Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2001-09-22
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: vdr
Version : 0.95
Upstream Author : Klaus.Schmidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.cadsoft.de/people/kls/vdr/index.htm
* License : GPL
Description : Video Disk Re
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 08:23:01PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote:
> - Source code for all the _development_tools_ from SAP (start with that)
I have contacted SAP about it and they may release the sources, but it did
not sound like this will happen in near future. Perhaps porting to nother
devel-cha
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 02:17:38PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
>
> OK. Well why don't you explain, either here, or in bug 66135, how the
> bug is still there and what should be done? The simple statement that
> Brian's comment is 'False' doesn't really move us forward...
Because I've already report
On Sep 21, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>inside the jail... (unless bind9 does not need to have any libs and config
>files such as resolv.conf inside its jail, in which case there is no need
>for such a script).
It does not.
The only things needed are /var/run/, /var/
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 12:52:37PM +0200, Martin F Krafft wrote:
> madison seems to be what the debian.org webpage sports as the package
> search over distributions. is it packaged? do you need someone to package
> it?
madison requires connectivity to a Debian database which is not publicly
acces
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 12:52:37PM +0200, Martin F Krafft wrote:
> madison seems to be what the debian.org webpage sports as the package
> search over distributions. is it packaged? do you need someone to
> package it?
>
madison has to be run on ftp-master, thats why it is not packaged.
If you wan
On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Richard B. Kreckel wrote:
> The social contract says "Our Priorities are Our Users and Free Software".
> Such a win-port might indeed serve some users. But for my own part, I do
> have some personal problems with making all free software win-compatible.
> Does it serve Fre
On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Martin F Krafft wrote:
> how about this: i'll make the package (which will basically be a
> postinst/prerm pair and nothing else, and then we can always integrate
IMHO it would be better if you did it the way it is done in the postfix
package. The initscript sets up the chroot
madison seems to be what the debian.org webpage sports as the package
search over distributions. is it packaged? do you need someone to
package it?
martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
\ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
if god had meant fo
also sprach Bdale Garbee (on Thu, 20 Sep 2001 06:00:59PM -0600):
> > bind9-chroot -- convert a bind9 installation to a chroot'd one
>
> What does this package do? I have offered numerous times to accept a patch
> for the bind9 package to optionally implement chroot installation and nobody
> ha
Hi,
On Thu, 30 Aug 2001, A Mennucc1 wrote:
[...]
> -why is the 'win' port important?
[...]
(Sorry for dropping in late to this thread, I was too busy lately to
follow debian-devel tightly.)
The social contract says "Our Priorities are Our Users and Free Software".
Such a win-port might i
On 20-Sep-01, 20:30 (CDT), Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I made it a *.deb package, because that allows you to use apt-get to
> automatically upgrade the package on a *nfs root* partition to the
> latest version.
(Brian, thanks for the explanation. That was a lot more useful than "you
wa
Andreas,
I don't have packages for recent CVS sources but I am working on it. I
am a bit behind because winbind is new in the current CVS tree for
what will become Samba 2.2.2 so I am making modifications to the
Debian packages to accomodate for new binary packages (for winbind and
friends.) Besid
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>
> On 21-Sep-2001 Adam Heath wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> >
> >> http://people.debian.org/~shaleh/lintian.
> >
> > It's normally customary to include a brief list of things we should be
> > testing.
I meant you shoul
Hi,
why don't autoconf and autoconf2.13 go into testing?
update-excuses says:
autoconf 2.52-2 (currently 2.13-27) (optional) (low)
autoconf uploaded 21 days ago, out of date by 11 days!
autoconf/[all archs]: Unsatisfiable Depends: autoconf2.13 (>=
2.13-34)
valid
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001 19:24:34 +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
>Dear Developers!
>
>I have taken the opportunity to create some nice (or not?) graphics of
>the mailing lists that Debian serves on lists.debian.org. I have
>analysed both the posting frequency and the total list of subscribers.
Nicer loo
On 20-Sep-2001 Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> http://people.debian.org/~shaleh/lintian.
>
I have fixed the silly spelling error bug, lather, rinse and repeat.
On 21-Sep-2001 Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 02:17:47PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>> http://people.debian.org/~shaleh/lintian.
>>
>>
> there is some problem with debian/Debian spell checking, it reports
> "spelling-error-in-copyright debian Debian" even if it is (IMH
John Hasler wrote:
>
> I wrote:
> > Surely there are locales for welsh and Scottish gaelic?
