Bug#835685: Pending fixes for bugs in the golint package

tag 835685 + pending thanks Some bugs in the golint package are closed in revision 6d914fecf8a0d6fb8eb56a1617f35e90dff17831 in branch 'debian/sid' by Martín Ferrari The full diff can be seen at https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-go/packages/golint.git/commit/?id=6d914fe Commit message:

Processed: Pending fixes for bugs in the golint package

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 835685 + pending Bug #835685 [src:golint] golint: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: go test -v -p 1 github.com/golang/lint github.com/golang/lint/golint returned exit code 1 Warning: Unknown package 'src:golint' Added tag(s) pending. Warning: Unknown

Processed: Pending fixes for bugs in the libnet-pcap-perl package

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 843704 + pending Bug #843704 [libnet-pcap-perl] libnet-pcap-perl: FTBFS: t/09-error.t fails with newer libpcap Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 843704:

Bug#844074: [pkg-go] Bug#844074: golang-google-cloud: FTBFS (use of internal package not allowed)

On 12/11/16 16:34, Martín Ferrari wrote: Looking more into this, it seems the problem is golang's stupid rules about canonical naming, which I tried to circumvent for compatibility and now it is backfiring. I will try to find a different solution now. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho)

Bug#840393: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#840393: Bug#840393: Bug#840393: mensis: FTBFS with newly released fontforge

Adrian Bunk writes: > > In unstable this is provided by: > /usr/include/fontforge/basics.h:extern void *grealloc(void *,long size); > Yeah right, but its no longer provided in new fontforge. Upstream also mentioned same.

Processed: bug 843704 is forwarded to https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=117831

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 843704 https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=117831 Bug #843704 [libnet-pcap-perl] libnet-pcap-perl: FTBFS: t/09-error.t fails with newer libpcap Set Bug forwarded-to-address to

Processed: Pending fixes for bugs in the libpoe-filter-ssl-perl package

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 828408 + pending Bug #828408 [src:libpoe-filter-ssl-perl] libpoe-filter-ssl-perl: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 828408:

Bug#828408: Pending fixes for bugs in the libpoe-filter-ssl-perl package

tag 828408 + pending thanks Some bugs in the libpoe-filter-ssl-perl package are closed in revision 2e0e0edc7ca6b1f9610bd3e367069530efbcaaae in branch 'master' by gregor herrmann The full diff can be seen at

Bug#830984: Bug#833004: Do you have resources to look after ball? [progress info]

Hi Danny On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 11:52:47AM +0100, Danny Edel wrote: > On 11/11/2016 02:29 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Start 197: AmberFF_test > > 197/334 Test #197: AmberFF_test .***Failed > > 0.19 sec > > (...) > > (line 511 TEST_REAL_EQUAL(r4_r1

Processed: Fix for the suil FTBFS

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #844101 [src:suil] suil: FTBFS: qbasicatomic.h:290:14: error: 'Ops' has not been declared Added tag(s) patch. -- 844101: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=844101 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#844101: Fix for the suil FTBFS

Control: tags -1 patch A fix for the suil FTBFS is attached. cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl

Bug#844115: Version tracking no longer knows about unstable versions

Package: bugs.debian.org Severity: serious Example: https://bugs.debian.org/844101 The graph in the right upper corner only says "testing", but the same version is also in unstable. This is likely caused by https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2016/11/msg5.html

Bug#843713: libsvn-web-perl: FTBFS (failing tests)

Control: tag -1 unreproducible moreinfo Hi Santiago, I cannot reproduce the problem here. can you show me exactly how the tests fail, e.g. by running $ perl -Mblib t/1use.t and $ perl -Mblib t/2basic.t after the build has failed? Thank you. Cheers, -Hilko

Processed: Re: Bug#843713: libsvn-web-perl: FTBFS (failing tests)

Processing control commands: > tag -1 unreproducible moreinfo Bug #843713 [src:libsvn-web-perl] libsvn-web-perl: FTBFS (failing tests) Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo. -- 843713: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843713 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#844074: [pkg-go] Bug#844074: golang-google-cloud: FTBFS (use of internal package not allowed)

On 12/11/16 16:12, Santiago Vila wrote: >> This looks like an older version of golang has been used. > > The one currently in stretch. Just try "dpkg-buildpackage -A" in a stretch > chroot. I have tried to rebuild and now it fails.. I don't understand this. Will investigate. > (Maybe we need

Processed: Re: Bug#844082: monodoc-base should depend on libmono-corlib4.5-cil

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 844082 mscorlib strong name missing, breaking dependencies Bug #844082 [monodoc-base] monodoc-base should depend on libmono-corlib4.5-cil Changed Bug title to 'mscorlib strong name missing, breaking dependencies' from 'monodoc-base

Bug#844074: [pkg-go] Bug#844074: golang-google-cloud: FTBFS (use of internal package not allowed)

Attached a full build log. golang-google-cloud_0.0~git20160615-5_amd64-20161112T044944Z.gz Description: application/gzip

Bug#844074: [pkg-go] Bug#844074: golang-google-cloud: FTBFS (use of internal package not allowed)

On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 04:09:21PM +0100, Martín Ferrari wrote: > On 12/11/16 10:38, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > imports google.golang.org/cloud/internal: use of internal package not > > allowed > > This looks like an older version of golang has been used. The one currently in stretch. Just

Bug#844074: [pkg-go] Bug#844074: golang-google-cloud: FTBFS (use of internal package not allowed)

On 12/11/16 10:38, Santiago Vila wrote: > imports google.golang.org/cloud/internal: use of internal package not > allowed This looks like an older version of golang has been used. Can you include the full build log? Thanks -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho)

Bug#831125: marked as done (polygraph: FTBFS with GCC 6: ContainerBodyIter.cc:75:22: error: no match for 'operator!=' (operand types are 'ofixedstream' and 'int'))

Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2016 15:05:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#831125: fixed in polygraph 4.3.2-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #831125, regarding polygraph: FTBFS with GCC 6: ContainerBodyIter.cc:75:22: error: no match for

Bug#828349: marked as done (ike: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0)

Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2016 15:05:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#828349: fixed in ike 2.2.1+dfsg-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #828349, regarding ike: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#828343: marked as done (httperf: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0)

Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2016 15:04:58 + with message-id and subject line Bug#828343: fixed in httperf 0.9.0-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #828343, regarding httperf: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#828537: marked as done (samdump2: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0)

Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2016 15:06:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#828537: fixed in samdump2 3.0.0-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #828537, regarding samdump2: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#828253: marked as done (boxbackup: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0)

Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2016 15:03:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#828253: fixed in boxbackup 0.11.1~r2837-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #828253, regarding boxbackup: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#844082: monodoc-base should depend on libmono-corlib4.5-cil

On 12/11/16 10:21, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: monodoc-base > Version: 4.6.1.3+dfsg-7 > Severity: serious > > $ mdassembler > The assembly mscorlib.dll was not found or could not be loaded. > It should have been installed in the `/usr/lib/mono/4.5/mscorlib.dll' > directory. > $ > > >

Processed: Re: boxbackup: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 828253 + pending Bug #828253 [src:boxbackup] boxbackup: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 828253:

Bug#844101: suil: FTBFS: qbasicatomic.h:290:14: error: 'Ops' has not been declared

Source: suil Version: 0.8.4~dfsg0-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, suil fails to build from source in unstable/amd64: […]

Processed: Re: httperf: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 828343 + pending Bug #828343 [src:httperf] httperf: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 828343:

Processed: Re: polygraph: FTBFS with GCC 6: ContainerBodyIter.cc:75:22: error: no match for 'operator!=' (operand types are 'ofixedstream' and 'int')

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 831125 + pending Bug #831125 [src:polygraph] polygraph: FTBFS with GCC 6: ContainerBodyIter.cc:75:22: error: no match for 'operator!=' (operand types are 'ofixedstream' and 'int') Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here.

