Re: libc6 broken?

2001-04-27 Thread Ulrich Wiederhold
Hello, * Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010426 21:40]: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:28:51PM +0200, Ulrich Wiederhold wrote: > > If I try a ./configure or a "make xconfig" with a new Kernel, I get this > > error-msg: > > /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > /lib/libc.so.6: undef

Re: libc6 broken?

2001-04-27 Thread Adrian Bunk
> * Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010426 21:40]: > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:28:51PM +0200, Ulrich Wiederhold wrote: > > > If I try a ./configure or a "make xconfig" with a new Kernel, I get this > > > error-msg: > > > /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > > /lib/libc.so.6:

Re: Storage (8*IDE HDs) any experiences?

2001-04-27 Thread Rahul Jain
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 09:33:19PM -0700, Brandon High wrote: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 09:42:16PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > IDE causes a bit of a performance hit, I don't think we're talking high > > speed file access here though... cheap is the objective. > > You'd be suprised at the p

I screwed up a bug closing

2001-04-27 Thread Dale Scheetz
I recently uploaded a new version of libgmp3 that finally fixed bug number 93661, but I got a typo in the changelog resulting in an attempt to close bug number 93361 instead, which appears to have succeeded, closing this bug against the gltron. Can I just "reopen" that report, or is it going to be

Re: updating of /etc/rc?.d

2001-04-27 Thread Brendan O'Dea
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 01:30:41PM -0400, Jason Lunz wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >> What's wrong with adding an exit 0 to the init.d files? > >dpkg will ask me whether I want to keep my changes each time I upgrade, >rather than just overwriting the script. I believe that dpkg only does that wh

Re: Referring what kernel-images to build to the technical committee?

2001-04-27 Thread Brian May
> "Herbert" == Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Herbert> Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Confusion: Adding 8 (or whatever it is) variations of each >> kernel version is going to make it harder to select the >> appropriate one. There is some fraction of the t

Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat

2001-04-27 Thread Daniel Stone
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 04:20:46PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 02:18:30AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: > > I could disagree pretty heavily by pointing that this would be shit as > > it would add an hour to the install. Why not just provide a stock i386 > > kernel and let peo

openldap question and possible feature conflict

2001-04-27 Thread Brian May
Hello, Open question to maintainer of openldap2: Are there any long term plans to upload a debian version of libldap2 with ssl and/or kpasswd support? Note: 1. I use both myself, although I only have kpasswd for testing... 2. I don't understand why kpasswd support required Kerberos, and can't use

Re: I screwed up a bug closing

2001-04-27 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Dale! You wrote: > I recently uploaded a new version of libgmp3 that finally fixed bug number > 93661, but I got a typo in the changelog resulting in an attempt to close > bug number 93361 instead, which appears to have succeeded, closing this > bug against the gltron. Can I just "reopen" that

´ÙÀ̾îÆ®¾Æ ¼ºÀοëÇ° ´ë¼¼ÀÏ !!!!!

2001-04-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Á¦¸ñ: debian-devel ´Ô  ¾È³çÇϼ¼¿ä ? ¡¡ ´ç»ç´Â ¹Ì±¹LA¿¡ ¼ÒÀçÇϸç ÀÎÅÍ³Ý ¼îÇθô Àü¹®¾÷ü ÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ¹Ì±¹¿¡¼­ È®½ÇÈ÷ ÀÎÁ¤ ¹ÞÀº Ç°¸ñÀ¸·Î ¿©·¯ºÐÀ» À§ÇØ Áغñ Çß½À´Ï´Ù. ÄÚ¸®¾ÆŸ¿î »çÀ̹ö¸ô »õ´ÜÀå ±â³ä Ưº° ¼¼ÀÏ»óÇ°   ¡¡

wnpp: ITP: gq - gtk ldap client

2001-04-27 Thread Ondřej Surý
Package: wnpp Version: N/A Severity: wishlist GQ is a GTK-based LDAP client. Features include: - browse and search modes - LDAPv3 schema browser - template editor - edit and delete entries - add entries with templates - export subtree or whole server to LDIF file - use any number o

Braille, anyone??