>
> Keith G. Murphy writes:
> > I should think not. Those are two *very* different Celtic languages.
>
> Nor did I say otherwise. Read my sentence as "Surely there is a locale for
> welsh and also a loc
On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Is Debian really that unpopular on Gibraltar?
> > Why not simply include them, so that Debian users in Gibraltar can use it?
> Gibraltar is Debian-based, a firewall distribution bootable from CD-ROM.
Ah. That changes things a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wouter Verhelst) writes:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
[...]
> Is Debian really that unpopular on Gibraltar?
IIRC Gibraltar is the name of a debian based firewall...
Yours,
Steffen
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Is Debian really that unpopular on Gibraltar?
> Why not simply include them, so that Debian users in Gibraltar can use it?
Gibraltar is Debian-based, a firewall distribution bootable from CD-ROM.
But installing the gibraltar-bootsupport package on a Debian system that
is in
On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> I do not understand this:
> autoconf2.13 2.13-38 (new) (optional) (low)
> Maintainer: Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> autoconf2.13 uploaded 15 days ago, out of date by 5 days!
> autoconf2.13/alpha: Unsatisfiable Depends: autoconf (>= 2.50)
> au
On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
> Please CC me in replies, I am currently not subscribed to -devel.
[...]
> packages mkinitrd-cd and gibraltar-bootsupport. But only the package
> mkinitrd-cd is interesting for Debian users / developers, the
> gibraltar-bootsupport package is very Gibral
I do not understand this:
autoconf2.13 2.13-38 (new) (optional) (low)
Maintainer: Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
autoconf2.13 uploaded 15 days ago, out of date by 5 days!
autoconf2.13/alpha: Unsatisfiable Depends: autoconf (>= 2.50)
autoconf2.13/arm: Unsatisfiable Depends: autoconf (>= 2.50)
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 07:12:24PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> > "Domenico" == Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Domenico> On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 10:36:12AM -0700, Ossama Othman
> Domenico> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 04:09:38PM +0200,
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 08:01:31AM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > update_output.txt says:
> > > gtk+extra: alpha: gpsim gpsim-dev gpsim-lcd gpsim-led gpsim-logic
> > > quicklist
> > > Perhaps all these packages need to be upgraded in testing
> > > simultaneously?
> I've posted to -devel or ma
I am looking for a URL or apt-sources.list line where I can get up to date
debian packages (cvs) of samba? I need the winbind tool to connect to a
windows 2000 domain. I have allready founded and tested the samba-tng debian
packages. that winbind does not work for me and I would like to try out the
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 02:17:47PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> http://people.debian.org/~shaleh/lintian.
>
>
there is some problem with debian/Debian spell checking, it reports
"spelling-error-in-copyright debian Debian" even if it is (IMHO) ok.
lintian 1.20.14.1 says nothing about the s
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 08:06:19PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > This "bug" is only because of debian/rules which continue to use an
> > obsolete (and no longer required) hack in order to remove unwanted
> > -rpaths.
>
> > Just remove the hack, it is no lo
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 02:21:15AM -0700, Bradley Bell wrote:
> Colin Watson Wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 03:39:15PM -0700, Bradley Bell wrote:
> > > I'm the maintainer of gtk+extra (libgtkextra16, libgtkextra-dev)
> > > which is quite out of date in testing, and I have no idea why. It
> > >
Hi all
Please CC me in replies, I am currently not subscribed to -devel.
I am the maintainer of the mkinitrd-cd package and have made many
improvements since the last release so, I would like to update it. But
because of a restructuring of the package, the source package has been
renamed from mki
yeah RTL is true about arabic . And it could be
solved by making an arabic keymap . Just for
curiosity , do you have arabic developers
who maintain arabic fonts/programs ?
If yes , may i know who ? if no , can some one
apply to do so ?
Thanks all for your help
--
On Fri, 21 Sep 2
Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please take a look at these packages and tell me about any problems
> which are not obvious - there is a lot of stuff still lacking and I
> only want to upload the packages to the archive when they are
> feature complete.
I really do not know much ab
I wrote:
> Surely there are locales for welsh and Scottish gaelic?
Keith G. Murphy writes:
> I should think not. Those are two *very* different Celtic languages.
Nor did I say otherwise. Read my sentence as "Surely there is a locale for
welsh and also a locale for Scottish gaelic".
