Your message dated Mon, 04 Dec 2006 07:02:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396875: fixed in emacs21 21.4a+1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
El lun, 04-12-2006 a las 01:52 -0500, Santiago José Ruano Rincón
escribió:
> I think the reason of this bug isn't the same of #393725, and they
> shouldn't be merged.
>
> op-panel requires the asterisk user, so, op-panel must depend on
> asterisk package to fix the bug. I know op-panel can run wit
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package op-panel
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: op-panel
> unmerge #398380
Bug#398380: op-panel: postinst fails: adduser: The group `asterisk' does not
exist.
Bug#393725: Destar is unable to restart op-panel daemon
Disconnected #398380 from all other
Package: bfilter
Version: 1.0.6-1
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
checking for inflate in -lz... yes
checking zlib.h usability... yes
checking zlib.h presence... yes
checking for zlib.h... yes
checking ace/ACE.h usability... no
checking ace/ACE.h presence... no
checking for ace/
Jurij Smakov a écrit :
Hi Joel,
Hello Jurij,
Sorry, I cannot reproduce the behavior you are describing. I have a
SS20 box, running sid with Debian's linux-image-2.6.18-3-sparc32
(version 2.6.18-6) kernel:
I don't try with debian package, only with official linux kernel. I
have te
I think the reason of this bug isn't the same of #393725, and they
shouldn't be merged.
op-panel requires the asterisk user, so, op-panel must depend on
asterisk package to fix the bug. I know op-panel can run without
asterisk on the same machine, but adding the dependency is a quick
solution (for
Please try to catch the bug like this (the backtrace attached to the bug is
relatively useless; it's not your error with creating the bt, it's just that
catching exceptions at the right spot is a little more problematic):
* Remove your current library file, located at
~/.local/share/bmpx/library.
Package: libkexif
Version: 0.2.5-1
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
Good - your configure finished. Start make now
/usr/bin/make -C obj-i486-linux-gnu
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/libkexif-0.2.5/obj-i486-linux-gnu'
*** Creating acinclude.m4
*** Creating configure.fil
Steve Langasek wrote:
> This sounds to me like it means the package is not vulnerable by
> default, is that correct? Should this bug be downgraded to
> 'important'?
Yes, and there's nothing we can do as maintainers to fix this, depending
on how people set up their servers.
I included info on how
Package: dict-bouvier
Version: 6.revised-2
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
Installing the build-deps
-> Attempting to parse the build-deps : pbuilder-satisfydepends,v 1.29
2006/11/06 20:20:56 lool Exp $
-> Considering build-dep debhelper (>> 3.0.0)
-> Trying debhelper
->
Package: dict-moby-thesaurus
Version: 1.0-5
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
Installing the build-deps
-> Attempting to parse the build-deps : pbuilder-satisfydepends,v 1.29
2006/11/06 20:20:56 lool Exp $
-> Considering build-dep debhelper (>> 3.0.0)
-> Trying debhelper
->
32212 was hald-addon-storage, I think.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[Insert famous quote here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.25
> retitle 401498 RM: lilypond [ia64] -- RoM; FTFTBS
Bug#401498: RM: lilypond for ia64
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assi
Your message dated Mon, 04 Dec 2006 06:02:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401295: fixed in gaim 1:2.0.0+beta5-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> # ok, new information passing in the mail :)
> severity 401354 serious
Bug#401354: mailscanner: includes undistributable/non-free images
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
>
End
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 08:59:51PM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Package: vim-spellfiles
> Version: 20060604-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build from source
Thanks for filing this bug as it reminds me I need to take a look at
vim-spellfiles again. The original pacakge was u
Hi Joel,
Sorry, I cannot reproduce the behavior you are describing. I have a
SS20 box, running sid with Debian's linux-image-2.6.18-3-sparc32
(version 2.6.18-6) kernel:
debian:~# uname -a
Linux debian 2.6.18-3-sparc32 #1 Fri Nov 24 16:10:16 GMT 2006 sparc GNU/Linux
debian:~# cat /proc/version
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 400372 unreproducible
Bug#400372: dpkg randomly craches on Sparc32 running HyperSPARC processor
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
>
End of message, stopping pro
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> severity 401354 normal
Bug#401354: mailscanner: is the transtec logo dfsg?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if y
tag 401354 + confirmed
retitle 401354 mailscanner: includes undistributable/non-free images
thanks
As well as the transtec logos which may or may not be distributable
(given they're a sponsor of mailscanner), the package also includes some
other logos (Google and O'Reilly) and a Dilbert cartoon ab
Your message dated Sun, 3 Dec 2006 21:02:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401345: Your sources are right
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> severity 401353 serious
Bug#401353: audacious-dev: the -dev package contains a symlink to non-existant
.so.4 package
Severity set to `serious' from `grave'
>
End of message, stoppin
severity 401345 important
thanks
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 08:19:33PM +0100, Manolo Díaz wrote:
> I can't compile this module from source. I'm using the kernel source
> from the debian package linux-source-2.6.18 (2.6.18-6). This is the log:
This same module is building fine against the Debi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 401345 important
Bug#401345: spca5xx-source: fails to compile.