2001-04-27 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
The RNIB have released the source to their Braille conversion program Braille-It under the GPL. This is a tool, written in C, which will take text and convert it into contracted Braille. [For those that don't appreciate this: grade 1 British Braille spells out words letter for letter, grade 2 is co

Re: wnpp: ITP: gq - gtk ldap client

2001-04-27 Thread Ashley Clark
* Ond?ej Sur? in "wnpp: ITP: gq - gtk ldap client" dated 2001/04/27 * 09:48 wrote: > Package: wnpp > Version: N/A > Severity: wishlist > > GQ is a GTK-based LDAP client. Features include: What's wrong with the current gq package? $ apt-cache show gq Package: gq Priority: optional Section: net

Re: wnpp: ITP: gq - gtk ldap client

2001-04-27 Thread Ondřej Surý
> What's wrong with the current gq package? Sorry, I hadn't noticed... I will close that bug. I appologies. -- Ondřej Surý <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Globe Internet s.r.o. http://globe.cz/ Tel: +420235365000 Fax: +420235365009 Pláničkova 1, 162 00 Praha 6 Mob: +420605204544 ICQ: 2

Re: Lightweight Web browsers

2001-04-27 Thread Jérôme Marant
Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > May I ask why you don't mention that this is a web browser for Gnome? > This information would be helpful for people that look for a lightweight > HTML browser, but don't want to install Gnome. For those people this > browser will not be a alternative

Re: wnpp: ITP: gq - gtk ldap client

2001-04-27 Thread Jérôme Marant
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ondøej Surý) writes: > Package: wnpp > Version: N/A > Severity: wishlist > > GQ is a GTK-based LDAP client. Features include: > > - browse and search modes > - LDAPv3 schema browser > - template editor > - edit and delete entries > - add entries with templates > -

Re: libc6 broken?

2001-04-27 Thread Mike Markley
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 02:40:24PM -0500, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake forth: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:28:51PM +0200, Ulrich Wiederhold wrote: > > If I try a ./configure or a "make xconfig" with a new Kernel, I get this > > error-msg: > > /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: updating of /etc/rc?.d

2001-04-27 Thread Mike Markley
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 01:36:41PM -0400, Jason Lunz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake forth: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > It is possible to disable a service simply by removing links in > > /etc/rc*.d . So long as you leave at least one (/etc/rc0.d/K*package > > would seem to be a good candidate), upda

Re: Referring what kernel-images to build to the technical committee?

2001-04-27 Thread Daniel Stone
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 09:19:56AM -0700, David Schleef wrote: It could also be useful as a hardware tester at install time: > "Would you like to test your hardware (and get a kernel custom > build for your hardware at the same time)? This process will > potentially take a long time." (Yes, I re

Re: Gnome bug 94684

2001-04-27 Thread Christian Marillat
"TB" == Thomas Bushnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] TB> The current bug (94684) he said "I can do nothing if upstream author TB> changes their API". Well, this has many problems: TB> 1) Upstream author didn't change an API, they changed a direct user TB>issue. False. TB> 2) He

Re: Referring what kernel-images to build to the technical committee?

2001-04-27 Thread Herbert Xu
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thats fine if you have already booted Linux. However, if you are > reading the installation instructions (as what Steve was saying), then > you probably do not have a Linux system yet. > Whats the point of finding out what the correct kernel is only after >

Re: Formal request for review: [Sam Hartman ] Referring what kernel-images to build to the technical committee?

2001-04-27 Thread Ian Jackson
Sam Hartman writes ("Formal request for review: [Sam Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] Referring what kernel-images to build to the technical committee?"): > Hi. I posted the following message to debian-devel last night and > have received agreement with the summary and apparently (it was not > expli

Re: RFC: Thoughts on building modules

2001-04-27 Thread Herbert Xu
Sam Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Note that all of the solutions I discussed involved this complexity. > I was objecting to your implication that setting up module source > packages was as simple as setting up arch-specific kernel image > packages, not saying the complexity was unnecessary.

Re: Gnome bug 94684

2001-04-27 Thread Miros/law `Jubal' Baran
27.04.2001 pisze Christian Marillat ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > TB> 3) He can report the problem to the gnome maintainers and mark the bug > TB>forwarded. > Apparently you don't understand. Read my lips ((c) G. Bush) I'll *never* > change the upstream API, I'll *never* ask the upstream author to

Re: updating of /etc/rc?.d

2001-04-27 Thread Michael Stone
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 02:50:24AM -0700, Mike Markley wrote: > Admittedly, it's "sort of" buried; I don't see why we couldn't modify > update-rc.d to use one of the unassigned but allowed runlevels to keep track > of this junk. I have no problem with removing all but the K symlinks in What would

Re: [doko@cs.tu-berlin.de: Bug#95285: Incorrect globbing under locales]

2001-04-27 Thread Michael Stone
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 10:59:35PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Paul Martin wrote: > > Looks like it would be a good idea to add "export LC_ALL=POSIX" to the > > default dh_make "rules" file. > > Well, we _could_ do that. It would probably have nasty effects if you > expected to be able to build a pa

Re: updating of /etc/rc?.d

2001-04-27 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 02:50:24AM -0700, Mike Markley wrote: > Admittedly, it's "sort of" buried; I don't see why we couldn't modify > update-rc.d to use one of the unassigned but allowed runlevels to keep track > of this junk. I have no problem with removing all but the K symlinks in > {0,6}.d to

Re: Strange problems...

2001-04-27 Thread xsdg
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 02:08:04PM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote: > On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > > > Previously Dale Scheetz wrote: > > > Anyone have any ideas? > > > > 1. figure out what uses insane amount of memory and apply kill and/or rm > > So, this is a common response from a

Re: libc6 broken?

2001-04-27 Thread Ulrich Wiederhold
Hello, * Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010427 07:44]: > > * Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010426 21:40]: > > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:28:51PM +0200, Ulrich Wiederhold wrote: > > > > If I try a ./configure or a "make xconfig" with a new Kernel, I get this > > > > error-msg: > > > > /lib/libc.so.

Re: updating of /etc/rc?.d

2001-04-27 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 04:41:54PM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote: > I believe that dpkg only does that when the maintainer has changed the > script in the newer version. That's been in dpkg for a very long time. I still wonder why it doesn't work in a lot of cases though. In every upgrade I get aske

searching for Raphael Bossek [Mailer-Daemon@master.debian.org: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender]

2001-04-27 Thread Josip Rodin
Hi, The BTS got several of these... - Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Delivery-date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 08:06:10 +0200 X-Failed-Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mail delivery failed

Re: Gnome bug 94684

2001-04-27 Thread Jules Bean
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 12:08:31PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote: > "TB" == Thomas Bushnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > TB> I'm perfectly happy for him to just do (3). But what he wants to do > TB> instead is declare real bugs non-bugs, on the grounds that he "can do > TB> nothing". If h

searching for Misha Nasledov [Mailer-Daemon@master.debian.org: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender]

2001-04-27 Thread Josip Rodin
Hmm, is this a typo in the domain name? - Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Delivery-date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 08:09:40 +0200 X-Failed-Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mail delivery fa

Re: Storage (8*IDE HDs) any experiences?

2001-04-27 Thread Russell Coker
On Friday 27 April 2001 06:33, Brandon High wrote: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 09:42:16PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > IDE causes a bit of a performance hit, I don't think we're talking high > > speed file access here though... cheap is the objective. > > You'd be suprised at the performance h

ITP: avrprog -- Programmer for Atmel AVR microcontrolers

2001-04-27 Thread Pedro Zorzenon Neto
Package: avrprog Version: 0.1.0 Severity: wishlist Programmer for Atmel AVR microcontrolers that uses PC paralell port to program the device in serial mode. The device can be programmed "in-system". Comes with a schematic of the hardware required. The hardware was designed to be efficient and un

ITP: cgen -- cpu tools generator

2001-04-27 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist >From Red Hat, CGEN (pronounced seejen) is a framework for developing generators of CPU-related tools such as assemblers, disassemblers and simulators. It specifies a description language for describing the architecture and organization of a CPU without referenc

Re: Referring what kernel-images to build to the technical committee?

