Bug#961154: debarchiver: diff for NMU version 0.11.5+nmu1

Thank you On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 at 23:51, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > Control: tags 961154 + patch > Control: tags 961154 + pending > > Dear maintainer, > > I've prepared an NMU for debarchiver (versioned as 0.11.5+nmu1) and > uploaded it to DELAYED/0. Please feel free to tell me if I > should

Bug#954158: tightvncserver output a blank screen with gray color under gnome

tags 954158 + moreinfo severity 954158 minor thanks Hi Have you checked your vnc startup script in ~/.vnc/xstartup or alternatively the startup script in ~/.vncstartup This is the set of commands used to start the window manager and other stuff. When reading the manual I can see that this is

Bug#917904: tightvncserver does not ask for password set by vncpasswd

debugging info > from tightvncserver, or a log file? The man page does not seem to mention > anything in that regard. > > > kind regards, > Christoph > > > On 1/2/19 1:26 AM, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > Hi Jan > > Thank you for the report. > I have now tested t

Bug#917904: tightvncserver does not ask for password set by vncpasswd

Hi Jan Thank you for the report. I have now tested this myself. I purged all vnc software installed, installed tightvncserver, run tightvncserver and then run vncpasswd to set a password. I failed to reproduce the problem. I'm asked for a password. So the question is what you did differently.

Bug#881097: To be removed from wheezy as well

Hi again After some more reading I think removing it should be ok anyway. I'll change the wording from "will be removed" to "may be removed" to allow us the freedom to keep it if nobody takes the action to actually remove it. // Ola On 17 December 2017 at 20:28, Ola Lundqv

Bug#881097: To be removed from wheezy as well

Hi I agree that it may not be the best to remove it then. I suggest we mark it as no-dsa then. Any objections? // Ola On 22 November 2017 at 21:00, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> wrote: > On 08/11/17 20:19, Ola Lundqvist wrote: >> Hi >> >> Considering

Bug#881097: To be removed from wheezy as well

Hi Considering that this package is about to be removed from jessie I guess it should be removed from wheezy too. How is that done? Should I contact the FTP maintainers about it, or do we simply ignore the issue? For people who wonder what we are discussing it is about CVE-2008-7319 Best

Bug#853619: proposed fix

Hi Fixed package uploaded now. // Ola On 3 September 2017 at 17:30, Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org> wrote: > ping > > Thanks > Adrian > > > On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 08:20:06AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > Hi Kir > > > > Thank you. I will test th

Bug#853117: tightvnc FTBFS on mips*: PIE / stipmips.s problem

Hi Thank you for this bug report. Do you have a proposed patch for this? If not do you think it would be acceptable if we remove the mips architecture for this package. I planned to remove support for this package (and let people use tigervnc instead) but it turned out that there were corner

Bug#852213: [Pkg-tigervnc-devel] Bug#852213: Bug#852213: tigervnc: diff for NMU version 1.7.0+dfsg-2.1

Sure will do that. // Ola On 28 January 2017 at 21:18, Salvatore Bonaccorso <car...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi Ola, > > On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 09:10:43PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: >> Hi >> >> Thank you. I'll make a "real" upload now instead. Thank y

Bug#852213: [Pkg-tigervnc-devel] Bug#852213: tigervnc: diff for NMU version 1.7.0+dfsg-2.1

; http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-tigervnc-devel -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / o...@debian.org Folkebogatan 26 \ | o...@inguza.com 654 68 KARLSTAD | | http://inguz

Bug#851771: CVE-2016-6175 and 851771

Hi Salvatore I started checking the CVEs for php-gettext and I'm not sure I follow the information for CVE-2016-6175. Maybe you have more data than I do. The vulnerability is that a malicous user that have permission to craft .mo files in the target filesystem could execute any php code on that

Bug#850054: [Pkg-tigervnc-devel] Bug#850054: /usr/bin/tigervncserver: label error in sanity check

cmd) { > $CMDS{$cmd} = $fqcmd; > - next cmd; > + next cmd2; >} > } >} > > ___ > Pkg-tigervnc-devel mailing list > pkg-tigervnc-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-tigervnc-devel -- --

Bug#849996: Release?

Great! Sent from a phone Den 3 jan 2017 15:27 skrev "Joachim Falk" <joachim.f...@gmx.de>: > Hi Ola, > > Am 03.01.2017 um 13:04 schrieb Ola Lundqvist: > > Hi > > > > Just want to check if your changes are ready for release? We have a new > RC bug

Bug#849478: closed by Ola Lundqvist <o...@debian.org> (Re: [Pkg-tigervnc-devel] Bug#849478: tigervnc: CVE-2014-8241: NULL pointer dereference flaw in XRegion)

har *) newReg->rects); > 1085 newReg->rects = (BoxPtr) Xmalloc(sizeof(BoxRec)); > 1086 } > 1087 } > 1088 Xfree ((char *) oldRects); > 1089 return; > 1090 } > > The patch from Red Hat, does add a check for newReg->rects, which in above is > m

Bug#849479: tigervnc: CVE-2014-8240: integer overflow flaw, leading to a heap-based buffer overflow in screen size handling

apPad(dpy), 0); > 82 > 83 xim->data = (char *)malloc(xim->bytes_per_line * xim->height); > > The referenced Red Hat patch will first validate xim->byptes_per_line > et al. > > Regards, > Salvatore -- - Ola Lundqvist ---

Bug#849479: [Pkg-tigervnc-devel] Bug#849479: Red Hat patch not applied to 1.6.0+dfsg-4?

Hi Salvatore It turned out that you were right and I was wrong. I'll include this in the build I'm preparing now. // Ola On 29 December 2016 at 11:42, Salvatore Bonaccorso <car...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi Ola, > > On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 08:42:28AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: &

Bug#849479: Red Hat patch not applied to 1.6.0+dfsg-4?

Thank you Sent from a phone Den 29 dec 2016 11:42 skrev "Salvatore Bonaccorso" <car...@debian.org>: > Hi Ola, > > On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 08:42:28AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > I will double check again. When I checked the source it looked like the > > c

Bug#849479: Red Hat patch not applied to 1.6.0+dfsg-4?

I will double check again. When I checked the source it looked like the code was there. Sent from a phone Den 29 dec 2016 06:03 skrev "Salvatore Bonaccorso" : > Hi Ola, > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 10:09:03PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > This problem was

Bug#843543: [Pkg-tigervnc-devel] Bug#843543: Bug#843543: tigervnc: FTBFS with xserver 1.19

not from the top of my head. >> > >> > I saw some patches in upstream github too[1]. IIRC they were not in the >> > last >> > release, but they can probably be backported? >> > >> > [1] >> > >> > https://github.com/TigerVNC/tigervnc/commit/3f

Bug#843543: [Pkg-tigervnc-devel] Bug#843543: Bug#843543: tigervnc: FTBFS with xserver 1.19

> > > > I saw some patches in upstream github too[1]. IIRC they were not in the > last > > release, but they can probably be backported? > > > > [1] > > https://github.com/TigerVNC/tigervnc/commit/ > 3fed95eda27dfbeee6535f987f5d14a66f64749b > > I just uploaded xserver 1.19 to sid, so thi

Bug#841288: [Pkg-tigervnc-devel] Bug#841288: Bug#841288: tigervnc-common: amd64 has dep libgnutls-deb0-28

Hi all I have made a source-only upload. This way the problem shall be solved. // Ola On 20 October 2016 at 08:49, Ola Lundqvist <o...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi > > I'm the one to blame. I built it on stable. > > The problem is easy to solve by stepping the revision and b

Bug#841288: [Pkg-tigervnc-devel] Bug#841288: tigervnc-common: amd64 has dep libgnutls-deb0-28

evel mailing list > pkg-tigervnc-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-tigervnc-devel > -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / o...@debian.org Folkebogatan 26 \ | o

Bug#836660: vzctl: please drop the build dependency on hardening-wrapper

Hi Correction uploaded now. Also for vzctl and ploop. // Ola On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 9:25 PM, Ola Lundqvist <ola.lundqv...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > That is very good news! > > Sent from a phone > > > Den 7 sep 2016 21:00 skrev "Moritz Mühlenhoff" <j