Processed: Re: samdump2: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 828537 + pending Bug #828537 [src:samdump2] samdump2: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 828537:

Processed: Re: ike: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 828349 + pending Bug #828349 [src:ike] ike: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 828349: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828349

Bug#828537: samdump2: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

tags 828537 + pending thanks Uploaded. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-

Bug#831125: polygraph: FTBFS with GCC 6: ContainerBodyIter.cc:75:22: error: no match for 'operator!=' (operand types are 'ofixedstream' and 'int')

tags 831125 + pending thanks Uploaded. :) Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-

Bug#828349: ike: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

tags 828349 + pending thanks Uploaded. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-

Bug#806865: transition: ppl

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi Release Team, I noticed yesterday that ppl has two RC bugs and was removed from testing. I would like to take over the package and fix it, but one of the RC bugs (#811825) is best

Bug#841572: marked as done (qink: FTBFS: mkdir: cannot create directory '/usr/share/doc/qink/': Permission denied)

Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2016 13:34:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#841572: fixed in qink 0.3.5-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #841572, regarding qink: FTBFS: mkdir: cannot create directory '/usr/share/doc/qink/': Permission denied to

Bug#844069: openntpd: installation fails: Unit entered failed state

Hi, On 2016-11-12 08:29:32 -0300, Dererk wrote: > Is it possible that you have manually enabled the constraint block at > /etc/openntpd/ntpd.conf configuration file? Yes, just like with the previous version (I did not change my config file), for which there was no failure. > If that's the case,

Processed: Re: qink: FTBFS: mkdir: cannot create directory '/usr/share/doc/qink/': Permission denied

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 841572 + pending Bug #841572 [src:qink] qink: FTBFS: mkdir: cannot create directory '/usr/share/doc/qink/': Permission denied Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 841572:

Bug#841572: qink: FTBFS: mkdir: cannot create directory '/usr/share/doc/qink/': Permission denied

tags 841572 + pending thanks Successfully uploaded qink_0.3.5-8.dsc to ftp.upload.debian.org for ftp-master. Successfully uploaded qink_0.3.5.orig.tar.gz to ftp.upload.debian.org for ftp-master. Successfully uploaded qink_0.3.5-8.debian.tar.xz to ftp.upload.debian.org for ftp-master.

Bug#844080: marked as done (ncftp: FTBFS: fails to regenerate configure from configure.in)

Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2016 15:14:34 +0200 with message-id <20161112131434.ps5es7uz5jq2z...@bunk.spdns.de> and subject line Re: ncftp FTBFS: fails to regenerate configure from configure.in has caused the Debian Bug report #844080, regarding ncftp: FTBFS: fails to regenerate configure from

Bug#844097: [photofilmstrip] Unable to save project

Package: photofilmstrip Version: 1:2.1.0-dmo1 Severity: grave --- Please enter the report below this line. --- When I try to save my project, I get this error message: Could not safe file '/home/markus/My PhotoFilmStrips/Kathreinmarkt 2016/Kathreinmarkt 2016.pfs': tostring() has been removed.

Processed: Re: ncftp: FTBFS: fails to regenerate configure from configure.in

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 844080 ncftp: FTBFS: fails to regenerate configure from configure.in Bug #844080 [src:ncftp] ncftp FTBFS: fails to regenerate configure from configure.in Changed Bug title to 'ncftp: FTBFS: fails to regenerate configure from

Bug#823447: marked as done (gtest: FTBFS with g++-6 and glibc 2.23: Test failure)

Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2016 12:00:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#823447: fixed in googletest 1.8.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #823447, regarding gtest: FTBFS with g++-6 and glibc 2.23: Test failure to be marked as done. This

Bug#828410: Building with OpenSSL 1.0.2 is sufficient for stretch

Control: tags -1 patch Not a perfect solution but sufficient for stretch is the patch below to use OpenSSL 1.0.2 The "| libssl-dev (<< 1.1.0~)" is added for backports. --- debian/control.old 2016-11-12 11:54:20.0 + +++ debian/control 2016-11-12 11:54:25.0 + @@

