Re: unmets in potato

2000-03-15 Thread Jeff Licquia
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 10:34:54PM +0100, Matthias Berse wrote: > On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 03:16:56PM +0100, Martin Waitz wrote: > > compile devicd3dfx-source and you are done :) > Am I the only one where make-kpkg modules-image fails on devicd3dfx? I > have to do it manually! But maybe that's relat

Re: The nature of unstable (was: Danger Will Robinson! Danger!)

2000-03-15 Thread Craig Sanders
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 05:27:26PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > Well, it's really sad that you like to dredge up year old context for > this thread to suit your mundane arguments, they have little context > with what I was saying. actually, it's really sad that you haven't learnt that closing down

Re: The nature of unstable (was: Danger Will Robinson! Danger!)

2000-03-15 Thread Craig Sanders
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 11:50:05PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > > > Uh, which were the packages in question? Did you report it at the > > > time? > > > > no need, the holes were already well known - and fixed in unstable. > > Security fixes have to be (and are) fixed in stable, too! most are. cr

Re: The nature of unstable (was: Danger Will Robinson! Danger!)

2000-03-15 Thread Craig Sanders
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 05:43:38PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote: > On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 05:27:26PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > > > it doesn't distract me at all. i mostly ignore it these days as it is of > > > little or no relevance to me. > > > > Safe to say, that is a really self-centered attit

ITP: bdfresize

2000-03-15 Thread Takuo KITAME
Hello. I intent to package bdfresize. ftp://ftp.cs.titech.ac.jp/pub/X11/contrib/Local/bdfresize-1.4.tar.Z> bdfresize - Resize BDF Format Font Bdfresize is a command to magnify or reduce fonts which are described with the standard BDF format. /* * Copyright 1988, 1992 Hiroto Kagotani * *

Re: realplayer installer and frozen

2000-03-15 Thread Joey Hess
Lars Wirzenius wrote: > I agree with Branden: remove the installer from potato. The problem that I forgot to mention is that anyone who upgrades from slink to potato w/o upgrading realplayer, and had realplayer installed via the installer in slink, is going to find that the old realplayer they hav

Re: The nature of unstable (was: Danger Will Robinson! Danger!)

2000-03-15 Thread Steve Greenland
On 14-Mar-00, 18:58 (CST), Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > actually, it's really sad that you haven't learnt that closing down > 'unstable' is a disastrously bad idea. you've been with debian long > enough now to have learnt that. How do you know? We've never tried it. You and others s

Re: WANPIPE X.25

2000-03-15 Thread Nicolás Lichtmaier
> Is there anybody here using the Sangoma WANPIPE cards to do X.25? I'm doing exactly that.

Debian Weekly News - March 14th, 2000

2000-03-15 Thread Joey Hess
-- Debian Weekly News http://www.debian.org/News/weekly/current/issue/ Debian Weekly News - March 14th, 2000 -- Wel

Using Debian's make-kpkg to build kernels

2000-03-15 Thread Chris Fearnley
The Philadelphia Area Debian Society (PADS) (http://www.CJFearnley.com/pads/) presents Using Debian's make-kpkg to build kernels When: Wednesday 15 March 2000, 8:00 PM - 9:30 P

Re: realplayer installer and frozen

2000-03-15 Thread Alex Yukhimets
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 07:09:31PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: > Lars Wirzenius wrote: > > I agree with Branden: remove the installer from potato. > > The problem that I forgot to mention is that anyone who upgrades from slink > to potato w/o upgrading realplayer, and had realplayer installed via the

Re: Debian and GNOME, partnership with Helixcode?

2000-03-15 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
[redirected to debian-devel] On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Fabien Ninoles wrote: > On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 06:29:06PM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > > The KDE packages in CVS contain Debian directories. They are not always > > perfect but allow anyone tracking KDE development to build packages. So > >

Re: The nature of unstable (was: Danger Will Robinson! Danger!)

