Hi,
Chris Hildebrandt wrote:
> the issue is independend from upgrading or fresh install. No, it does
> not work after killing the processes.
Hrm.
> Yes, the problem does affect openoffice.org-base only, all other modules
> did and do work fine.
OK.
> By the way, the sun-java6 bug mentioned bef
found 527910 1:3.1.0~rc2-1
thanks
Hi,
Thomas Florek wrote:
> Package: openoffice.org-base
> Version: 1:3.1.0-1
>
> --- Please enter the report below this line. ---
> I am one of the sid users mentioned by Chris Hildebrandt who noticed
^ ux.
> this bug too and even before h
Hi,
Torsten Wohlfarth wrote:
> As the other reporters told, openoffice base does not start.
> It doesn't matter, if i start with oobase or from a running other aplication.
> No error-message in terminal, but a running soffice.bin process.
What exactly does a "me, too" message without any addition
tag 527910 - unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
Chris Hildebrandt wrote:
> the issue is independend from upgrading or fresh install. No, it does
OK, I just logged in into a fresh chrot + apt-get installed OOo and OpenJDK.
Yes, it doesn't start :/
Now to find out why it works in my normal sid...
Grüße/
tag 520944 + confirmed
tag 520944 + help
thanks
{ CC'ing debian-python }
Hi,
Adrià Cereto Massagué wrote:
> the problem seems to be specifically in the module pyuno. Here's the
> traceback
> in an interactive python shell:
>
> Python 2.5.4 (r254:67916, Feb 18 2009, 03:00:47)
> [GCC 4.3.3] on
Hi,
Chris Cheney wrote:
> Apparently they did not fix this in ooo-build-3-0-1 for whatever
> reason...
>
> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448776
how exactly does that have to do with 520944? In 3.0.1 it works.
In 3.1 it does not. With Python 2.*5*.
When I build with python 2.6 I of
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Chris Cheney wrote:
> > Apparently they did not fix this in ooo-build-3-0-1 for whatever
> > reason...
> >
> > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448776
>
> how exactly does that have to do with 520944? In 3.0.1 it works.
&g
retitle 521741 conflicting build-deps: libraptor1-dev / libcurl4-openssl-dev
tag 521741 + sid
thanks
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Your message dated Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:21:13 +
> with message-id
> and subject line Bug#521741: fixed in openoffice.org 1:3.0.1-9
> has caused the Debian Bu
Hi,
Philipp Kern wrote:
> > /build/buildd-openoffice.org_3.0.1-9-i386-T7P7Im/openoffice.org-3.0.1/ooo-build/build/OOO300_m15/binfilter/bf_starmath/source/starmath_smmod.cxx:277:
> > internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
> > Please submit a full bug report,
> > with preprocessed source if ap
Hi,
Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> Your package writer2latex seems failing to build from source in a pbuilder
> sid
> chroot :
>
> [javac] --
> [javac] 16. ERROR in /home/drazzib/Dev/debian-
> pkg/work/rebuild/build/writer2latex/writer2latex-0.5.0.2/sourc
> [javac] e/writer2la
Hi,
Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> > Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> >> [javac] 20. ERROR in /home/drazzib/Dev/debian-
> >> pkg/work/rebuild/build/writer2latex/writer2latex-0.5.0.2/sourc
> >> [javac] e/writer2latex/filter/ByteArrayXStream.java (at line 39)
> >> [javac]import com.sun
tag 521035 + pending
thanks
[ Ccing boost maintainers for reference ]
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> forwarded 521035 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490044
As I Have thorsten the bt and he posted it there, boost was involved in the
backtrace [1]
and given the histories of
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> tag 521035 + pending
> thanks
>
> [ Ccing boost maintainers for reference ]
>
> Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > forwarded 521035 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490044
>
> As I Have thorsten the bt and he posted it there, boost was i
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Turned out to have a completely different root cause and that it actually also
> crashes on amd64 given the "right" circumstances.
Workaround: apt-get install openoffice.org-ogltrans.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard --
found 523044 1:2.4.1-7
severity 523044 important
thanks
Sami Liedes wrote:
> Something, presumably in openoffice.org or in pre/postinstall,
> modifies the file
>
> /usr/lib/openoffice/basis3.0/share/config/javasettingsunopkginstall.xml
Yep. unopkg.