Bug#832908: mongodb: CVE-2016-6494: world-readable .dbshell history file: LTS update and upgrade handling

Hi Chris I had this // Make sure this file is not readable by others But maybe it was not clear enough. :-) // Ola On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Chris Lamb wrote: > > This is why I just override the "world readable" part and > > let the rest be controlled by the user. >

Bug#832908: mongodb: CVE-2016-6494: world-readable .dbshell history file: LTS update and upgrade handling

Hi Chris The reason I do not simply set the umask to a fixed value is to use the same principle as upstream. That is honor the umask set bu the user. There may be reasons why group read and/or write should be set for example. I agree with upstream that the umask should be honored, but not as

Bug#832908: mongodb: CVE-2016-6494: world-readable .dbshell history file: LTS update and upgrade handling

Hi again Here is the working patch (attached). Hope it helps for later versions too. // Ola On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 12:15 AM, Ola Lundqvist <o...@inguza.com> wrote: > Hi again > > I just realize that we need to change back the umask after the file is > created. I'll update

Bug#832908: mongodb: CVE-2016-6494: world-readable .dbshell history file: LTS update and upgrade handling

Hi again I just realize that we need to change back the umask after the file is created. I'll update the patch tomorrow and send one that I know works. // Ola On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Ola Lundqvist <o...@inguza.com> wrote: > Hi all > > I have prepared a preliminary patc

Bug#832908: mongodb: CVE-2016-6494: world-readable .dbshell history file: LTS update and upgrade handling

Description: World readable dbshell log file This correction make sure the ~/.dbshell log file is not world readable. . mongodb (1:2.0.6-1deb7u1) wheezy-security; urgency=high . * Non-maintainer upload by the Long Term Security Team. * Make sure dbshell log file is not readable by others. Au

Bug#832908: mongodb: CVE-2016-6494: world-readable .dbshell history file: LTS update and upgrade handling

Hi I'm member of the Long Term Security team in Debian and I'm following this as I plan to backport the correction to wheezy. I have a few questions: 1) When do you think you will have a correction available that I can have a look at? 2) How do you plan to handle the "upgrade case" that is will

Bug#827031: Bug#656862: Bug#827031: xvnc4viewer: crashes with stack smashing on startup

nvestigate it for a while. Cheers // Ola On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Roman Mamedov <r...@romanrm.net> wrote: > On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 14:21:47 +0200 > Ola Lundqvist <o...@inguza.com> wrote: > > > It was not Torsten who wrote the patch. > > > Just FYI. > >

Bug#827031: Bug#656862: Bug#827031: xvnc4viewer: crashes with stack smashing on startup

:D Sent from a phone Den 14 jun 2016 14:33 skrev "Roman Mamedov" <r...@romanrm.net>: > On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 14:21:47 +0200 > Ola Lundqvist <o...@inguza.com> wrote: > > > It was not Torsten who wrote the patch. > > > Just FYI. > > Apologies for

Bug#827031: xvnc4viewer: crashes with stack smashing on startup

Hi Roman It was not Torsten who wrote the patch. Just FYI. We may have a security issue, but I guess it is not critical. Epecially since it is in a client software. / Ola Sent from a phone Den 14 jun 2016 14:18 skrev "Roman Mamedov" : > On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 14:02:42 +0200

Bug#827031: xvnc4viewer: crashes with stack smashing on startup

Hi The harden build flags bug is still open (I reopened it). The proposed patch was not good enough. / Ola Sent from a phone Den 14 jun 2016 14:02 skrev "Thorsten Glaser" <t.gla...@tarent.de>: > On Sat, 11 Jun 2016, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > > Thanks a lo

Bug#827031: xvnc4viewer: crashes with stack smashing on startup

Hi Thorsten Thanks a lot for your report. It happen to be the harden-build flag correction that caused this. I have reverted that now and will upload a corrected package shortly. Thanks again! // Ola On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Thorsten Bonow wrote: >