2000-03-15 Thread Craig Sanders
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 09:23:42PM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote: > On 14-Mar-00, 18:58 (CST), Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > actually, it's really sad that you haven't learnt that closing down > > 'unstable' is a disastrously bad idea. you've been with debian long > > enough now to h

Re: Danger Will Robinson! Danger!

2000-03-15 Thread Erik
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 12:46:39AM +0200, Ari Makela wrote: > John Lapeyre writes: > > >Maybe you find it easy. But you are relatively elite in debian > > knowledge. > > I'm not a beginner. I even earn my living as an unix > administrator. But I'm certainly not a unix guru. > > >I got a

Re: The nature of unstable (was: Danger Will Robinson! Danger!)

2000-03-15 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 06:06:24PM +1100, Craig Sanders écrivait: > and fuck you too! how dare you fucking misrepresent my position and > twist what i said in such a reprehensible manner? > > if you don't fucking understand what i'm saying then shut the fuck up. Could you stop use those FUCKING w

Re: The nature of unstable (was: Danger Will Robinson! Danger!)

2000-03-15 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 12:10:54PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > > > > Uh, which were the packages in question? Did you report it at the > > > > time? > > > > > > no need, the holes were already well known - and fixed in unstable. > > > > Security fixes have to be (and are) fixed in stable, too!

Re: The nature of unstable (was: Danger Will Robinson! Danger!)

2000-03-15 Thread Craig Sanders
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 09:35:35AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Le Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 06:06:24PM +1100, Craig Sanders écrivait: > > and fuck you too! how dare you fucking misrepresent my position and > > twist what i said in such a reprehensible manner? > > > > if you don't fucking understand

Re: The nature of unstable (was: Danger Will Robinson! Danger!)

2000-03-15 Thread Craig Sanders
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 10:05:09AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > > > Security fixes have to be (and are) fixed in stable, too! > > most are. > > IMNSHO *all* of them must be. It would be wrong to leave the users of stable > `in the cold'. Those bugs that aren't fixed in stable are the worst > releas

Re: The nature of unstable (was: Danger Will Robinson! Danger!)

2000-03-15 Thread Miros/law `Jubal' Baran
15.03.2000 pisze Craig Sanders ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): [cut] Gentlemen, I have seen ``South Park: The Movie'' and I like it -- in the cinema. Not here. I don't like to see developers of my favourite Linux distribution to behave in such a childish way. Would you kindly like to get your toys and go t

Embedded(/RT) Debian? Embeddian GNU/Linux?

2000-03-15 Thread W. Borgert
Hi, does anybody know, wether there are ideas or plans to make an Debian GNU/Linux especially for embedded and/or realtime systems, i.e. "Embedian GNU/Linux"? I think, that the Linux Router Project was once based on Debian, but this is very specialised on one task. And I don't know what Mobile L

Re: aptitude

2000-03-15 Thread Robert Ramiega
On Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 08:00:27PM -0500, Fabien Ninoles wrote: > > You just miss another one: sl-stormpkg from Stormix. > Sure, it's not on potato but add > deb ftp://download.stormix.com/storm potato main > in sources.list and install sl-stormpkg. > > It's GPLed, GNOME-based, used whatever com

Re: The nature of unstable (was: Danger Will Robinson! Danger!)

2000-03-15 Thread Craig Sanders
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 09:35:35AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > You have 3 RCB open against your packages (11, 25 and 21 days old), right. one of them for a package (spamdb) which doesn't even exist anymore so it's a bit difficult to see how it could be "release critical". two of them for

Re: The nature of unstable (was: Danger Will Robinson! Danger!)

2000-03-15 Thread John Galt
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Ben Collins wrote: > First of all, you need to check your numbers. Last I checked there were > ~350 official developers in the keyring. Right, so this proves my point in > that we should encourage developers to put a priority on frozen and the > next release cycle. And pleas

I don't get copies of bug reports to my packages

2000-03-15 Thread Gregor Hoffleit
For some reason, since a while I don't get copies of bug reports against my packages mailed to me. I'm tracking debian-bugs-dist now and checking the web page once in a while, but this is less than satisfying. Is this feature of the BTS still supposed to work, and how can I check what goes wrong ?