Besides that, every extension packages has it r
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > modified. I know I have not modified it by hand.
> >
> > It's not a file which is supposed to be edited by the user anyway.
>
> OK, what would you suggest instead? /etc doesn't work either. Which leaves
> us with /var/spoo
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Sami Liedes wrote:
> > Something, presumably in openoffice.org or in pre/postinstall,
> > modifies the file
> >
> > /usr/lib/openoffice/basis3.0/share/config/javasettingsunopkginstall.xml
>
> Yep. unopkg.
> Besides that, every ext
Mohammed Sameer wrote:
> This is insane from OOo!
No one denied this. When Debian followed upstream 1:1 you would not be
able at all to share the dicts between the apps and ship the stuff (at least)
theree times: .oxt for OOo, xpi (or putting it in one dir specific for
the used mozilla product) fo
severity 523643 important
thanks
Hi,
Chris Cheney wrote:
> hunspell-fr is missing the symlink for fr_MC which is listed in its old
> usr/share/myspell/infos/ooo/hunspell-fr file. This causes it to not be
> usable in that country.
And why is this grave? This would be grave if it wasn't working in
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Mohammed Sameer wrote:
> > This is insane from OOo!
>
> No one denied this. When Debian followed upstream 1:1 you would not be
> able at all to share the dicts between the apps and ship the stuff (at least)
> theree times: .oxt for OOo, xpi (or
Package: libxml2
Version: 2.7.3.dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
debian/copyright of libxml2_2.7.3.dfsg-2 says:
"t was downloaded from ftp.gnome.org."
But on ftp.gnome.org there's nothing newer than 2.6 anymore, maybe
you want to point to ftp://xmlsoft.org/libxml2/?
Grüße/Regards,
Rene
signatur
2.1
+- utf8'ize debian/copyright
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:06:37 +0200
+
myspell-sv (1.3.8-6-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Updated the address to the fsf in the copyright file.
diff -u myspell-sv-1.3.8-6/debian/copyright myspell-sv-1.3.8-6/debian/copyright
--- myspell-sv-1.3.8-
Hi,
Aris Karagiannidis wrote:
> Hello, openoffice crashes when i try to have two instances open, for example
> oocalc and antother oocalc for another spreadsheet.
> oocalc and oodraw where i copy a chart from oocalc to edit it.
>
> openoffice crashes as soon as o type the oo${name} on the alt+f2
clone 513743 -1
reassign -1 gcc-4.3
reopen -1
# maybe before, but that's the first version which appears in a buildog
# of a build causing a broken version
found -1 4.3.2-4
thanks
Hi,
ok, OOo is now fixed in testing by a bin-NMU with testings gcc (and that's
what will be in lenny), but it still i
reassign 514830 gcc-4.3
found 514830 4.3.2-4
tag 514830 + sid
severity 514830 important
thanks
Hi,
Matthias Klose wrote:
> reassign 514830 openoffice.org
> thanks
No. The bug is worked around for Debian in lenny. Please don't give the OOo
packages a RC bug right now.
Set it to important or what
clone 515265 -1
retitle -1 RM: aria -- ROM; Depends on GTK 1.2
reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
thanks
Hi,
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> aria build-depends on libgtk1.2-dev, which will be removed for Squeeze.
>
> Please port it to use GTK 2 or request it's removal.
OK, let's do the latter.
Grüße/Regar
clone 515349 -1
retitle -1 RM: manedit -- ROM; Depends on GTK 1.2 and GLIB 1.2
reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
thanks
Hi,
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> manedit build-depends on libgtk1.2-dev and libglib1.2-dev, which will
> be removed for Squeeze.
>
> Please port it to GTK 2 or request it's removal.
O
severity 516090 serious
retitle 516090 dependencies allow mixture of 2.4.1 arch-dep with 3.0.1
arch-indep which fails to start
reassign 516090 openoffice.org
reopen 516084
severity 516084 serious
forcemerge 516090 516084
found 516090thanks
Hi,
jblanc wrote:
> Package: openoffice.org-core
> Versi
Hi,
Julien Blanc wrote:
> Looks also like there is a dependancy problem.