Bug#825123: debarchiver: release files generated by debarchiver use weak digest algos in signatures

reopen 825123 severity 825123 important thanks Hi Christoph You were perfectly correct in your suspicion about my config file. I did have the hash algorithm specified there. I just did not know that myself... It was changed in 2014. I can not tell if I did that or some upgrade script. I really

Bug#825123: debarchiver: release files generated by debarchiver use weak digest algos in signatures

On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 11:47 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: ..CUT... > Another way would probably be to simply add the preference setting to > the gpg config (for the debarchiver user)... may in the beginning if > later (user) settings would override such. > But I

Bug#775390: php-elisp: fails to upgrade lenny - squeeze - wheezy - jessie

Hi Thanks. Solved now. // Ola On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:26 AM, Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org wrote: Package: php-elisp Version: 1.13.5-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade

Bug#775548: php-elisp: fails to upgrade lenny - squeeze - wheezy - jessie

cheers, Andreas --- Youhei SASAKI uwab...@gfd-dennou.org uwab...@debian.or.jp GPG fingerprint: 4096/RSA: 66A4 EA70 4FE2 4055 8D6A C2E6 9394 F354 891D 7E07 -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / o...@debian.org

Bug#760449: harden: outdated info

Hi I agree with you. I think we should consider to remove the package altogether. // Ola On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Ivo De Decker ivo.dedec...@ugent.be wrote: package: harden severity: serious Hi, The information in harden is seriously outdated. The last upload was my NMU to fix

Bug#736041: upgrading to serious: libtiff4-dev is being removed

Hi Thanks for the report. I have now filed a new bug requesting this package to be removed from the archive. Regards, // Ola On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:38 AM, Jay Berkenbilt q...@debian.org wrote: Control: severity 736041 serious libtiff4-dev is now being removed, which will leave your

Bug#739471: dpsyco-sudo: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3): /etc/sudoers

Hi Andreas Thanks. You are right. This was required before, but when /etc/sudoers.d was introduced this is no longer necessary. On the other hand dpsyco is not used by many, so maybe we should just remove the package altogether. // Ola On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Andreas Beckmann

Bug#728173: ploop: FTBFS on non-x86: misses fallocate, syncfs syscall numbers

Thanks. Will fix. On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 4:02 AM, Aaron M. Ucko u...@debian.org wrote: Source: ploop Version: 1.9-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Builds of ploop on Linux architectures other than amd64 and i386 have been failing: ploop.h:21:2: error:

Bug#728172: ploop: FTBFS: libxml/parser.h: No such file or directory

Thanks for the report. I'll do so. I thought I had checked it on a minimal install but it turned out to be more than a minimal one. // Ola On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 3:59 AM, Aaron M. Ucko u...@debian.org wrote: Source: ploop Version: 1.9-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from

Bug#728172: ploop: FTBFS: libxml/parser.h: No such file or directory

at 8:04 AM, Ola Lundqvist o...@inguza.com wrote: Thanks for the report. I'll do so. I thought I had checked it on a minimal install but it turned out to be more than a minimal one. // Ola On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 3:59 AM, Aaron M. Ucko u...@debian.org wrote: Source: ploop Version: 1.9-2

Bug#728172: ploop: FTBFS: libxml/parser.h: No such file or directory

Found it. It was a missing dependency on pkg-config. I thought that one was build-essential, but I was apparently wrong. On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Ola Lundqvist o...@inguza.com wrote: Hi Now I have checked. There is already a build dependency on libxml2-dev. Build-Depends: debhelper

Bug#728173: ploop: FTBFS on non-x86: misses fallocate, syncfs syscall numbers

and sparc ploop is possible to build for i386 and amd64. I raise this question as there is a problem to have a build dependency on ploop if ploop can not be built for the same (or more) architectures as vzctl. Cheers // Ola On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Ola Lundqvist o...@inguza.com wrote

Bug#685251: Bug#699385: Acknowledgement (pu: package quantum/2012.1-5)

Just to inform that a request to the release team has been filed and available at http://bugs.debian.org/699385. // Ola -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / o...@debian.org Annebergsslingan 37 \ | o...@inguza.com

Bug#697062: crashes on s390x

-- - Ola Lundqvist --- / o...@debian.org Annebergsslingan 37 \ | o...@inguza.com 654 65 KARLSTAD | | http://inguza.com/ +46 (0)70-332 1551 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE

Bug#685251: Fixing Debian bug #685251 for the ryu plugin in Openstack

-proposed-updates; urgency=high + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Backport of the removal of ryu app from 2012.1-7. Closes: #685251. +This needs to go directly to testing as the changes in 2012.1-6 is +too excessive. + + -- Ola Lundqvist o...@debian.org Sat, 29 Dec 2012 08:38:07 +

Bug#685251: [Openstack-devel] Fixing Debian bug #685251 for the ryu plugin in Openstack

). DS. On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 04:39:20PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 11/14/2012 05:30 AM, Ola Lundqvist wrote: Hi Thomas and Julien The 2012.1-6 upload was done before the freeze That isn't right. The freeze date was the 30th of June, while the package was uploaded by Loic on the 6th

Bug#685251: [Openstack-devel] Fixing Debian bug #685251 for the ryu plugin in Openstack

Hi Thomas (and Julien) Thanks for the ckeck. See answers below. On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 06:38:20PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 12/29/2012 04:57 PM, Ola Lundqvist wrote: Hi Julien I have now finally got enough time to actually do this backport. I have attached the proposal as a diff

Bug#685251: [Openstack-devel] Fixing Debian bug #685251 for the ryu plugin in Openstack

Sorry. Forgot to attach the new diff. // Ola On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 02:22:01PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: Hi Thomas (and Julien) Thanks for the ckeck. See answers below. On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 06:38:20PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 12/29/2012 04:57 PM, Ola Lundqvist wrote: Hi

Bug#685251: Fixing Debian bug #685251 for the ryu plugin in Openstack

Hi Thomas and Julien The 2012.1-6 upload was done before the freeze and the plan was to have it included in testing before the freeze. Apparently that did not happen. I was under the impression that the freeze would be to uploads after the freeze, not to the packages that had not yet done the

Bug#685251: Is #685251 fixed in quantum_2012.1-6?

Hi Thomas No that upload does not fix the bug you refer to. If you read the mail thread for that bug report I have sent a question about this one, but I never got an answer. I see three options for this one: 1) Move whole quantum package (and all packages that depends on it) to the contrib

Bug#685251: quantum-plugin-ryu-agent: ImportError: No module named ryu.agent.ryu_quantum_agent / ryu.app

://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/openstack-devel -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / o...@debian.org Annebergsslingan 37 \ | o...@inguza.com 654 65 KARLSTAD | | http://inguza.com/ +46 (0)70-332

Bug#684736: melange: diff for NMU version 1:2012.1-2.1

at 07:05:36AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: Hi Ola On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 08:12:28PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote: Thanks for this mail. Sorry for not actually attaching the diff. It is now attached. As you can see I did not put any (= ${source:Version}) as I do not see any reason why

Bug#684736: melange: diff for NMU version 1:2012.1-2.1

specific reason why it should be there? Best regards, // Ola On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 08:53:48AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: Hi Ola On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:34:07AM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote: tags 684736 + patch thanks Hi openstack developers The attached patch

Bug#685251: [Openstack-devel] Bug#685251: quantum-plugin-ryu-agent: ImportError: No module named ryu.agent.ryu_quantum_agent / ryu.app

Hi openstack developers This bug is seen also in testing. An obvious fix is to add a dependency on a dependency on quantum-plugin-ryu for quantum-plugin-ryu-agent. But that is not the whole solution. The other thing that is needed is ryu.app, which I understand is not part of the quantum

Bug#684736: [Openstack-devel] Bug#684736: melange: ImportError: No module named melange

tags 684736 + patch thanks Hi openstack developers The attached patch should solve this problem. Do you want me to upload this fix? I have not tested it but it should solve the problem. Best regards, // Ola // Ola On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 04:04:51PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: Package:

Bug#677400: [Openstack-devel] Bug#677400: Bug#677400: This is not a bug, it is a feature!