Re: I don't get copies of bug reports to my packages

2000-03-15 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Gregor Hoffleit wrote: > For some reason, since a while I don't get copies of bug reports against my > packages mailed to me. I'm tracking debian-bugs-dist now and checking the > web page once in a while, but this is less than satisfying. mee too. Same for bug submitters btw, I had to d

ITP: e16keyedit

2000-03-15 Thread Laurence J Lane
e16keyedit is a gtk+ based keybinding editor for the enlightenment window manager. The license is BSD-style. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: I don't get copies of bug reports to my packages

2000-03-15 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > mee too. Same for bug submitters btw, I had to dig into my > debian-bugs-dist folder today to see what a maintainer said to a > bugreport I filed and why it was listed as closed on the rc-bugs page :( Ditto. I was really surprised to find a bug sever

'impact' ttf license?

2000-03-15 Thread Stefan Ott
hello i'm planning to package a perl tool i made (available at http://tools.desire.ch/perlbeat) which includes some gifs using the IMPACT (windows) truetype font. now i wonder if this is ok, because i don't know about impact's license. does anyone? thanks for your help Stefan

Re: Becoming a developer

2000-03-15 Thread John Travers
Kenneth Scharf wrote: > > >From what I read on this subject, I thought that most > of the flame war was on KDE, and that it might be > possible to include KDE IF, they made certain specific > releases in their license. Since I thought that RMS > had appoved the newer QT license as a free license

new version in frozen?

2000-03-15 Thread Michael Meskes
I just checked through the bugs open against quota and found that quite a lot of them are fixed in the new upstream version 2.00-pre4. Yes, it is not final so far but probably will be pretty soon. Now I wonder if it is possible to add this version to frozen. If not all bug fixes have to be backport

Re: new version in frozen?

2000-03-15 Thread Richard Braakman
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 08:32:48AM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote: > I just checked through the bugs open against quota and found that quite a > lot of them are fixed in the new upstream version 2.00-pre4. Yes, it is not > final so far but probably will be pretty soon. Now I wonder if it is > possible

Re: Becoming a developer

2000-03-15 Thread Craig Sanders
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 11:32:42AM +, John Travers wrote: > This is what I have understood so far, but cannot guarentee corectness: > > The free QT liscence with QT2 is a fully valid open source liscence. It > is completely compatible with DFSG. Linking to it with pure GPL code is > not allowe

Re: new version in frozen?

2000-03-15 Thread Michael Stone
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 12:45:40PM +0100, Richard Braakman wrote: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 08:32:48AM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote: > > I just checked through the bugs open against quota and found that quite a > > lot of them are fixed in the new upstream version 2.00-pre4. Yes, it is not > > final

Re: priority of x-window-manager

2000-03-15 Thread Changwoo Ryu
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [policies snipped] > Also, I don't understand what this will buy us. An app, such as a window > manager, can be internationalized, but it might not be localized for the > user's locale. > > IOW, it doesn't seem to me that a window manager is any more

Re: The nature of unstable (was: Danger Will Robinson! Danger!)

2000-03-15 Thread Michael Stone
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 09:03:18PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 09:35:35AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > You have 3 RCB open against your packages (11, 25 and 21 days old), > > two of them for the same package (vtun). again, they hardly seem > "release critical" >

Permission policy

2000-03-15 Thread Volker Ossenkopf
I need some advice to solve a recent bug report regarding a frozen package. The program needs rx-permissions for a device belonging to the cdrom group and rw-permissions for a device belonging to the audio group. Until now the program is sgid cdrom to work correctly with the cdrom-device without

Re: The nature of unstable (was: Danger Will Robinson! Danger!)