Maybe, yes.
> I'll try to remove and reinstall everything, and found the following :
>
> apt-get install openoffice.org-core -V
> Les NOUVEAUX paquets suivants seront installés :
>openoffice.org-common (3.0.1-2)
>o
Hi,
Julien Blanc wrote:
> In fact, i'm saying wrong version, because i would expect apt-get not to
> install anything in this case (not migrating to 3.0 since there is a
> dependancy breakage). This is what it does when installing, unfortunately not
There is no dependency breakage. The dependenci
Hi,
Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> I think that the Conflicts is correct, because this is really what happens.
> Both libcolamd-3.2.0_3.2.0-2 and libsuitesparse-3.2.0_3.2.0-1 cannot be
> installed together.
Yep.
> On the other hand, I think that the Replaces is perhaps inappropriate because
> libc
# also in stable
found 516784 1:2.4.1-7
thanks
Hi,
Simon Josefsson wrote:
>
> openoffice.org-3.0.1/ooo-build/src/OOo_3.0.1rc2_rev2_src_extensions.tar.bz2:OOO300_m15/jfreereport/download/liblayout.zip:liblayout/resource/rfc1345.txt
>
> I looked into this more carefully, and it seems the openo
tag 516784 + pending
thanks
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Simon Josefsson wrote:
> >
> > openoffice.org-3.0.1/ooo-build/src/OOo_3.0.1rc2_rev2_src_extensions.tar.bz2:OOO300_m15/jfreereport/download/liblayout.zip:liblayout/resource/rfc1345.txt
OK; will be fixed in stable with th
Package: openoffice.org-core
Severity: serious
Version: 1:3.0.1-3
Hi,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> what I get is
>
> |~# apt-get dist-upgrade
> |Reading package lists... Done
> |Building dependency tree
> |Reading state information... Done
> |Calculating upgrade... Done
> |The follo
C
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: Re: Bug#517001: openoffice.org-writer2latex: error when adding
extension
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To: <20090225001838.7457.83271.report...@xerces>
X-PGP-Key: 248AEB73
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Organization: The Debian Project
Sam
severity 517032 important
tag 517032 + unreproducible
tag 517032 + moreinfo
thanks
Vsevolod Krishchenko wrote:
> Package: b43-fwcutter
> Version: 1:011-5
> Severity: grave
What saiys that extracting the firmware on postinstall is
an integral part of this package? ;-) It's just for convenience.
T
tag 517001 + unreproducible
tag 517001 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Sam Morris wrote:
> When upgrading today:
>
> Setting up openoffice.org-writer2latex (0.5.0.2-2) ...
> Adding extension
> /usr/lib/openoffice/share/extension/install/writer2latex.oxt...An error
> occurred while enabling: writer2latex
Hi,
Sam Morris wrote:
> Setting up openoffice.org-writer2latex (0.5.0.2-2) ...
> Adding extension
> /usr/lib/openoffice/share/extension/install/writer2latex.oxt...An error
> occurred while enabling: writer2latex-filter.jar
> done.
Hmm
> Versions of packages openoffice.org-writer2latex dep
Hi,
Sam Morris wrote:
> > > Setting up openoffice.org-writer2latex (0.5.0.2-2) ...
> > > Adding extension
> > > /usr/lib/openoffice/share/extension/install/writer2latex.oxt...An error
> > > occurred while enabling: writer2latex-filter.jar
> >
> > I like unopkgs (non-)verboseness. Was the extens
reassign 517001 openoffice.org-core
retitle 517001 missing conflicts against 3.x' -java-common, unopkg fails on
Java extensions
severity 517001 serious
tag 517001 + pending
thanks
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > Maybe this mismatch causes it. Can you (if you still can reproduce
&
Hi,
Matthias Klose wrote:
> no, this is likely a bug in OOo. before re-assigning this again:
>
> - please find out if it is fixed in 3.0.x (apparently it is)
Yes.
> - please find out if it is fixed in 2.4.2 (apparently you are not
>interested in it).
Apparently not. Someone from Gentoo s
close 490820 2.63-1
thanks
Hi,
if this is fixed in 2.63, why is this bug still open (and worse: confuses
users that it will applies on sid dist-upgrades, where sid just got 2.63-3)?
(apt-listbugs showed it, so I cancelled my dist-upgrade and put it on
hold - according to Juliens comment it was no
tag 517738 + pending
tag 517738 + sid
thanks
Hi,
Daniel Schepler wrote:
> From my pbuilder build log:
>
> ...
> checking for perl... /usr/bin/perl
> checking the Perl version... checked (perl 5)
> checking for required Perl modules... all modules found
> ./configure: line 6568: test: : integer e
found 518975 1:2.4.0-3
thanks
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Package: myspell-en-us
> Version: 1:3.0.1-5
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> Your package is failing to purge:
> Removing myspell-en-us ...
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/myspell-en-us.postrm: line 6:
> update-openoffice-dicts: command not found
> dpkg: er
Hi,
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Policy is pretty clear on this. You can not rely on Depends being
> present during the purge phase.
But that call is in *remove*, not purge.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debia
clone 518975 -1
reassign -1 dictionaries-common-dev
retitle -1 should guard update-openoffice-dicts call with -x
severity -1 wishlist
tags 518975 + moreinfo help
thanks
Hi,
Agustin Martin wrote:
>
> > [...]
> > dpkg: dependency problems prevent removal of dictionaries-common:
> > myspell-en-us
reopen 524658
close 534658 1:3.1.1~ooo310m14-1
thanks
Hi,
oops, typoed the bugnr in the changelog. sorry :-)
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AE
Package: petc
Version: 3.0.0.dfsg-5
Severity: serious
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=petsc;ver=3.0.0.dfsg-5;arch=hppa;stamp=1246379358:
[...]
dpkg-source: extracting petsc in petsc-3.0.0.dfsg
dpkg-source: info: unpacking petsc_3.0.0.dfsg.orig.tar.gz
dpkg-source: info: applying petsc_3.0.
table; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * fix Build-Depends for new dpkg-dev (closes: #535276)
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard Fri, 03 Jul 2009 10:31:34 +0200
+
petsc (3.0.0.dfsg-5) unstable; urgency=medium
* Removed babel-1.2.0 and libsidl-dev from Build-Depends (closes: #529485).
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 09:57:05PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> > kword? I think the package is useful with kword/kthesaurus from koffice2, so
> > not sure remove it is nice.
> >
>
> Ping?
Pong.
> Could you remove this? koffice is gone =)
I know, and thus upgraded the bug to serious some t
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 02:30:53PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> The attached patch fixes #531443.
... and introduces a "FTBFSed-when-build-two-times-in-a-row" bug...
Grüße/Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.de
Package: boost1.39
Version: 1.39.0-1
Severity: serious
[ normally, on boost1.39 this would be important only as boost1.39
didn't ever build for mips, but now that you changed libboost-dev
to boost 1.39 without even waiting for all architectures being at least
there makes now all packages build-dep
Package: unixodbc-dev
Version: 2.2.11-17
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
sqlext.h etc. seems to be gone in -17:
$ debdiff unixodbc-dev_2.2.11-16_amd64.deb unixodbc-dev_2.2.11-17_amd64.deb
[The following lists of changes regard files as different if they have
different nam
severity 405559 important
tag 405559 + moreinfo
tag 405559 + unreproducible
thanks
Juergen Kosel wrote:
> like the machine of Brian Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> my computer
> also runs debian etch for amd64 and the same versions of openoffice.org
> and related packages are installed. (At least on the
severity 405679 important
retitle 405679 [fixed for 2.2, cws cmcfixes30] Buffer overflows in
EnhWMFReader::ReadEnhWMF and WMFReader::ReadRecordParams
merge 405679 405679
# fixed package for sarge already at the security team
found 405679 1.1.3-9sarge3
close 405679 1.1.3-9sarge4
thanks
Hi,
Daniel
Package: hunspell-uz
Version: 0.6-1
Severity: serious
You need to conflict against all Mozillas/Ice* because they still use
myspell. hunspell is compatible with myspell but the other way round is
not sure.
Please conflict against mozilla-browser, iceape-browser, firefox, thunderbird,
iceweasel,
close 405986 1.1.3-9sarge4
close 405986 2.0.4-1
reassign 405986 openoffice.org
merge 405986 405679
thanks
Hi,
Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> >>From http://secunia.com/advisories/23612/ :
>
> A vulnerability has been reported in OpenOffice, which potentially
> can be exploited by malicious people to com
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 06:38:04PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Package: hunspell-uz
> > Version: 0.6-1
> > Severity: serious
>
> > You need to conflict against all Mozillas/Ice* because they still use
> > myspell. hunspell is compa
tag 408013 + moreinfo
tag 408013 + unreproducible
Hi,
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 05:25:08PM -0500, A. Maitland Bottoms wrote:
> > $ oowriter
> > no suitable windowing system found, exiting.
>
> > ** (process:26780): WARNING **: Unknown error forking main binary /
> > abnorm
tag 408265 + moreinfo
tag 408265 + unreproducible
thanks
Vincas Ciziunas wrote:
> Package: openoffice
> Version: ooffice
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Running openoffice results in this. The same goes for oowriter and oocalc.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ooffice
tag 409225 + moreinfo
severity 409225 important
reassign 409225 pythoon-central
thanks
Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> Today while trying to update python-uno from version 2.1-2 to 2.1-3,
> I've got:
>
> Preparing to replace python-uno 2.1-2 (using .../python-uno_2.1-3_i386.deb)
> ...
> Traceback
tag 409841 + unreproducible
thanks
Sabine Habouzit wrote:
> When I run oocalc and tries to edit a cell, putting random content (like
> 1234) in it,
> then pressing enter the application totally freezes. Opening an already
> existing oocalc
> spreadsheet also freezes the UI completely.
>
> Attac
reopen 399986
thanks
Still fails with 0.5.12.
Gr��e/Regards,
Ren�
--
.''`. Ren� Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 9
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > reopen 399986
> > thanks
> >
> > Still fails with 0.5.12.
>
> Sorry, you need to provide more info. How exactly have you encountered a
> failure ?
Well, the failure is in the report alr
Package: openoffice.org
Severity: serious
- Forwarded message from Moritz Mühlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Moritz Mühlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Potential non-free content in OpenOffice package
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 10:24:05 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.
Am Mittwoch, 6. Dezember 2006 08:12 schrieben Sie:
> These are probably the same AFM files that were relicensed by Adobe in
> the Public Domain (essentially) in spring. They can be downloaded from
> ftp://cam.ctan.org/tex-archive/fonts/adobe/afm/Adobe-Core35_AFMs-314.tar.gz.
No, they are not.
e.
Package: libneon26-gnutls
Severity: serious
Hi,
bazaar now got NMUed and it now builds against libneon26-gnutls. Which
isn't a problem in itself.
The Problem here is that libneon26 and libneon26-gnutls are *NOT*
parallel installable. This causes bazaar to indirectly conflict with
anything linked
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian.
> This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has
> been received. It is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
> interested parties for their attention; th
severity 402324 serious
thanks
Mike Hommey wrote:
> Package: hunspell
> Severity: grave
serious, not grave.
> hunspell's copyright file points to
> /usr/share/doc/mozilla-browser/MPL-1.1.txt.gz
> for the MPL license, while this file disappeared due to mozilla removal from
> the archive.
>
> Pe
tag 403728 + pending
thanks
Am Dienstag, 19. Dezember 2006 13:06 schrieb Martin Orr:
> When I try to upgrade to openoffice.org in experimental, I get
> dpkg: error processing
> /var/cache/apt/archives/openoffice.org-style-default_2.1~rc2-1_all.deb
> (--unpack):
> trying to overwrite /usr/lib/open
severity 403728 serious
reassign 403728
openoffice.org-style-default,openoffice.org-style-industrial,openoffice.org-style-hicontrast,openoffice.org-style-crystal
thanks
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 19. Dezember 2006 13:06 schrieb Martin Orr:
> Package: openoffice.org-style-default
> Version: 2.1~rc2-1
> Sev
severity 404105 important
thanks
Am Donnerstag, 21. Dezember 2006 20:29 schrieb Stefan Fritsch:
> Package: openoffice.org
> Version: 2.0.4.dfsg.2-1
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
>
>
> openoffice.org crashes when loading the exploit from [1]. There is
> i
reopen 396225
severity 396225 grave
retitle 396225 -2 "poisoned" hosts
found 396225 1.1.1-2
retitle 394862 RM: openoffice.org-soikko -- RoOOoM; unmaintained upstream,
buggy, non-free, superseded by -voikko
thanks
Hi,
Am Freitag, 3. November 2006 10:16 schrieben Sie:
> ok, i'll give up on this.
Am Dienstag, 7. November 2006 19:03 schrieb brian jones:
> i'm having the same problem installing openoffice.org. this is
> debian-amd64 stable.
^^^
Which doesn't have OOo for amd64. And never will get. etch/sid have it.
So this one is completely normal.
Hint: openoffice.org was
# I'd consider it grave, as it was once for fontconfig but now is important
severity 398923 important
reassign 398923 fontconfig
forcemerge 393909 398923
thanks
Am Donnerstag, 16. November 2006 16:39 schrieb Hendrik Naumann:
> Setting up ttf-opensymbol (2.0.4-7) ...
> Updating fontconfig cache
severity 380513 important
tag 380513 + moreinfo
thanks
Thomas Zander wrote:
> Subject: openoffice.org-writer: 2.0.3 has wrong colors and misses text in
> anchored frames
> Package: openoffice.org-writer
> Version: 2.0.3-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Wow. And i
notfound 384727 2.0.3-3
found 384727 2.0.4~ood680m1-1
severity 384727 important
tag 384727 + confirmed
tag 384727 + pending
tag 384727 + experimental
retitle 384727 openoffice.org-2.0.4~ood680m1 failes to compile on amd64, tries
to find unowinreg.dll
thanks
Hi,
Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
> Pack
tag 385149 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 29. August 2006 15:50 schrieb Mechtilde:
> > Starting from terminal gives: *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid
> > pointer: 0xb61ed890 ***
> >
> > Not sure if relevant but kernel patched with Ingo Molnar’s realtime
> > preemption patch
Can you tr
Package: gjdoc
Version: 0.7.7-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
gcj-4.1 got uploaded to sid today changing libgc7 to libcj7-0.
gjdoc needs to be rebuilt aginst libgcj7-0.
Regards,
Rene
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'ex
Package: libdbus-1-dev
Version: 0.92-2
Severity: grave
Hi,
I just tried to rebuild OOo 2.0.4 rc1 against the new libdbus-1-3 (which
incidentially was uploaded as I wanted to upload 2.0.4~rc1 to
unstable); aas I needed to do this I and this failed:
ccache g++ -fsigned-char -fmessage-length=0
Hi,
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> # apt-get install openoffice.org-dtd-officedocument1.0
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree... Done
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
> openoffice.org-dtd-officedocument1.0
> 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 185 not upgra
severity 387138 important
forwarded 387138 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tag 387138 ++ moreinfo
merge 377163 387138
thanks
Brent S. Elmer wrote:
> Openoffice.org displays the splash screen then gives the following error
> on startup. I had the problem in 2.0.3-6 so I tried the version in
> unstable to see i
Hi,
please find includeda the -13.2 NMU diff for this bug.
--- xkbsel-0.13/debian/changelog
+++ xkbsel-0.13/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+xkbsel (0.13-13.2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * NMU
+ * remove obsolete libxaw6-dev build-dependency (closes: #386223)
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard <[EM
7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
--- changelog.old 2006-09-16 12:14:49.0 +0200
+++ changelog 2006-09-16 12:06:33.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+debmirror (20060907.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * NMU
+ * depend on libdigest-sha1-perl (closes: #386707)
+
+ -- Rene Engelha
Package: texlive-lang-cyrillic
Severity: serious
dpkg: error processing
/media/usbdisk/debian/pool/main/t/texlive-lang/texlive-lang-cyrillic_2007-2_all.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man1/rubibtex.1.gz', which is also in
package tetex-bin
texlive-lang-cyrillic needs a Rep
Package: texlive-font-utils
Severity: serious
Selecting previously deselected package texlive-font-utils.
Unpacking texlive-font-utils (from .../texlive-font-utils_2007-2_powerpc.deb)
...
dpkg: error processing
/media/usbdisk/debian/pool/main/t/texlive-bin/texlive-font-utils_2007-2_powerpc.deb
Package: texlive-latex-base
Severity: serious
on my dist-upgrade:
Selecting previously deselected package texlive-latex-base.