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
Your message dated Mon, 04 Dec 2006 04:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#361031: fixed in libapache-dbi-perl 1.05-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Severity: serious
Package: ftp.debian.org
Can you please remove the out-of-date ia64 package for lilypond in
unstable? The crucial prerequisite guile-1.8 does not work on it, and
the guile maintainer does not have the necessary expertise to fix it
right away. For the moment, this means that guil
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22
> severity 401397 normal
Bug#401397: Unable to remove ndiswrapper module
Severity set to `normal' from `critical'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> reopen 305065
Bug#305065: [dummy] ruby1.9 should not be part of a stable release
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> # ruby1.9 is not stable yet. I think that ruby1.9 should not
Package: free-java-sdk
Version: 1.0-1
Severity: serious
free-java-sdk should be removed or at least renamed; there are a lot
of other free sdk's available; the package is just used for
advertising the sablevm runtime. please call this package sablevm-sdk
and provide a sablevm-jre (both should be i
Your message dated Mon, 4 Dec 2006 03:37:23 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line python-setuptools: FTBFS: can't read .../easy_install-2.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Package: vim-spellfiles
Version: 20060604-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
VERSIONS:
debhelper: 5.0.42
aap: 1.072-1.1
unzip: 5.52-9
locales: 2.3.6.ds1-8
quilt: 0.45-5
LOG:
Script started on Sun 03 Dec 2006 08:53:56 PM ES
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 400172 + unreproducible
Bug#400172: cacao: FTBFS on amd64: import "java/lang/management/MemoryUsage" is
not valid
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> severity 400172 important
Bug#400172: cacao: FTBFS on amd64: import "java/lang/
tags 400172 + unreproducible
severity 400172 important
thanks
Sending commands to @bugs.debian.org doesn't do very much.
Sending to [EMAIL PROTECTED] does however...
Tom Parker
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It looks like the problem I am seeing on the NSLU2 is similar to
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=81829 and all of its
reincarnations. Historically, problem has been blamed on faulty lower
level functionality (kernel, filesystem, hardware), but two different
people started seeing i
Your message dated Sun, 3 Dec 2006 19:06:25 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line woody is gone
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 401354 serious
Bug#401354: mailscanner: is the transtec logo dfsg?
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Woops ! Forgot the attachment of the diff between /var/lib/dpkg before
and after manually installing a deb.
--
Gordon Farquharson
diff -Naur apt-files-broken/var/lib/dpkg/available
apt-files-fixed/var/lib/dpkg/available
--- apt-files-broken/var/lib/dpkg/available 2006-12-01 17:17:15.
severity 401482 important
thanks
This is hardly RC. GDB seems to work for lots of people. I'm happy to
help with bug reports, but please don't abuse severity.
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 11:15:53PM +, Sam Morris wrote:
> GDB always reports that it "Failed to read a valid object file image from
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 401482 important
Bug#401482: gdb: Failed to read a valid object file image from memory
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administr
This problem is not solved because it causes the Debian Installer to
fail on a NSLU2. In practice, one can manually delete the *.bin files
in /var/cache/apt/ during an install (I haven't tried to see if it
fixes the problem), but I expect that this procedure is not the user
friendly installation e
Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Could you also attach a strace ?
No problem; hope it helps.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.
strace.iceape.bz2
Description: Binary data
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 11:45:15PM +0100, Amaya wrote:
> Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> > A vulnerability has been found in twiki. See
> > http://twiki.org/cgi-bin/view/Codev/SecurityAlert-CVE-2006-6071 for
> > details.