2000-03-15 Thread Craig Sanders
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 07:07:51AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 09:03:18PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > > i haven't yet decided what to do about vtun. i'll probably get around > > to upgrading it to the latest version one day, but i made a mistake > > packaging it in the f

Re: aptitude

2000-03-15 Thread Fabien Ninoles
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 10:55:38AM +0100, Robert Ramiega wrote: > On Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 08:00:27PM -0500, Fabien Ninoles wrote: > > > > You just miss another one: sl-stormpkg from Stormix. > > Sure, it's not on potato but add > > deb ftp://download.stormix.com/storm potato main > > in sources.l

Re: The nature of unstable (was: Danger Will Robinson! Danger!)

2000-03-15 Thread Michael Stone
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 11:18:49PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 07:07:51AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 09:03:18PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > > > i haven't yet decided what to do about vtun. i'll probably get around > > > to upgrading it to the

Re: I don't get copies of bug reports to my packages

2000-03-15 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 11:25:47AM +0100, Gregor Hoffleit wrote: > For some reason, since a while I don't get copies of bug reports against my > packages mailed to me. I'm tracking debian-bugs-dist now and checking the > web page once in a while, but this is less than satisfying. I noticed that [E

Re: The nature of unstable (was: Danger Will Robinson! Danger!)

2000-03-15 Thread Raphael Hertzog
[ ok I'll keep calm this time ] Le Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 09:03:18PM +1100, Craig Sanders écrivait: > right. one of them for a package (spamdb) which doesn't even exist > anymore so it's a bit difficult to see how it could be "release > critical". That's possible, but then it would be great if you

Re: priority of x-window-manager

2000-03-15 Thread Tomohiro KUBOTA
Hi, From: Changwoo Ryu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: priority of x-window-manager Date: 15 Mar 2000 21:04:47 +0900 > Korean (and maybe Japanese) X users often see the Netscape titlebar > incorrectly displays Korean web page title. Many of the window > managers still don't care about this and

Re: The nature of unstable (was: Danger Will Robinson! Danger!)

2000-03-15 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 03:24:29AM -0700, John Galt wrote: > On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Ben Collins wrote: > > > > First of all, you need to check your numbers. Last I checked there were > > ~350 official developers in the keyring. Right, so this proves my point in > > that we should encourage develop

Apt-Problem

2000-03-15 Thread Andreas Tille
Hallo, since last week I have a problem when upgrading potato. In the dselect install process after obtaining the necessary packages I get mysterious "Size mismatch" for all packages. All the packages are stored /var/cache/apt/archives/partial and a `dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/partial/*

Re: The nature of unstable (was: Danger Will Robinson! Danger!)

2000-03-15 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
Steve Greenland wrote: > There is nothing stopping anyone from making snapshot releases of > unstable. Mirror the archive. Burn a CD. Done. That's what a snapshot > is. As one of the many people who does not have cheap, fast, reliable internet access, I would like to say that for me to mirror 650

Re: Apt-Problem

2000-03-15 Thread Syed Khader Vali
> On Wed, 15 Mar 2000 14:17:54 +0100 (CET), Andreas Tille <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> said: Andreas> http://ftp.tu-clausthal.de/pub/linux/debian/dists/frozen/main/binary-i386/devel/libtool_1.3.3-9.deb Andreas> Size mismatch E: Unable to fetch some archives, maybe try Andreas> with -

Re: Danger Will Robinson! Danger!

2000-03-15 Thread Matthias Berse
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 11:29:42AM -0500, Jacob Kuntz wrote: > the most commonly installed packages today, and i had to build them for a > dozen machines because stable was too far behind. That's your own fault! If you are that experienced that you can build you own packages you probably should kno

Re: Apt-Problem

2000-03-15 Thread Andreas Tille
On 15 Mar 2000, Syed Khader Vali wrote: > I got the same error when I was doing an apt-get upgrade last > night. It was with man-db. But when I did an apt-get upgrade after > sometime again, it did not reget the package again, but installed with You are mory lucky than me because I tried the same

Re: new version in frozen?