--
John Has
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This "bug" is only because of debian/rules which continue to use an
> obsolete (and no longer required) hack in order to remove unwanted
> -rpaths.
> Just remove the hack, it is no longer required. It no longer serves
> any useful function either.
False.
"JG" == Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> Were they empty when the package was removed, or only after it was
> purged? If the latter, then at the moment, you'll have to remove them
> manually in your postrm:
> rmdir /etc/sound/events 2>/dev/null || true
Or rmdir -p --ignor
"JG" == Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> Were they empty when the package was removed, or only after it was
> purged? If the latter, then at the moment, you'll have to remove them
> manually in your postrm:
> rmdir /etc/sound/events 2>/dev/null || true
> etc. There is cu
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 09:42:09AM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 06:40:32PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 08:51:26PM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> > > Since your organization is the official authority for maitaining and
> > > ISO country
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 11:02:50AM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Why dpkg don't remove empty directories in /etc when purging ?
> It is a dpkg bug ?
>
> I received these bugs :
>
> 112513 /etc/sound/events
>
> 112995 /
Colin Watson Wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 03:39:15PM -0700, Bradley Bell wrote:
> > I'm the maintainer of gtk+extra (libgtkextra16, libgtkextra-dev) which is
> > quite out of date in testing, and I have no idea why. It has no RC bugs and
> > the dependencies are satisfied. Maybe I'm missing s
> "Domenico" == Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Domenico> On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 10:36:12AM -0700, Ossama Othman
Domenico> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 04:09:38PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
>> > ehm... this bug seems to be preventing
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 10:38:48AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> subscriptions add and unsubscribes substract from there. A graph for a
> statistic is worth nothing if it doesn't have the zero point in it.
> First unit statistics lesson.
Rubbish. The correct lesson is to learn to always look at
Hi,
Why dpkg don't remove empty directories in /etc when purging ?
It is a dpkg bug ?
I received these bugs :
112513 /etc/sound/events
112995 /etc/gnome
112994 /etc/gnome
Hi again.
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001, Martin Schulze wrote:
[zeropoint or not - that's the question]
> That's not giving us anything. It doesn't draw a picture of the
> subscribe frequency, nor does it provide a better view of the number
> of subscribers.
Well, it _does_ draw a picture of sub
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 06:40:32PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 08:51:26PM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> > Since your organization is the official authority for maitaining and
> > ISO country codes, I extensively used your page
> > http://www.din.de/gremien/nas/nabd/is
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 10:36:12AM -0700, Ossama Othman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 04:09:38PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > ehm... this bug seems to be preventing lots of packages to make in
> > testing, shouldn't it get some more attention?
>
> I was under the impression this
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 05:21:39AM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote:
> [05:09:10 tmp]$ grep-available -PX xfonts-intl-arabic
> Package: xfonts-intl-arabic
Which are couple of fonts in an Emacs-only encoding, not useful
outside of Emacs.
> Please note that in general Linux distros have problems with Arabic
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Hi!
>
> [Cc me on replies, I'm not subscribed]
>
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2001, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Gathering data happens all 30 minutes and I've let it run for a couple
> > of days before making this annoncement, so there are some data to
> > show.
>
> It looks
On 21-Sep-2001 Adam Heath wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>
>> http://people.debian.org/~shaleh/lintian.
>
> It's normally customary to include a brief list of things we should be
> testing.
It. The package. The thing I uploaded. Run lintian on your packages. Do you
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > The graphs are indeed nice, what did you use to make them?
>
> The graphs say `rrdtool', which is a pretty good hint :)
Indeed.
Here's the source for the thing.
http://cvs.infodrom.org/murphy/rrd-update?cvsroot=Infodrom-Tools
Hi!
[Cc me on replies, I'm not subscribed]
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Gathering data happens all 30 minutes and I've let it run for a couple
> of days before making this annoncement, so there are some data to
> show.
It looks strange that it seems that debian-devel-an
> Hi there
>
> I dont find any packge that supports iso 8859-6
> -- that is arabic fonts .
>
[05:09:10 tmp]$ grep-available -PX xfonts-intl-arabic
Package: xfonts-intl-arabic
Priority: optional
Section: x11
Installed-Size: 62
Maintainer: Milan Zamazal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Architecture: all
Sou
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> http://people.debian.org/~shaleh/lintian.
It's normally customary to include a brief list of things we should be
testing.
54 matches
Mail list logo