Unpacking texlive-latex-base (from .../texlive-latex-base_2007-2_all.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/media/usbdisk/debian/pool/main/t/texlive-base/texlive-latex-base_200
Hi,
Frank Küster wrote:
> I don't think this is the correct solution. We already have
>
> conflicts;texlive-common;tetex-bin (<< 2007), tetex-base (<< 2007),
> tetex-extra (<< 2007), tetex-doc (<< 2007)
>
> Furthermore, in all of Rene's reports there is something like
>
> Versions of packages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Frank Küster wrote:
> > I don't think this is the correct solution. We already have
> >
> > conflicts;texlive-common;tetex-bin (<< 2007), tetex-base (<< 2007),
> &g
Hi,
Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Fre, 13 Apr 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
> > > Just a plain upgrade out of aptitudes UI.
> > > And no, I didn't use any --force foo. I wouldn't have reported a bug if
> > > I had.
>
> Did you select the tetex-bin 2007 packages for removal??
>
> My only explanation i
Package: dbus
Version: 1.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
see e.g.
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=openoffice.org;ver=2.2.0-4;arch=i386;stamp=1176796749:
[...]
Setting up dbus (1.0.2-2) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/dbus.postinst: line 21: ps: command not found
Removing stale PID file /var/run/dbus/p
Hi,
Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> > see e.g.
> > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=openoffice.org;ver=2.2.0-4;arch=i386;stamp=1176796749:
> >
> > [...]
> > Setting up dbus (1.0.2-2) ...
> > /var/lib/dpkg/info/dbus.postinst: line 21: ps: command not found
>
> ps, command not found ? ps is part of
Package: libcurl4-openssl-dev
Severity: grave
Hi,
as you spoke on -release about a curl transition I wanted to do a testbuild
an installed libcurl4-openssl-dev.
The build breaks:
ccache g++ -Wl,-z,combreloc -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,-rpath,'$ORIGIN' -Wl,-zdynsort
-shared -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--version-script
..
Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> i just uploaded 7.16.2-1 to experimental, i also fixed this bug. please,
> cpuld you redo the test with this new version?
I tested again after installing libcurl4-openssl. And this indeed works.
Will try with 7.16.2-1 once its rebuilt for amd64 here.
Gr??e/Regards,
Re
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > i just uploaded 7.16.2-1 to experimental, i also fixed this bug. please,
> > cpuld you redo the test with this new version?
>
> I tested again after installing libcurl4-openssl. And this indeed works.
> Will try
severity 420803 grave
thanks
Sam Morris wrote:
> Package: openoffice.org-dev-doc
> Version: 2.0.4.dfsg.2-5etch1
> Severity: serious
Hmm. You probably meant "grave".
> The tags in /usr/lib/openoffice/sdk/docs/DevelopersGuide_intro.html
> seem to be screwed up, resulting in most of the informatio
Package: java-gcj-compat-dev
Version: 1.0.65-10
Severity: serious
Hi,
Richte java-gcj-compat-dev ein (1.0.65-10) ...
file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libgij.so
file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libgcj.so
file does not exist: /usr/lib/
Package: ecj-gcj
Version: 3.2.2-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
(as already told on IRC)
While installing the new gcj (sorry, german):
$ sudo dpkg -i *ecj*deb
(Lese Datenbank ... 292312 Dateien und Verzeichnisse sind derzeit installiert.)
Vorbereiten zum Ersetzen von ecj 3.2.2-1 (durch ecj_3.2.2-1_all
Package: gcj-4.1
Version: 4.1.2-4
Severity: serious
(as already mentioned on IRC).
the new gcj-4.1 apparently changed location of jawt (and other sos):
libgcj7-1-awt: /usr/lib/gcj-4.1-71/libjawt.so
java-gcj-compat-dev does excpects it on another path:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 2007-04-26 13:50
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
clone 421301 -1
severity -1 important
retitle -1 needs update for new gcj-4.1
reassign -1 java-gcj-compat-dev
thanks
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> java-gcj-compat-dev does excpects it on another path:
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 2007-04-26 13:50
701 - 800 of 1325 matches
Mail list logo