___ Openstack-devel mailing list openstack-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/openstack-devel -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / o...@debian.org Annebergsslingan 37 \ | o...@inguza.com

Bug#677400: [Openstack-devel] This is not a bug, it is a feature!

: On 06/18/2012 08:38 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: On Mon Jun 18 2012 01:06:30 PM CST, Ola Lundqvist o...@inguza.com wrote: The statement in the mail to the development list is wrong. Install scripts can modify configuration files if it is done in a safe way preserving local modifications. No! If you

Bug#663566: tightvnc: diff for NMU version 1.3.9-6.3

\ Xvnc/config/cf/host.def \ - Xvnc/config/imake/Makefile.proto + Xvnc/config/imake/Makefile.proto \ + Makefile \ + Xvnc/Makefile install: DH_OPTIONS= install: build -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / o

Bug#663566: tightvnc: diff for NMU version 1.3.9-6.3

Thanks! Sent from my phone -Original Message- From: Mònica Ramírez Arceda mon...@debian.org To: o...@debian.org Cc: 663...@bugs.debian.org Sent: Sat, 07 Apr 2012 12:23 Subject: Re: Bug#663566: tightvnc: diff for NMU version 1.3.9-6.3 El ds 07 de 04 de 2012 a les 11:03 +0200, en/na Ola

Bug#663566: tightvnc: FTBFS: dpkg-source: error: aborting due to unexpected upstream changes

-source: error: aborting due to unexpected upstream changes, see /tmp/tightvnc_1.3.9-6.2.diff.2fER2e dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b tightvnc-1.3.9 gave error exit status 2 -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / o...@debian.org

Bug#648361: uninstallable on kfreebsd-amd64

nevertheless, then please do so. Otherwise you could also set Architecture to linux-any until we're ready to provide GNU/kFreeBSD support. debian-bsd: if someone can test PPTP on GNU/kFreeBSD using my patch, please do! Thanks! -- Robert Millan -- - Ola

Bug#648361: uninstallable on kfreebsd-amd64

Hi Robert, On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 07:14:35PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: [ CCing debian-bsd; if someone can test the patched version of PPTP on GNU/kFreeBSD, please do and report. Thanks! ] Yes that would be very welcome! Hi Ola, 2011/11/13 Ola Lundqvist o...@debian.org: Have you

Bug#648361: uninstallable on kfreebsd-amd64

+ # Solaris 10 + # LIBS = -lnsl -lsocket -lresolv === added file 'debian/patches/series' --- debian/patches/series 1970-01-01 00:00:00 + +++ debian/patches/series 2011-11-10 19:13:38 + @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +kfreebsd-gnu.diff -- - Ola Lundqvist

Bug#642768: tightvnc: FTBFS: make[2]: *** No rule to make target `clean'. Stop.

from the build systems. -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / o...@debian.org Annebergsslingan 37 \ | o...@inguza.com 654 65 KARLSTAD | | http://inguza.com/ +46 (0)70-332 1551

Bug#609916: ledcontrol broke my laptop keyboard

because LEDs are often used by input devices to control keymaps etc., and changing their state can often be very disruptive. Ian. -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / o...@debian.org Annebergsslingan 37 \ | o...@inguza.com

Bug#607775: /usr/bin/vnc4server: cannot start vncserver

, Roman -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / o...@debian.org Annebergsslingan 37 \ | o...@inguza.com 654 65 KARLSTAD | | http://inguza.com/ +46 (0)70-332 1551 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE

Bug#604531: Unblock for debarchiver

Package: release.debian.org Severity: serious Tags: squeeze I would like you to unblock the debarchiver package (version 0.9.6). It has a mis-spelling in the control file (recomments instead of recommends) making all the recommends totally useless. I have uploaded a fix for that and I would

Bug#604432: Typo 'Recomments' instead of 'Recommends' in debian/control

Hi I raised it to serious. :-) Fix uploaded and bug filed against release.debian.org to unblock it for next release. // Ola On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:35:38PM +0530, Kartik Mistry wrote: On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Ola Lundqvist o...@debian.org wrote: Thanks a lot for this report