Processed: Building with OpenSSL 1.0.2 is sufficient for stretch

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #828410 [src:libradsec] libradsec: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0 Added tag(s) patch. -- 828410: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828410 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Building with OpenSSL 1.0.2 is sufficient for stretch

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #828546 [src:sipxtapi] sipxtapi: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0 Added tag(s) patch. -- 828546: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828546 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#828546: Building with OpenSSL 1.0.2 is sufficient for stretch

Control: tags -1 patch Not a perfect solution but sufficient for stretch is the patch below to use OpenSSL 1.0.2 The "| libssl-dev (<< 1.1.0~)" is added for backports. --- debian/control.old 2016-11-12 11:41:25.0 + +++ debian/control 2016-11-12 11:41:43.0 + @@

Bug#840073: [PKG-OpenRC-Debian] Bug#840073: Bug: #840073 Patch to fix upgrade from jessie to stretch/testing

ping On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 19:14 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > tags 840073 patch > thanks > > Hi, > > looking at the problem and setting up piuparts, and using a local repository, > I > think the problem with upgrade from jessie to stretch/sid is solved with the > attached patch. > > The

Bug#844069: openntpd: installation fails: Unit entered failed state

On 11/12/2016 06:12 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > -- Unit openntpd.service has begun starting up. > Nov 12 10:05:50 zira ntpd[22799]: ntpd: constraint configured without libtls > support > Nov 12 10:05:50 zira systemd[1]: openntpd.service: Control process exited, > code=exited status=1 > Nov 12

Bug#838904: Autobuilding mdk-doc (non-free)

Dear (possibly currently overloaded with transitions) Debian Release Team, non-free subdivision, First of all, thanks for all your work on Debian, and even on the non-strictly-Debian parts of it! As per the Developers Reference, I'm leaving a note here that IMHO my mdk-doc non-free package can

Bug#828478: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] ovs-pki: Use SHA-512 instead of SHA-1 as message digest.

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 01:28:19PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:06:53PM -0500, Ryan Moats wrote: > > "dev" wrote on 07/01/2016 08:05:40 PM: > > > > > From: Ben Pfaff > > > To: d...@openvswitch.org > > > Cc: Ben Pfaff

Processed: Building with OpenSSL 1.0.2 is sufficient for stretch

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #828408 [src:libpoe-filter-ssl-perl] libpoe-filter-ssl-perl: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0 Added tag(s) patch. -- 828408: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828408 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: This is de facto a patch

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 839515 patch Bug #839515 [src:dateutils] dateutils must depend and build-depend on tzdata Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 839515:

Bug#828408: Building with OpenSSL 1.0.2 is sufficient for stretch

Control: tags -1 patch Not a perfect solution but sufficient for stretch is the patch below to use OpenSSL 1.0.2 The "| libssl-dev (<< 1.1.0~)" is added for backports. --- debian/control.old 2016-11-12 11:01:57.0 + +++ debian/control 2016-11-12 11:02:01.0 + @@

Bug#844088: conversant-disruptor: FTBFS randomly (failing tests)

Package: src:conversant-disruptor Version: 1.2.8-1 Severity: serious Dear maintainer: I tried to build this package in stretch with "dpkg-buildpackage -A" (which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it) but it failed:

Bug#828354: Building with OpenSSL 1.0.2 is sufficient for stretch

Control: tags -1 patch Not a perfect solution but sufficient for stretch is the patch below to use OpenSSL 1.0.2 The "| libssl-dev (<< 1.1.0~)" is added for backports. --- debian/control.old 2016-11-12 10:57:59.0 + +++ debian/control 2016-11-12 10:58:15.0 + @@

Processed: Building with OpenSSL 1.0.2 is sufficient for stretch

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #828354 [src:ipsec-tools] ipsec-tools: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0 Added tag(s) patch. -- 828354: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828354 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Building with OpenSSL 1.0.2 is sufficient for stretch