> Just for the sake of detail, your site may be vulnerable if:
>1. If you have E
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 379103 pending
Bug#379103: ITP: complearn-gui -- 3D drag-and-drop interface to CompLearn
universal data mining system
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 379104 pending
Bug#3
Package: gdb
Version: 6.4.90.dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
GDB always reports that it "Failed to read a valid object file image from
memory" when executing a program. This seems to make back traces useless
(they come o
Il giorno ven, 01/12/2006 alle 11.31 +0100, Andreas Barth ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> did you see this remark?
>
> * Stefan Fritsch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061127 13:08]:
> > This upstream bug report could also be related:
> >
> > "Server has a memory leak when handling chunked responses."
> > http://iss
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> severity 401391 serious
Bug#401391: uswsusp thinks my swap partition doesn't exist.
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contac
Hello
After my bug report, i remove the .evolution directory and i restart it.
Sometimes he hang.
Le dimanche 03 décembre 2006 à 23:18 +0100, Øystein Gisnås a écrit :
> 2006/11/30, WaVeR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Evolution crash when try to open a new mail, after the crash i can't start
> > evo
Your message dated Sun, 03 Dec 2006 22:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#400916: fixed in zeroc-icee 1.1.0-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
2006/12/3, WaVeR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello
After my bug report, i remove the .evolution directory and i restart it.
Sometimes he hang.
If it's an IMAP account and a particular message is the problem, it
doesn't help to delete ~/.evolution.
Does it help if you disable the preview pane? That i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> #i changed the severity of the wrong libpng bug
> severity 401465 serious
Bug#401465: libpng12-dev: Incorrect shlibs information
Severity set to `serious' from `grave'
>
End of messa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> #it causes other programs (like krita) to hang
> severity 401423 grave
Bug#401423: libpng12-0: regression in 1.2.13 : libpng hangs when saving profile
Severity set to `grave' from `im
2006/11/30, WaVeR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Evolution crash when try to open a new mail, after the crash i can't start evolution
"always hang in startup". I'm using evolution and dependecy from the
experimental branch
Can you try to switch message folder quickly when you startup to see
if you can
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> #it causes other programs (like krita) to hang
> severity 401465 grave
Bug#401465: libpng12-dev: Incorrect shlibs information
Severity set to `grave' from `serious'
>
End of message,
Someone (Nickname: Salz) on the german debian irc helped solving this
problem.
Just delete the *.bin files in /var/cache/apt/
-- Florian Sievers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> notfound 386259 0.92+svn-r217-1
Bug#386259: FTBFS: aclocal: macro `AM_PROG_MKDIR_P' required but not defined
Bug marked as not found in version 0.92+svn-r217-1.
(By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.)
> close 381571 1.00~beta-r473-1
Bug#381
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 400399 + unreproducible
Bug#400399: monodoc-http: documentation doesn't appear. get
System.NullReferenceException instead.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> severity 400399 important
Bug#400399: monodoc-http: documentation does
Your message dated Sun, 03 Dec 2006 21:47:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401303: fixed in twiki 1:4.0.5-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
tags 400399 + unreproducible
severity 400399 important
On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 23:47 +0100, Ernest ter Kuile wrote:
> The two lower frames both contain:
>
> Server error in '/monodoc' application
> Description: Error processing request.
>
> Error Message: HTTP 500.
I just installed monodoc-http a
I've got the same problem. But only on one of my two etch systems. Both
were up-to-date till this morning. But only my notebook is showing this
problem. On my desktop-system everything works well. Yesterday the
update works well on both systems.
I allready updated the apt package to version 0.6.46
Your message dated Sun, 03 Dec 2006 21:02:12 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#400617: fixed in samba 3.0.23d-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Szaka, David, Frans,
Okidoki, what happens now? I'd be keen to see this in the package and
then in the installer ASAP.
Is there going to be a new upstream release? Is the patch just going to
be applied to the Debbian package? (Looks easy enough to me.)
If there is anything I can do to help, plea
Package: libpng12-0
Version: 1.2.13-4
Severity: serious
The libpng12-0.shlibs file still lists 1.2.8rel as the minimum version.
Since the drop_pass_width patch has been (IMO incorrectly) removed, that
makes the symbol exported again and you need to bump the shlibs file.