Bug#600585: vzctl: package fails to purge due to missing line continuation

. +Closes: #XX. + + -- Florian Ernst f...@lf.net Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:28:41 +0200 + vzctl (3.0.24-7) unstable; urgency=medium * No longer ignore errors on startup. -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / o...@debian.org

Bug#600585: Bug#600081: vzctl: diff for NMU version 3.0.24-7.1

But Mammals -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / o...@debian.org Annebergsslingan 37 \ | o...@inguza.com 654 65 KARLSTAD | | http://inguza.com/ +46 (0)70-332 1551 | \ gpg/f.p

Bug#576227: insserv: warning: script is corrupt or invalid

at 06:53:43PM +0200, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: Ola, Same here, stop/start now properly shuts down all services, etc. Still need to wait for the new kernel though. Christian * Ola Lundqvist o...@debian.org [100910 21:53]: Hi Christian and Kir Now I have verfied that the new vzctl

Bug#576227: insserv: warning: script is corrupt or invalid

Hi Christian Thanks for the help to verify the package. // Ola On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 06:53:43PM +0200, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: Ola, Same here, stop/start now properly shuts down all services, etc. Still need to wait for the new kernel though. Christian * Ola Lundqvist o

Bug#576227: insserv: warning: script is corrupt or invalid

@ K05networking@ K06ifupdown@ K07umountfs@ K08umountroot@ K09reboot@ README S00vzreboot* This can't be correct ;) Christian -- christian hofstaedtler -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / o...@debian.org Annebergsslingan 37

Bug#576227: insserv: warning: script is corrupt or invalid

@ K04umountnfs.sh@ K05networking@ K06ifupdown@ K07umountfs@ K08umountroot@ K09reboot@ README S00vzreboot* This can't be correct ;) Christian -- christian hofstaedtler -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / o...@debian.org

Bug#576227: insserv: warning: script is corrupt or invalid

S00vzreboot* This can't be correct ;) Christian -- christian hofstaedtler -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / o...@debian.org Annebergsslingan 37 \ | o...@inguza.com 654 65 KARLSTAD | | http

Bug#595446: ntop: GPL code links openssl without a license exception

On Sep 4, 2010, at 11:42 AM, Ola Lundqvist wrote: Hi Luca On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 11:20:22AM +0200, Luca Deri wrote: Ola first of all please package ntop 4 not 3. Ok. I have given over the maintenance of ntop to Jordan who is Cc on this email. I think Jordan is working

Bug#595450: ntop: ascii data files in /etc is a violation of FHS

interpre -- debconf information excluded -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / o...@debian.org Annebergsslingan 37 \ | o...@inguza.com 654 65 KARLSTAD | | http://inguza.com/ +46 (0)70-332

Bug#595446: ntop: GPL code links openssl without a license exception

suggests: pn graphviznone (no description available) ii gsfonts 1:8.11+urwcyr1.0.7~pre44-4.2 Fonts for the Ghostscript interpre -- debconf information excluded -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / o...@debian.org

Bug#595450: ntop: ascii data files in /etc is a violation of FHS

-- - Ola Lundqvist --- / o...@debian.org Annebergsslingan 37 \ | o...@inguza.com 654 65 KARLSTAD | | http://inguza.com/ +46 (0)70-332 1551 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36

Bug#595446: ntop: GPL code links openssl without a license exception

:37 AM, Ola Lundqvist wrote: Hi Luca I got this bug in Debian. Do you have any good idea on how we can solve this. Can you release a special 3.3 version (based on 3.3) that have such an addition to the license? Best regards, // Ola On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 08:25:11PM -0400

Bug#594783: insserv: warning: script 'S06vzquota' missing LSB tags and overrides

3.0.3-2fast remote file copy program (lik Versions of packages vzctl suggests: pn linux-patch-openvznone (no description available) -- no debconf information -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / o

Bug#584824: ntop and logcheck-database: error when trying to install together

://edos.debian.net/file-overwrites/. -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / o...@debian.org Annebergsslingan 37 \ | o...@inguza.com 654 65 KARLSTAD | | http://inguza.com/ +46 (0)70-332 1551

