Bug#388691: ibm-3270: Licensing issues

2006-09-22 Thread Bastian Blank
tags 388691 moreinfo thanks On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 09:36:24PM -0300, Wagner Bruna wrote: The copyright file for ibm-3270 says: Copyrights on x3270 are a work in progress and any assistance in clarifying them would be appreciated. but there's no active bug about some issues. So it is

Processed: Re: Bug#388691: ibm-3270: Licensing issues

2006-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 388691 moreinfo Bug#388691: ibm-3270: Licensing issues There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#388691: ibm-3270: Licensing issues

2006-09-22 Thread Wagner Bruna
--- Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Particularly, public use needs clarification: Copyright 1989 by Georgia Tech Research Corporation, Atlanta, GA 30332. All Rights Reserved. GTRC hereby grants public use of this software. Neither I nor the ftp-team see a problem with that.

Bug#388691: ibm-3270: Licensing issues

2006-09-22 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:47:55PM -0300, Wagner Bruna wrote: --- Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Particularly, public use needs clarification: Copyright 1989 by Georgia Tech Research Corporation, Atlanta, GA 30332. All Rights Reserved. GTRC hereby grants public use of

Bug#388691: ibm-3270: Licensing issues

2006-09-22 Thread Wagner Bruna
[sent also to debian-legal for advice] --- Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:47:55PM -0300, Wagner Bruna wrote: --- Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Particularly, public use needs clarification: Copyright 1989 by Georgia Tech Research

Bug#388691: ibm-3270: Licensing issues

2006-09-22 Thread Wagner Bruna
--- Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [public use] Your reading of this clause is not the plain English reading of it. public use does not mean use in public, in means use by the public -- i.e., use by anyone. I don't know if it is clear enough, at least for a non-native English

Bug#388691: ibm-3270: Licensing issues

2006-09-22 Thread Steve Langasek
severity 388691 normal thanks On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 07:19:16PM -0300, Wagner Bruna wrote: [public use] Your reading of this clause is not the plain English reading of it. public use does not mean use in public, in means use by the public -- i.e., use by anyone. I don't know if it is

Processed: Re: Bug#388691: ibm-3270: Licensing issues

2006-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 388691 normal Bug#388691: ibm-3270: Licensing issues Severity set to `normal' from `serious' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#388691: ibm-3270: Licensing issues

2006-09-21 Thread Wagner Bruna
Package: ibm-3270 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.3 The copyright file for ibm-3270 says: Copyrights on x3270 are a work in progress and any assistance in clarifying them would be appreciated. but there's no active bug about some issues. Particularly, public use needs clarification: