I'd like to apologize in advance for the tone of this message, but the
situation with this package is really irritating. Ten months ago, I
added a me-too type message to bug #268471 begging for the current
upstream version to replace the one in Debian. Not only did nothing
ever come of that,
On Sep 23, 2006, at 3:15 AM, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 00:41:05 -0700 (-0700), Daniel Gimpelevich
wrote:
I'd like to apologize in advance for the tone of this message, but
the situation with this package is really irritating. Ten months
ago, I added a me-too type message
On Dec 15, 2005, at 9:17 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
Guillem Jover wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 07:45:23PM -0800, Daniel Gimpelevich wrote:
If that release is imminent, there is something that I would
like to take care of beforehand: I think I have found a bug that
causes
random garbage
On Dec 15, 2005, at 7:26 PM, Guillem Jover wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 05:51:39PM -0800, Daniel Gimpelevich wrote:
Attached is a patch that was tested on an Ubuntu system. It allows the
current sid and dapper (0.7.2-1ubuntu1) sources to build on PowerPC
with binutils 2.16.1
Attached is a patch that was tested on an Ubuntu system. It allows the
current sid and dapper (0.7.2-1ubuntu1) sources to build on PowerPC
with binutils 2.16.1-2ubuntu6, but not with binutils
2.16.1cvs20051117-1ubuntu1.
ppc.diff
Description: Binary data
--
No gnu's is good gnu's. --Gary
5 matches
Mail list logo