(Of course, this doesn't
ython (v2.5)
python2.5-examples - Examples for the Python language (v2.5)
python2.5-minimal - A minimal subset of the Python language (version 2.5)
Closes: 396394 397000 401451
Changes:
python2.5 (2.5-4) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Update to 20061203, taken from the 2.5 release branch.
- Fixes
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 400372 linux-image-2.6.18-3-sparc32
Bug#400372: dpkg randomly craches on Sparc32 running HyperSPARC processor
Bug reassigned from package `dpkg' to `linux-image-2.6.18-3-sparc32'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you ne
reassign 400372 linux-image-2.6.18-3-sparc32
thanks
Included most of the relevant discussion for the kernel team's benefit.
On Sun, 2006-11-26 at 10:19:39 +0100, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
> Guillem Jover a écrit :
> >On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 19:19:58 +0100, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
> > > Package: dpkg
> > >
tag 401455 + patch
tag 393393 + patch
thanks
Hi,
As I'm closing the two above mentioned bugs in a single operation, and
the process for them is really trivial, I'm only sending a single
patch for both bugs.
Greetings,
--
Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244
PGP key 1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 401455 + patch
Bug#401455: liburi-perl: Several trivial Lintian checks fail when rebuilding
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> tag 393393 + patch
Bug#393393: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's
Tags were: etch-ignore
Tags added
By the way, I also have an amd64 system (running the amd64 arch) that
doesn't show this problem!
(with apt 0.6.42.6)
-- Jan Evert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Sun, 03 Dec 2006 19:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401450: fixed in goobox 0.9.93-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Rob Browning wrote:
>> I should have a new version uploaded later this week, probably
>> by tomorrow night.
>
> Ping?
I should actually be tonight. I've merged Jérôme's changes, and I
should be able to upload later today.
Thanks
--
Hi,
Mattia I'm sorry you got this, after I asked to enable iasl on all
arches to be able to use it in qemu. I started investigating this
last week or so, but didn't file a bug report because I've not come
yet with a complete solution. Below my current analysis anyway, if
I've time I'll try to come
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Rob Browning wrote:
> I should have a new version uploaded later this week, probably
> by tomorrow night.
Ping?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061203 15:59]:
[...]
>
>
>>> I'd be happy to help as a co maintainer for multipath-tools.
>> Nothing against.
>
>>From QA perspective, it would be good to have only the people listed in
> Uploaders who actually have time for the package
Package: bmpx
Version: 0.32.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
Here I can't really use bmpx to listen to my (moderatly big) mp3/ogg
library. After scanning my mp3 directory, bmpx asks me to accept it, i
click on "accept all" (or something like that) and it crashes
ins
Package: python2.5
Version: 2.5-3.1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
python2.5-config barks about /usr/include/python2.5/pyconfig.h being
missing. Presumably python2.5-config should be moved to the
python2.5-dev package, which contains the
Package: goobox
Version: 0.9.93-6
Severity: serious
Hello,
$ apt-get source goobox
$ grep Uploaders goobox-0.9.93/debian/control
Uploaders: Uploaders: Helge Kreutzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ciao,
Enrico who is trying to implement a maintainer view for the debtags
website, but things like these do
El domingo, 3 de diciembre de 2006 15:13, Szakacsits Szabolcs escribió:
> On Sun, 3 Dec 2006, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> > On Sun, 3 Dec 2006, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> > > Sorry I didn't explain myself better. My patch was only for Vista.
> >
> > Disagree. Your patch is fine for all NTFS volu
No matter if you support the war effort or completely disagree with the
decision to be there, one common.
The project started by conducting customer research into the
decision-making needs of senior IT managers.
Beside many bugfixes, a lot of new features were added. Bent-railed Doug
Kalitta is no
Hi Andree,
On Sun, 3 Dec 2006, Andree Leidenfrost wrote:
> I've tested and all looks well! When booting into Vista after a resize,
> chkdsk is started and after another reboot the system starts as usual.
> You are a star
Thanks for the testing but I object the last sentence because I think
tags 398373 +pending
quit
Commited to svn.