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #828620 [src:zorp] zorp: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0 Added tag(s) patch. -- 828620: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828620 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#828620: Building with OpenSSL 1.0.2 is sufficient for stretch

Control: tags -1 patch Not a perfect solution but sufficient for stretch is the following change to use OpenSSL 1.0.2: The "| libssl-dev (<< 1.1.0~)" is added for backports. --- debian/control.old 2016-11-12 10:39:30.0 + +++ debian/control 2016-11-12 10:39:47.0 +

Processed: Mark as pending

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 843852 pending Bug #843852 [amanda-common] amanda-common: Cannot run amdump - and report about missing ssl symbols Added tag(s) pending. > tags 843700 pending Bug #843700 [amanda-common] amanda-common: missing dependency on perlapi-* Added

Processed: libzorpll must (build)depend on libssl1.0-dev

Processing control commands: > retitle -1 libzorpll must (build)depend on libssl1.0-dev Bug #828418 [src:libzorpll] libzorpll: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0 Changed Bug title to 'libzorpll must (build)depend on libssl1.0-dev' from 'libzorpll: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0'. > block 828620 by -1 Bug

Bug#830984: Bug#833004: Do you have resources to look after ball? [progress info]

On 11/11/2016 02:29 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Start 197: AmberFF_test > 197/334 Test #197: AmberFF_test .***Failed > 0.19 sec > (...) > (line 511 TEST_REAL_EQUAL(r4_r1 - r4_i, r1_r4 - r1_i): got -145.471, > expected -103.957) - > (line 513

Bug#828418: libzorpll must (build)depend on libssl1.0-dev

Control: retitle -1 libzorpll must (build)depend on libssl1.0-dev Control: block 828620 by -1 Control: tags -1 patch Using OpenSSL 1.0.2 in stretch not only fixes the FTBFS in libzorpll, it also allows zorp to fix the similar FTBFS by using OpenSSL 1.0.2. The "| libssl-dev (<< 1.1.0~)" is added

Bug#839466: marked as done (avahi-sharp: FTBFS: mdoc: Could not find file "/etc/localtime")

Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2016 12:35:55 +0200 with message-id <20161112103555.7iuakn6mj4khw...@bunk.spdns.de> and subject line Already fixed in unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #839466, regarding avahi-sharp: FTBFS: mdoc: Could not find file "/etc/localtime" to be marked as done.

Bug#811691: marked as done (FTBFS with GCC 6: enumerator value for... is not)

Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2016 10:34:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#811691: fixed in desmume 0.9.11-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #811691, regarding FTBFS with GCC 6: enumerator value for... is not to be marked as done. This means

Processed: I forgot to add the affects

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 839466 src:avahi-sharp Bug #839466 [libmono-corlib4.5-cil] avahi-sharp: FTBFS: mdoc: Could not find file "/etc/localtime" Added indication that 839466 affects src:avahi-sharp > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Processed: The bug was in libmono-corlib4.5-cil

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 839466 libmono-corlib4.5-cil 4.2.1.102+dfsg2-8 Bug #839466 [src:avahi-sharp] avahi-sharp: FTBFS: mdoc: Could not find file "/etc/localtime" Bug reassigned from package 'src:avahi-sharp' to 'libmono-corlib4.5-cil'. No longer marked as

Processed: Mark as pending

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 828232 pending Bug #828232 [src:amanda] amanda: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 828232: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828232

Bug#844083: openhft-lang: FTBFS randomly (DataValueGeneratorTest.testGenerateInterfaceWithDateNativeInstace fails)

Package: src:openhft-lang Version: 6.7.6-1 Severity: serious Dear maintainer: I tried to build this package in stretch with "dpkg-buildpackage -A" (which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it) but it failed:

Bug#844082: monodoc-base should depend on libmono-corlib4.5-cil

Package: monodoc-base Version: 4.6.1.3+dfsg-7 Severity: serious $ mdassembler The assembly mscorlib.dll was not found or could not be loaded. It should have been installed in the `/usr/lib/mono/4.5/mscorlib.dll' directory. $ The libmono-corlib4.5-cil dependency is present in

