed in control-center 1:2.14.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sat, 03 Jun 2006 08:40:00 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#370089: fixed in totem 1.4.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 03 Jun 2006 08:40:23 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#365977: fixed in control-center 1:2.14.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
On Saturday 03 June 2006 17:31, Isaac Clerencia wrote:
I have prepared packages including a fix for the problem with colors in
krita in powerpc. Can you try them and report? :)
They are available at:
http://155.210.13.238/~isaac/koffice/
There're only:
- krita-data_1.5.1-2_all.deb
-
On Fri, 2 Jun 2006 10:01:49 -0400 Andrew Moise wrote:
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 12:49:09PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
Is source available (and included in the .orig.tar.gz archive) for
every part of the package? If this is the case, then the package is
OK for main.
The style files are
I'm currently working on porting this plugin to xfce 4.4 - it should be
ready soon.
--
Stefan Ott
http://www.desire.ch/
PLAN everything! http://www.planster.net/
pgpF0VWvivoZY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 06:22:50PM +0300, Eddy Petri??or wrote:
On 6/3/06, Eddy Petri??or [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/4/06, Gürkan Sengün [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello
please try to start briquolo like this:
export SDL_DEBUG=yes
SDL_AUDIODRIVER=disk briquolo
and tell me if it
Package: inkscape
Version: 0.43-4
Followup-For: Bug #369828
I have the same problem with both versions: 0.43-4 and 0.43-5. I tried
to remove the content of the extension directory, but it didn't work.
Got sigsevs then.
I wish there was a way to rollback to the previous version that worked.
Now
Your message dated Sat, 03 Jun 2006 09:34:37 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#354571: fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Le Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 12:34:58PM +0200, Adeodato Simó :
Okay, I'll do, thanks. However, I'm sorry that you don't have the time,
since my objective was only to have amule in good shape, and I wouldn't
have minded (or would have preferred, even) to act as a tutor/sponsor
and walk you through
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 01:34:56PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
AIUI, the proper fix for this is to do a reupload of the package with
dpkg-buildpackage -sa, to get the orig.tar.gz re-tagged by dak.
Except that doesn't work, last time I tried to fix a similar situation
this way.
Requires
On Wed, May 31, 2006, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
It may be uploaded as part of the current 0-day NMU policy.
Attached is the last version of the patch for the NMUs I've uploaded.
I do not close #362404 as I did not use the dh_installxfonts thing.
I hope it helps.
--
adn
Mohammed Adnène
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 05:12:44AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Which means the lirc-modules-source needs the same version of lirc?
That's bad, IMHO lirc-modules-source should be able to be build even
without lirc installed. For example this is useful to build a module on
a machine and copy
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 124108 + fixed
Bug#124108: ivtools-interviews: typo in package description
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
tag 145887 + fixed
Bug#145887: shared library package naming does not match soname
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
tag 224712
Your message dated Sat, 3 Jun 2006 19:33:57 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line gr-usrp: uninstallable on amd64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
1 - 100 of 207 matches
Mail list logo