2001-04-27 Thread Andreas Metzler
David Schleef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thursday 26 April 2001 09:05, Andreas Metzler wrote: >> > _Afair_ it is necessary to run a k6 (or athlon) "optimized" kernel to >> > use 3DNow! in applications like xmms or lame. This probably applys to >> > ISSE, MTTR and MMX, too. > This is not corr

Re: Referring what kernel-images to build to the technical committee?

2001-04-27 Thread David Schleef
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 08:00:49PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 09:19:56AM -0700, David Schleef wrote: > It could also be useful as a hardware tester at install time: > > "Would you like to test your hardware (and get a kernel custom > > build for your hardware at the same

Re: Lightweight Web browsers

2001-04-27 Thread Christian Kurz
On 01-04-27 Jérôme Marant wrote: > Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > May I ask why you don't mention that this is a web browser for Gnome? > > This information would be helpful for people that look for a lightweight > > HTML browser, but don't want to install Gnome. For those people th

Re: auditd as logrotate replacement?

2001-04-27 Thread T.Pospisek's MailLists
Hi Arthur and discussion round, On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Arthur Korn wrote: > So, basically, since auditd does feature encryption, it does not > have any chance to be the default for log rotation, even if it > was a lot better than logrotate? What giant pile of crap. But what you could do is a virtu

Re: Gnome bug 94684

2001-04-27 Thread Branden Robinson
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 01:54:30PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 12:08:31PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote: > > "TB" == Thomas Bushnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > TB> I'm perfectly happy for him to just do (3). But what he wants to do > > TB> instead is declare real

Re: Gnome bug 94684

2001-04-27 Thread Steve Langasek
On 27 Apr 2001, Christian Marillat wrote: > *You* are a serious problem. > If you don't want to change your configuration each time you did a apt-get > upgrade, then install potato. > testing/unstable is for real men (tm). In that case, perhaps these packages should be removed from testing. Th

Re: auditd as logrotate replacement?

2001-04-27 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 01:48:29PM -0300, Alejo Sanchez wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 08:35:51PM -0300, Alejo Sanchez wrote: > > > well, your version would do it the dlopen() way. > > > actually we were going to ask if there was a > > > restriction on depending on dlopen(), as it could > > > b

Re: character sets

2001-04-27 Thread Stephen Zander
> "Brian" == Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Brian> 1. use xemacs mule latin input mode. It doesn't work for Brian> me, have to try and find out why. Maybe I need to include Brian> something in my .emacs file, or maybe I need to unstable Brian> version of xemacs. Try usin

Re: Lightweight Web browsers

2001-04-27 Thread Jérôme Marant
Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > So come on people, let's install all 6000 packages, because maybe we > could use them once. > Listen, I've packaged it in order to make available in debs for people willing to test it. Now, don't blame me about those gnome dependencies since

How to remove a package from ftp.debian.org?

2001-04-27 Thread Michael Meskes
Subject says it all. Do I have to file a bug against ftp.debian.org? Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael@Fam-Meskes.De Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!

Re: Gnome bug 94684

2001-04-27 Thread Thierry Laronde
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 09:15:12AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 01:54:30PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 12:08:31PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote: > > > "TB" == Thomas Bushnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > TB> I'm perfectly happy for hi

Re: How to remove a package from ftp.debian.org?

2001-04-27 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Michael Meskes wrote: > Subject says it all. Do I have to file a bug against ftp.debian.org? Yes, magic wands have not been perfected yet :) Wichert. -- / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenien

Re: Lightweight Web browsers

2001-04-27 Thread Aaron Lehmann
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 10:25:46AM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote: > I mainly focused on low memory consumption, and Encompass meet this > requirement. Yes, but only when you ignore the bloat from the horrible Gnome libraries that entangle it. "Encompas doesn't take much ram, the ram is all taken

Re: searching for Misha Nasledov [Mailer-Daemon@master.debian.org: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender]

2001-04-27 Thread Aaron Lehmann
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 03:00:33PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > > Hmm, is this a typo in the domain name? > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > unrouteable mail domain "nsaledov.com" Typo. He's at nasledov.com.

Re: How to remove a package from ftp.debian.org?

2001-04-27 Thread Stefan Hornburg Racke
Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Subject says it all. Do I have to file a bug against ftp.debian.org? Yes. Ciao Racke -- Tech beats design - hold your breath for http://fuckdotcom.de For projects and other business stuff please refer to COBOLT NetServices (URL: http://www.

Re: How to remove a package from ftp.debian.org?

2001-04-27 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Michael Meskes wrote: > Subject says it all. Do I have to file a bug against ftp.debian.org? Yes.

Re: How to remove a package from ftp.debian.org?

2001-04-27 Thread David Whedon
Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 04:52:58PM +0200 wrote: > Subject says it all. Do I have to file a bug against ftp.debian.org? > yes http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-archive-manip.en.html#s-removing-pkgs David P.S. this sort of question can probably be best asked on -mentors. > Michael >

ITP: ghfaxviewer - the GNU HaliFAX Viewer

2001-04-27 Thread Wolfgang Sourdeau
Package: ghfaxviewer Version: 0.21.1-1 Severity: wishlist Licence is GNU General Public License version 2 This program is the GNU HaliFAX project's viewer. It is able to display fax files output by the HylaFAX(tm) system as well as any other G3/G4-encoded TIFF fax file. The range of suppor

Re: Lightweight Web browsers

2001-04-27 Thread mdanish
> Maybe because they're bloated, take huge gobs of memory, and are > designed only to emulate the mistakes and misdesign of a certain OS > from Redmond? I too agree that Linux window managers and session managers should not aspire to emulate Microsoft, I'd rather see some newer and better ideas imp

Re: (OT) Storage (8*IDE HDs) any experiences?

2001-04-27 Thread Dimitri Maziuk
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 12:49:13AM -0500, Rahul Jain wrote: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 09:33:19PM -0700, Brandon High wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 09:42:16PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > IDE causes a bit of a performance hit, I don't think we're talking high > > > speed file access he

Re: Gnome bug 94684

2001-04-27 Thread Branden Robinson
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 05:11:35PM +0200, Thierry Laronde wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 09:15:12AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 01:54:30PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 12:08:31PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote: > > > > "TB" == Thomas

Re: Gnome bug 94684

2001-04-27 Thread Colin Walters
Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Programs shouldn't gratuitously break configurations which worked. > When woody is released, and people upgrade en masse to it, they will > want their configurations to carry on working. In my experience, GNOME has had this problem since version 1.0; almos

Re: libc6 broken?

2001-04-27 Thread Ulrich Wiederhold
Hello Mike, * Mike Markley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010427 11:41]: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 02:40:24PM -0500, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake > forth: > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:28:51PM +0200, Ulrich Wiederhold wrote: > > > If I try a ./configure or a "make xconfig" with a new Kernel, I get this

Re: Braille, anyone??

2001-04-27 Thread pm
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 08:09:28AM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > The RNIB have released the source to their Braille conversion program > Braille-It under the GPL. This is a tool, written in C, which will URL? -- Paul Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (work) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (home) <[EMAIL

Grand Opening

2001-04-27 Thread Merchandise WholeSale
First off I would like to Thank You for taking time to read this letter. Second of all your e-mail address was pulled from an on-line source, if this was unsolicited from an unclean source we're very sorry, but you will not receive any other e-mails from us. This is the only & last mes

Re: Gnome bug 94684

2001-04-27 Thread Christian Marillat
"CW" == Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: CW> Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Programs shouldn't gratuitously break configurations which worked. >> When woody is released, and people upgrade en masse to it, they will >> want their configurations to carry on working. CW> In

Re: (OT) Storage (8*IDE HDs) any experiences?