2000-03-15 Thread Michael Meskes
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 07:01:25AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote: > The only RCB left in quota is a *packaging* bug. IMHO, that should get Correct. > fixed and the new version of quota should go into woody--better the > devil we know that the devil we don't. (And we really don't need another > "well

Re: new version in frozen?

2000-03-15 Thread Michael Meskes
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 12:45:40PM +0100, Richard Braakman wrote: > There is a point where backporting is actually more risky than using > the (presumably tested) new upstream version. I thinks so too, yes. > However, what else has changed in quota 2.00? Are there incompatibilities? I don't kno

Re: 'impact' ttf license?

2000-03-15 Thread Stefan Ott
thanks to all of you for the information. Stefan On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 05:02:26AM -0800, Joseph Carter wrote: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 12:17:04PM +0100, Stefan Ott wrote: > > i'm planning to package a perl tool i made (available at > > http://tools.desire.ch/perlbeat) which includes some gifs

Re: new version in frozen?

2000-03-15 Thread Michael Stone
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 01:56:09PM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 07:01:25AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote: > > fixed and the new version of quota should go into woody--better the > > devil we know that the devil we don't. (And we really don't need another > > "well, this new v

A "progressive" distribution

2000-03-15 Thread Bernhard R. Link
After reading this nice diskussion with all it's aspects, I want to complete the mess and suggest a "distribution" called e.g. "progressive" beetween stable(frozen) and unstable. As I understood the problem, at the moment, only the stable distribution is able to be distributed, while the unstabl

Re: TeTeX bugs

2000-03-15 Thread Christoph Martin
Denis Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 01:11:03PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > Since the teTeX in slink works fine and the one is potato is broken > > (a bug in babel which prevents compilation of *every* document in > > French), I prefer the old stuff. >

Re: TeTeX bugs

2000-03-15 Thread Christoph Martin
Denis Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Dylan Paul Thurston wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 01:11:03PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > > Since the teTeX in slink works fine and the one is potato is broken > > > (a bug in babel which prevents compilation of *

ZnO pressure sensor varistors, negative temperature coefficient (NTC) and positive temperature coefficient (PTC) full range product

2000-03-15 Thread ke xing
Guangdong Foshan Kestar Electronic Co., Ltd. is specializing in ZnO pressure sensor varistors, negative temperature coefficient (NTC) and positive temperature coefficient (PTC) full range products. We have implemented of ISO 9002. We devote ourselves to customers' satisfaction, excellent quali

Re: Embedded(/RT) Debian? Embeddian GNU/Linux?

2000-03-15 Thread Bdale Garbee
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > does anybody know, wether there are ideas or plans to make > an Debian GNU/Linux especially for embedded and/or realtime > systems, i.e. "Embedian GNU/Linux"? The problem is that "embedded" covers such a huge range these days. I've built several embed

Re: A "progressive" distribution

2000-03-15 Thread bug1
"Bernhard R. Link" wrote: > > After reading this nice diskussion with all it's aspects, I want to > complete the mess and suggest a "distribution" called > e.g. "progressive" beetween stable(frozen) and unstable. > > As I understood the problem, at the moment, only the stable > distribution is ab

Re: A "progressive" distribution

2000-03-15 Thread Bdale Garbee
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > After reading this nice diskussion with all it's aspects, I want to > complete the mess and suggest a "distribution" called > e.g. "progressive" beetween stable(frozen) and unstable. I gather you haven't read the discussion of package pools in the archi

Re: priority of x-window-manager

2000-03-15 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 09:04:47PM +0900, Changwoo Ryu wrote: > You misunderstood "i18n" as just the translation support (and "l10n" > as the translations). Translation is just a category of i18n. > Atsuhito means i18n for the correct character displaying. > > Korean (and maybe Japanese) X users

Embedded(/RT) Debian? Embeddian GNU/Linux?