--
Cheers,
Sven Arvidsson
http://www.whiz.se
PGP Key ID 760BDD22
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Your message dated Sun, 03 Dec 2006 16:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#398733: fixed in open-iscsi 2.0.730-0.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 03 Dec 2006 16:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#397636: fixed in open-iscsi 2.0.730-0.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 401439 important
Bug#401439: linux-image-2.6.17-2-parisc: XFS module will not load
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
> reassign 401439 linux-2.6
Bug#401439: linux-image-2.6.17-2-parisc: XFS module will not load
Bug reassigned from pa
severity 401439 important
reassign 401439 linux-2.6
tags 401439 moreinfo
thanks
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 08:20:26AM -0700, Kurt Fitzner wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.17-2-parisc
> Version: 2.6.17-9
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
No, it does not.
> The following
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 398373 +pending
Bug#398373: gnome-applets drivemount: incorrectly claims that USB drive is
unmounted during the cache flush
Tags were: pending
Bug#355261: gnome-applets: drivemount_applet2 : should wait until unmounting
finished
Tags added: pendi
Hi Debian kernel team,
would you please tag this bug as WONTFIX, so that it does not get
included in bug squashes anymore?
Thanks,
Giuseppe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Sun, 03 Dec 2006 15:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#399764: fixed in xxdiff 1:3.2-0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 03:00:14PM +0100, Guido Guenther wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
> On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 04:48:48PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > so one of the maintainers seems to have dropped out definitly now.
Yeah, seems so. I'm completely lost with the currently.
> I'd be happy to help as a
w a compiler bug.
+ *
+ * Giuseppe Sacco, 20061203
+ */
+assert(format != NULL);
+
va_list args;
va_start(args, format);
@@ -217,7 +227,18 @@
msg->msg + 4, MAXMSGSIZE + 1, format, args) + 1;
va_end(args);
+/*
+ * Changed from
if (len <=
Package: linux-image-2.6.17-2-parisc
Version: 2.6.17-9
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
The following error is returned when attemtping to load the xfs module:
FATAL: Error inserting xfs (/lib/modules/2.6.17-2-parisc/kernel/fs/xfs/xfs.ko):
Invalid module format
dmesg rev
* Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061203 15:59]:
> On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 03:00:14PM +0100, Guido Guenther wrote:
> > Hi Andreas,
> > On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 04:48:48PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > so one of the maintainers seems to have dropped out definitly now.
>
> Yeah, seems so. I'm
On Sun, 3 Dec 2006, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Dec 2006, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> >
> > Sorry I didn't explain myself better. My patch was only for Vista.
>
> Disagree. Your patch is fine for all NTFS volumes. There is no need to
> set the mounted on NT4 bit on any volume duri
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.25
> # ftp.d.o removals arent RC
> retitle 401406 RM: python2.3-doc -- RoM; obsolete
Bug#401406: RM: python2.3-doc
Changed Bug title.
> severity 401406 normal
Bug#401406: RM: python2.3-do
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.25
> # ftp.d.o removals arent RC
> retitle 401407 RM: python2.3 -- RoM; obsolete
Bug#401407: RM: python2.3
Changed Bug title.
> severity 401407 normal
Bug#401407: RM: python2.3 -- RoM; ob
> > It works fine on php 5.[01].x
>
> But etch is going to ship with php 5.2. If phpgroupware is to be included
> with etch, we'll need a phpgroupware package that's compatible with php 5.2.
While obviously suboptimal, the phpgroupware package could tighten its
dependencies to just php4 and work
Hi Andreas,
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 04:48:48PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> today on IRC (times are CET):
> 16:26 < aba> waldi: can you please comment on 390023?
> 16:28 < waldi> aba: no
> 16:35 < aba> waldi: are you not the maintainer of this package any more?
> (my last question was not answered
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> #update my e-mail address. Old one will be turned off, soon.
> submitter 290325 Johannes Rohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bug#290325: mozilla-calendar: Prehistoric calendar breaks locale
Chan
retitle 400178 prg2lout failure causes occasional FTBFS
severity 400178 important
thanks
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 11:41:10 +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
> There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
Unresolved cross references do not cause lout to fail; retitling
accordingly. The real probl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 400178 prg2lout failure causes occasional FTBFS
Bug#400178: lout: FTBFS: unresolved cross reference
Changed Bug title.
> severity 400178 important
Bug#400178: prg2lout failure causes occasional FTBFS
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
On Sun, 3 Dec 2006, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Dec 2006, David [iso-8859-15] Martínez Moreno wrote:
> > El domingo, 3 de diciembre de 2006 11:36, Anton Altaparmakov escribió:
> > > > Thank you very much, guys. What should we do know, apply the
> > > > two-line
> > > > patch fr
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