2001-04-27 Thread Dimitri Maziuk
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 05:32:31PM -0700, Alvin Oga wrote: ... > - even if you had 2 power supplies... > - most motherboards only has one atx power connector True. And if you went for redundant PS's and a mobo that supports them, the cost would go way up. > - are the two power supplies pro

Re: Lightweight Web browsers

2001-04-27 Thread David Starner
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 08:32:06AM -0700, Aaron Lehmann wrote: > Yes, but only when you ignore the bloat from the horrible Gnome > libraries that entangle it. "Encompas doesn't take much ram, the ram > is all taken up by libgnome, libgnomeui, libbonobo, libgnomevfs, > libesd, libaudiofile, libgal,

Re: Referring what kernel-images to build to the technical committee?

2001-04-27 Thread Otto Wyss
>In fact, most of the options could be auto-detected from >/proc/cpuinfo. > >It could also be useful as a hardware tester at install time: >"Would you like to test your hardware (and get a kernel custom >build for your hardware at the same time)? This process will >potentially take a long time."

simple g++-3.0 problem

2001-04-27 Thread Dale E Martin
Hi, I'm using the prerelease g++-3.0 for some testing. I've got a weird compilation problem that I don't understand at all, and I was wondering if anyone could shed any insight on it. This program: // Begin c++ program #include #include class foo { public: foo(){} ~foo(){} string getS

Re: Lightweight Web browsers

2001-04-27 Thread Jochen Voss
Hi, On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 04:46:19PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: > Please note that did not ITPed it since I'm not sure people except > from me are interested in such a browser. And It does not seem to make > you very happy. Unless people are interested to see it in debian > I won't uplo

Re: simple g++-3.0 problem

2001-04-27 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Dale E Martin wrote: > does not compile with g++-3.0 - I get the following error: > ~/test/c++> g++-3.0 simple-problem-g++3.cpp -o simple-problem-g++3 > simple-problem-g++3.cpp:9: parse error before `)' token It doesn't now string, since that is in the std namespace. Either insert "usin

Re: simple g++-3.0 problem

2001-04-27 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 02:31:12PM -0400, Dale E Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > Basically, it doesn't like the declaration "string getString()"... > g++-2.95.4 doesn't seem to mind this code, and I can't for the life of me > figuer out why it would be broken. I think this is the

Re: Packages not making it into testing

2001-04-27 Thread Tommi Virtanen
Anthony Towns writes: > + mpg123 uploaded 125 days ago, out of date by 115 days! > mpg123-alsa is uninstallable (needs alsa-base 0.4, which is no > longer available?) mpg123 won't work with the newer ALSA, and there seems to be no real mpg123 activity. I'll drop ALSA

Re: simple g++-3.0 problem

2001-04-27 Thread Dale E Martin
> g++ << 3.0 handled the "std" namespace incorrectly and let you get away > with this. g++ 3.0 requires that you either declare "using std" or explicitly > say "std::string getString()". > >Not looking forward to fixing this in all my own code, I knew it had to be something silly like this

Bug#95525: where are libssl09 and libssl095a?

2001-04-27 Thread Luca Filipozzi
Package: libssl096 Version: 0.9.6-1 Severity: normal In bug report #78410 entitled "libssl096 does not provide /usr/lib/lib*.so.0", Ivan Moore complains that libssl096 fails to provide libcrypo.so.0 etc. After several email exchanges, Ivan and the maintainer, Christoph Martin, end up agreeing tha

Re: Packages not making it into testing

2001-04-27 Thread Daniel Kobras
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 09:41:46PM +0300, Tommi Virtanen wrote: > Anthony Towns writes: > > > + mpg123 uploaded 125 days ago, out of date by 115 days! > > mpg123-alsa is uninstallable (needs alsa-base 0.4, which is no > > longer available?) > > mpg123 won't work with the newer AL

Re: Gnome bug 94684

2001-04-27 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > TB> 1) Upstream author didn't change an API, they changed a direct user > TB>issue. > > False. You know, your utter reluctance to do more than write the minimal possible words causes frequent problems. Here's how it's a direct user issue.