Bug#844081: khal: FTBFS randomly (test_default_calendar fails)

Package: src:khal Version: 0.8.4-1 Severity: serious Dear maintainer: I tried to build this package in stretch with "dpkg-buildpackage -A" (which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it) but it failed:

Bug#844080: ncftp FTBFS: fails to regenerate configure from configure.in

Source: ncftp Version: 3.2.5-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source ncftp fails to build from source. It still builds on buildds, but recreating configure from configure.in does not work when invoked manually: | $ autoreconf -f -i | aclocal: warning: autoconf input should

Bug#844014: marked as done (node-js-yaml is not installable in unstable)

Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2016 09:49:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#844014: fixed in node-js-yaml 3.7.0+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #844014, regarding node-js-yaml is not installable in unstable to be marked as done. This means

Bug#833207: RFS: hylafax/3:6.0.6-7 [RC] -- Flexible client/server fax software

Joachim Wiedorn wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: important FYI please use X-Debbugs-CC pseudo-header over the regular "CC" header, otherwise I need to lookup the bug number manually. :) > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hylafax" Uploading to ftp-master (via ftp to

Processed: bug 811691 is forwarded to https://sourceforge.net/p/desmume/bugs/1570/

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 811691 https://sourceforge.net/p/desmume/bugs/1570/ Bug #811691 [desmume] FTBFS with GCC 6: enumerator value for... is not Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://sourceforge.net/p/desmume/bugs/1570/'. > thanks Stopping processing

Bug#844074: golang-google-cloud: FTBFS (use of internal package not allowed)

Package: src:golang-google-cloud Version: 0.0~git20160615-5 Severity: serious Dear maintainer: I tried to build this package in stretch with "dpkg-buildpackage -A" (which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it) but it failed:

Bug#844073: net-tools: FTBFS: /usr/include/linux/ip.h:85:8: error: redefinition of 'struct iphdr'

Source: net-tools Version: 1.60+git20150829.73cef8a-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, net-tools fails to build from source in

Bug#844069: openntpd: installation fails: Unit entered failed state

Package: openntpd Version: 1:6.0p1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I get the following error: E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Setting up openntpd (1:6.0p1-1) ... Job for openntpd.service failed because the control process exited with error code.

Bug#806089: marked as done (openmprtl: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (No such file or directory))

Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2016 09:07:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#806089: fixed in openmprtl 3.9.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #806089, regarding openmprtl: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (No such file or directory) to

Bug#844015: marked as done (coz-profiler: FTBFS: pkg-config: Command not found)

Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2016 09:03:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#844015: fixed in coz-profiler 0.0.git.20161011T1320-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #844015, regarding coz-profiler: FTBFS: pkg-config: Command not found to be marked as

Processed: bts

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 497471 Bug #497471 {Done: "FedEx SmartPost" } [cdimage.debian.org] sarge images have syslinux binaries without source Bug reopened Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #497471 to the same

Bug#842721: jayway-jsonpath: FTBFS (Could not resolve all dependencies)

I tried the build and seems it is. The new gradle-debian-helper automatically adds the "maven" plugin to every projects that has a "java" plugin applied, and the "maven" plugin adds a "install" task which seems to depend on the "jar" task. d/rules executes the "install" task, which also executes

Bug#844014: node-js-yaml

Putting back in the right order... > On 12/11/16 00:25, Jérémy Lal wrote: > > > > 2016-11-11 20:48 GMT+01:00 Ross Gammon : > >> Package: node-js-yaml >> Version: 3.6.1+dfsg-1 >> Severity: grave >> Justification: renders package unusable >> >> Dear Maintainer, >> >>

Bug#844021: libnative-platform-java 0.11-4 is not compatible with programs built with 0.10*

Hi Vincent, Thank you for the report. In fact I have patched libnative-platform-java/0.11-4 to work with gradle/2.13, see [1]. Turns out the upstream developer suddenly renamed the class without any transition. I do not make sure this patch works for gradle/2.13 building all packages, but I can

<    1   2