Bug#566758: xvnc4viewer doesn't deal with bindv6only=1

Thanks. Fix is now in upload queue. // Ola On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 04:21:46PM +0100, Maurice Massar wrote: hi, On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 07:37:13AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 17:01:54 -0700, Glen Reesor wrote: Here's the xvnc4viewer part of the output from

Bug#566758: xvnc4viewer doesn't deal with bindv6only=1

' and look for the right port number. Also check if echo 0 /proc/sys/net/ipv6/bindv6only before starting it makes things work (if it does, that's a bug in the package, so it needs to be reported). Cheers, Julien -- - Ola Lundqvist

Bug#561563: backport: Bug#561563:

being who wants me to know what I can do. Anonymous,http://www.securityfocus.com/columnists/420 -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / o...@debian.org Annebergsslingan 37 \ | o...@inguza.com 654 65 KARLSTAD

Bug#561563: vzctl: Unable to set capability: Operation not permitted

Hi Could you please try what Daniel did, simply to reinstall the package from stable and see if that solves your problem. Best regards, // Ola On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 10:06:10AM +0100, A Mennucc wrote: Package: vzctl Version: 3.0.22-14 Severity: grave Justification: renders package

Bug#560949: CVE-2009-3560 and CVE-2009-3720 denial-of-services

=1.164r2=1.165 [3] http://expat.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/expat/expat/lib/xmltok_impl.c?r1=1.13r2=1.15view=patch -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / o...@debian.org Annebergsslingan 37 \ | o...@inguza.com 654 65

Bug#558433: nwatch fails to start with a Can't locate PortScan/ScannedHost.pm error

Now removed from the archive. // Ola On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 09:20:52PM +0100, Fabrice Coutadeur wrote: Hi Ola, Ola Lundqvist escribió: Ok, good to know. In that case I suggest that we remove the nwatch package from Debian, unless someone steps forward and port it to the later versions

Bug#558433: nwatch fails to start with a Can't locate PortScan/ScannedHost.pm error

-updates'), (500, 'karmic-security'), (500, 'karmic') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.31-15-generic (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- - Ola Lundqvist

Bug#558433: nwatch fails to start with a Can't locate PortScan/ScannedHost.pm error

. Thanks, Fabrice Ola Lundqvist escribió: Hi Fabrice Do you have the package nmap installed? // Ola -- --- Inguza Technology AB --- MSc in Information Technology / o...@inguza.comAnnebergsslingan 37\ | o...@debian.org 654 65

Bug#558433: rm -- nwatch

-- maintainer of nwatch On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 09:20:52PM +0100, Fabrice Coutadeur wrote: Hi Ola, Ola Lundqvist escribió: Ok, good to know. In that case I suggest that we remove the nwatch package from Debian, unless someone steps forward and port it to the later versions. What do you think? I

Bug#552897: vzquota: FTBFS: vzdqload.c:23:1: error: __USE_ISOC99 redefined

| -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / o...@debian.org Annebergsslingan 37 \ | o...@inguza.com 654 65 KARLSTAD | | http://inguza.com/ +46 (0)70-332 1551 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4

Bug#527757: ntop-3.3 - libtool compile errors

Hi Anand Please use the latest version from unstable. If you run dpkg-buildpackage it will build fine. I do not want to answer all the questions about the quirks I have needed in order to make things work, they are simply too many... :-) Best regards, // Ola Quoting Anand Raj Manickam

Bug#548920: Uninstallable as ndiff has been removed

is uninstallable as one of its dependencies ndiff has been removed from unstable. Cheers Luk -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / o...@debian.org Annebergsslingan 37 \ | o...@inguza.com 654 65 KARLSTAD

Bug#543312: CVE-2009-2732: Basic Authentication Null Pointer Denial of Service

) iEYEARECAAYFAkqSNzUACgkQNxpp46476aqaRwCePEnRlTpotXKtcCnxSRnqbSoX imEAnRKiKt/JAzk57KKzHsAMFEo/v66K =DhPT -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / o...@debian.org Annebergsslingan 37 \ | o...@inguza.com 654 65 KARLSTAD

  1   2   3   4   >