Re: Gnome bug 94684

2001-04-27 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It doesn't seem very reasonable to expect the Debian packagers to try > to fix upstream bugs like this. Certainly it might be more work than I could expect Christian to do, and I don't expect him to try and fix it. I expect him to forward the bug upstr

Re: simple g++-3.0 problem

2001-04-27 Thread Ulrich Eckhardt
On Friday 27 April 2001 20:49, Dale E Martin wrote: > #include use #include cheers U

Re: Storage (8*IDE HDs) any experiences?

2001-04-27 Thread Rahul Jain
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 12:48:52PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote: > See http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/hardware/46g.png for some quick > benchmark results showing the differences between a single IDE drive, two > drives on separate channels, and two drives on the same channel. > > Apart from one

Re: searching for Raphael Bossek [Mailer-Daemon@master.debian.org: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender]

2001-04-27 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 02:45:57PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > Hi, > > The BTS got several of these... FYI, I tried to contact him several times before NMUing commonc++, and got neither bounce nor response. Other bug report logs against his packages seem to indicate that he has been MIA for som

Re: Lightweight Web browsers

2001-04-27 Thread Aaron Lehmann
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Now I agree that there's lots of bloat in Gnome, but I have to disagree > with you about Glib. Glib provides many handy routines (such as linked > list management, and a threads API) for C programmers. Having Glib provide > these routines is a much better choice than

Re: Problem with installing Postgres throught APT

2001-04-27 Thread Oliver Elphick
Rahul Jain wrote: >I had a horrible time upgrading and I ended up removing some packages with >--force-depend, and then apt-get dist-upgrading. Would adding a replaces: to >some packages help? I know that the pgsql-pl and ecpg packages were merged, >so >at least it will help there.

have apt use an rsync style tool ?

2001-04-27 Thread Jean Charles
wouldn't it be great if you could just download what has changed on some package ? for exemple the maintainer changes something in /etc/init.d/sendmail and you have to download 1mo . with rsync you would just download the part that changed ... well just an idea

Re: have apt use an rsync style tool ?

2001-04-27 Thread Jacob Kuntz
from the secret journal of Jean Charles ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > wouldn't it be great if you could just download what has changed > on some package ? for exemple There was a HUGE flameware on this issue a few months ago. Check the archives and be sure you have something positive to add before you st

Re: Lightweight Web browsers

2001-04-27 Thread Eric Gillespie, Jr.
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001 20:51:05 + (UTC), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aaron Lehmann) said: > them to some extent. I like several of the routines, but > things such as g_malloc() and g_free() are equivilent to > functions in the standard C libary. I am also very suprized Not at all. Why should

Re: have apt use an rsync style tool ?

2001-04-27 Thread Adam Heath
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Jean Charles wrote: > wouldn't it be great if you could just download what has changed > on some package ? for exemple > > the maintainer changes something in /etc/init.d/sendmail and you > have to download 1mo . > with rsync you would just download the part that changed ...

Are build-dependancies mandatory?

2001-04-27 Thread Marcin Owsiany
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 06:00:07AM -0500, BugScan reporter wrote: > > Package: cvs (debian/main) > Maintainer: Eric Gillespie, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 95263 missing build dependency The policy says: A source package may declare a dependency or a conflict on a binary package. Th

Re: Are build-dependancies mandatory?

2001-04-27 Thread Adam Heath
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 06:00:07AM -0500, BugScan reporter wrote: > > > > Package: cvs (debian/main) > > Maintainer: Eric Gillespie, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > 95263 missing build dependency > > The policy says: > > A source package may declar

SSH-1.2.3-9.3 Building from source package.

2001-04-27 Thread Emerson Farrugia
Hi, I'm trying to build ssh-1.2.3-9.3 from a souce package on a Potato box. (Reasons for using source package are optimization, control over ./configure flags, etc). The box is to be used for server applications, and does not have X or GNOME libraries, which the build process is looking for. ./de

Re: Lightweight Web browsers

2001-04-27 Thread Christian Kurz
On 01-04-27 Jérôme Marant wrote: > Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > So come on people, let's install all 6000 packages, because maybe we > > could use them once. > > > Listen, I've packaged it in order to make available in debs for > people willing to test it. Now, don't b

Re: Are build-dependancies mandatory?