2000-03-15 Thread Andreas Schuldei
My first mail seems to got lost. excuse me if this turns up twice. In fact I am working on an minimal debian (-based) system. I am building an embedded system which tries to be as small as possible. I started with the linux router project, took some parts from the bootfloppys and wrote some Makef

Re: Embedded(/RT) Debian? Embeddian GNU/Linux?

2000-03-15 Thread Joe Block
Andreas Schuldei wrote: > In fact I am working on an minimal debian (-based) system. > > I am building an embedded system which tries to be as small as possible. > I started with the linux router project, took some parts from the > bootfloppys and wrote some Makefiles to take essential Binaries et

Re: Apt-Problem

2000-03-15 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Andreas Tille wrote: > Reading Package Lists... Done > Building Dependency Tree... Done > The following NEW packages will be installed: > libtool > 0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 13 not upgraded. > Need to get 177kB of archives. After unpacking 681k

Re: A "progressive" distribution

2000-03-15 Thread Mark Mealman
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > After reading this nice diskussion with all it's aspects, I want to > > complete the mess and suggest a "distribution" called > > e.g. "progressive" beetween stable(frozen) and unstable. > > I gather you haven't read the discussion of package p

Re: A "progressive" distribution

2000-03-15 Thread Jacob Kuntz
i have seen a lot of discussion about a distribution half way between stable and unstable. on the surface that sounds like exactly what we need, but at least one person pointed out that this is not the way to manage a project with hundreds of developers working against hundreds of seperate releases

Re: A "progressive" distribution

2000-03-15 Thread sterwill
Jacob Kuntz wrote: > the production branch should always work. a system could be put in place > where you could always get an iso image of the production branch that is > recent to within a few days. i imagine that we would need to get pools in > place before we could even attempt this. this type o

Re: A "progressive" distribution

2000-03-15 Thread Ed Szynaka
I really don't think that a "progressive" branch is necessary. The problems involved in keeping track of three branches at one time and trying to keep version dependencies in order between branches would far out weigh any benefit that would be created by such a branch. IMHO the structure (stable,

Re: A "progressive" distribution

2000-03-15 Thread Michael Stone
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 02:36:47PM -0500, Ed Szynaka wrote: > The problem that I see is that there is too much time between stable > releases. I think that shorter and much more regular time periods > between freezes is necessary. By fixing the number and date of freezes, > with say three or four

Re: The nature of unstable (was: Danger Will Robinson! Danger!)

2000-03-15 Thread John Galt
I'll believe it when I see a newly minted developer. It never should have been closed in the first place, so therefore I see the fact that it HAD to be opened as doubt-inspiring as to whether there will ever be a newly minted developer. Until I see a working new-developers mechanism, I see com

Re: A "progressive" distribution

2000-03-15 Thread J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 14:12:49 -0500, Jacob Kuntz wrote: > try this hypothetical release method out: > > there are two trees. let's call them devel and production. debian saavy > folks (maintainers) run devel. new packages are uploaded to devel where > they are tested extensivly. when a package

Re: A "progressive" distribution

2000-03-15 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote: > But it won't. This approach ignores the fact that "stability" is a property > of a release as a whole (the set of packages and their interdependencies, > ISOs, boot floppies and the upgrade path from the previous release) rather > than the sum of t

Re: A "progressive" distribution

2000-03-15 Thread Ed Szynaka
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 02:36:47PM -0500, Ed Szynaka wrote: > > The problem that I see is that there is too much time between stable > > releases. I think that shorter and much more regular time periods > > between freezes is necessary. By fixing the number and date of freezes, > > with say thr

Re: A "progressive" distribution

2000-03-15 Thread Lalo Martins
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 03:06:57PM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote: > > > But it won't. This approach ignores the fact that "stability" is a property > > of a release as a whole (the set of packages and their interdependencies, > > ISOs, boot floppies