2001-04-27 Thread Marcin Owsiany
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 06:13:37AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > > The policy says: > > > > A source package may declare a dependency or a conflict ^^^ > > on a binary package. [...] > Some 3.x policy version added bui

Re: Storage (8*IDE HDs) any experiences?

2001-04-27 Thread Jeremy Zawodny
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 12:48:52PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote: > > See http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/hardware/46g.png for some quick > benchmark results showing the differences between a single IDE > drive, two drives on separate channels, and two drives on the same > channel. Hm. The server r

Re: Are build-dependancies mandatory?

2001-04-27 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
> > I still don't understand why the policy (version 3.5.3.0) > doesn't simply say "must" rather then "may". > Debian is a community which exists for the mutual benefit of its members. Members playing games like 'policy does not say I *HAVE* to do it' do not make Debian a better place. let's a

Re: Are build-dependancies mandatory?

2001-04-27 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 12:11:41AM +0200, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 06:13:37AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > > > The policy says: > > > > > > A source package may declare a dependency or a conflict >

ITP: mped -- a small editor with syntax highlighting and more

2001-04-27 Thread Roberto Suarez Soto
Package: mped Severity: wishlist Version: 3.0.98l Minimum Profit (mp, mped in Debian Systems) is a programmer's text editor. It features small memory and disk requirements (68kB), syntax highlighting, context-sensitive help for the source code being edited, multiple simultaneous file editing,

fortunes-atheist copyright again (would be FW: Re: copyright)

2001-04-27 Thread Carlos Laviola
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Like I said before (see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-0104/msg01443.html), I intend to package Wayne Aiken's atheist fortunes available at his site (http://www4.ncsu.edu/~aiken/). This is the response I've got from him. I'm waiting for advice (i

Re: Are build-dependancies mandatory?

2001-04-27 Thread Marcin Owsiany
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 03:25:54PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > > > > I still don't understand why the policy (version 3.5.3.0) > > doesn't simply say "must" rather then "may". > > > > Debian is a community which exists for the mutual benefit of its members. > > Members playing games lik

tomcat and apache troubles

2001-04-27 Thread J. R. Westmoreland
I'm obviously doing something wrong but I can't find it! :( There appears to be a communications problem between apache and tomcat. When I attempt to link to a .jsp file I get "you don't have permission". What am I doing wrong? J.R. -- J.R. Westmoreland (W7JR) E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ITP: mped -- a small editor with syntax highlighting and more

2001-04-27 Thread Roberto Suarez Soto
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Minimum Profit (mp, mped in Debian Systems) is a programmer's text editor. It features small memory and disk requirements (68kB), syntax highlighting, context-sensitive help for the source code being edited, multiple simultaneous file editing, ctags support, wo

Re: Referring what kernel-images to build to the technical committee?

2001-04-27 Thread Herbert Xu
Otto Wyss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Even if your idea sounds a little bit crazy, this is probably the best > way at the moment to get a well suited kernel. But I'd rather see a > kernel where all options were compiled into separate modules so simply > choosing the right modules constructs the

Re: openldap question and possible feature conflict

2001-04-27 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Brian" == Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Brian> I have got a bug report #95246 requesting Heimdal be Brian> compiled against openldap2. This would enable being able to Brian> store the Kerberos database in the openldap database. All Brian> data is stored in LDAP encry

Re: ITP: mped -- a small editor with syntax highlighting and more

2001-04-27 Thread Michael Janssen \(CS/MATH stud.\)
In Roberto Suarez Soto's email, 28-04-2001: > Package: mped > Severity: wishlist > Version: 3.0.98l > > Minimum Profit (mp, mped in Debian Systems) is a programmer's text editor. > It features small memory and disk requirements (68kB), syntax highlighting, > context-sensitive help for the sourc

  1   2   >