Re: realplayer installer and frozen

2000-03-15 Thread Bob Nielsen
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 01:00:59AM -0500, Alex Yukhimets wrote: > On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 07:09:31PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: > > Lars Wirzenius wrote: > > > I agree with Branden: remove the installer from potato. > > > > The problem that I forgot to mention is that anyone who upgrades from slink >

Re: A "progressive" distribution

2000-03-15 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Ed Szynaka wrote: > > > The problem that I see is that there is too much time between stable > > > releases. I think that shorter and much more regular time periods > > > between freezes is necessary. By fixing the number and date of freezes, > > > with say three or four a y

Re: A "progressive" distribution

2000-03-15 Thread Michael Stone
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 03:17:09PM -0500, Ed Szynaka wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 02:36:47PM -0500, Ed Szynaka wrote: > > How does this account for drastic changes to something like libc that > > might take weeks or months to shake out? > > Well say that there are 3 releases a year. That gi

Re: A "progressive" distribution

2000-03-15 Thread J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 15:06:57 -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > A possibly naive question: apt-get will refuse to install packages if > their dependencies aren't met. Why can't dinstall do the same? It could do so. > It wouldn't help with out and out buggy programs but at least it would > catc

Re: A "progressive" distribution

2000-03-15 Thread Michael Stone
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 03:27:18PM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Ed Szynaka wrote: > > > How does this account for drastic changes to something like libc that > > > might take weeks or months to shake out? > > Build daemons could take care of the 90% or so of packages that w

Re: realplayer installer and frozen

2000-03-15 Thread Jordi
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 07:09:31PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: > Lars Wirzenius wrote: > > I agree with Branden: remove the installer from potato. > > The problem that I forgot to mention is that anyone who upgrades from slink > to potato w/o upgrading realplayer, and had realplayer installed via the

Re: Permission policy

2000-03-15 Thread Martin Waitz
hi, > The program needs rx-permissions for a device belonging to the > cdrom group and rw-permissions for a device belonging to the > audio group. > > Any ideas? users using your program and thus being able to access the sound / cdrom hardware should be in the cdrom+audio group for themself its

Re: Bug#58174

2000-03-15 Thread Jean-Philippe Guérard
Le 2000-03-14 17:57:30 +0100, Michael Meskes écrivait : > This bug is listed as important bug against metamail. I do wonder though if > it is important enough to warrant a removal. This bug has been reported > against mime-support originally. Since no bug in mime-support was found it > was re-assig

Re: A "progressive" distribution

2000-03-15 Thread Joseph Carter
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 03:17:09PM -0500, Ed Szynaka wrote: > Well say that there are 3 releases a year. That gives say 3 months for > devel. With a freeze scheduled to start at the beginning of the 4th > month and a stable release at the end of a month of freeze. I think > that even the most dr

Re: The nature of unstable (was: Danger Will Robinson! Danger!)

2000-03-15 Thread Kenneth Scharf
I am going to attempt to install Potato over a 28.8/56k modem. I have downloaded and 'burned' all 15 floppies needed for the basic system, and will install that first. Then I will set up PPP, and fire up dselect (apt method). I have already done this at work (but on a T1->lan->proxy setup). I

Re: An advise how to apply for the TkMan author to change his license.

2000-03-15 Thread Shaul Karl
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2000 at 03:18:47AM +0200, Shaul Karl wrote: > > [22:42:00 src]$ tail -n 9 tkman-2.1b4/README-tkman > > > > Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its > > documentation for documentation for any purpose, without fee, and > > without a written agreement

Re: A "progressive" distribution

2000-03-15 Thread Craig Sanders
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 01:34:22PM -0500, Mark Mealman wrote: > > First things first. Let's get potato released, and then get pools and > > flavors implemented before we try to release woody. > > I'm all for that if you think the pools idea has any chance of being > implented in our lifetime. I